* It’s hard to deal with these sorts of girls, because they take a small scale personal conflict and escalate it into a societal issue and rope as many others into the drama as possible.
They will force all their Facebook friends and teachers, and other authority figures to get involved in the issue and choose a side…and god help whoever chooses the wrong side.
There is a fear of getting labelled a rape apologist or racist or ugly monster. Once you are tainted by these accusations, you can find yourself socially isolated…which is something no teenager wants.
I think the changes happening are really affecting girls most of all. Boys are pretty much as they always were in private or among themselves – but they are smart enough to not want to stick their necks out and get themselves in trouble.
* A factor in the feminization of young white males over recent decades — at least as regards public school students — has been lower participation rates in the contact sports due to at least two factors:
1) school and school district consolidation beginning mainly in the 1970s: This resulted in much larger consolidated high schools where sports like football became increasingly the domain of elite athletes. My county in western North Carolina had 9 small community high schools in the 1950s and early 1960s. Each high school had a football team, for example. Now, with it has 3 high schools, and that’s with a population about twice as large as when there were nine high schools. Where there was once 9 quarterbacks, there are now 3.
2) racial integration: This put whites, who mature about a year later than blacks, at a disadvantage in competition for starting positions, quite apart for innate average differences in the foot speed, for example.
* Women enforce social norms far more than men do. This is why the popularity of PC among women is such a problem. They do not face you like a man. They spread poison behind the back of their chosen victims.
HBD-friendly groups need women and Jews (for their esprit de corps and IQ). Driving them away is folly. I have tried to appeal to their self-interest by pointing out that the people moving to Europe are violently anti-Semitic and misogynistic. I have had a lot more success with Jews than white women, who take a perverse pride in holding two mutually incompatible positions.
* Most women and girls if given a choice would share a few high status, dominant men, with achingly brief encounters, over a lifetime of beta male devotion. When beta male provisioning becomes worthless/devalued by rising female income and declining male wages and relative status/power, even more so.
There is a *reason* this stuff happens all the time. Women like emasculating men, its got a name among PUAs lets call it here the “stuff test.” (You can guess the real name, I understand this is a G rated blog).
Women love love love to “stuff test” a man to find out if he’s the real Alpha deal or a mewling beta male pretender. Emasculate 95% of men, and by definition those left are the real Alpha deal. Again most women would prefer to share an Alpha than have ALL of a beta male.
This is why btw that most women support mass Third World immigration particularly Muslims. And why “Chicks dig Chechens.” They ache for a man to simply dominate them and take charge, and will happily slave away at two jobs supporting their weed smoking, MMA wannabe, drug murdering and terrorist husbands. Paging Mrs. Tsarnaev, Mrs. Tsarnaev, your pressure cooker is ready. [As if she didn’t know.]
What Roissy/Heartiste does is the Lord’s Work. Men and **especially** boys need to know PUA stuff, and yes this means the end of monogamy and the nuclear family but that was baked into the cake the moment birth control became cheap and reliable and women moved into the workforce.
Heartiste had a discussion recently of Drug Dealer Game. Pretending to be a Drug Dealer, particularly an “intelligent” one who is “thinking of going straight” is like crack to women. They can’t get enough of it. In HS, after all, who just tells girls to shove it and has them swooning? Thug or Old School Clean Cut Athletes who are BMOC, the school drug dealer, and other uber-dominant men. And as girls emasculate more and more of their male peers, they demand ever more dominance in their men. Probably most of the HS girls Haidt talked to would be happy in burqua being told what to do for the rest of their lives.
Example: Angela “Let’s Flood All of Europe with Muslims” Merkel. It doesn’t stop even after menopause.
This is why the “personal is the political” and it is vital for every White man and boy to Alpha up as much as possible.
* Fairly typical of most educated, professional women. They want a companion who is a sexless, teddy bear provider, and hot sex with bad boys. I think for a brief moment they can get it, but not for long. Eventually the teddy bear provider will disgust them, and probably catch on. Female infidelity is a deal breaker for the vast majority of men and always will be (deeply closeted gays the exception of course).
Women of course enjoy degrading themselves. They find it Fifty Shades of Grey hot.
Can the nuclear family as a widespread institution survive with most men knowing the true nature of female sexuality and desire? The utter unlikelihood of most women remaining faithful for those who are not uber Alpha? I would say, no. [The story was a woman’s fantasy made for other women to read and find “hot.” Or, gay-marriage norming straight marriage.]
Like it or not, Whites are simply moving to Black norms of reproduction and family: single moms, kids with different bad boys, no fatherly involvement or support (why would there be any?) and men focused completely on being the baddest, sexiest, bad boys around. With the dearth of male cooperation and wealth building that implies. Asians *may* resist this for some time, but even in China and Japan you see signs of the same thing. I think even Mormons will dissolve under female hypergamy.
Women can certainly have sexual freedom. Getting a man to stick around on the other hand is pretty unlikely. Women certainly don’t like it, but chose it freely.
Call it the Reverse Jane Austen. Instead of aunts and sisters and friends preaching choosiness and chastity until a woman chooses, its girrrrrrrrrllllll! power to slutty eleventy!!!11!! But its what women want to hear.
* The U. of California system has an Old Lesbians Network among the administrators, such as the UC Santa Cruz president who jumped off the highrise of her girlfriend (for whom she had gotten a $180k job with UC).
* “Denton, a well-regarded engineer, had been named this spring in a series of articles examining UC management compensation. She had been criticized for an expensive university-funded renovation on her campus home, and for obtaining a UC administrative job for Kalonji.”
Lesbians with money love owning multiple properties, also many are realtors. Ellen DeGeneres and girlfriend are always buying and selling properties near Hollywood and the lowest price I have seen was 20 million with the highest at 42 million iirc.
“ellen degeneres new house 2014 Ellen DeGeneres new $40 million dollar mansion is insane! It sits on 2.3 acres, and the main house is over 13,000 square…..”
UC Santa Cruz chancellor dies in suicide plunge
UC Santa Cruz Chancellor Denice Denton, apparently despondent over work and personal issues, died Saturday after she jumped from the roof of a 42-story San Francisco apartment building, police said. Denton’s partner, Gretchen Kalonji, has an apartment in the building, property records show.
Denton, a well-regarded engineer, had been named this spring in a series of articles examining UC management compensation. She had been criticized for an expensive university-funded renovation on her campus home, and for obtaining a UC administrative job for Kalonji.
Denton, 46, died Saturday morning after jumping from the Paramount at Mission and Third streets, police said. The building is advertised as San Francisco’s tallest luxury rental apartment building. A guest at the nearby Argent Hotel called authorities at 8:17 a.m. to report a body on the roof of a parking structure below the apartment building, police said. The medical examiner ruled her death a suicide.
Denton had been on medical leave from the university since June 15 and was expected to return to work this week, said UC Santa Cruz spokesman Jim Burns. She was absent from the university’s commencement exercises last week because she was not feeling well, he said.
Denton’s mother, Carolyn Mabee, was in the apartment building at the time of her death, police said. She told authorities that her daughter was “very depressed” about her professional and personal life.
* Have you ever read Tom Wolfe’s essay “Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers”? The punchline is that all of the pampered little minorities who get to act out their grievances end up, in the end, back in the projects living miserable lives.
I.e., the joke is on these kids who are flexing their rhetorical muscles trying to intimidate their betters. Yeah, a few of them will get sinecures as affirmative-action counselors or whatever. But most of them are going to end up with lousy lives.
I kind of feel sorry for them. Of course, I can’t help indulging myself occasionally just telling the truth to an SJW to see if I can cause him/her to have a coronary.
* Women in the Nordic countries like sports more than women in the Mediterranean countries.
Nobody seems less interested in sports than Mexican-American girls. Has there ever been a prominent Mexican-American female athlete? I used to assume that Lisa Fernandez, the great UCLA softball player of the 1980s, was a local Mexican-American girl, but she turns out to be Caribbean (Cuban and Puerto Rican) born in NYC.
If you take hair dye out of the equation, I bet natural blonde girls tend to be more into sports than natural brunettes. It could be nature, it could be nurture, I don’t know, but compare female sports participation in Sweden to Italy. Italian women are expected to spend a lot of time each day on grooming and seldom get intensely into sports.
But, now that I think about it, there is the caveat that time spent in the sunshine and in chlorinated swimming pools tends to lighten hair, so girls on the swim team or cross country team, for example, tend to be blonder than they would be without environmental influences.
* So in 2006 the Harvard mean girl professors found ways of ganging up on men such as Harvard President Lawrence Summers. Just as an aside, Donna Shalala is mentioned in your 2006 VDare. She now heads the Clinton Foundation. Hill and Humma and Donna…old lesbians networking. May be complete bs but repeated on Rush Limbaugh that Hill & Huma share a suite when on the road.
* I’ve noticed this behavior amongst 20-something women in bars whenever I engage. If I say something off color, their nose wrinkles and I get the “That’s offensive!” line, followed by a pause, within which I’m supposed to grovel and beg forgiveness. The first few times I got this response, I myself paused , feeling like I was in the Twilight Zone, but thankfully never apologized.
Now I’ve gotten a bit more aggressive, and if one of them pulls the “That’s offensive!” line, I laugh and tell them to blow it out their backside, or else to toughen up. If they persist in telling me how much what I said was “offensive”, I ask them and their friends if they’re always such a lousy person to hang out with. Then I stop talking to them.
And for the record, I’m usually just making a minor joke involving sex or race or homosexuality. It’s nothing worse that what you might hear on Family Guy or Archer or South Park or some other partially-politically incorrect show. And I’m definitely not threatening them.
A few of these girls even went to a bouncer/bartender to complain about what I’d said—in other words, they tried to tell the teacher. Note this was after I’d stopped talking to them and refusing to engage if they tried. The bouncers/bartenders usually tell them to just let it go, at which they get even angrier: it seems as if this is the first time in their lives that they couldn’t have an “offensive” person hung, drawn, and quartered at a whim.
This is a Princess Syndrome: in school and in work environments, we’ve given women a princess-like power over men, the ability to yell “off with their heads” at any moment, and be completely obeyed without question. A privileged American woman might grow from childhood to mid-20s these days and might never have a moment where her feelings aren’t paramount over a male’s feelings or beliefs, and when she didn’t have the immediate power to ruin his life for hurting her feelings.
* I totally agree that women are more cruel than men once we take violent interactions out of the picture. It’s very hard, if not mostly impossible, for straight men to realize the extent to which this is the case, because they are biologically programmed to protect women. Gay men, who professionally interact with large numbers of women, are more likely to be aware of the self-serving downside of women and less likely to feel as if they are walking on eggshells around them. Gay men don’t take women anywhere as seriously as straight men.
* Two separate elites dislike each other, but because they’re both elite they propagate policies that support them, and the net effect is to propagate policies that support elite policies.
There’s an elite right that wants to keep wages down, because they own businesses and want to make more money. In the old days, they went in for red scares, etc., preventing socialism from ever taking root. They didn’t really care that much about cultural-right issues like obscenity on TV, etc, so the left won those fights.
There’s an elite left that wants to end poverty, racism, etc. They’re behind all the ridiculous SJW crap coming out of the universities. They don’t really care that much about paycheck issues like unions anymore, so the right won those fights.
The end result is that the left won the cultural war (LGBTCBY, sex on TV, white men are evil) and the right won the economic war (wages are low), which screws over…working-class white men. Exactly who’s going for Trump.
Since there’s a lot of math and science people here: Let populist-elitist issues like immigration be denoted by the y axis (of course, the elites are on top), and traditional left-right stuff like abortion and affirmative action be denoted by the x axis (of course, the ‘right’ is on the positive side on the right of the graph paper). The elite right pulls up and to the right, the elite left pulls up and to the left, and you wind up going ‘up’–with big profits for big business and the working and middle classes balkanized by race and gender.
* Richard Spencer has talked in some podcast appearances about how the white bourgeois class has acted against white people’s interests in general. Traditionally Western societies had aristocracies to put a check on the greed of merchants, bankers and capitalists, and this had the effect of maintaining white identity; but then aristocracies lost the social and cultural wars of the Enlightenment, and their influence went into decline in the following egalitarian age. Now the commercial elite, at least in the U.S., can do pretty much whatever it wants, though it might take a few election cycles and some strategic investments to get its way.
* When whites reject blacks, SJW’s call the whites “racists” and the blacks “victims.”
When women reject men, SJW’s call the women “empowered” and the rejects “losers.”
I’d rather live in the world of empowered whites which shows more consideration for male sexual rejects than we currently see. At least the Catholic Church demonstrated that it valued the rejects’ lives when it set up celibate monastic orders to give them homes and some measure of dignity.
