Take the Russian Gift Horse’s gift and run like hell to North America

Posted on September 30, 2015 by Luke Ford

Michael Scheuer writes: One has to be amazed at the number of chances to save itself that America keeps encountering and refusing to grasp and exploit in the Arab world. We were safely out of Iraq when Obama and the Republicans returned us to that hell hole created by Mr. Bush, Mr. Blair, and Israel First. We were safely and serenely sitting on the sidelines and happily watching the descent of the Muslim world into a massive sectarian war when Obama signed us up to fight on the side of both Saudi Arabia and Iran, thereby knowingly and deservedly earning the hatred of Sunnis and Shias. We were completely out of harm’s way from the migrant mess the effeminate Europeans are either too stupid or too cowardly to halt, and Obama, his party, and the Republicans have sent a half billion dollars of our taxes for the EU to waste while it commits suicide-by-migrant, and now want to bring 100,000 migrants into an already migrant-drowning and internally insecure America.
Now, miraculously, another and perhaps last chance to save ourselves has fallen into our increasingly unworthy laps. As our enemies would say, “God is great!” Russian President Putin is moving military forces into Syria, and seems to have concluded a deal with Iran which will see Tehran occupy the Shia areas of Iraq once the nuclear deal cannot be undone. In addition, the media report that our European “allies” are moving in Putin’s direction, with chancellors, prime ministers, pundits, and politicians in Italy, France, Germany, Britain, and elsewhere claiming that the West needs to be more “realistic” and ally itself with Russia, Syria, and — implicitly — Iran to defeat the Islamic State. And, finally, Thursday’s FOX news brought word that Israel has signed up with Putin and his Arab and Persian sidekicks by setting up “a joint mechanism with the Russian military to coordinate their operations in Syria and avoid any accidental confrontations.”

In the space of the foregoing paragraph readers can see that, under Mr. Putin’s auspices, all of the following enemies of the United States will soon be killing each other in the Syria-Iraq theater: Russia, Syria, Lebanese Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, other Syrian Islamist groups, the Islamic State, Turkey, Iran, and Iraq. The killing will be applauded and temporarily supported by the EU’s taxpayer monies, aircraft, and an accommodation with Assad, while it simultaneously and desperately tries to stave off the need send any of Europe’s tiny — except for Turkey — and antiquated armies to the war. Israel’s deal with Russia — which implicitly approves Moscow’s military plans for Syria, as well as Iran’s in Iraq — is surprising because no matter how the approaching disaster ends, it will render terrible news for Israel’s security.

The Russian, Iranian, and EU intervention on Assad’s behalf will, of course, damage their already bankrupt economies, raise Shia-vs-Sunni tensions in Europe, and unite Russia’s Sunni mujahedin in the North Caucasus and motivate them to step up attacks. The intervention will also be another case of a Western — or, in Moscow’s case, perhaps semi-Western — led invasion of Muslim territory, and it will be seen by the Sunni world as an action meant to provide victory and territorial expansion to the hated Shia and Alawite heretics. Needless to say — save for those who govern Western states — this intervention will again validate all the Islamic State has said about the Crusaders’ hatred for and threat to the existence of Sunni Islam.

As is the case in each Western intervention in the Islamic world, a Russian-led intervention also will fast become the Islamic State’s most capable recruiter, and new fighters will flow in from across the Islamic world and/or they will stage attacks in their home countries. Because of Moscow’s clear intention to help Iran achieve primacy in the region, moreover, the Saudis, Emiratis, Kuwaitis, and other Arab tyrannies will continue publicly damning IS, while at the same time beginning to clandestinely send money and arms to IS, al-Qaeda, and any other organization willing to kill Shias and the Russians and Europeans who back them.

Posted in Russia, Syria | Comments Off on Take the Russian Gift Horse’s gift and run like hell to North America

Jewish Intensity As A Weapon For Defending Jewish Interests

Posted on September 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

Karin Friedman is Jewish but not a Zionist. I have mixed feelings about what she writes. Narrowed vision and emotional intensity can be helpful in war and Jews have good reasons for thinking they are constantly at war. Seeing both sides of an issue, hearing other people out, maintaining civility at all times are certainly virtues in many contexts, but not necessarily in a war context.

Perhaps some Gentiles need to grow a pair so that they are less intimidated by Jewish intensity?

Karin Friedman writes:

“American Jews are actually being trained since childhood to interact with non-Jews in a deceitful and arrogant manner, in coordination with each other, to emotionally destroy Gentiles and Israel critics in addition to wrecking their careers and interfering with their social relationships. This is actually deliberate, wicked, planned behavior motivated by a narcissistic self-righteous fury….

The problem is that Gentiles are taught through emotional pressure and violence via the media and the school system to be very sensitive to Jewish suffering so when a Zionist becomes outraged at them for challenging their world view, the Gentile really has to fight against his own inner self in a huge battle against his “inner Jew” making him feel inadequate and intimidated. But the Jew doesn’t care how much he or she hurts others. Jews only care about what’s good for the Jews. …

I once reduced a 50 year old man to hysterical sobbing tears because I told him gently and lovingly that Jews were not that unique. I just told him the Jews, like everyone else, have had good times and bad times. Times when they were slaughtered and other times when they slaughtered others. Just like everyone else. Guess what he did next. He emotionally abused me in an insulting way and then cut off all further communication. Jewish behavior is so predictable that it’s truly scary. …

If you mention cutting off the money or if you mention the possible compromise of living with Palestinians as equals in one state they become very angry and start using bullying tactics, unless they have some reason to fear you, in which case they shun you and complain about you to the authorities, try to get you arrested or try and destroy your career or social status through character assassination. …

Zionists all believe in the myth of “1000 years of Jewish suffering” and feel that the world owes them compensation for their ancestors’ “unique” suffering. It’s a criminally insane viewpoint. They cope with the contradictions between their belief that they are the good guys and what Jews are actually doing to their neighbors, both in the Middle East and in the US, by developing mental health issues. Most Zionists are functional schizophrenics.”

Posted in Israel, Jews | Comments Off on Jewish Intensity As A Weapon For Defending Jewish Interests

Stefan Molyneaux on Israel and the Nature of Judaism

Posted on September 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

I am not sure why Stefan Molyneaux puts so much reliance on strongly anti-Judaic sources.

Judaism has a complex relationship to free speech. Jewish texts such as the Talmud often contain many different points of view, including unpopular minority views.

I just don’t see how Jews have acted any worse than any other group establishing a homeland in a difficult place and constantly fighting off enemies.

When you go after Jews for doing the same thing that many other people have done in a tough place, what’s up with that?

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on Stefan Molyneaux on Israel and the Nature of Judaism

Jews & Putin

Posted on September 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

Russia’s leader Vladimir Putin seems Jew-friendly to me (particularly to Chabad), but it is interesting that most of his enemies in Russia are Jewish. I doubt that most Jews in Russia oppose him.

I am not exactly sure why so many people in the American media want to stir up a WWIII with Putin.

If I were Putin, I would be furious at Western involvement in the lands next to me such as Ukraine and Poland. I would want to enforce the equivalent of the Monroe Doctrine in my part of the world.

In my personal experience of Jewish life, I’ve never noticed significant anti-Putin sentiment but I have noticed a knee-jerk response in many Jews bearing a historical grudge that Russia sucks.

Posted in Jews, Russia | Comments Off on Jews & Putin

I’m Glad Jews Are Powerful

Posted on September 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

The more powerful you are, the more people fear you and the better they treat you.

When I’ve had more power, people have treated me better. When I’ve been weak, they’ve often treated me with contempt.

We never know what other people’s intentions are. All we can do is maximize our strength. Weak peoples get decimated. Look at what happened to the Chinese in the 19th and 20th Century and to Christians in the Middle East today (outside of Israel).

Jews and Israel must be strong or they will be in danger of genocide.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on I’m Glad Jews Are Powerful

The Ordeal Of Civility

Posted on September 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

I asked a friend who operates a Jewish store in Los Angeles who the most polite Jews were. He said English Jews followed by Jews whose families have lived in other Anglo countries for many years. Who were the rudest Jews? Those from Morocco and the Middle East.

From Wikipedia:

John Murray Cuddihy (January 22, 1922 – April 18, 2011[1] ) was an American sociologist. He was a member of the doctoral faculty at the Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York (GSUC).

He is the author of No Offense: Civil Religion and Protestant Taste and The Ordeal of Civility: Freud, Marx, Lévi-Strauss and the Jewish Struggle with Modernity, two books in the sociology of religion. Cuddihy has been described as a “Catholic atheist,”, and “a brilliant yet eccentric critic of contemporary American Jewry”.

In The Ordeal of Civility, Cuddihy explicates the wrenching process of adjusting to modernity experienced by the shtetl Jews of the Pale in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries who had to adapt quickly from a tribal culture to a modern Protestant civil culture rather than slowly adjusting over the centuries. It is in this context that he locates the efforts of Jewish intellecuals, such as Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud and Claude Lévi-Strauss to facilitate the transition by providing a cohesive narrative that attempts to universalize the experience and thus provide an apologia to both the ingroup of Jews and the outgroup of gentiles.[5]

In No Offense, a critique of American civil religion,[6] Cuddihy argues that Catholic and Jewish intellectuals in America gave up the distinctive religious claims of Catholicism and Judaism, respectively, in the interests of not offending the Protestant majority. Cuddihy views various intellectual critiques of modernity – both conservative and radical – as the product of resentment against the more successful, enlightened, Protestant majority.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on The Ordeal Of Civility

WP: West Point law professor resigns after advocating attacks on colleagues ‘sympathetic to Islamist aims’

Posted on September 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

Washington Post: A West Point law professor has resigned after arguing that fellow legal scholars who criticize the war on terrorism are “treasonous” and should be arrested, interrogated and even attacked as “unlawful enemy combatants.”

William C. Bradford resigned from his post on Sunday following an uproar over a paper titled “Trahison des Professeurs” (Treason of the Professors), published in the National Security Law Journal in July.

…The Guardian first drew attention to Bradford on Saturday, pointing out that his paper went as far as to advocate attacking “Islamic holy sites” as part of a “total war” on Islamist radicalism.

But it was Bradford’s call for legal scholars “sympathetic to Islamist aims” to be imprisoned, “attacked” and, it is implied, even killed that has drawn the most criticism.

In his paper, Bradford argued that a “clique of about forty” legal scholars critical of the war on terrorism — from his footnotes, their ranks appear to include professors at top schools like Harvard, Princeton and NYU — comprise a “super-weapon that supports Islamist military operations” aimed at “American political will” to fight.

Using the acronym CLOACA, which ostensibly stands for “critical law of armed conflict academy” but is also the name for an animal’s anus, Bradford’s article painted these supposedly “treasonous” scholars as “a Western Fifth Column” of Islamist terrorism that should be treated as such. He even went as far as to suggest that the law schools where they work or the journalists they speak to could also be targeted.

“As unlawful combatants for failure to wear the distinctive insignia of a party, CLOACA propagandists are subject to coercive interrogation, trial, and imprisonment,” he wrote. “Further, the infrastructure used to create and disseminate CLOACA propaganda — law school facilities, scholars’ home offices, and media outlets where they give interviews —are also lawful targets given the causal connection between the content disseminated and Islamist crimes incited. Shocking and extreme as this option might seem, CLOACA scholars, and the law schools that employ them, are — at least in theory — targetable so long as attacks are proportional, distinguish noncombatants from combatants, employ nonprohibited weapons, and contribute to the defeat of Islamism.”

…In an article picking apart Bradford’s argument piece by piece, Matt Ford, an associate editor at the Atlantic, pointed out that “Treason of the Professors” may not even be Bradford’s most controversial work.

“Since 2014, according to what is apparently his LinkedIn page, he has been circulating an article for publication entitled, ‘Alea Iacta Est: The U.S. Coup of 2017,’” Ford wrote on Monday. “The abstract is strewn with thinly-veiled references to President Obama, asking, for example, ‘What conditions precedent would be required before the American military would be justified in using or threatening force to oust a U.S. president attempting to “fundamentally transform the United States of America”?’ Although describing it simply as a ‘heuristic test of a proferred theory,’ it also wonders aloud, ‘Is such a duty incumbent upon the U.S. armed forces at present?’ That’s a disquieting question for a faculty member to pose, when he’s charged with instructing the nation’s officer corps.”

In his e-mail to The Post, Bradford wrote that “Alea Iacta Est” (ominous Latin translation: “the die is cast”) was “an unpublished work, the purpose of which is to examine whether a coup might be possible in the U.S. and how best to ensure that it never occurs. Comments about this article are clearly made by those who haven’t read it.”

Similarly, Bradford told The Post that “Treason of the Professors” outlines “a spectrum of modalities preferable to more coercive measures,” such as arrest, interrogation or outright attacks. “My article indicates that only true propagandists inciting attacks could be subjected to the sanctions I mention, and this parallels existing case law I reference as well as emerging customary international law.”

Posted in America, Islam | Comments Off on WP: West Point law professor resigns after advocating attacks on colleagues ‘sympathetic to Islamist aims’

Dennis Prager: No, Ann Coulter Is Not an Anti-Semite

Posted on September 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

Dennis Prager writes: (JTA) — During the course of the second Republican presidential debate, Ann Coulter, the well-known commentator, writer, speaker and provocateur, tweeted: “How many f—ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?”
Her explanation was that she had grown frustrated with the candidates’ remarks that concentrated on things nearly all Republicans agree on – admiration of Ronald Reagan, opposition to abortion and support for Israel – and ignored what she considers the biggest domestic problem facing America: immigration, both legal (under current law) and illegal. She regarded the candidates’ remarks as “pandering” to various Republican constituencies and tweeted out a series of critical and angry comments, including the one about Jews, in response to repeated pledges to support Israel.
She was rightly condemned by Republicans and Democrats alike for the tweet. How could she not be? It was indefensible. And it did damage to Republicans, conservatives and supporters of Israel.
But that should not be the end of the discussion.
The tweet raises a number of important questions. These include whether Ann Coulter is an anti-Semite, who we should label an anti-Semite and who the enemies of Jews are in America today.
The first is the easiest. Ann Coulter is not an anti-Semite. Those Jews who think she is point to two pieces of evidence: the recent tweet and something she said in a 2007 interview with Donny Deutsch, a TV personality who happens to be Jewish.
In that interview, she said that America (and presumably the world) would be better if everybody were a Christian. Deutsch asked if that meant all Jews should become Christian. Coulter said yes and Deutsch was offended. He was further offended when she labeled Christians, including herself, and Jews who became Christians “perfected Jews.”
Against this is a lifetime of defending Jews and Israel. Every mention of Jews or Israel I’ve read in any of her books is a spirited defense of Jews and Israel, or an attack on those who attack Jews and Israel. I should add, for what it’s worth, she has been to my home twice for Shabbat dinner. Indeed, she has said that experiencing Shabbat and reading the explanation for it in my book, “The Ten Commandments: Still the Best Moral Code,” have moved her to start observing a Sabbath. I guess you can say she might become a perfected Christian.
Her remarks to Deutsch were hardly anti-Semitic.
First, both common sense and Judaism demand that we judge people by their behavior, not by their religious beliefs. Believing that the world would be better if everyone were a Christian hardly renders one a bigot, let alone a Jew hater. Everyone who holds a doctrine believes the world be better if everyone embraced their doctrine. Don’t secular liberals believe that the world would be better if everyone were a secular liberal?
Second, if theological beliefs render one a hater, most religious Jews would have to be considered haters. That would include all those Orthodox Jews who consider Christianity idol worship and therefore won’t enter a church. And it would include all Jews who believe, as I do, that the Jews are the chosen people.
We need to be very careful before labeling people anti-Semites. This is especially so with regard to Christians who believe that the only way to salvation is through belief in Christ. The fact is that the Jews’ and Israel’s best friends in America are largely those evangelical Christians who believe that only faith in Jesus saves.
I have worked with evangelical Christians for 20 years, regularly speak at their conventions and churches, and can attest to the sincerity of their support for Jews — it’s all the more remarkable given how much contempt many Jews heap on them.
And no, they don’t support Israel in order to hasten the apocalypse and the Second Coming. People who dislike the Christian right have simply made that up in order to discredit their support. There is nothing in the New Testament that suggests this. Evangelical leaders such as Pastor John Hagee, the founder of Christians United for Israel, have said repeatedly that the timing of the New Testament prediction of Armageddon is solely in God’s hands. It is impossible for Christians to do anything to hasten the return of Jesus.
Evangelicals support Israel primarily because they believe God’s promise to Abraham in Genesis that He will bless those who bless the Jews and curse those who curse the Jews. They also believe that Israel is the morally superior side in the Middle East conflict.
I might add, however, that even if the reason evangelicals supported the Jews and Israel were to hasten the Second Coming – so what? If tens of millions of Christians will support Jews until Jesus returns, isn’t that a good thing?

…Ann Coulter aimed her famously provocative rhetorical gun at her intended target – the GOP candidates – and instead hit an innocent bystander, America’s Jews. When you harm someone, even accidentally, you owe an apology. Her tweet hurt her, her cause and the Republican Party as well as Jews, and she should say she’s sorry. But she is not an anti-Semite.
Jews shouldn’t accuse people of this when it isn’t true – whether it is Ann Coulter or Hillary Clinton.

Posted in Ann Coulter, Anti-Semitism, Dennis Prager | Comments Off on Dennis Prager: No, Ann Coulter Is Not an Anti-Semite

Australia: A Light Unto the Nations

Posted on September 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

Steve Sailer writes: We are constantly told that it is impossible for a country to police its borders, but Australia doesn’t seem to have gotten the memo. First, it stopped cold its boat-borne Camp of the Saints; and now there’s this exercise in national dignity. From The Guardian:

Chris Brown denied visa to tour Australia on character grounds

Performer who pleaded guilty to attacking his then girlfriend Rihanna in 2009 has 28 days to appeal

Shalailah Medhora
Saturday 26 September 2015 21.32 EDT

The US singer Chris Brown has had his visa application to tour in Australia formally denied on character grounds, the immigration minister, Peter Dutton, has confirmed. …

“People to whom these notices are issued have 28 days to present material as to why they should be given a visa to enter Australia,” the minister said. “Decisions on whether a visa will or will not be issued are made after that timeframe and consideration of the material presented to the Department of Immigration and Border Protection.”

On Thursday the newly appointed women’s minister, Michaelia Cash, indicated that Brown would not be let in. “I can assure you that the minister for immigration and border protection will be looking at this very, very seriously,” she said. …

Cooke said the “high-profile example” of Brown having his visa denied was a “good sign of the times changing”.

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Thanks Steve – we Australians have a lot of which we can be proud. We have also limited the influx of Muslims by way of our strongly skills-based legal migration criteria.

However, we haven’t limited enough. We still have too many (ie, any) Muslims migrating to this country through family reunion programs and our humanitarian intake. Furthermore, the ‘invite-the-world’ lobby here has a lot of influence and will gain the ascendancy if the Labor Party wins the next election.

* They say we in California can learn a lot from the Aussies also about living in a drought:

“Drought survival: What Australia’s changes can teach California”, San Francisco Chronicle, Kevin Fagan, September 25, 2015.

A description of the Aussie policy that has worked:

“Would Australia’s asylum seeker policy stop boats to Europe?”, Sara Davies and Phil Orchard, April 24, 2015:

“The Australian solution

There were dramatic changes in Australia’s immigration policy in 2013… which have been followed up and taken further…

In 2013, with bipartisan support of those two major parties, mainland Australia was legally “excised” from the migration zone. It was done so that anyone arriving without a visa by boat would not be processed in Australia.

All people who seek to enter Australia by sea, under the Asylum Legacy Act, are no longer entitled to enter or stay in Australia while their refugee claims are processed. Instead, they can be transported to detention facilities in Papua New Guinea or Nauru. Alternatively, under a recent agreement, they can also agree to move to Cambodia.

Beyond this, the … government has also returned some boats to Indonesia without processing asylum seeker claims and, in two instances, to Sri Lanka following a very brief teleconference interview with the asylum seekers on board. That process was widely condemned by human rights advocates, given ongoing human rights abuses in Sri Lanka.

That shift in policy under successive Labor and now the Liberal National governments in Australia has been chiefly designed as a deterrent: or, to use Tony Abbott’s slogan, to “stop the boats”. So has it worked?

…If your sole criteria for success is the number of boats arriving in Australia each year, then “no advantage” (meaning no asylum in Australia) and “stop the boats” (including the turning back of boats in international waters) has worked. In 2013, the Australian government reported that 300 boats with approximately 20,000 people on board arrived; in 2014, there were 0.

…

It also appears that no asylum seekers drowned in Australian waters during the 2013-2014 period.”

The two problems the article raises are money (darn, that means it can’t possibly work, none of the European governments know how to spend money!) and:

“…the European Court of Human Rights ruled in 2012 that efforts by the Italian government to return migrants intercepted at sea to Libya violated its legal obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights because the migrants “were under the continuous and exclusive de jure and de facto control of the Italian authorities.”

This suggests that similar practices to Australia’s would be illegal under the European Convention.”

That “de jure and de facto control” sure sounds weasel-wordy.

So there’s your real problem. Legal systems adversarial to the well-being of the people of the countries to which they belong. You might even say that the legal systems of many of these countries have been filled with neo-colonialists who fully and confidently expect to have a say in how people run their lives all over the world. Of course they know better that those poor down-trodden others and the racists over which they lord, eh?

* When Chris Brown and his posse got into a brawl in New York with Drake and his posse back in 2012, one of the injured was an Australian woman whose face needed sixteen stitches. I love that Australia doesn’t take criminals anymore. Especially this piece of shit. For felony assault of Rihanna he got community service. Jay-Z should have worked him for that.

* I have mixed feelings about this.

I’m not a big fan of Mr. Brown, but ‘Character Grounds’ seems a bit subjective. It could easily become a tool that gets abused by loud minorities (i.e. radical feminists) to keep out people they don’t like for political reasons.

As far as how it is applied it seems a bit arbitrary…virtually all rappers have bad character (It’s almost a prerequisite in the genre)

I’m afraid we’ll see a scenario down the line where Steve won’t get to visit Bondi Beach (?)

* “We are constantly told that it is impossible for a country to police its borders,”

Saudi Arabia, Japan, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Israel, and Mexico do not have a hard time policing their borders.

* Closed borders is possible if that is a consistent ideology in power, but if the public electorate oscillates between political choices of open borders and closed borders, open borders wins out. We need a better strategy that is more resistant to a finicky, manipulated electorate.

* I’m sure Australia can survive without the ‘talents’ and the presence of a Chris Brown. I was delighted when, a few years ago, the British singer formerly known as Cat Stevens turned up on the US ‘no fly’ list. While I happened to like Mr. Stevens work and his conversion to Islam was made before this ‘faith’ hit #1 on the world terror charts, it serves a useful purpose to let celebrities know
the world is not their oyster and they can have their wings clipped just like anyone else.

* Hell, Canada keeps freaking drunk drivers out. You can kiss off visiting Canada if you got sozzled and busted years and years before. Wifebeating and brawling would likely get you lynched right there at the border. Civilized people, those Canadians. It is a privilege (literally) to visit their country.

* Pretty sure historian David Irving was refused entry to Aust due to his writing.

* As an Australian let me tell you that this is just pro-feminist signaling on the part of the Australian government. There’s nothing laudable here, just more of the constant “men are bad and dangerous” drumbeat that has turned Australian women into unhappy, fat and angry feminists. By the way, there are no racial overtones to this story in Australia. He’s an American pop star to us, race is not really germane.

* Australia has it’s own problems. The Australian economy depends on the Chinese construction bubble, Chinese/Indian uni-student fees, recycling money in hospitality, selling raw resources and exporting live animals for Muslims to slaughter them.
Also our immigration policy has been under near-constant attack from both the government and private mass-media, I’m not sure how long it will last.

* If you pause to think about it, the bizarre nature of this “character” BS is laid bare.

Men get into fistfights all the time. A bigger guy bashes up a smaller guy, cops break things up, all goes on as before.

Chris Brown, however, is having his career targeted and his international travel restricted because he beat up a woman.

Meanwhile, we are treated to an endless chorus of Ronda Rousey’s blatherings about how she can beat up any man alive. And how those two Army ranger chicks are bigger and badder than all the males in the armed forces.

Has no one noticed the absolute incongruence of these tales?

If Ronda Rousey is so fricking badass then Chris Brown did nothing wrong.

* Let’s not get too excited about Australia. The legal migration is deplorable – and the vast majority of it is from the 3rd world. The rate of Chinese & Indian migration has totaled 1 million, each. Singh is now the most common surname, outnumbering Smith, Armstrong & Jones which were once the most common surnames. We haven’t had the rates of violence against whites as experienced in Europe & the UK, but I’m sure that won’t be too far off. There is also a big element that is pro-mass immigration and enjoys it when we get illegal immigrants coming here, especially if it is by boat. I’m not joking or exaggerating about this either. They love it. Can’t get enough of it.
As for this Chris Brown thing – Julien Blanc wasn’t allowed here either – something about violence towards women or woman hating. I couldn’t care less about either of them, but it’s just another example of PC Totalitarianism – do they honestly think Brown & Blanc are going to come here with the express intention of physically abusing women? They probably do, but no point in going on about it, good citizens don’t think, right? Right? Damn right!

* Australia still has ridiculously high levels of legal immigration. While the country’s immigration program is geared toward skilled migrants, the irreversible demographic and cultural changes it is imposing on what was once a 98 percent ethnically European country are immense. Australia is rapidly becoming a colony of China and India.

As Frank Salter has noted: “Anglo Australians, still almost 70 percent of the population, are presently being displaced disproportionately in the professions and in senior managerial positions by Asian immigrants and their children. The situation is dramatic at selective schools which are the high road to university and the professions. Ethnocentrism is not a White disorder and evidence is emerging that immigrant communities harbour invidious attitude towards Anglo Australians, disparaging their culture and the legitimacy of their central place in national identity.”

* Sailer would not be allowed into Oz for sure on the grounds he’s a racist. As a matter of fact, pretty much his entire blog would be prosecuted under Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act.

There is certainly a high demand for free speech websites and blogs etc for Australians and Sailer’s meets that need. Freedom of speech is a market that Australia has vacated and you people, under our free trade agreement we have with each other as reward for the Iraq War, can supply that market, so long as you keep your sites not on our shores*. It’s one of those jobs Australians just won’t do! (Well, we are not allowed to do them on pain of prosecution).

People banned from Oz recently:

Tyler The Creator
Julien Blanc
Snoop Dogg

(Snoop Dogg’s banning was promoted by Change.org)

Of course there’s been a long term banning of David Irving and Gerry Adams.

I’m sure the list could go on if I tried to google it all.

Just as you have the market cornered in free speech we have the market cornered in banning things.

We have successfully criminalised cigarette smokers with a standard pack being now upwards of AUD$20 (and that’s a cheap pack). Banning alcohol is next cab off the rank I can assure you with a lot of media noise on the subject these days.

So, let’s not get carried away Mr. Sailer with that light on the hill business. That sort of talk is a Yank’s remit anyway 🙂 Consider us more of smouldering ruin of liberty, with a few last ditch flare ups here and there. After all, I’m willing to bet we are one election away from all the illegals back in their boats and on their way again.

Plus, don’t forget, we are inextricably tied to Asia as our historically high legal immigration intake demonstrates. As Murdoch said back in 1999:

It is a pity to see immigrant numbers declining. Australia needs to recommit itself to the challenge and opportunity of large scale immigration. We should think of ourselves as a brilliant basketball team, eager to choose the first draft of human talent – intellectual and entrepreneurial talent, and what might be termed the talent of animal spirits – from anywhere in the world. Living next to Asia gives us an obvious source of highly talented immigrants.

John Howard met Murdoch’s target and raised him a few hundred thousand per annum.

*Actually, better get some legal advice on that as I know other similar racial vilification acts do have the authority to prosecute even those who are not Oz citizens and not residing in Oz. How they would go about extraditing Sailer is another matter but the law certainly has provisions for it.

* I’ve never counted the number of people I know who’ve moved to Australia permanently, but its a lot! Australia is widely viewed as the promised land over here.

If its any consolation, you can be sure their kids will be Australians and nothing else, and not some hyphenated variety.

* The left in Australia are having another who-whom struggle. They can’t figure out if it’s OK to ban a misogynist if he is black.

* Let’s not discount Europe’s geographic advantage. The Mediterranean, regardless of how much it narrows in Gibraltar, is a fine barrier for an advanced nation. The maritime border between Greece and Turkey bears closer scrutiny, but it’s still water, and it requires boats to pass. The land border of Turkey in Europe is an easily blockaded strip of land. Unless the Russians start funneling refugees (who would not get such a good reception on the borders of Russia’s neighbors), there is no reason why Europe cannot be Australia.

* I live in the USA so have to figure out the Australian situation from afar. The Australian commenters here are very helpful with this. So….. Australian whites are on a more high class suicide course than America’s whites. We bring in some hi-IQ people but for the most part we allow in (legally and illegally) uneducated third worlders who are mostly Hispanic. Australia is keeping out uneducated, low class, non-English speaking third worlders. Australia has zero illegal immigration (so it seems) though I wounder what they do with visa over-stayers which is a major source (40%) of illegal immigration in America.

Instead Australia’s legal immigration system is allowing in the educated, skilled, English speaking of Asia with China and India sending them the most. By denying boat people entry this is excluding Muslims. So their immigration is slanted against Muslims and slanted towards the educated and well to do of Asia.

Conclusion: The extermination of traditional white-European Australia which built Australia (and the only slaves were white!) and died for Australia, will come via legal immigration. The multi-Kulti leftist dreams will be realized as traditional Australia loses its nerve and becomes an Asian populated nation with a white minority. What a cave in!! And they (whites) can feel OK about it because it is all done legally.

* I read a comment at another blog that suggested there may actually be a conscious effort by the Chinese to gradually insert large numbers of Chinese into Canada/Australia so that eventually the numbers will have the effect of moving politics in those countries in a direction favourable to China.

Both countries are huge exporters of resources and have tiny populations when compared to China…shifting say 5-10 million people is inconsequential to China, but can have a huge effect on politics in Can/Aus, this can have consequences for the US down the road.

* China is always happy to see its people leave and establish themselves overseas. Lowly Panama has been flooded by Chinese. Chinese can have as many children as they like (and can support) outside of China. So these populations will be growing fast.
Overseas Chinese will establish business networks with their (always!!) real homeland China and with other overseas Chinese. This is a slow growing threat worldwide to all who are not Chinese. I would not allow any Chinese to move here or study here in America. Other Asians would be allowed in from nations that are not economic and civilizational rivals like the Chinese are. For example, I have zero problem with Vietnamese and Koreans coming here legally. Japanese are OK too.
We get too many scammers, Muslims and affirmative action beneficiaries from India/Pakistan so no immigration for them for 20 years, then re-think it. I can dream can’t I?

Chinese spies in America? We are flooded with them. They are not full blown spies but they gather industrial secrets and send them home. Look for younger and techy Chinese students to be doing this as they steal from universities they do research at and companies that employ them. Done for money and loyalty to China.

* Australia currently has a centre-right liberal government which is doing pretty well at controlling refugee immigration, but way too liberal on economic immigration.

Large scale immigration from Asia is sending house prices surging and destroying affordable family formation for working and lower-middle class whites. It’s also means more mouths to feed from the country’s resource-based economy. The dilemma for voters in Australia and New Zealand is that the centre-right is ok at policing the borders and checking refugee immigration, but is too liberal with economic immigration, while the centre left is a bit better on economic immigration and AFF, but is too liberal on refugee immigration and too slack on issues like immigrant related crime.

* Lee Kuan Yew actually said explicitly in several interviews that he believed that yellow could only mix with yellow, brown with brown, white with white and so on. Otherwise problems would arise.

In some ways Australia’s position is more precarious than Europe’s, as the Asians who migrate here are actually functional and highly-competitive in the job-market; without any need for affirmative action. The universities really highlight the difference in attitudes, while whites are off partying or traveling; Chinese end the night asleep on the keyboards in the library. I remember many times being virtually the only white (sans a German exchange student or two) in the entire faculty past about 7-8PM.

* Not only are the Chinese that I’ve meet (sure, not the largest sample in the world, but not that small either) not anti-government, they are extremely, almost unthinkingly, pro-Chinese ethnically. The educated Chinese I’ve known are the most openly pro-their-race people I’ve met, perhaps because it doesn’t even occur to them not to be. They will openly say things in a mixed-race group like “it’s a great neighborhood, it’s being taken over by the Chinese!” Like a fish in water, they seem to see this as natural, which it probably is.

* Not a looter, just an undocumented shopper.

Not a rapist, just an undocumented lover.

Not a knockout gamer, just an undocumented boxer.

Not a stabber, just an undocumented surgeon.

Not a carjacker, just an undocumented passenger.

Not a hijacker, just an undocumented pilot.

Posted in Australia, Immigration | Comments Off on Australia: A Light Unto the Nations

Australian Jewish Writer Is Very Sensitive To Asylum Seekers

Posted on September 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

From The Guardian:

…Funder’s first year in New York was spent settling her family in and travelling to promote All that I Am, which was published in 20 countries. She did some journalism and worked for a charity called Icorn, the International Cities of Refuge Network that offers shelter for artists and writers facing persecution in their home countries, and continues to work with other writers such as Tom Keneally to lobby Melbourne and Sydney to become Icorn cities.

…In the past she spoke publicly about her horror of the Howard government’s treatment of asylum seekers. If anything the debate is now more rancorous and the international crisis more gut-wrenching.

As someone who worked in human rights law before becoming a writer, she feels an obligation to be involved but hasn’t quite caught up with the details of how Australia is treating asylum seekers and has a fear of being so sensitive to current events it prevents her from writing.

“Some things are just so awful, I don’t know, I’m not quite sure how I’m going to compartmentalise that,” she says.

“It can be kind of gutting, because if I’m writing about this country which I love on lots of levels, then I need to be aware of ugliness and human ugliness and political ugliness and all of those things but not be overcome by those things.”

She’s not in tears but her voice wavers a little. It might be the exhaustion, or something else.

“It’s an emotional thing writing a novel. If I was a political activist I’d be out there, but I’m not. I’ll do what I can.”

I hope she moves a few young male Muslim asylum seekers into her own home so she can enjoy their contributions.

Posted in Australia, Immigration, Jews | Comments Off on Australian Jewish Writer Is Very Sensitive To Asylum Seekers