Education and HBD in the NY Times

Lion of the Blogosphere:

1. In a high school in Greenville, South Carolina, the percent of students graduating from high school is rising. But it turns out, their performance on standardized tests is simultaneously falling. “Only one in 10 Berea students were ready for college-level work in reading, and about one in 14 were ready for entry-level college math.” The value of a high school diploma as a mechanism for certifying that the holder has some minimum level of ability becomes worthless if everyone is given a high school diploma.

The high school in the article is 38% white, 30% black and 28% Hispanic. The white students probably have parents who are too poor or too unconcerned about their children’s wellbeing to move to a better school district.

2. The West Windsor-Plainsboro Regional School District in New Jersey has the exact opposite problem. Too many Asian students. The students are 65% Asian.

A white parent told the NY Times, “My son was in fourth grade and told me, ‘I’m not going to amount to anything because I have nothing to put on my résumé.’” The district is trying to make the schools less stressful, and the Asian parents are complaining about that, saying that the whites are trying to “hold their children back.”

Asian parents just don’t understand the benefits of self-actualization.

COMMENTS:

* These people are miserable grinds. They are mostly memorizing things, and cheating a great deal. America was a pretty nice place without Asians, why is having them an improvement?

* I’m old and remember The West before 3rd world immigration began. It was a nice place. If Asians are so smart then why don’t they stay in Asia and make it a nice place? Why do they move to white countries?

* Because Jews have a higher verbal ability and appear to be more extroverted, they have dominated in fields such as Law, Academia and show business (which includes politics), not afforded to East Asians, and it appears this will remain in effect for a long time.

* Several advantages of north east asians come to mind:

a) low birth rate, unlike blacks or especially muslims (the latter breed like rabbits here in Germany)
b) lower aggressiveness than blacks and especially muslims (the MAOA-2R [“warrior gene”] allele has an occurrence of about 15% in the arab population, whereas it only occurs to about .1 to .5% in Europeans).
c) usually smart. They have a higher mean IQ than blacks or muslims, both being pretty dumb. Technical ability of muslims is quite low, unlike that of the average german, for example; north east asians have demonstrated that they, too, are able to invent stuff. I’ve got some Samsung screens and a phone, switches and routers from TP-Link (the latter running OpenWrt), so it’s OK. Muslim engineers or scientists in Germany are very rare (if at all), they won’t make it.

However, at the same time I want to retain my own cultural and genetic heritage. Germany has a very high culture, with great art, philosophy, literature and science having been produced over the last few hundred years. We shouldn’t throw that away because of lesser folks overrunning us (like the muslims in Germany). The Japanese even had readable authors like Akutagawa, Osamu Dazai or Natsume Soseki, and they have Schopenhauer and Heidegger societies. The complete opposite of muslims, who despise books and learning and greatness in general.

All in all it can be said that blacks and muslims are the worst immigrants a first world nation can have.

* Japan has a population of about 120 million out of well over a billion people in Asia. (A huge amount depends on how you define “Asia”, but the point stands.) For the most part, it’s best to take the attitude that when you get, say, a billion Chinese, you get China and not even the Chinese want to live there.

* Asians don’t understand parenting has no impact on life outcomes.

* No impact on adult IQ. I’m sure it impacts other outcomes, such as what college you can get into and how hard you will work to get through it.

* People of all races cheat in academics. But I am talking about tendencies and proportionality. Asians cheat much more on exams than whites, blacks, or latinos, disproportionately more. Google “Asian cheater stereotype” for more information. This is not to say Asians score better only due to cheating. They tend to be smarter, study harder, and cheat harder.

I grew up in NYC surrounded by all sorts of people and Asian abuse of welfare is well known. Asians are known to run cash businesses and don’t show income. They then use low income to qualify for low-income housing, food stamps, EITC, etc. Grandparents who have never given a dime to the US govt are brought over from China and instantly qualify for food stamps, medicare, and social security. Anchor babies are babies born in the US for the sole benefit of collecting citizen benefits w/o having to bear citizen duties.

I don’t think Asians are the worst people ever. They make better immigrants than most. But there is a myth of Asians being model minorities that don’t burden the US . This is not true.

* People of all races cheat in academics. But I am talking about tendencies and proportionality. Asians cheat much more on exams than whites, blacks, or latinos, disproportionately more. Google “Asian cheater stereotype” for more information. This is not to say Asians score better only due to cheating. They tend to be smarter, study harder, and cheat harder.

I grew up in NYC surrounded by all sorts of people and Asian abuse of welfare is well known. Asians are known to run cash businesses and don’t show income. They then use low income to qualify for low-income housing, food stamps, EITC, etc. Grandparents who have never given a dime to the US govt are brought over from China and instantly qualify for food stamps, medicare, and social security. Anchor babies are babies born in the US for the sole benefit of collecting citizen benefits w/o having to bear citizen duties.

I don’t think Asians are the worst people ever. They make better immigrants than most. But there is a myth of Asians being model minorities that don’t burden the US . This is not true.

* Will Whites or Asians win the battle of the ice people?

* The Jews will win. Asians will grind their way to doing fine. The whites may self destroy, otherwise they should do better then Asians. The Jews will do the best in this mess. However, if Trump wins and does his thing for 8 years it’s gonna be Jews, whites and Asians. Trump is gonna breath new life into white America, or at least this is what I think and this is why I vote for him.

* I’m not so optimistic that the Jews will win. A Trump victory could be a prelude to a further shift (after him) towards far-right nationalism that is hostile to Jews. Alternatively, a Hilary victory would speed up the third worldization of the United States. A U.S. filled with third worlders, many of them Muslims, could be very hostile to Jews. Of these two scenarios, I prefer the first in that at least some aspects of traditional American life would be preserved, just not for us. Seems like a good idea to keep the passport up to date and a packed bag ready in the closet.

* Jews are happy to know that their tribe dominate NYC and LA, two very important titan cities of specific industries of status: Wall St and Hollywood. No one cares about the south and flyover prole country in the grander scheme of things, where gentile proles call home.

East Asians have no place of their own, not even the Bay of Pigs in Silicon Valley, where Whites dominate the tech industry. Asians generally do not boss Whites in their cubicles.

* American nationalism is not hostile to Jews and never has been. Open borders will not only bring in more people hostile to Jews, but will also dilute Jewish political influence. If you vote on the basis of what’s good for the Jews, better vote Trump.

As T said, most Americans regard Jews as regular white folks, and can’t even tell they’re Jewish unless the Jews in question are of the whiny strident NY / NJ kind.

* I grew up in flyover country, and my family and the few other Jewish families who lived near us weren’t invisible. The “town gentry” were mostly very nice to us, but it was hit or miss among other strata of the population, Just about everyone in town went to church on Sundays (and Wednesdays), and everyone noticed that we didn’t This situation pertained in pre-Hitler Germany and Austria also. There were prominent politically liberal Jews in the large cities who aroused the ire of the rightwing nationalists, but there were also a lot of ordinary Jews living in small towns in places like Bavaria and Hesse. Most were outwardly assimilated and were patriotic, even nationalist. But of course we know that their neighbors turned on them in the end.

About Luke Ford

I've written five books (see Amazon.com). My work has been covered in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and on 60 Minutes. I teach Alexander Technique in Beverly Hills (Alexander90210.com).
This entry was posted in Asians, Diversity. Bookmark the permalink.