July 3, 2015 Yahoo Finance Exclusive: Earl Holt started giving money to GOP pols after marrying the widow of a Jewish businessman Luke Ford No sacred cows.

Yahoo Finance Exclusive: Earl Holt started giving money to GOP pols after marrying the widow of a Jewish businessman

Posted on July 3, 2015 by Luke Ford

Yahoo: “As president of a white nationalist group linked with the murders of nine churchgoers in Charleston, S.C. on June 17, Earl P. Holt III is straddling the uneasy boundary between free speech and racial hatred.”

How can there be a boundary between free speech and racial hatred? If people speak freely, they are going to disparage out-groups.

Would Yahoo call the Bible hate speech? In it, God commands the Israelites to commit genocide against the Canaanites.

How is there any link between the Council of Conservative Citizens (CoCC) and Dylann Roof other than that Dylan read CCC’s website and cited it in his manifesto?

Once known only to watchdog groups that monitor extremist groups, Holt has suddenly become notorious for racial slurs splattered across the Internet and for writings on his group’s web site that supposedly inspired Dylann Roof, the alleged Charleston shooter, to carry out a massacre.

Earl P. Holt was known before the massacre to many of those who shared his values.

Tens of millions of Americans don’t like blacks and they tend to vote Republican.

Holt’s campaign contributions — and the apparent source of his money — are causing consternation now because of hostility he has shown toward blacks and Jews. Holt is president of a nonprofit group called the Council of Conservative Citizens, based in St. Louis. The group says it supports politically conservative causes and doesn’t encourage or condone racism. It does, however, routinely highlight crimes committed by blacks against whites, and the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks extremist groups, describes the council as “a virulently racist group whose website has referred to blacks as ‘a retrograde species of humanity.’” The Anti-Defamation League also considers the council extremist and says, “although the group claims not to be racist, its leaders traffic with other white supremacist groups.”

Notice how Yahoo won’t identify SPLC and the ADL for what they are — Jewish nationalist groups at war with other nationalist groups. If Jews can be nationalist while convincing non-Jews that nationalism for goyim is bad, then Jews have an advantage in the competition for resources and power (a cohesive group will out-compete individuals).

Some Jews like nationalism for themselves but don’t like it for Gentiles because it usually excludes Jews and places them in the out-group just as Jewish nationalism places goyim in the out-group.

On The Blaze (which has since taken down his posts), Holt said blacks are “the laziest, stupidest and most criminally-inclined race in the history of the world.

And that is clearly wrong how? In every country where there are large numbers of blacks and accurate crime records, blacks commit murder and other crimes at a much higher rate than whites and asians. Blacks also have the lowest labor participation rates among the major races. Blacks also have the lowest average IQs of the major races. What Holt said was not nice, but it was truthful.

How come when blacks commit murder, we don’t make inquiries into what they were reading? Isn’t that racist?

Posted in ADL, Blacks, CoCC, Crime, Nationalism, SPLC | Comments Off

Steve Sailer: The Real Story Behind the Pine Bush Anti-Semitism Lawsuit

Posted on July 3, 2015 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Jews are the most intellectually aggressive people in this earth, the big two religions (Christianity and Islam) are influenced by Judaism but with less tribalism and more universalism. Jews can also do universalism, Marxism has conquered the World, most political movements that gained traction worldwide have been created and promoted by jews.

* I paid a visit to the Museum of Modern Art in Manhattan on Monday. During the course of my 3+ hour visit I made some observations of visitor demographics that may be of interest.

It was a surprisingly young crowd, I would estimate the average age in the 25 to 30 range. Who says young people don’t appreciate culture?
As for race, my best guess is 60% white, 35% East Asian, 5% everything else. I’m counting as white some Spanish speaking people of fully European appearance. There were very few visible Hispanics and surprisingly few South Asians. The typical black visitor was a young lady in her teens or early 20′s in a group with a few white girls her age, though I also saw a few older black women by themselves. I saw some Orthodox Jewish men, identified by their yamulkes. No Hasidim, though they probably would be forbidden to view sometimes improper images (though there were a few headscarf wearing Muslim women, whom one would think would be under similar restrictions).
While there were many couples and some families (the MoMA isn’t really a place for children), among singles and people in groups of friends I would say that females outnumbered males by at least 5 to 1.
Almost all of the guards in the galleries were black men. That surprised me a bit, surely people of all races would want what’s probably a decent paying and reasonably prestigious job. It then occurred to me that perhaps management thinks that black men have a more intimidating appearance, with their mere presence discouraging visitors from trying to touch the artworks. Sort of the same concept as when nightclubs hire black bouncers. Though I noted with some amusement that the skinniest, nerdiest guard in the whole place was watching over its most famous work, Van Gogh’s Starry Night.

* I recall that you once mentioned that German Jews kept Russian Jews out of their country clubs. So modern Jews have retconned history to make it seem like Russian Jews were actually excluded from country clubs by WASPs. That had the benefit of smoothing over intragroup Jewish conflict while also maintaining Jewish solidarity against the “anti-semitic” WASP bogeyman.

* Two separate issues are being conflated. There was harassment of the small number of liberal Jewish kids by other schoolchildren and there is also resistance amongst the broader community (both Jewish and Other) to developments proposed by the Satmar. The existence of the Hasidic community at Kiras J seems to have increased tensions and its possible that the Jewish children in various Pine Bush schools bore the brunt of this. It is also possible that someone in the Satmar community fed the story to the NYT thinking it would pressure the town into treating its own claims more favorably.

* Within modern-era Jewish literature/plays/TV there is a well-mined fissure of grating & chafing in matters of divergent customs/tastes between the shtetl people and the pedigreed Mitteleuropa types (though usually from the down-punching perspective of the latter): food, clothes, manners– all the status-nitpicking staples. If they don’t seem to spend much time explaining the bit to gentiles, it’s probably less to do with “retconning” than the question of why anyone not part of such supersubtle intramural rubes-toffs rivalry would be expected to understand or care. Identifying the common outgroup enemy, by contrast, requires no such explication. At any rate the cultural narcissism of small differences runs both ways. Take Amory Blaine’s ridiculous list of Yale/Princeton distinctions in “This Side of Paradise,” over which no one not from that circle would be partisan or even have an opinion. I bet there’s some Chinese teen in San Gabriel scrutinizing it like Confucian dialectics though.

* I’m told by a Jewish resident of the neighborhood that Lamm’s buldings were built in blatant violation of the building codes, and that the Hasidim targeted Bloomingburg because it had a small, easily overwhelmed voting base and its municipal organization didn’t give it the means to fight off the tactics of Lamm and the Hasidim.

* Various kinds of Jews squabble with each other all the time, but they are very good at closing ranks and uniting over blaming outsiders before the poor dumb outsiders notice the quite good reasons for the internal divisions.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Jews | Comments Off

Jews, Christians & Loyalty

Posted on July 3, 2015 by Luke Ford

I love stories of betrayal (even though from a rational perspective, there is no such thing, we use the word for when people important to us have different priorities from what we expected, e.g., if your wife commits adultery, she’s not betraying you, she’s simply acting on different priorities than what you expected).

As Robert J. Avrech wrote in the foreword to my book, Yesterday’s News Tomorrow: Inside American Jewish Journalism:

Betrayal fascinates Luke Ford. It’s his life.
Luke betrayed his father, a prominent Seventh Day Adventist minister, when Luke converted to Judaism.
Luke betrayed his second “father” when he sacrificed his friendship with Dennis Prager to work on an unauthorised biography of his hero.
Luke betrayed Judaism when he became lukeford.com, the preeminent journalist covering LA’s sordid, mob-infested porn industry. Luke betrayed his Orthodox synagogue when he lied about his work and told the rabbi that he was a “freelance journalist who writes about crime for a Japanese magazine.”

Damon: “What about trust? I think we should expect more from those we’re closest to. Also, what if these acts of ‘priority’ are taking place behind your back? Doesn’t that bolster the perception of betrayal?”

It’s just emotionally charged language to deal with the uncomfortable reality that different people have different interests that constantly clash. That’s why all relationships are often frustrating and painful. There’s no betrayal. All we should expect is that people will pursue their interests and those interests will always differ at times from our own. If I take your wife, am I betraying you? No, I am just pursuing my interests and those interests clash with yours.

If you identify as a Jew or as a Christan, your primarily loyalty may be to other Jews or Christians, not to your country.

That may look like betrayal but it simply Jews being loyal to Jews, Christians being loyal to Christians, just like Muslims are often loyal to Muslims and Chinese are often loyal to Chinese. Almost every group is tribal except for Anglos.

All of the American scientists who gave nuclear secrets to Stalin were Jewish. Around the same time, Stalin became paranoid that Soviet Jews had more loyalties to the Jewish state than to Mother Russia.

From the book Exploring Intelligence Archives: Enquiries Into the Secret State: “Many Jewish scientists — among them some of the greatest names in Soviet science — worked in secret scientific institutions. Targeting such would-be emigrants for recruitment promised to yield intelligence directly relevant to American defence at a time when the Reagan administration was conducting a furious arms race with the USSR. Certainly the KGB feared such recruitments. Even though he seemed to have no evidence to this effect, Yuri Andropov, when its chairman in the 1970s, steadfastly maintained to the East German foreign intelligence chief Markus Wolf that the ‘refusnik’ Anatoly Sharansky — a computer scientist in a research institute — was a CIA spy. It was owing to his work for this institute that he was denied permission to emigrate to Israel in 1973.”

I find this article in the Washington Post thrilling: “How the CIA ran a ‘billion dollar spy’ in Moscow”

From CIA.gov: “Tolkachev commented a number of times to at least one of his case officers that the brutal treatment that his wife’s parents had suffered was a key factor in his motivation to work against the Soviet regime. He never shed any light on why the authorities had taken these actions against his wife’s parents, but once suggested that his wife and her parents were Jewish. Given the Stalinists’ anti-Semitism, this factor may have played a role in their persecution.”

From the book The Main Enemy: The Inside Story Of The Cia’s Final Showdown With The KGB: “…Tolkachev never told his CIA handlers whether he or his wife was Jewish.”

From the Sydney Morning Herald:

JOHN GUILSHER, as the CIA field officer in Moscow, handled one of the West’s greatest espionage coups of the Cold War in the classic traditions of the spy trade.
The CIA almost blew its chance to recruit the specialist engineer Adolf Tolkachev in the late 1970s, but once he had been recruited, Guilsher’s professionalism and bravery helped build a bond that yielded military secrets of incalculable importance.
Tolkachev provided details of the research and development of the radar systems for the Soviet’s front-line fighters from the MiG-29 and MiG-31 to the Sukhoi Su-27, as well as for cruise missiles and avionics.
His secret revelations more than matched the importance of another “volunteer” spy, Colonel Oleg Penkovsky of the Soviet military intelligence service, who provided the CIA with key information in 1960.
Tolkachev’s secret treasure trove was almost stillborn: five times from January 1977 to February 1978 he approached cars with US diplomatic licence plates in Moscow, begging to speak to an American. Ironically, the first car he approached at a petrol station belonged to the CIA’s Moscow station chief, who ignored the Russian, fearing he was a KGB agent sent to entrap Americans.
But the persistent Russian – resentful of the Soviet Union’s earlier treatment of his Jewish parents – kept returning, each time revealing more about himself, indicating that he had information about Soviet weapon systems. Finally, the CIA assigned Guilsher, a Russian-speaking officer, to make contact.

Posted in Jews, Soviet Union | Comments Off

T.S. Eliot & The Jews

Posted on July 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

Forward: During a 1933 lecture in Virginia, published in 1934 as “After Strange Gods,” (which he later refused to reprint) Eliot, following Maurras, stressed the importance of social “unity of religious background…. Reasons of race and religion combine to make any large number of free-thinking Jews undesirable,” Eliot declared.

* “The notorious passage in After Strange Gods is capable of the interpretation that a community of orthodox Jews would be socially desirable because of the strong social bonds established by Jewish solidarity.” Roger Kojecky, T. S. Eliot’s Social Criticism (London: Faber, 1971)

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Jews | Comments Off

The Legion of the Archangel Michael

Posted on July 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

I appreciate it when people grapple with their character defects. I am grateful when they have a sense of their destructive tendencies. I’m relieved when they have an accurate perception of themselves and of their tendencies.

I think the people in my life are better off because I have grappled with my moral flaws and destructive addictions. Despite this work, I still find it easier most of the time to find fault with others than to find fault with myself. I still find it much easier to think about the bad things that others have done to me than to confront the bad things I have done to others and could well do again.

In 12-Step programs, we learn to get in touch with the part of ourselves that could do the horrible things that others have done to us. In other words, we learn to develop empathy and to see our own defects of character that have influenced the ways we have felt about ourselves and influenced the way others have treated us.

Jews are generally grateful when other groups come to terms with their group defects. For instance, Jews appreciate it when Muslims condemn Muslim terror and when blacks condemn black criminality and irresponsibility and when whites own up to the dark sides of their history and when Germans agonize over the Holocaust. Yet Jews, like the rest of the human race, often do not enjoy coming to terms with the destruction that some Jews have done. For instance, the organized Jewish community has been a force in America for over 120 years pushing for more immigration even though the majority of America during that time were probably against more immigration. Every major Jewish organization in America supports immigration amnesty.

I’ve never heard Jewish organizations grapple with the fact that all of the American scientists who gave Joseph Stalin nuclear capability were Jewish. I’ve never heard any Jews agonize that the person who stole the crown jewels of American nuclear secrets and gave them to the Jewish state of Israel which then likely traded them to America’s arch-enemy, the Soviet Union, for the release of Soviet Jews was a Jewish cokehead (Jonathan Pollard).

Jews have done a lot of good in the world and a lot of harm. In America, they’ve occupied a disproportionate role in organizations that promote the interests of minorities at the expense of the majority. Depending on where you are coming from, this is a good or a bad thing.

I find it interesting to put myself in the place of other peoples, such as blacks, Nazis, Muslims, goyim, Orthodox Jews from birth, white nationalists, and the like. I find it interesting to imagine myself in the shoes of some of the big enemies of the Jews and to try to see the world as they have seen it, to understand that they love their group as much as I love Jews, and to figure out how Jews may have hurt or hindered or helped their group and perhaps how the behaviors of real life Jews may have played a role in the persecution of Jews.

I think it is good for Jews, and for all groups, to understand how their actions affect other people. Jews played a major role in the development of communism, for instance, and played a big role as Stalin’s willing executioners of various genocides. Not only did approximately six million Jews die in the Holocaust, but approximately six million Ukrainians were deliberately starved to death by Stalin with help from some Jews such as Lazar Kaganovich (the biggest Jewish mass murderer in history).

You might wonder how a Jew could get in touch with a part of himself that might understand genocide. Well, think about Purim. Jews celebrate a story that culminates in Jews murdering 75,000 of their enemies. Think about how the God of the Torah commanded the Hebrews to commit genocide against the native inhabitants of Canaan. Think about how great the world would be if all the enemies of the Jews disappeared. Think about how the average Jewish Israeli wishes all Palestinians would disappeared. Think about how awesome it would be if Iran disappeared. It’s not that hard to get in touch with the genocide in your heart and therefore to understand how other groups want their enemies to similarly vanish.

Every group has a victimology and every victimology has a nationalism and every nationalism has the capacity for genocide.

Accurate criticism helps individuals and groups to behave better and to analyze life more intelligently.

Jews and Romanians, for instance, have a particularly rotten history. I’m not sure there was any country in Europe where Jews and goyim hated each other more (perhaps only Poland).

Romanian nationalist Corneliu Zelea Codreanu led a movement that was largely spiritual but had enormous real-world impact.

According to Wikipedia:

Corneliu Zelea Codreanu was a Romanian politician of the far right, the founder and charismatic leader of the Iron Guard or The Legion of the Archangel Michael (also known as the Legionary Movement), an ultra-nationalist and violently antisemitic organization active throughout most of the interwar period. Generally seen as the main variety of local fascism, and noted for its mystical and Romanian Orthodox-inspired revolutionary message, it grew into an important actor on the Romanian political stage, coming into conflict with the political establishment and the democratic forces, and often resorting to terrorism. The Legionaries traditionally referred to Codreanu as Căpitanul (“The Captain”), and he held absolute authority over the organization until his death.
…Codreanu learned antisemitism from his father, but connected it with anticommunism, in the belief that Jews were, among other things, the primordial agents of the Soviet Union…
Cuza was preaching that the Jewish population was a manifest threat to Romanians, claimed that Jews were threatening the purity of Romanian young women, and began campaigning in favor of racial segregation.
… Throughout its existence, the Legion maintained strong links with members of the Romanian Orthodox clergy,[45] and its members fused politics with an original interpretation of Romanian Orthodox messages — including claims that the Romanian kin was expecting its national salvation, in a religious sense.
…Corneliu Zelea Codreanu explained early on: “The country is dying for lack of men and not for lack of political programs.”[52] Elsewhere, he pointed out that the Legion was interested in the creation of a “new man” (omul nou).[53]
Despite its apparent lack of political messages, the movement was immediately noted for its antisemitism, for arguing that Romania was faced with a “Jewish Question” and for proclaiming that a Jewish presence throve on uncouthness and pornography.[54] The Legionary leader wrote: “The historical mission of our generation is the resolution of the kike problem. All of our battles of the past 15 years have had this purpose, all of our life’s efforts from now on will have this purpose.”[55] He accused the Jews in general of attempting to destroy what he claimed was a direct link between Romania and God, and the Legion campaigned in favor of the notion that there was no actual connection between the Old Testament Hebrews and the modern Jews.[56] In one instance, making a reference to the origin of the Romanians, Codreanu stated that Jews were corrupting the “Roman-Dacian structure of our people.”[57]
He began openly calling for the destruction of Jews,[58][59] and, as early as 1927, the new movement organized the sacking and burning of a synagogue in the city of Oradea.[60] It thus profited from an exceptional popularity of antisemitism in Romanian society: according to one analysis, Romania was, with the exception of Poland, the most antisemitic country in Eastern Europe.[61]

Corneliu Zelea Codreanu sounds like many other charismatic nationalists, such as Ze’ev Jabotinsky — the developer of a powerful combination of religion and nationalism fused to a particular people and a particular land.

Posted in Jews, Romania | Comments Off

Do You Want To See A Muslim Groveling To Jews?

Posted on July 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

If so, read this Pakistani-Brit politician’s speech:

Sajid Javid’s speech at the Union of Jewish Students’ Annual Conference 2014

Shalom Aleichem [Hebrew for “Peace be with you”]. Thank you for coming, and thank you for inviting me along today. It’s always great to see young people getting engaged with the political process. …

As I’m sure you’re all aware, there’s an increasingly vocal campaign for a full-scale cultural boycott of Israel. It’s a campaign I have no time for … It was wrong when Gurpreet Kaur Bhatti’s Behzti came under siege from members of the Sikh community. It was wrong when Christian groups tried to drive Jerry Springer The Musical off the stage. And it’s wrong when Jewish artists are targeted simply because of their connection to Israel. A century ago William Howard Taft called anti-Semitism a “Noxious weed”.

A century later, I don’t want to see that weed taking root in any aspect of British life. That’s why I will always be proud to stand up and resist calls for boycotts of Israel. I know that such calls are nothing more than a smokescreen for the oldest hatred. That’s why I am proud to see the government taking real action against anti-Semites who want to gain a foothold in Britain’s universities. We’re denying a platform to extremists who would abuse our freedoms in order to sow the seeds of division.

And that’s why I’m proud of the work we’re doing with the Holocaust Educational Trust. We’re paying for two teenagers from every British school to visit Auschwitz, letting them see for themselves the horrors of the Shoah. I had the privilege of joining a group of children from my constituency when they visited two years ago. I’ve read a great deal about the atrocities of the Nazi regime. And I was extremely moved by the permanent Holocaust exhibition at the Imperial War Museum.

But nothing can prepare you for the experience of actually being there. The Prime Minister found that for himself when he visited this week. I’m sure everyone who goes to Auschwitz is touched by what they see in different ways. For me, I will never forget the sight of a case filled with thousands upon thousands of shoes taken from those who were murdered. Mixed in among them there were countless tiny pairs that had clearly been stolen from the feet of children.

As a parent – and as a human being – it’s a sight that will live with me forever. As the Holocaust Educational Trust says, when we understand where prejudice leads, we can stop it in its tracks. …

I’m proud to be the child of immigrants. It’s who I am. It’s what I am. The same was true of Yehudi Menuhin. He was born an American and died a British citizen.

But for his whole life he was, of course, Jewish through and through. I know that his name, Yehudi, is the Hebrew word for “Jew”. But what I didn’t know until recently was the story of how he came to be called that. You see, not long before Menuhin was born his parents were out house-hunting together.

I think it might have been in New York. They thought they’d found the perfect place. But as they were leaving, the landlady, unaware of their background, cheerily told them that: “You’ll be glad to know I don’t take Jews!” His parents were rightly appalled, though sadly not surprised. But they were proud people. They didn’t want to hide in the shadows. To deny who they were. To simply ignore the bigotry of others. So there and then, they decided that their unborn child would be given a name that declared his race and religion to the world.

That’s why, a few months later, they called their first and only son “Yehudi” – “The Jew”. And as he grew up and toured the globe, probably the greatest violinist of all time, his name proclaimed not just who he was, but what he was. It shouted it from posters, album covers and programmes around the world. Celebrating his heritage, not hiding it. Just as his parents intended. [Etc, etc] (Sajid Javid’s speech at the Union of Jewish Students’ Annual Conference, 14th December 2014)

Posted in England, Islam, Jews | Comments Off

Who Shapes America?

Posted on July 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

Joe Biden: “What affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else. … It wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was ‘Will and Grace,’ it was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace [gay marriage]. Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense.”

Chaim Amalek writes: The goy is too stupid to fight this on his own. Only with the aid of a Jew can the fight be carried to the enemy camp. That’s how it was for the Bolsheviks (they had Lev Bronstein), and that is how it must be in this as well. Jewish brains, Muslim valor, and Christian numbers might yet reverse this pink tide. AMALEK is available.

Just think how this might have turned out if instead of 1993’s movie “Philadelphia” there had been a big budget movie about the sexual preferences of John Wayne Gacey. Or a film biopic about the very short life and brutal death of the 13 year old white heterosexual Christian boy Jesse Dirkhising at the hands of two homosexuals.

Posted in America, Homosexuality | Comments Off

What Is The Red Pill Community?

Posted on July 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

Wikipedia: The red pill and its opposite, the blue pill, are popular culture symbols representing the choice between embracing the sometimes painful truth of reality (red pill) and the blissful ignorance of illusion (blue pill). Redpills are people who have chosen to face reality, while bluepills remain living in ignorance of the truth, whether by choice or because they have not had a choice.

Posted in Culture | Comments Off

The Hyper-Sexualization of Western Culture

Posted on July 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

When you read the Bible, you see the Hebrews creating a generally stricter sexual morality than that which reigned at the time. Still, the Hebrews frequently sinned in the sexual arena and the Bible is unsparing in pointing out their shortcomings.

I grew up a Seventh-Day Adventist where all sex outside of marriage was regarded as a sin. To the extent the Church could, it encouraged turning down the flame of sexual tension. On a practical level, I noticed among conservative Christians that sexual sins were regarded as the worst sins.

When I converted to Judaism, I noticed that sexual sins weren’t necessarily regarded as any more serious than breaking the dietary and Sabbath laws. I noticed that most Modern Orthodox Jews I knew had sex before marriage, every Orthodox bachelor I knew well was a porn addict, and that most Orthodox Jews who took Orthodox Judaism seriously kept sex for marriage.

At the same time, I wrote on Hollywood and the porn industry, where I noticed Jews pushing sexual boundaries.

I’ve never married. I’ve dated a lot (both Jews and non-Jews). I’ve noticed that Jews tend to have fewer hang-ups and compunctions about sex, power, money, fame, honor, success, etc. Jews and Judaism seem to have greater peace with the natural passions. According to what I’ve read and what I’ve seen, non-Orthodox Jews tend to have twice as many lifetime sexual partners as non-Jews.

There’s a lot of talk about “Jewish guilt” but I’ve rarely seen a Jew troubled by guilt regarding his sexuality.

Non-Jews play as big a role in the global porn industry as Jews. Pretty much every normal guy wants to see women naked and boffed. If all Jews disappeared from the media, would there be less of this? I doubt it.

None of the Jews leading the transgressive charge are Orthodox Jews. Traditional Jews are not interested in turning up the West’s sexual heat. I’ve never heard Orthodox Jews opining that anti-Semitism is the result of sexual repression. I’ve rarely heard normal Orthodox Jews say that sexual repression is a bad thing. The Orthodox Jews I know don’t like the pornification of America. They want to raise their children in a healthy environment and they don’t like sexualized billboards, magazine covers, pop music and the like.

Another thought — Jews don’t monopolize the media. They exercise an influence approximately proportionate to their IQ.

It is my impression that the media feel as free to mock Jews and Judaism as they do to mock Christians and Christianity.

I find Weeds and Orange is the New Black (OITNB) compelling viewing. I’ve watched every episode. Yes, they’re sexually transgressive. They’re also good TV and for TV, they’re smart.

Another thought — it’s weird for me to attend Orthodox shul daily, to pray daily with a minyan, to study Torah daily, and then to notice Jews in the media pushing sexual transgression.

The Jews I know have, in some ways, stronger and more cohesive family and communal lives than the Seventh-Day Adventists I know. If you go to a typical Orthodox shul, it overflows with children. Their parents are devoted and want to keep the kids safe from the goyim and from the sexually transgressive wider society.

Now that I no longer watch porn, I like action movies. I still get an adrenaline high and the murder relaxes me.
As soon as a camera was invented, a man, Jewish or non-Jewish, has wanted to point it at a pretty woman and get her to undress. The visual medium inevitably leads to pornography. As the Torah commanded, do not follow your heart and your eyes after which you prostitute yourselves. (Num. 15:39)

Yom Tov: “To me it makes sense. When you try to escape the one true source of values that explicitly lists and forbids these specific sexual deviancies, sexual deviance is the ultimate statement of having been liberated from the confines of Jewish practices/law.”

Christopher Donnellan: “The Jews that established themselves in Hollywood, and built the modern film industry, such as Jack Warner and L.B. Mayer, were pretty conservative morally, and conformed to Anglo-American aesthetic and moral standards, but their wayward children and grand-children turned popular culture into an open sewer.”

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Hollywood, Jews, Pornography, Sex | Comments Off

Japan vs. England – FIFA Women’s World Cup 2015 Highlights

Posted on July 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

While watching this game, I found myself rooting strongly for England. I guess because I feel a deep genetic, historical and cultural connection. The more similar I am to someone, the more I like them. I guess I’m a horrible racist.

Posted in England | Comments Off