As I have warned many times, Jews will be the losers in the re-tribalism of Australia:
A man screaming “go back to Israel” and “swear to Allah” had to be forcibly pinned to the ground after a scuffle outside a Melbourne synagogue yesterday.
The enraged man cornered an orthodox Jew and then slapped him during an argument outside the Adass Synagogue, south of Melbourne…
Repeatedly claiming to be of Aboriginal descent, he is seen screaming at the Jewish man to “go back to Israel”.
“I am from Australia,” the Jewish man responds.
Tensions boil over when man in the red t-shirt tries to grab the other man around the neck and is tackled by a group of onlookers in religious dress.
I’d say more about one aspect of this story, but Jewish leaders supported the retention of a law that makes debate too dangerous.
Luke: What does Andrew Bolt mean by that last paragraph? I thought Jews were on the side of the angels.
Comments to Andrew Bolt:
* This is now the unofficial law of the land … if any stranger approaches you and mentions a certain prophet – then prepare for combat. Ask questions later.
* Awwww! That nice angry man accepts that Israel is a Jewish homeland.
* and yet we are still letting more of these people into this country. How many times must we see this sort of thing before we wake up…what is worrying is that this guy looks like a moderate Moslem.
Posted inAnti-Semitism, Australia, Jews|Comments Off on Orthodox Jews tackle enraged man outside Melbourne synagogue
* It’s hard to deal with these sorts of girls, because they take a small scale personal conflict and escalate it into a societal issue and rope as many others into the drama as possible.
They will force all their Facebook friends and teachers, and other authority figures to get involved in the issue and choose a side…and god help whoever chooses the wrong side.
There is a fear of getting labelled a rape apologist or racist or ugly monster. Once you are tainted by these accusations, you can find yourself socially isolated…which is something no teenager wants.
I think the changes happening are really affecting girls most of all. Boys are pretty much as they always were in private or among themselves – but they are smart enough to not want to stick their necks out and get themselves in trouble.
* A factor in the feminization of young white males over recent decades — at least as regards public school students — has been lower participation rates in the contact sports due to at least two factors:
1) school and school district consolidation beginning mainly in the 1970s: This resulted in much larger consolidated high schools where sports like football became increasingly the domain of elite athletes. My county in western North Carolina had 9 small community high schools in the 1950s and early 1960s. Each high school had a football team, for example. Now, with it has 3 high schools, and that’s with a population about twice as large as when there were nine high schools. Where there was once 9 quarterbacks, there are now 3.
2) racial integration: This put whites, who mature about a year later than blacks, at a disadvantage in competition for starting positions, quite apart for innate average differences in the foot speed, for example.
* Women enforce social norms far more than men do. This is why the popularity of PC among women is such a problem. They do not face you like a man. They spread poison behind the back of their chosen victims.
HBD-friendly groups need women and Jews (for their esprit de corps and IQ). Driving them away is folly. I have tried to appeal to their self-interest by pointing out that the people moving to Europe are violently anti-Semitic and misogynistic. I have had a lot more success with Jews than white women, who take a perverse pride in holding two mutually incompatible positions.
* Most women and girls if given a choice would share a few high status, dominant men, with achingly brief encounters, over a lifetime of beta male devotion. When beta male provisioning becomes worthless/devalued by rising female income and declining male wages and relative status/power, even more so.
There is a *reason* this stuff happens all the time. Women like emasculating men, its got a name among PUAs lets call it here the “stuff test.” (You can guess the real name, I understand this is a G rated blog).
Women love love love to “stuff test” a man to find out if he’s the real Alpha deal or a mewling beta male pretender. Emasculate 95% of men, and by definition those left are the real Alpha deal. Again most women would prefer to share an Alpha than have ALL of a beta male.
This is why btw that most women support mass Third World immigration particularly Muslims. And why “Chicks dig Chechens.” They ache for a man to simply dominate them and take charge, and will happily slave away at two jobs supporting their weed smoking, MMA wannabe, drug murdering and terrorist husbands. Paging Mrs. Tsarnaev, Mrs. Tsarnaev, your pressure cooker is ready. [As if she didn’t know.]
What Roissy/Heartiste does is the Lord’s Work. Men and **especially** boys need to know PUA stuff, and yes this means the end of monogamy and the nuclear family but that was baked into the cake the moment birth control became cheap and reliable and women moved into the workforce.
Heartiste had a discussion recently of Drug Dealer Game. Pretending to be a Drug Dealer, particularly an “intelligent” one who is “thinking of going straight” is like crack to women. They can’t get enough of it. In HS, after all, who just tells girls to shove it and has them swooning? Thug or Old School Clean Cut Athletes who are BMOC, the school drug dealer, and other uber-dominant men. And as girls emasculate more and more of their male peers, they demand ever more dominance in their men. Probably most of the HS girls Haidt talked to would be happy in burqua being told what to do for the rest of their lives.
Example: Angela “Let’s Flood All of Europe with Muslims” Merkel. It doesn’t stop even after menopause.
This is why the “personal is the political” and it is vital for every White man and boy to Alpha up as much as possible.
* Fairly typical of most educated, professional women. They want a companion who is a sexless, teddy bear provider, and hot sex with bad boys. I think for a brief moment they can get it, but not for long. Eventually the teddy bear provider will disgust them, and probably catch on. Female infidelity is a deal breaker for the vast majority of men and always will be (deeply closeted gays the exception of course).
Women of course enjoy degrading themselves. They find it Fifty Shades of Grey hot.
Can the nuclear family as a widespread institution survive with most men knowing the true nature of female sexuality and desire? The utter unlikelihood of most women remaining faithful for those who are not uber Alpha? I would say, no. [The story was a woman’s fantasy made for other women to read and find “hot.” Or, gay-marriage norming straight marriage.]
Like it or not, Whites are simply moving to Black norms of reproduction and family: single moms, kids with different bad boys, no fatherly involvement or support (why would there be any?) and men focused completely on being the baddest, sexiest, bad boys around. With the dearth of male cooperation and wealth building that implies. Asians *may* resist this for some time, but even in China and Japan you see signs of the same thing. I think even Mormons will dissolve under female hypergamy.
Women can certainly have sexual freedom. Getting a man to stick around on the other hand is pretty unlikely. Women certainly don’t like it, but chose it freely.
Call it the Reverse Jane Austen. Instead of aunts and sisters and friends preaching choosiness and chastity until a woman chooses, its girrrrrrrrrllllll! power to slutty eleventy!!!11!! But its what women want to hear.
* The U. of California system has an Old Lesbians Network among the administrators, such as the UC Santa Cruz president who jumped off the highrise of her girlfriend (for whom she had gotten a $180k job with UC).
* “Denton, a well-regarded engineer, had been named this spring in a series of articles examining UC management compensation. She had been criticized for an expensive university-funded renovation on her campus home, and for obtaining a UC administrative job for Kalonji.”
Lesbians with money love owning multiple properties, also many are realtors. Ellen DeGeneres and girlfriend are always buying and selling properties near Hollywood and the lowest price I have seen was 20 million with the highest at 42 million iirc.
“ellen degeneres new house 2014 Ellen DeGeneres new $40 million dollar mansion is insane! It sits on 2.3 acres, and the main house is over 13,000 square…..”
UC Santa Cruz Chancellor Denice Denton, apparently despondent over work and personal issues, died Saturday after she jumped from the roof of a 42-story San Francisco apartment building, police said. Denton’s partner, Gretchen Kalonji, has an apartment in the building, property records show.
Denton, a well-regarded engineer, had been named this spring in a series of articles examining UC management compensation. She had been criticized for an expensive university-funded renovation on her campus home, and for obtaining a UC administrative job for Kalonji.
Denton, 46, died Saturday morning after jumping from the Paramount at Mission and Third streets, police said. The building is advertised as San Francisco’s tallest luxury rental apartment building. A guest at the nearby Argent Hotel called authorities at 8:17 a.m. to report a body on the roof of a parking structure below the apartment building, police said. The medical examiner ruled her death a suicide.
Denton had been on medical leave from the university since June 15 and was expected to return to work this week, said UC Santa Cruz spokesman Jim Burns. She was absent from the university’s commencement exercises last week because she was not feeling well, he said.
Denton’s mother, Carolyn Mabee, was in the apartment building at the time of her death, police said. She told authorities that her daughter was “very depressed” about her professional and personal life.
* Have you ever read Tom Wolfe’s essay “Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers”? The punchline is that all of the pampered little minorities who get to act out their grievances end up, in the end, back in the projects living miserable lives.
I.e., the joke is on these kids who are flexing their rhetorical muscles trying to intimidate their betters. Yeah, a few of them will get sinecures as affirmative-action counselors or whatever. But most of them are going to end up with lousy lives.
I kind of feel sorry for them. Of course, I can’t help indulging myself occasionally just telling the truth to an SJW to see if I can cause him/her to have a coronary.
* Women in the Nordic countries like sports more than women in the Mediterranean countries.
Nobody seems less interested in sports than Mexican-American girls. Has there ever been a prominent Mexican-American female athlete? I used to assume that Lisa Fernandez, the great UCLA softball player of the 1980s, was a local Mexican-American girl, but she turns out to be Caribbean (Cuban and Puerto Rican) born in NYC.
If you take hair dye out of the equation, I bet natural blonde girls tend to be more into sports than natural brunettes. It could be nature, it could be nurture, I don’t know, but compare female sports participation in Sweden to Italy. Italian women are expected to spend a lot of time each day on grooming and seldom get intensely into sports.
But, now that I think about it, there is the caveat that time spent in the sunshine and in chlorinated swimming pools tends to lighten hair, so girls on the swim team or cross country team, for example, tend to be blonder than they would be without environmental influences.
* So in 2006 the Harvard mean girl professors found ways of ganging up on men such as Harvard President Lawrence Summers. Just as an aside, Donna Shalala is mentioned in your 2006 VDare. She now heads the Clinton Foundation. Hill and Humma and Donna…old lesbians networking. May be complete bs but repeated on Rush Limbaugh that Hill & Huma share a suite when on the road.
* I’ve noticed this behavior amongst 20-something women in bars whenever I engage. If I say something off color, their nose wrinkles and I get the “That’s offensive!” line, followed by a pause, within which I’m supposed to grovel and beg forgiveness. The first few times I got this response, I myself paused , feeling like I was in the Twilight Zone, but thankfully never apologized.
Now I’ve gotten a bit more aggressive, and if one of them pulls the “That’s offensive!” line, I laugh and tell them to blow it out their backside, or else to toughen up. If they persist in telling me how much what I said was “offensive”, I ask them and their friends if they’re always such a lousy person to hang out with. Then I stop talking to them.
And for the record, I’m usually just making a minor joke involving sex or race or homosexuality. It’s nothing worse that what you might hear on Family Guy or Archer or South Park or some other partially-politically incorrect show. And I’m definitely not threatening them.
A few of these girls even went to a bouncer/bartender to complain about what I’d said—in other words, they tried to tell the teacher. Note this was after I’d stopped talking to them and refusing to engage if they tried. The bouncers/bartenders usually tell them to just let it go, at which they get even angrier: it seems as if this is the first time in their lives that they couldn’t have an “offensive” person hung, drawn, and quartered at a whim.
This is a Princess Syndrome: in school and in work environments, we’ve given women a princess-like power over men, the ability to yell “off with their heads” at any moment, and be completely obeyed without question. A privileged American woman might grow from childhood to mid-20s these days and might never have a moment where her feelings aren’t paramount over a male’s feelings or beliefs, and when she didn’t have the immediate power to ruin his life for hurting her feelings.
* I totally agree that women are more cruel than men once we take violent interactions out of the picture. It’s very hard, if not mostly impossible, for straight men to realize the extent to which this is the case, because they are biologically programmed to protect women. Gay men, who professionally interact with large numbers of women, are more likely to be aware of the self-serving downside of women and less likely to feel as if they are walking on eggshells around them. Gay men don’t take women anywhere as seriously as straight men.
* Two separate elites dislike each other, but because they’re both elite they propagate policies that support them, and the net effect is to propagate policies that support elite policies.
There’s an elite right that wants to keep wages down, because they own businesses and want to make more money. In the old days, they went in for red scares, etc., preventing socialism from ever taking root. They didn’t really care that much about cultural-right issues like obscenity on TV, etc, so the left won those fights.
There’s an elite left that wants to end poverty, racism, etc. They’re behind all the ridiculous SJW crap coming out of the universities. They don’t really care that much about paycheck issues like unions anymore, so the right won those fights.
The end result is that the left won the cultural war (LGBTCBY, sex on TV, white men are evil) and the right won the economic war (wages are low), which screws over…working-class white men. Exactly who’s going for Trump.
Since there’s a lot of math and science people here: Let populist-elitist issues like immigration be denoted by the y axis (of course, the elites are on top), and traditional left-right stuff like abortion and affirmative action be denoted by the x axis (of course, the ‘right’ is on the positive side on the right of the graph paper). The elite right pulls up and to the right, the elite left pulls up and to the left, and you wind up going ‘up’–with big profits for big business and the working and middle classes balkanized by race and gender.
* Richard Spencer has talked in some podcast appearances about how the white bourgeois class has acted against white people’s interests in general. Traditionally Western societies had aristocracies to put a check on the greed of merchants, bankers and capitalists, and this had the effect of maintaining white identity; but then aristocracies lost the social and cultural wars of the Enlightenment, and their influence went into decline in the following egalitarian age. Now the commercial elite, at least in the U.S., can do pretty much whatever it wants, though it might take a few election cycles and some strategic investments to get its way.
* When whites reject blacks, SJW’s call the whites “racists” and the blacks “victims.”
When women reject men, SJW’s call the women “empowered” and the rejects “losers.”
I’d rather live in the world of empowered whites which shows more consideration for male sexual rejects than we currently see. At least the Catholic Church demonstrated that it valued the rejects’ lives when it set up celibate monastic orders to give them homes and some measure of dignity.
I keep getting asked about former adult film star Jenna Jameson’s new reality show – not because I know a lot about Jameson, or her profession, but because the show chronicles her conversion to Judaism.
Jenna Jameson was one of the leading porn stars (I think now they call them “adult film stars,” presumably more politically correct) from 1993-2008, and built a large and profitable empire from her success (is that how you describe it?). Jameson has two children with her ex-husband, former MMA fighter Tito Ortiz. (Ortiz has full custody of their children.) Jameson is engaged to be married to an Israeli diamond dealer, Lior Bitton, and apparently she is converting to Judaism. And according to Bitton, they are making a reality show out of it for Israeli television’s Channel 2. The show is reportedly in the early stages of production, with no executive producers or production companies attached.
I know. There’s a lot going on here. I’ll try to break it down.
The porn industry is very problematic. While there are conflicting reports over whether there’s a higher incidence of women turning to porn as a way to make a living after coming from abuse, Jameson did say in a 2004 interview with Anderson Cooper that “It’s something that I’ve thought about a lot, and I can’t really say for sure if that is reasoning behind why I’ve gotten into the adult industry.”
Also, the treatment of women in particular in the porn industry is incredibly fraught (for a rundown of some of the topics and issues involved, see this article on ABC.net.au), and the images portrayed in porn of women in particular have been accused of everything from desensitizing men to “real” sex, contributing to the denigration and disrespect of women, and contributing to a culture that does not value intimacy.
I believe all of those things to be true, but I also know that especially with the invention of the internet, porn isn’t going anywhere.
Converting
I think it is tremendous when anyone decides to convert to Judaism. My ex did it, and so did his mother after our wedding. Joining a tribe of people who make up such a tiny percentage of the population but have such a large voice and presence and who have a homeland that is under global scrutiny for existing and whose politics are constantly challenged is no small task.
Posted inConversion, Pornography|Comments Off on Are we slut-shaming Jenna Jameson and should we stop?
Three weeks after the gruesome discovery of a woman’s burned and bound body near MBTA commuter rail tracks, authorities in Massachusetts have issued an arrest warrant for a Boston man.
Forty-three-year-old Fernando Owens of Boston’s Dorchester neighborhood is wanted in connection with the homicide of 29-year-old Ashley Bortner of New Jersey.
This story reminds me of Richard Wright’s novel Native Son:
Bigger Thomas wakes up in a dark, small room at the sound of the alarm clock. He lives in one room with his brother Buddy, his sister Vera, and their mother. Suddenly, a rat appears. The room turns into a maelstrom and after a violent chase, Bigger claims the life of the animal with an iron skillet and terrorizes Vera with the dead rodent. Vera faints and Mrs. Thomas scolds Bigger, who hates his family because they suffer and he cannot do anything about it.
That evening, Bigger has to see Mr. Dalton for a new job. Bigger’s family depends on him. He would like to leave his responsibilities forever but when he thinks of what to do, he only sees a blank wall. He walks to the poolroom and meets his friend, Gus. Bigger tells him that every time he thinks about whites, he feels something terrible will happen to him. They meet other friends, G.H. and Jack, and plan a robbery of the white wealth. They are all afraid of attacking and stealing from a white man, but none of them wants to admit their concerns. Before the robbery, Bigger and Jack go to the movies. They are attracted to the world of wealthy whites in the newsreel and feel strangely moved by the tom-toms and the primitive black people in the film, but they also feel that they are equal to those worlds. After the cinema, Bigger returns to the poolroom and attacks Gus violently, forcing him to lick his blade in a demeaning way to hide his own cowardice. The fight ends any chance of the robbery occurring; Bigger is obscurely conscious that he has done this intentionally.
When he finally gets the job, Bigger does not know how to behave in the large and luxurious house. Mr. Dalton and his blind wife use strange words. They try to be kind to Bigger, but they actually make him very uncomfortable; Bigger does not know what they expect of him. Then their daughter, Mary, enters the room, asks Bigger why he does not belong to a union, and calls her father a “capitalist”. Bigger does not know that word and is even more confused and afraid to lose the job…
That night, he drives Mary around and meets her Communist boyfriend Jan. Throughout the evening, Jan and Mary talk to Bigger, oblige him to take them to the diner where his friends are, invite him to sit at their table, and tell him to call them by their first names. Bigger does not know how to respond to their requests and becomes very frustrated, as he is simply their chauffeur for the night. At the diner, they buy a bottle of rum. Bigger drives throughout Washington Park, and Jan and Mary drink the rum and have sex in the back seat. Jan and Mary part, but Mary is so drunk that Bigger has to carry her to her bedroom when they arrive home. He is terrified someone will see him with her in his arms; however, he cannot resist the temptation of the forbidden, and he kisses her.
Just then, the bedroom door opens, and Mrs. Dalton enters. Bigger knows she is blind but is terrified she will sense him there. He silences Mary by pressing a pillow into her face. Mary claws at Bigger’s hands while Mrs. Dalton is in the room, trying to alert Bigger that she cannot breathe. Mrs. Dalton approaches the bed, smells alcohol in the air, scolds her daughter, and leaves. As Bigger removes the pillow, he realizes that Mary has suffocated. Bigger starts thinking frantically, and decides he will tell everyone that Jan, her Communist boyfriend, took Mary into the house that night. Thinking it will be better if Mary disappears and everyone thinks she has left Chicago, he decides in desperation to burn her body in the house’s furnace. Her body would not originally fit through the furnace opening, but after decapitating her, Bigger finally manages to put the corpse inside. He adds extra coal to the furnace, leaves the corpse to burn, and goes home.
Posted inBlacks, Crime|Comments Off on ‘Police searching for black male who tied white woman up and burned her alive.’
As anyone who binge-watched Netflix’s new superhero-noir series can tell you, it’s remarkably frank about sexuality: There are a half-dozen sex scenes, and they’re as vivid as they are realistic. Jessica Jones’s creators and performers told us that those scenes grew out of the show’s takes on gender, power, and superhero-genre tropes — and that they were much more enjoyable to watch than to film.
Read no further if you don’t want Jessica Jones spoilers.
“People go, ‘Wow, this must be fun.’ Well, they don’t realize you do it all day. It takes, like, half a day to film it,” said Mike Colter, who plays Jessica’s love interest, a fellow superstrong loner named Luke Cage. Most of the show’s sex scenes are between him and Krysten Ritter’s Jessica, and they’re pronouncedly athletic. The first one begins with the two of them in missionary position and ends with Jessica playing power bottom by getting Luke to take her from behind. Even for the eye-poppingly muscular Colter, the scene was physically draining.
“My chest and my arms were burning, there were points in my back — I was like, ‘Another take?’ Literally, I was trembling,” Colter recalled. He took solace in the leadership of episode director S.J. Clarkson, known for her work on Dexter and Heroes. “She’s the sex-scene director to have if you want to do sex scenes, because she knows exactly where to put the hands and what to do with the hands and what to do with the head. She’s just technically sound on it.”
Technical precision was also the preferred approach for David Petrarca, who directed the episode in which we see Luke and Jessica go at it three times. “The problem is, people bring their own kind of shame about sex to the table” when you shoot sex scenes, he said. “If you project that into the environment, you charge the atmosphere. So the best way is to make it as pedestrian as humanly possible.”
That said, one of the moments he directed wasn’t pedestrian by non-superhuman standards: Jessica is on top of Luke, riding him so hard that they shatter the bed’s bottom legs. The bed was a custom-built rig with breakable legs, which were held together with a pin. On command, a trigger would pull the pin and drop the bed. But even while filming that scene of sexual frenzy, the on-set atmosphere was one of artistic distance.
“That’s a technical shot! That’s me trying to get an Edward Hopper–esque image of the lonely woman in the window!” Petrarca recalled. “You work through the mechanics: Sheet’s gonna go here, your arm’s here, maybe he rolls this way to the left.”
Very few Jews have any agenda with regard to interracial sex. They work hard, they look after their families, they hang out with their own kind, they do the best they can in life. A tiny number of elite Jews, however, want to make the West more tolerant, more cosmopolitan, and less racist and they think it is a mitzva to show things like glamorous black-white sex and positive portrayals of trannies and homosexuals.
Portrayals of Jewish-Gentile hookups, however, are sure to raise the hackles of traditional Jewry (for whom inter-marriage is a scandal).
NEW YORK — A painting of a black woman and a Hasidic Jew embracing and kissing on the cover of the New Yorker magazine drew criticism Monday from leaders on both sides of a racially divided community.
The artist, Pulitzer Prize winner Art Spiegelman, and New Yorker editor Tina Brown said the Valentine’s Day cover advocates replacing conflict with love.
Spiegelman, in an accompanying commentary, acknowledged that his image is a dream that is “knowingly naive” and that the problems besetting Jews and blacks in Brooklyn’s Crown Heights section “cannot be kissed away.”
“But once a year, perhaps, it’s permissible, even if just for a moment, to close one’s eyes, see beyond the tragic complexities of modern life, and imagine that it might really be true that ‘All you need is love,’ ” he wrote.
Tensions between the community’s blacks and ultra-Orthodox Jews erupted in August, 1991, with two deaths and days of racially fueled violence. Conflict continues, with alleged bias attacks from both sides.
The cover of the Feb. 15 issue, which appeared on newsstands Monday, may do more harm than good, said the Rev. Herbert Daughtry, a black activist.
“I think that instead of healing anything, there will be anger emanating because of this,” Daughtry said.
Daughtry and Rabbi Joseph Spielman, chairman of the Crown Heights Jewish Community Council, both called the painting “unfortunate.”
“Rather than healing, this just makes everything ludicrous,” Spielman said, pointing out that Hasidim may not even kiss their wives or show them physical affection in public.
Spiegelman said the negative reactions from both groups made him sad. But he added, by telephone from Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., it ultimately may have a positive effect.
“If it unites both communities against me, at least we’ve gotten them united,” he said.
Brown, who took over as editor last year, defended the cover.
“Art Spiegelman’s beautiful image, representing as it does his dreamlike vision of comity and love, speaks for itself,” she said.
Daughtry said he doubted that the magazine would have used a cover showing a black man kissing a Hasidic woman. Spiegelman said he considered such a picture and conceded racial stereotypes affected the final version.
* In recent decades, the leading Jewish organizations have invoked the Holocaust to argue that anti-Semitism is a distinctively virulent and murderous form of hatred. But in the first postwar decades their emphasis — powerfully reinforced by contemporary scholarly opinion — was on the common psychological roots of all forms of prejudice. Their research, educational, and political action programs consistently minimized differences between different targets of discrimination. If prejudice and discrimination were all of a set piece, they reasoned that they could serve the cause of Jewish self-defense as well by attacking prejudice and discrimination against blacks as by tackling anti-Semitism directly.
* …there was never much of a black-Jewish alliance on the communal or organizational level. There were a great many individual Jews who over the years had worked on behalf of blacks, but, with some exceptions, they were leftist and liberal activists who had little connection to the Jewish community. This was certainly true of the Jewish lawyers and student volunteers who worked with the black movement in the South in the 1960s…During the McCarthy era, Jewish organizations repeatedly pointed out that it was a fallacy to infer from the fact that a great many (perhaps even a majority of) Communists were Jews that a great many, let alone a majority of, Jews were Communists. The logic was impeccable with respect to alleged Jewish pro-Communism, and equally impeccable with respect to alleged Jewish civil rights activism.
Posted inBlacks, Hollywood, Jews|Comments Off on New Jewish Superhero Show Jessica Jones Contains Tons Of Interracial Sex
Sara Mayer, 31, of Borough Park, who hanged herself Sunday, had a nervous breakdown on the eve of her arranged wedding about five years ago — and had already endured years of physical and mental abuse by relatives, according to the source.
“[Her suicide] was a family mental-health and abuse issue on top of being forced into marriage with her first cousin,” the source said, recalling how the union was annulled just months later.
“Ever since [her marriage], she has been in and out of mental hospitals,” the source explained. “She had been coerced by her mother’s side of the family’’ to marry her cousin. “She married the son of the mother’s sister.”
Some members of the Brooklyn family apparently didn’t find out about Sara’s torment until just recently.
Faigy Mayer committed suicide in July.Photo: Facebook
Growing up, some relatives “kept calling her retarded, ugly, etc. We didn’t know this until later,” the source said.
The source added that Sara and her younger sister Faigy — who jumped to her death from a Manhattan rooftop bar in July — had been seeking advice from a family member for their depression, even though the relative wasn’t a licensed therapist.
“In Williamsburg, it was so bad that the rabbis got together and they put a poster up warning the community about her and the lack of her credentials,” the source said. “But despite the rabbis’ warning, people are still seeing her for family therapy.”
“To have lost two girls in less than a year shows that something is up with this family. It’s very sad.”
Posted inHasidim|Comments Off on NYP: Hasid who hanged herself was forced to marry her first cousin
Anatoly Karlin writes: On the global scale, the Protestant world comprise nine of the world’s top 10 most financially literate countries, and an amazing 17 of the world’s top 25 – which is also a convenient threshold representing 50%+ financial literacy. (By which point the stock of both developed world Protestant countries pretty much ends). The world’s offshore bank, Switzerland, is a relatively disappointing 15th.
9 of the top 10 countries are within the Hajnal line of Europe, or are their descendants; and 17 of the top 25.
Predictably, the non-Protestant exception in the top 10 is Israel. The Jews can sure count their shekels.
The Catholics and Orthodox Christians tended to do a lot worse, even though as we know IQ differences between them and the Protestant world are fairly minor. Likewise with the Confucian civilization.
This suggests that Protestant populations have tended to culturally evolve (or gene-culturally evolve) an “intuitive” understanding of finance like things, while the rest of the world pretty much has to figure it out from zero. More intelligent populations with financial experience, such as the Japanese, tend to be relatively better at it (43% financially literate); less intelligent populations without much financial experience, such as the Indians and Iranians, do much worse at it (<25% financially literate).
Posted inWASPs|Comments Off on Protestantism and the Financially Literate Ethic
(1) A solid majority of Muslims in Egypt support the death penalty. Conservatively assuming 80% of the population is Sunni Muslim, that’s 51% of the population that are essentially Islamist extremists and potential Islamic State sympathizes. That also happens to be the exact percentage that voted for Muslim Brotherhood candidate Mohammed Morsi in 2012. This probably makes liberal democracy in Egypt all but impossible: Its either the mustachioed soldiers or the bearded preachers. Choose one.
(2) The majority of Muslims in Malaysia and Jordan, both countries widely seen as “moderate,” support the dealth penalty for apostasy.
(3) The only country of the Arab Spring to transition to a more or less functioning democracy is Tunisia. Probably not coincidentally, it is also the most religiously “progressive” of all the Arab states. In those areas where the Islamic State has been taking power – northern Iraq, eastern Syria, the Sinai, the central Libyan coast, chunks of Afghanistan – it appears that the local population supports the death penalty for apostasy and other extremist interpretations of Islam, far more so than even in the rest of the world. Perhaps ~50% is a sort of “tipping point” for the most rabidly chiliastic Islamist cults to take root?
(5) It seems almost banal to point it out, but then again, as Gregory Cochran points out, even very obvious things need to be repeated now and then.
…
It is highly unlikely would find more than 1% of Christians in any country supporting the death penalty for apostasy, and even that 1% would as often as not be merely trolling the pollster. The only surveyed major Muslim countries with a comparable level of insanity are Kazakhstan and possibly Turkey. Regardless of 70 years of secular propaganda, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan have three to five times the number of fundamentalists per capita, with 5-6% of their Muslim population supporting death for apostasy; though still an order of magnitude better than neighboring Afpak and the Middle East, these figures can already make themselves felt in events such as the defection of a senior Tajik policeman to the Islamic State.
It only gets worse from there on. Tunisia, with 16% of the population being fundamentalists, gets regularly wracked by terrorist strikes; Bangladesh, with 33%, sees atheist bloggers murdered with impunity. The percentage of Muslims who are fundamentalists in Western Europe is (based on other polls) probably generally around the 25% mark. That is a lot of fundamentalists. And it translates to a permanent, simmering terrorist threat. Which – rather conveniently? – requires an ever expanding security/surveillance state to keep suppressed. Once you go above the 50% mark, as in Jordan, Pakistan, or Egypt, only a dictator or a well-respected monarch prevents the people – the demos – from actualizing their back-to-the-roots fantasies.
Posted inIslam|Comments Off on World Map of Muslim Support of the Death Penalty for Apostasy
From VDARE: In the first hour of his show on Wednesday (November 25, 2015), Rush Limbaugh had some fun prepping his listeners to endure being harangued about political issues by any leftist relatives with whom they’ll be sharing a dinner table on Thanksgiving. For example, the Democratic National Committee has a special web page titled “Your Republican Uncle” and bearing this introduction:
The holiday season is filled with food, traveling, and lively discussions with Republican relatives about politics sometimes laced with statements that are just not true. Here are the most common myths spouted by your family members who spend too much time listening to Rush Limbaugh and the perfect response to each of them.
[Emphases in original]
One of the subjects they purport to set their (gullible) groupies straight on is “Immigrants & Refugees.” (Their talking point under that heading is a very brief challenge/response containing substantial misinformation about the vetting of refugees by our crack federal bureaucracy.)
If you’re anticipating such amiable colloquy at Thursday’s dinner table, how might you get ready for the onslaught?
Well, immigration is a vast subject about which most Americans, even “bright, well-educated, well-traveled” ones, tend to know very little. So it’s difficult to prepare for the myriad of possible sub-topics that might arise. Thus it may be better to go armed (mentally!) with something simple and of large import.
That could well be the concept that’s in NumbersUSA’s famous six-minute “World Poverty, Immigration, and Gumballs” video. Roy Beck’s presentation in the video makes graphically clear—even to nearly-innumerate viewers—that mass immigration to the U.S. can’t materially succour “the wretched of the earth,” since there are so many of them.
Presumably because of all the refugee news of late, there’s been a new surge of viewership for the “gumballs” video. In a mass email dispatched last Saturday (November 21), with subject line “Our gumball video went viral again—have you seen it?”, NumbersUSA announced:
You may have seen it making the rounds on the internet, but here it is straight from the source.
This video is more relevant than ever as politicians in Washington are saying we should resettle tens of thousands of refugees in the U.S. It has been viewed over 17 million times on Facebook in the past couple weeks and we weren’t even the ones sharing it.
[Emphases in original]
Their email links to the video at this Facebook page, but you don’t have to sign in with Facebook to view it there. (A comment at that page by one Shawn Kelchner, at 11:44 a.m. on November 21, is “Best video ever! even dumb people should be able to understand.”)
It’s also available elsewhere on the web. For example, this version at a YouTube page has English [!!] subtitles. More generally, just do a Google search on “gumballs video,” and you’ll find it on top.
If you, as a VDARE.com reader, have never seen the “gumballs” video, it’s high time you did. If you have seen it before, this is a perfect time for a review. Either way, it’ll be good to have it fresh in your mind if you’ll be sitting around with a cohort of the clueless at Thanksgiving dinner.
The “Off the Charts” video is particularly useful in debunking the “nation of immigrants” lie. Beck shows graphically that situation (the level of immigration that could cause someone to say this was a “nation of immigrants”) did not occur until about 2010. (Two minute version here.)
One of the most memorably vivid characterizations of the USSR was as a communal apartment, in which every ethnicity had its own room. Except the majority Russians, who had to make do with the foyer while paying the bulk of the rent, which didn’t make them too happy.
In some sense, US Whites are not in a dissimilar situation. They were the ethnic group that essentially built the country and produced virtually all its most eminent intellectual figures, but now have to listen to BLM activists claiming “their people” built Princeton. (Just as they were once Kings and Queens of Egypt, which just goes to show that at its root BLM is essentially a “progressive” front for Black Nationalism). They are faced with constant attacks on their “privilege” even as that very privilege not just vanishes by goes into active reverse (see Deaton & Case’s revelations about the the White mortality crisis, and Ron Unz’s finding that the most discriminated against group in university admissions are White Gentiles).
Thus, it is not surprising to see an incipient reaction against this, the latest facet of it being the rash of White Student Unions now being formed in universities across the US.
In todays society where people seem more divided by race than any time in recent history, is this even surprising or wrong? Maybe white people feel the need to band together in order to stand up for themselves.
But this narrative is incorrect. In private interviews conducted with the creators of a number of these groups, Breitbart Tech has found that a number of the new “White Student Unions” are indeed the product of students on campus who are afraid to speak out publicly.
But these students aren’t white supremacists, or even white nationalists. In some cases, they are not even white. One of the anonymous student group founders we spoke to, who did not wish to be identified, was of South Asian descent. Another founder was Mexican-American. They are concerned by what they see as unchecked hostility towards their fellow white students.
Interestingly, these pages themselves appear to be explicitly adopting the language of the diversity commissars, as seen on one of the posts at the UCF White Student Union.
The White Student Union surge is a legitimate one filled with positive intentions. We will continue to be a voice and safe space for people of Whiteness.
COMMENTS:
* This is a good article so it seems that we are finally getting to the bottom of the significance of the civil rights movement. The purpose of the civil rights movement and the doctrine of disparate impact is to undermine the idea of private property and the legal concepts of consent and consideration. It is not as simple as saying that women and minorities were “denied” a position on the other end someone has to offer it – at one time private property, liberty of contract and freedom of association were upheld to be sacrosanct principles. There are two ways of organizing society – status or contract as Sir Henry Maine stated in his book on principles on ancient law. In our disparate impact society any legal entity that does anything the civil rights leaders dont like (which cannot be defined ahead of time) is subject to legal extortion. Highly paid experts who produce nothing of value spend their lives trying to avoid and rationalize this extortion. Maybe some of the white working class should be retrained as disparate impact specialists in our new multicultural utopia.
* It’s just ironic that this kind of a White segregationist idea has long since been promoted by David Duke – a White nationalist opinion leader who has been marginalized and who’s always been viewed as totally “far out”. And here we have these White Student unions springing up left and right – it didn’t take very long.
"This guy knows all the gossip, the ins and outs, the lashon hara of the Orthodox world. He’s an [expert] in... all the inner workings of the Orthodox world." (Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff)