Aboriginal Violence & Censorship

Vesna Tenodi emails:

Dear Luke,

I came across your post about Australian Aborigines, found the article interesting, and the links informative.

I am an archaeologist and artist, based in Sydney, used to have a gallery in the Blue Mountains, now shut down due to Aboriginal violence and vandalism and the corruption in the Aboriginal industry.

Our ordeal started in 2009, and with the local council deciding to censor our art because some aborigines (especially those white people who nowadays pretend to be aborigines) were “offended”.

We kept fighting for our rights to create and display our art in front of our own private gallery, took the local council to land court (since local councils have no jurisdiction over art and it was unlawful decision). We lost and were forced to remove our “offensive sculpture”. Our case coincided with Andrew Bolt case (who “offended” white aborigines by pointing out that they are white) we both lost at the end of 2010 – but those two cases – our Wanjina Watchers in the Whispering Stone sculpture and Andrew’s court case, marked a beginning of change in people’s attitudes. Australians are no longer so willing to just accept all the nonsense we are forced to tolerate.

We’ve been proactively reclaiming our basic rights to academic and artistic freedom ever since; we have good support and achieved some success in raising awareness of these taboo issues. We keep urging Australian authorities to investigate corruption in the Aboriginal industry, and publish relevant material. I also publish articles regarding Australian prehistory in the American webzine Pleistocene Coalition News.

Posted in Aborigines, Australia | Comments Off on Aboriginal Violence & Censorship

Is Trump Hitler?

Paul Gottfried writes: Lately I’ve been looking at the nasty stuff that the neocon-Republican establishment has been throwing at the Donald to bring down his poll numbers. Some of it is so ridiculous that it points not to any failing in a controversial presidential candidate but to the narrow twilight world in which the establishment’s lackeys are comfortably nestled together. An utterly self-defeating attack has come from that decrepit “conservative” icon, George Will, who in his nonage has given up wearing his once accustomed bow-tie but continues to be an insufferable bore. George has warned ad infinitum that Trump is “no true conservative.” If he were, he would be rallying to the established positions of the established Republican Party and perhaps divvying up his fortune with Jeb Bush, who was Will’s favorite candidate for president, as long as Jeb showed signs of life. What is more, Trump by leading an insurgency against the GOP establishment might contribute to “the destruction of the Republican Party.” Since that party and its current leadership are the true guides to what is “conservative,” Trump is in fact destroying conservatism, which is presumably dependent on that living oracle, the RNC. Needless to say, George misses or pretends not to see that most of the Right despises his living oracle and may be supporting Trump precisely because he may bring about what Will conjures up as a nightmare. His nightmare is the hope of others.

An even dumber strategy has come from Jonah Goldberg, who has just announced that “no movement that embraces Trump can call itself conservative.” Apparently, Jonah’s glaringly leftist positions on social issues, including gay marriage, in no way conflict with his right to determine the nature of conservatism—or his right to call Trump on TV “the bane of humanity.” Jonah has also reached for some bewildering historical analogies in his diatribes against the Donald. Indeed his historical parallels are so obscure as to leave his probable readers running to Wikipedia for enlightenment.

Okay, let’s give Jonah the right to belabor his strained comparison of Trump to Mussolini. Other establishment journalists are using it, and his readers may have heard of the interwar fascist leader who fell into Hitler’s clutches. This doesn’t mean of course that there is any substance in the comparison drawn (the last I heard Trump was not replacing the Constitution with a corporate national state). But at least Jonah’s likely readers, who are GOP junkies and for the most part culturally illiterate, might have encountered il Duce’s name somewhere, perhaps on a quiz show or in an undergraduate course on twentieth-century history at Jonah’s alma mater Goucher College.

But how does the average reader of Jonah’s pap deal with such scare figures as Huey Long and (I’m kidding you not!) Father Coughlin? In a recent column Jonah warns that by advancing Trump, we may be giving prominence to a dangerous populist like the interwar Louisiana Senator or the anti-Semitic demagogue Father Coughlin. Now I’m not here to defend either the flamboyant Long or the Michigan priest who slammed Wall Street and Jewish capitalists in the 1930s (before going back to being a New Deal Democrat). But I can’t imagine that most under-eighty Americans, or perhaps anyone but aging Jewish liberals who attend Bernie Sanders rallies or subscribe to Commentary, would have heard of Jonah’s villains. Perhaps that is the group that Jonah is reaching out to.

I’ve encountered even dumber historical comparisons coming out of conservatism, inc., for example, by Goldberg’s frenetic companion-in-arms Glenn Beck. This yap show host, with a pleading voice that is perpetually about to crack, has had pictures projected on to a wall behind him of Hillary Clinton and German existential philosopher Martin Heidegger. Beck’s viewers were urged to look at these juxtaposed pictures, to understand why American democracy is now in danger. It would surprise me if Beck, who’s been ranting against Trump for several months now, hasn’t added a photo of the Donald to his Rogues’ Gallery. Once again I can’t see how this linkage of current GOP villains to dead historical figures, whom one’s audience is not likely to have heard of, can assist the GOP cause. I won’t dwell on the by now minor problem that the historical figures we’re supposed to boo have generally been misrepresented.

In view of these clumsy assaults on Trump, I must compliment the Washington Post syndicated columnist Richard Cohen for comparing Trump to someone whose name we would know, namely Adolf Hitler. Cohen started the “Trump is like Hitler” routine as early as April, 2011, before this comparison had taken off in the national press. He’s had to work hard to make this comparison sound plausible. And certain obvious difficulties remain, for example the impossibility of finding anti-Semitism in Trump’s background or the absence in his rhetoric of anything resembling the Nazis’ expansionist foreign policy. I don’t even know whether Trump can speak German with Hitler’s Upper Austrian accent. Although Cohen’s view of two parallel lives may not convince all of us, among certain readers even paranoid fantasy can pass for truth.

It make no difference if I, as someone with an impoverished imagination, can’t think of anything that would make Trump and Hitler seem similar, except for the facts that both talked about unemployment and threats to the homeland, shared the same gender and had hair on their heads. Cohen’s comparison can catch on, because his readers know who Hitler was, that is, a very evil man who killed lots of people and, perhaps even worse, made politically insensitive remarks. If a journalist wants to pummel Trump with poisonous darts, then at least come up with a usable historical comparison. Don’t bring up liberal villains who aren’t even featured on the History Channel. Just go for the big H.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Is Trump Hitler?

British lawmakers will soon debate whether to ban Donald Trump from the U.K.

I can’t wait for Donald Trump to be elected president so he can tell these pompous twits to get lost and to pay for their own defense. They’ve been sucking on the American tit for too long. Grow up mates! Time for America to leave NATO.

Washington Post:

In an unusually disdainful statement, London’s Metropolitan Police said, “Mr. Trump could not be more wrong.”

London Mayor Boris Johnson, a member of the right-wing Conservative Party who is tipped by some to be the next British leader, also responded: “The only reason I wouldn’t go to some parts of New York is the real risk of meeting Donald Trump.”

British Prime Minister David Cameron described Trump’s comments as “divisive, stupid and wrong.”

But the petition to ban Trump from entering Britain could go beyond words. The British Home Office really does reserve the right to refuse entry to foreigners coming to the country to speak under the unacceptable behaviors or extremism exclusion policy.

Anti-Muslim American speakers such as Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer have been blocked from entering the country by these rules before, as have extremist Islamic preachers and others whose presence the home secretary has decided would “not be conducive to the public good.”

Some prominent politicians, including Jack Dromey, home affairs spokesman of the opposition Labour Party, and Natalie Bennett, leader of the Green Party, have backed the proposed Trump ban.

To an American reader, banning someone from entering the country because of words they’ve uttered may seem extreme, but Britain and much of Europe have a very different attitude toward free speech. There has been some debate in the country as to whether to ban the Islamic State’s signature flag, for example. In theory, at least, anti-Muslim sentiment is dealt with just as seriously.

Posted in Donald Trump, England, Islam | Comments Off on British lawmakers will soon debate whether to ban Donald Trump from the U.K.

Aboriginal Violence, Aboriginal Censorship

When I was growing up at Avondale College, if an abo gave you a hard time, you took him and his family on a lengthy walkabout and explained to him that the white man now ruled the land. If that didn’t work, we made him listen to five hours of my dad’s lectures on righteousness by faith. That always sorted them out.

A report from down under:

It took four long years, but during the second half of 2012 we started seeing the good results of our awareness-raising campaign. In 2009 Goomblar Wylo decided to tell the truth about Australian Aborigines, for the DreamRaiser Trilogy. His honesty and courage served as an example and inspiration to other brave Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people, who have stepped forward to repeat, confirm and expand on the truth as told by him, about the extent of damage done by Aboriginal hatred and violence, and political correctness gone mad. Recommended articles:

Donald Richardson and Vesna Tenodi: Aboriginal Harassment of International Artists – Open letter to Australian and Polish authorities

Elizabeth Farrelly: Protecting a cultural right to abuse

Donald Richardson and Vesna Tenodi: Aboriginal Violence against Australian Artists

Stephanie Jarrett: Brutal traditions of Aboriginal culture have no place in society today

Kerryn Pholi: Silencing Dissent Inside the Aboriginal Industry

Keith Windshuttle: Sacred Traditions Invented Yesterday

Kerryn Pholi – a former “Professional Aborigine” talks about reverse racism

Alison Anderson: My people must grow up

Bess Price: Cry from the heart

Following the Aboriginal attacks on the Prime Minister on Australia Day 2012, we have received a great number of enquiries about Aboriginal violence in general and their bad behaviour in the Blue Mountains in particular.

We cannot respond to each individual enquiry, but here is a link to a very informative website:

Australian Database of Indigenous Violence

For a wide range of current affairs and indigenous issues, discussed in the context of current political correctness which is paralysing Australian society, visit:

Quadrant Online – the leading general intellectual journal of ideas

Our case and harassment of ModroGorje artists belong to an entirely new level of violence, which has been going on for quite some time, but has stayed under the radar and was allowed to continue unreported.

We have achieved a great outcome for all Australian artists. After years and decades of being lied to, the Australian public has become aware that there is no copyright of any ancient imagery – or even more recent art, 70 years after the artist’s death. There is no copyright on styles and designs, there is no ownership of ideas, and nobody needs Aboriginal permission to create art and sell their own work.

The public has now been made aware that many forms of violence against non-Aboriginal artists and ‘disobedient’ writers and free-thinkers are legally and morally unfounded.

There is a growing number of indigenous and non-indigenous Australians striving to change the current reality of bad attitudes, violent behaviour and self-destructive Aboriginal conduct.

As a result, a database is now being compiled, with details of specific cases of violence against intellectuals, artists, writers, journalists, and small business owners in Australia, to be available soon.

vesna

vesna1

Posted in Aborigines, Australia, Censorship | Comments Off on Aboriginal Violence, Aboriginal Censorship

Race Takes Center Stage In American Politics

Eduardo Porter writes for the New York Times:

Race, of course, has shaped political choices for a long time. The Republican takeover of the South is understood by scholars as a reaction to whites’ sense of betrayal after the Democratic push for desegregation under President Lyndon Johnson.

Racial animosity has long helped foster a unique mistrust of government among white Americans. Nonwhite voters mostly like what the government does. But many white Americans, researchers have found, would rather not have a robust government if it largely seems to serve people who do not look like them.

Americans owe their unusually minimalist state in large measure to racial mistrust. As the economists Alberto Alesina and Edward Glaeser put it in an important paper, European countries are much more generous to the poor relative to the United States mainly because of American racial heterogeneity. “Racial animosity in the U.S. makes redistribution to the poor, who are disproportionately black, unappealing to many voters,” they wrote.

The eminent sociologist William Julius Wilson described two decades ago how race and economics collided. In the United States, he wrote, white taxpayers have opposed welfare because they see themselves “as being forced, through taxes, to pay for stuff for blacks that many of them could not afford for their own families.”

Scholars have found evidence for these attitudes all over the place.

For instance, Julian Betts of the University of California, San Diego and Robert Fairlie of the University of California,Santa Cruz found that for every four immigrants entering public high schools, one native student switched to a private school.

Daniel Hungerman from the University of Notre Dame found that all-white congregations became less charitable as the share of black residents in the community rose.

Perhaps because they have relied more on government programs and protections, members of minority groups have decidedly different beliefs about supporting social solidarity. Another study published by the Pew center in November found that 62 percent of white Americans would like the government to be smaller and provide fewer services. Only 32 percent of blacks and 26 percent of Hispanics agreed.

Notably, minorities in the United States have never held much power. They are unlikely to feel that political influence to direct and constrain what government does is slipping away.

The rich democracies of the West are living through strange times. In Europe, voters are increasingly drawn to xenophobic politics, driven, according to the former German foreign minister Joschka Fischer, by fear “based on the instinctive realization that the ‘white man’s world’ — a lived reality assumed by its beneficiaries as a matter of course — is in terminal decline.”

Right-wing parties, Mr. Fischer added, are replacing the notion of a nation built on a shared commitment to a common constitutional and legal order with an ethnic definition of nationhood, derived from common descent and religion. White Europeans, in other words, are circling the wagons.

A few years ago it looked as if the United States — long more tolerant of immigration, with a more fluid sense of national identity that readily allowed for hyphenation — could avoid this turn.

But judging by this year’s political debate, held against the background of improving but still insufficient prosperity, Americans are moving in the same direction. Racial identity and its attendant hostilities appear to be jumping from their longstanding place in the background of American politics to the very center of the stage.

Posted in America, Politics, Race | Comments Off on Race Takes Center Stage In American Politics

What is with these midwestern women?

From Breitbart: TEL AVIV – A Michigan woman posted a video on YouTube defending Palestinian stabbing attacks against Jews and compared Jews to animals.

In the Arabic-language video (watch it here) translated by MEMRI and titled “Is stabbing Jews haram [forbidden]?”, pro-Palestinian activist Lina Allan blasts Muslims who say that stabbing is “haram,” or forbidden under Islamic law, and tells such Muslims to “go back to watching Turkish soap operas.”

“I support any decision made by the Palestinian people in order to regain its rights and its land,” said Lina Allan in reference to the act of stabbing Jews.

Throughout the video, Allan does not use the word “Israelis” in her description of the stabbing attacks, choosing instead to use the word “Jews.”

“Some people have commented on the Palestinians’ stabbing of Jews by saying that it is haram, that it is prohibited,” Allan said in the video.

“Who are you to say what is halal [permissible] and what is haram,” she asked critics of stabbing attacks. “Sadly, there are many people in the Arab world who think that just because their mother and father are Muslim, they themselves automatically became muftis, and are allowed to say what is halal and what is haram — according to their whims and personal desires, of course.”

“If they like smoking, they pronounce cigarettes halal; and if they hate cigarettes, they pronounce them haram,” she said.

She compares those who believe stabbings are prohibited under Islam to defenders of “animal rights – not human rights, but at best, animal rights.”

“Let me tell you, even animals would not object to this if they could talk,” she continues.

“Nobody can feel the suffering of the Palestinian people but the Palestinians living in Palestine,” Allan admonishes fellow Muslims. “I wish that you would stop interfering. Spare us your views, and go back to watching Turkish soap operas. It would be better if you didn’t talk about something you don’t understand.”

According to MEMRI, Allan represented the State Department’s US-Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI) at the Jameed Festival in Jordan, a food and culture event honoring rural women.

Posted in Islam | Comments Off on What is with these midwestern women?

What Are The Causes Of Insecurity?

Dr. Gerald Stein writes:

Insecurity is in the nature of being human. It is a commonplace, even if most people make a serious effort to disguise it. Too many things to know, too many to learn, too many rejections — most everyone has had significant experience of the things that undermine confidence. But, what makes for more than the usual amount of insecurity? What contributes to some people becoming “insecure?” Here are a few of its causes:

Temperament: Little human personalities can be different from the moment of birth. Just as not all children have the same color eyes or hair, neither do they have the same temperament. Pre-school kids have distinctive and lasting characteristics on such dimensions as being reactive vs. calm, tending to approach or avoid new situations, and being introverted or extroverted. While not guaranteeing fractured confidence as an adult, inborn qualities can make a contribution to it.
Overly Critical Parenting: Security can be undermined by parents who are too critical, neglectful, or frankly abusive. Sometimes neglect is unavoidable, as it tends to be in families where there are lots of children or the parents are working long hours outside of the home to put food on the table. But sometimes the insecurity develops because of something more subtle. If you are born to extroverted parents and you are introverted (while your siblings are more like your folks), you may feel like an odd-duck, not quite fitting in. If your dad was hoping for an athlete and you are an artist, the same sense of parental disappointment might be hard to miss.
Bullying: Kids can be targeted by the classmates for all sorts of reasons including the way they look, where they live, how they dress; and racial, religious, or ethnic differences. Gender matters too, especially if you are the sole female in a physics class with a wise-guy classmate who makes fun of you and a teacher who hasn’t the capability to stop it, as I witnessed back in high school.
Body Image: In a society filled with spectacularly beautiful advertising images, it is difficult to be plain; and worse yet, unattractive in any way. Too tall, too skinny, too fat — God help you. Too much acne, bad hair, a lack of finely-tuned motor coordination, same problem. Some of us continue to see ourselves in terms of that early self and struggle with the sense of insecurity produced back then.
Learning Problems: This can take the form of a learning disability, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), or even being average in a school filled with high achievers.
Multiple Changes of Residence: Being the new kid is not usually fun, especially for introverted young people who struggle with fitting in and finding friends. Insecurity can follow.
Parental Overprotection: When parents prevent their children from doing things that are simply a part of growing up, they can communicate to the child that he isn’t up to the task. Moreover, they rob the young one of the chance to grow from experience, learn what he needs to know in the social sphere, and become more confident. He may also be at risk of being seen as “different” by his peers, because he is the kid who “isn’t allowed” to do things most other parents freely permit.

Posted in Psychology | Comments Off on What Are The Causes Of Insecurity?

NYT: Coordinated Attacks on Women in Cologne Were Unprecedented, Germany Says

New York Times:

BERLIN — German authorities said on Tuesday that coordinated attacks in which young women were sexually harassed and robbed by hundreds of young men on New Year’s Eve in the western city of Cologne were unprecedented in scale and nature.

The assault, which went largely unreported for days, set off a national outcry after the Cologne police described the attackers as young men “who appeared to have a North African or Arabic” background, based on testimony from victims and witnesses. More than 90 people have filed legal complaints, the police said on Tuesday.

The police in Hamburg also said that 10 women had reported being sexually assaulted and robbed in a similar fashion on the same night, and they urged witnesses to come forward.

Germany took in more than one million migrants last year, and with the country struggling to deal with the political, social and wider consequences of the influx, the delayed public response has led to concerns that the authorities were playing down the seriousness of the assault to prevent it from becoming a point of contention in the broader debate.

The assault took place late on Thursday on the vast public square in front of the city’s main train station, a central transit point for anyone coming or going from a fireworks display over the Rhine and the bars and nightclubs in the heart of the city, in the shadow of its landmark cathedral.

Heiko Maas, Germany’s justice minister, warned on Tuesday against linking the assaults to the influx of refugees, saying that the ethnicity of the perpetrators was irrelevant.

“The rule of the law does not look at where someone comes from but what they did,” Mr. Maas told reporters in Berlin. “We will investigate what circles the perpetrators may have come from.”

The Cologne police say they believe several hundred men, ages 15 to 35, were involved in the violence that began in the early hours of the New Year, after the square was cleared because men had been throwing firecrackers into the crowd.

Wolfgang Albers, Cologne’s chief of police, said the assaults had taken place in the chaos that followed, as the square was emptied. The men appeared to have broken into smaller groups, the police said, with each one encircling a woman; while some would grope the victim, others would steal her wallet or cellphone.

One victim reported that she had been raped, the police said.

Henriette Reker, Cologne’s mayor, called a crisis meeting on Tuesday to address the issue. Ms. Reker, who was stabbed during a campaign event in October by an attacker who opposed her welcoming attitude toward migrants, called the assault “absolutely intolerable” and pledged her support for the authorities’ investigation.

The city holds a large festival every year before Easter, when thousands of costumed revelers throng the streets to celebrate with parades and parties, and Ms. Reker echoed the concerns of many about safety during the Carnival season.

In an effort to prevent further violence, Ms. Reker said that city officials would begin working on measures to help young women protect themselves and to explain the city’s attitudes and norms to its many newcomers.

“We will explain our Carnival much better to people who come from other cultures,” she said, “so there won’t be any confusion about what constitutes celebratory behavior in Cologne, which has nothing to do with a sexual frankness.”

Cologne, with roughly one million inhabitants, is among Germany’s most ethnically diverse cities, and it took in more than 10,000 refugees last year, many of them young men from Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria. The city authorities said they would increase security after the assaults, as they continued to search for suspects.

The euphoria that accompanied the first wave of arrivals in Germany this summer has since given way to growing unease about the difficulty of integrating hundreds of thousands of people of a different religion and who were raised in a different culture.

Far-right and anti-immigrant groups in Germany, and others who oppose the influx, swiftly seized on the episode, saying it demonstrated the dangers associated with accepting huge numbers of migrants.

Lutz Bachmann, head of the anti-immigrant Pegida movement, accused German leaders on Twitter of complicity in the assault. In a post that named Ms. Merkel; her deputy, Sigmar Gabriel; and other politicians, Mr. Bachmann said, “You are all responsible for the abuse in Cologne!”

Posted in Germany, Immigration, Islam, Rape | Comments Off on NYT: Coordinated Attacks on Women in Cologne Were Unprecedented, Germany Says

Jonah Goldberg: It’s time to put the term ‘neocon’ out to pasture

You know a term is a dirty word when its proponents want it put out to pasture.

Jonah Goldberg is a neo-con. By no means, is he conservative. Neo-cons were behind the disastrous Afghan and Iraq invasions of 2002 and 2003 respectively.

During the 1980s, “liberal” became a dirty word, so Americans left of center embraced the term “progressive” instead.

During the 1970s and 1980s, neo-cons took over the conservative movement, moving it left. Neo-cons now dominate the Republican party.

As Burt Blumert put it: “Neocons, as ex-Trotskyites, are bad enough, but those who follow the pro-pagan Leo Strauss are deadly. He advocated the Big Lie. Forgive me for all the gory details, but these people – with their other leaders like Bill Buckley and Irving Kristol and the help of the CIA – perverted the American right into loving the welfare-warfare state.”

What does it mean to be conservative? To be against equality. Conservatives are against equality and against nation building. Neo-cons are for equality and for imposing democracy and western values at the point of a gun.

Most Jews are not neo-conservatives. Neo-cons account for a tiny proportion of Jews but they are immensely influential due to their money, brains, energy and cohesion. It is much easier to get a job as a public intellectual if you are a neo-con than if you are a conservative like Paul Gottfriend.

Gottfriend is particularly biting about Jonah Goldberg and other Fox News neo-cons.

Jonah Goldberg writes:

In interviews and on the stump, Sen. Ted Cruz likes to attack President Obama, Hillary Clinton and “some of the more aggressive Washington neocons” for their support of regime change in the Middle East.

Every time we topple a dictator, Cruz argues, we end up helping terrorists or extremists.

He has a point. But what interests me is his use of the word neocon. What does he really mean?

Some see dark intentions. “He knows that the term in the usual far-left and far-right parlance means warmonger, if not warmongering Jewish advisers, so it is not something he should’ve done,” former Bush advisor Elliott Abrams told National Review. Another former Bush advisor calls the term “a dog whistle.”

I think that’s all a bit overblown. Cruz is just trying to criticize his opponent Marco Rubio, who supported regime change in Libya.

But Abrams is right – and Cruz surely knows – that “neocon” has become code for suspiciously Hebraic super-hawk. That’s absurd and absurdly reductive. So maybe it’s time we retired the term, which is now a catchall for “things I don’t like.”

At first, neocons weren’t particularly associated with foreign policy. They were intellectuals disillusioned by the folly of the Great Society. As Irving Kristol famously put it, a “neoconservative is a liberal who was mugged by reality.” The Public Interest, the first neoconservative publication, co-edited by Kristol, was a wonkish domestic policy journal.

Kristol later argued that neoconservatism was not an ideology but a “persuasion.” William F. Buckley, the avatar of supposedly authentic traditional conservatism, agreed. The neocons, he explained, brought the new language of sociology to an intellectual tradition that had been grounded more in Aristotelian thinking.

The neocon belief in democracy promotion grew out of disgust with Richard Nixon’s détente and Jimmy Carter’s fecklessness, but hardly amounted to knee-jerk interventionism. When Jeane Kirkpatrick articulated a theory of neoconservative foreign policy in Commentary magazine in 1979, she cautioned that it was unwise to demand rapid libertalization in autocratic countries, and that gradual change was a more realistic goal than immediate transformation.

Posted in Jews, Jonah Goldberg, Neoconservatives, Paul Gottfried | Comments Off on Jonah Goldberg: It’s time to put the term ‘neocon’ out to pasture

Cumberland County HIV positive black man ordered to trial on new charges of raping child, airing it on the internet

REPORT: It took only a few minutes Monday for a district judge to order William C. Byers Augusta to stand trial in Cumberland County Court on new charges linked to the rape of a 6-year-old boy that was aired over the internet.

The child rape and conspiracy counts were the third set of offenses police filed against the North Middleton Township man, who is accused of acting with an HIV-positive Harrisburg man, 61-year-old Ira Task, in orchestrating and broadcasting the assaults.

Public Defender John Shugars, who represents the 19-year-old Byers Augusta, stipulated with Assistant District Attorney Nathan Boob that an affidavit of probable cause listing the accusations against Byers Augusta correctly outlines the testimony the alleged victim would present if called to the witness stand.

That stipulation spared the child from appearing before Fegley, Shugars noted. He said both sides agreed to allow Fegley to determine whether to send the new charges on to county court based only on the information in the affidavit, although he stressed that this client wasn’t admitting guilt.

Posted in AIDS, Blacks, Crime, Homosexuality | Comments Off on Cumberland County HIV positive black man ordered to trial on new charges of raping child, airing it on the internet