Never Mind the Bodies, SPLC Says: “Black Lives Matter Is Not a Hate Group”

Steve Sailer writes: As we’ve seen from recent murder statistics, BLM activism closely correlates with subsequent increases in the number of homicides.

Never mind the dead bodies, however, because the Southern Poverty Law Center is here to define from first principles how BLM can’t be a hate group despite all the murders that happen in its wake:

Black Lives Matter Is Not a Hate Group

Richard Cohen
President
July 19, 2016

Each year, the Southern Poverty Law Center, of which I am the president, compiles and publishes a census of domestic hate groups.

Our list, which is cited extensively by journalists, academics and government officials alike, provides an important barometer—not the only one, of course—to help us understand the state of hate and extremism in America.

In recent weeks, we’ve received a number of requests to name Black Lives Matter a hate group, particularly in the wake of the murders of eight police officers in Dallas and Baton Rouge. Numerous conservative commentators have joined the chorus. There is even a Change.org petition calling for the hate group label.

In our view, these critics fundamentally misunderstand the nature of hate groups and the BLM movement.

Generally speaking, hate groups are, by our definition, those that vilify entire groups of people based on immutable characteristics such as race or ethnicity. Federal law takes a similar approach. …

Many of its harshest critics claim that Black Lives Matter’s very name is anti-white, hence the oft-repeated rejoinder “all lives matter.” This notion misses the point entirely. Black lives matter because they have been marginalized throughout our country’s history and because white lives have always mattered more in our society. As BLM puts it, the movement stands for “the simple proposition that ‘black lives also matter.’”

The backlash to BLM, in some ways, reflects a broad sense of unease among white people who worry about the cultural changes in the country and feel they are falling behind in a country that is rapidly growing more diverse in a globalizing world. We consistently see this phenomenon in surveys showing that large numbers of white people believe racial discrimination against them is as pervasive, or more so, than it is against African Americans.

Black Lives Matter is not a hate group. But the perception that it is racist illustrates the problem. …

If you weren’t so hateful hate-filled, why would BLM hate you so much?

COMMENTS:

* So race is immutable to the SPLC? I thought it was just a social construct?

It’s a good thing BLM isn’t vilifying whites or anything.

* I think the pushback is intensifying — i.e. BLM propaganda & public image consciousness — because there is a natural limit to Professional Black Guy shakedown-artisty, once other blacks start to sense that whatever theme it is this year that led to the pan-media jag of stoking the feels has begun to turn a bit counter-productive. You hear it in the recent commentary by Michael Jordan and Richard Sherman. Enthusiasm for BLM-brand self-assertion and self-publicity is on the wane; meanwhile white liberal Civil Rights Geeks are left holding the bag.

* By this standard, any group should be able to avoid the hate group label so long as their mission statement has the right verbiage. Don’t worry about what the members say or do, right?

I find it hard to believe the SPLC would play favorites here. They’re trying to stop hate, and nothing is more important.

* But the perception that [BLM] is racist illustrates the problem.

You hate me. You have a problem. I hate you. You have a problem.

* “WHAT DO WE WANT?”

“DEAD COPS!”

“WHEN DO WE WANT ‘EM?”

“NOW!”

Nope. No hate there, Mr. Cohen. Your eagle-eyed SPLC outfit really did your Scout’s Honor homework to nail that tough one.

* The SPLC is the most successful fund raiser on the left for a reason. They sell a very consistent product. People who give them money know that they product the are buying is always anti-white, anti-conservative, anti-native, and anti-male.

* The SPLC is a leftist group, effectively the equivalent of the imprimatur for Cultural Marxism.

As an agent of CultMarx, their goal is a world where white conservative/Christian males (WCMs) are permanently driven from power in the polis that they built. Drive us out, and Trotsky’s permanent revolution will follow.

* It gets a lot simpler when you realise that the SPLC is a hate group. That they include the JDL & Nation of Islam in their list of hate groups just for cover, so it’s not quite so obvious (and those entries have a ‘more in sorrow than in anger’ feel about them). This article makes it clear exactly who the target of their hate is.

* The irony is BLM, Obama, and his shitty crew just makes life more difficult for the significant number of black folks who are intelligent, self-possessed, and successful contributors and strivers. Imagine this guy turning on his tv and seeing that DNC shitshow. Your heart has to go out to the guy:

* Race is a social construct, a hangup, for us awful and racist Whites.

For SPLC and #BLM and the Democrats and all their sycophants, race is a deadly serious business to be used for destruction and political advantage. And business is GOOD.

* Transgenderism pulls the rug from under the ‘immutability’ argument. It’s really very simple:

1. Bruce Jenner was a man who was attracted to women.
2. Bruce Jenner became a woman who is attracted to other women.
3. Hence, her sexuality changed from heterosexual to homosexual, and therefore sexuality is not immutable.
4. Therefore, it is ok to discriminate on the basis of sexuality.

* SPLC is so obviously another bigoted anti-white tribal outfit masquerading as civil rights group. Europeans are going through the same humiliation, whites in africa have already been defeated.

* They are a money machine via the lawsuits they gin up. They do better as the US judiciary gets more liberal Obama judges appointed. State level too as graduating lawyers are more liberal-left every year.

Posted in Blacks, BLM, Crime, SPLC | Comments Off on Never Mind the Bodies, SPLC Says: “Black Lives Matter Is Not a Hate Group”

What is Donald Trump’s favorite drink? White Russian. What’s Hillary’s? Black Mule.

Posted in Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on What is Donald Trump’s favorite drink? White Russian. What’s Hillary’s? Black Mule.

What’s The Correlation Between IQ And Success?

Coe79QhUsAABnJo

CofVt20UAAAKVft

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on What’s The Correlation Between IQ And Success?

Trump & Netanyahu

Steve Sailer writes: I’ve been pointing out for a long time that if you are looking for the foreign political leader whom Trump most seeks to emulate, it’s likely not Putin, Mussolini or Hitler, it’s the guy he made a campaign commercial for:

But the idea that the New Yorker Trump has followed Netanyahu’s massively publicized career and wishes to emulate it in an American context is apparently too mindblowingly out there for the press to deal with. Where do the really important issues — like the six-pointed star tweet — fit into this? How can Trump be the New Hitler if he’s (obviously) pro-Semitic? Trump’s concept that if nationalism is good for the Jews it’s good for the Americans too is far too alien for the media mind to contemplate.

On a another topic, I’d hardly be surprised if the Russian government had some kind of role in publishing the DNC emails. It’s kind of a tradition in Russian history to publish to the world foreign leaders’ secret documents. One of the first things Lenin and Trotsky did when the Bolsheviks came to power in 1917 was to publish the Czarist government’s secret diplomatic files, which caused much embarrassment to Russia’s ex-allies, France and Britain, when their plans for divvying up the spoils of war were revealed. I don’t have any proof who was behind recent releases of conversations by American diplomat Victoria Nuland on Ukraine and Anne Applebaum’s husband, the then foreign minister of Poland, on America, but they would fit within this tradition.

No doubt the Russians also have a more common tradition of keeping the results of espionage secret for blackmail, building atomic bombs, and other nefarious purposes, but the Russian government is rare among governments in having a tradition of posting stolen materials to the world.

COMMENTS:

* The helpful readers of the NY Times explained in the comments that Presidential candidates are NOT permitted to make jokes (how convenient for the humorless Hillary) involving foreign leaders because jokes don’t translate well (apparently neither does the text on “RESET” buttons). And that Trump is guilty of treason and should be tried and executed, or at the very least taken off the ballot so that the Republicans can nominate someone who is dull (even duller than Hillary) and beatable. It’s not fair of them to nominate someone like Trump.

* Part II is even better and is giving Leftists fainting spells (or at least their are feigning fake indignation) – Trump is disrespectful to a woman journalist, etc.

Here he makes utterly clear that he is speaking of past cybersleuthing – “if they have them, they have them” and is not encouraging future espionage. But the NY Times prints a dishonest headline anyway.

* The quote was out of context. A few minutes earlier he said that it was likely that the Russians had already hacked Hillary’s emails. So, at worst, he was not calling for the Russians to hack – but, to produce the fruits of their earlier hacking.

Of course, there is a switch here. The Hillary people are appalled that they might be released. But, if they were all personal as Hillary claims, there is no national security issue.

The anti-Hillary folks, who are supposedly convinced that Hillary deleted emails with state secrets, are the ones who think it is fine for the deleted emails to be released.

Trump did a corrective tweet afterwards saying the Russians should turn them over to the FBI. And that really is fine by any metric – if the Russians already have the deleted emails, turning them over to the FBI would bring out the truth without compromising national security.

* Trump does not suffer from the bear-baiting instinct and Russophobia that seems to be endemic among American bureaucrats and anyone else over a certain age in this country. Neither do I. I like Vladimir Putin, and I am not in the least concerned about any Russian “aggression” under his leadership. Only the Deep State is concerned about that, because Russia, as the last remaining Christian Great Power, is one of the largest threats to their globalist ideology. Ordinary people have nothing to fear from Putin.

The media’s reaction to Trump’s comments is literally hysterical in the Freudian sense—i.e. it is a neurotic reaction the desperately tries to repress what Trump is bringing to everyone’s consciousness, viz. that every foreign government in the world likely has Hillary Clinton’s emails and that SHE is the real threat to national security. The media blaming Trump for what Hillary actually did is a textbook case of transference. Oh Sigmund, why couldst thou not be living at this hour…

With that being said, I don’t think Trump was making a joke. I think he was reminding the media and Hillary of what we all already know to be the case but which must be suppressed for the sake of the narrative. One of the great difficulties in being a real Alpha male in this day and age—or even just having an intact, rational male psychology—is that no one ever actually “gets” you. They hear your words; but your point, your nuance, the inward form with which you imbue the words, are lost on all but a select few.

* The ABCNNBCBS crowd spun it on the nightly news that Trump was ASKING Russia to hack current political and government accounts.

Yes, I watched it, and NO, there’s no other way they were spinning it.

“Trump is asking a foreign government to attack US email accounts.”

This is, of course, BS. Trump was clearly referring to the missing 30k emails. Past tense.

* Compared to all the things they’ve thrown against the wall with regard to Trump this is nothing:

-raciis
-misogyny
-Megyn bleeding out of he you know what
-Birtherism
-Trump U swindles
-mocking disabled
-hating on Mexicans in general
-disrespecting La Raza judge
-anti Muslim
-insufficient respect for Black Lives Matter
-campaign manager manhandling reporter
-violence at rallies
-namecalling at debates
-Cruz mistress crisis plot
-attacks on Heidi Cruz
-small hands = small unit
-Atlantic City failure
-multiple bankruptcies
-multiple marriage
-not really a billionaire
-Melania plagiarism
-wont release tax returns
-undermining NATO

It’s also hard to explain in one sentence so non political junkies wont understand. It also calls attention to Hillary’s old email scandal which they want everyone to forget. It also brings more attention to the current email scandal which is so big that people haven’t even read all the emails yet. There’s more dirt to be revealed there. Mostly it appears to be a sign that they are running out of ideas. A much better strategy would be to continue calling out Trump as a racist for being a successful white male.

That poll today that showed Trump 47 Hillary 40 must have been a real gut punch for the Left; they’re beginning to realize that Hillary could really lose to someone they consider a clown.
If only they could turn back time to last October when Biden announced he wouldn’t run.

* In the movie, As Good as it Gets, Jack Nicholson plays a writer and someone asks him how he writes women so well. He replies, “I think of a man and I take away reason and accountability.”

Today’s press is feminized, often literally.

* I watched that press conference and thought trump was on his sterling A game. He’s great with the flippant insults, and then he did that John Lovitz bit. Great. He shall be The Great Entertainer if he wins; we have a hard time conceptualizing just how damn boring politicians are especially when they need not be because I suppose that’s the sea we swim in. Biden just gave a great speech though, that Irish verbal intensity. The other thing that struck me about Trump which I don’t think Trump mentioned is that asssange says he has emails that would get hillary arrested immediatly, and now Marsha Blackburn is calling to investigate the can of worms that is the Clinton foundation. Trump should remind people more frequently that Hillary is currently under investigation for stuff that might wind up sounding most like treason.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Trump & Netanyahu

Did Israel Lawmaker Just Call for Swimming Pool Apartheid?

Shocking! I thought Judaism was all about #onelove.

Forward: The leader of a local Israeli government council said Thursday that he doesn’t want to see Arabs using public swimming pools in his locality.

“I don’t hate Arabs, but I don’t want them at my pools,” Lower Galilee Regional Council head Motti Dotanhe told a radio station. “I don’t go to their pools, either.”

“If I’d come in a sleazy bathing suit, or if girls in bikinis come with me, it’s clear to you what will happen to them, so that’s why they’ll [Arabs] stay in their pools and my guys will stay in our pools.”

Dotan claimed that his comments had nothing to do with racism. “It’s cultural differences, it’s not racism… In non-Jewish, Arab culture, you go into the pool with clothes, trying to dictate all types of clothing, and that’s why it doesn’t suit us. The culture of cleanliness isn’t the same as ours. Why is that racist?” he asked.

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on Did Israel Lawmaker Just Call for Swimming Pool Apartheid?