Only a tiny number of Jews engage in radical politics, but when they do, they wreak immense destruction (communism and its genocides, for example, as well as the end of prayer in public American schools, the removal of Christianity from America’s public spaces, etc). The goyim who are racially aware hate organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), and the Simon Wiesenthal Center, which are waging war on non-Jewish forms of nationalism.
* Why don’t the Southern Law Poverty Centre (the name apparently derives from government funding lawyers could get to sue on behalf of poor people) mention Harpending’s explanation for the obvious superiority of Ashkenazim over gentiles and non-Ashkenazim. The SPLC are conflating the views of Harpending with those of Kevin MacDonald. MacDonald is the one who talks about Jewish intelligence being the result of eugenic practices, Harpending’s book is arguing the opposite.
* They make most of their money scaring old Jewish ladies into giving money so the SPLC can prevent the next Holocaust.
* The SPLC is a hyper-ethnic Jewish Organization waging hyper-ethnic Jewish warfare against The Historic Native Born White Christian American Majority.
* Dees was brought up by a radical-Left Jewish family, and got the usual hardLeft, anti-White socialization therefrom. In fact, he’s primarily a figurehead; the two main movers and shakers at the $PLC are Heidi Beirach and Mark Potok, both Jew-communist lawyers. I exchanged a few e-mails with Heidi B. when she was trying to put the slam on Kevin MacDonald; she’s a nasty piece of work. Then there’s an outer circle of largely symbolic White shabbatz goyim and even a Latino or two, to provide the usual rainbow flavor. Basically $PLC is a Jew-controlled, communist-front hedge fund whose principal purpose (aside from collecting shekels) is to smother White opposition to the anti-White immigration rackets. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. Jews do not intend to be pogrom’d. Or ghetto’d. Or holocaust’d. Ever. Again. Low-IQ Blacks and Mestizos they can easily control; Asians – Chinese in particular – are, like the (out-of-Asia ) Ashkenazic Jews – high IQ and savage collectivists. They get along just fine. Whites’ central tendency is (cf. KMac) altruism + individualism, making of them a potential lethal threat to the Jews’ age-old universalist goal of the Destruction of the Nations. So they must be eliminated, and the $PLC (and hundreds of other Jewish Tribal organizations) is here to help. Not to mention our entire, Zion-owned political and chattering class.
* Societies succeed because they’ve built up, usually over centuries, a widely accepted and practiced set of behaviors; social capital built up of predictable actions and attitudes and beliefs. The core of the culture.
Immigrants who do not have that ingrained culture are likely to be destructive of social capital and destructive to the host society. Despite the gibberish of the lunatic left most people recognize this and quite rightly reject the attempt to destroy their society in pursuit of a crazed political fantasy.
* The Fraser Institute came out with their Human Freedom Index, using 76 distinct indicators of personal and economic freedom. All 17 Anglo-Germanic nations (not including Liechtenstein) finish in the top 22. This is how the 7 nations in question ranked:
#3. Finland
#8. Ireland
#12. Austria
#25. Portugal
#33. France
#34. Italy
#37. Spain
1. Melbourne
2. Vienna
3. Vancouver
4. Toronto
5. Calgary
5. Adelaide
7. Sydney
8. Perth
9. Auckland
10. Helsinki
10. Zurich
All 11 cities are in the Anglo-Germanic world, including one each from Austria and Finland. Needless to say, no Latin cities made the list.
These two studies add to the mountain of evidence that the Anglo-Germanic countries (and cities) totally dominate all international standard of living/quality of life rankings. And Ireland, Finland and Austria consistently cluster with the rest of the Anglo-Germanic world, while France, Italy, Spain and Portugal don’t.
* Northwest Europe has Nordic-Germanic-Protestant core that consists of Scandinavia, Germany, Holland and Britain, and a periphery that includes Finland, the Alpine States, Belgium, Luxembourg, Ireland and the Anglo settler societies. So even though Finland, Ireland and Austria are partial outliers in a cultural sense, they clearly belong to the Anglo-Germanic family of nations in a way that the Latin countries don’t.
I’m arguing that the Hajnal line divides Eastern Europe from Western Europe as a whole, not just Northwest Europe. You say that there is variation within the Hajnal line region. Absolutely. Above all, there is a major cultural fault line that divides Nordic-Germanic-Protestant Northwest Europe from Mediterranean-Latin-Catholic Southwest Europe, and the Hajnal line divides both from Alpine-Slavic-Orthodox Eastern Europe.
One major difference between Northwest and Southwest Europeans is racial phenotype. The latter are generally shorter and darker than the former. All of the Anglo-Germanic nations average 50% or more of their native (or white in the case of the Anglo settler societies) population having either light-coloured hair (blond, red, light brown) or light-coloured eyes (blue, green, grey). None of the Latin nations do.
Of the 7 nations in question, the percentage of each having light-coloured hair or eyes is:
Finland: 85%
Ireland: 60%
Austria: 54%
France: 43%
Italy: 23%
Spain: 19%
Portugal: 16%
As for average height (in this case for 20 year-old males), the Anglo-Germanic nations all fall between 174.3 and 181 cms. The tallest Latin nation is shorter than the shortest Anglo-Germanic nation. Here’s how the 7 nations in question fared:
Finland: 178.4 cms
Austria: 177 cms
Ireland: 175 cms
France: 174.1 cms
Italy: 173.2 cms
Spain: 172 cms
Portugal: 170.5 cms
A couple more economic lists, both taken from Wikipedia, showing that Finland, Ireland and Austria cluster with the other Anglo-Germanic nations near the top, and consistently beat France, Italy, Spain and Portugal in these crucial indices.
Per Capita Income:
Ireland: $53,462
Austria: $51,307
Finland: $49,497
France: $44,538
Italy: $35,823
Spain: $30,278
Portugal: $22,130
Unemployment Rate:
Austria: 5.7%
Finland: 9.4%
Ireland: 9.7%
France: 10.5%
Italy: 12.4%
Portugal: 13%
Spain: 22.7%
And finally, from your post on the worldwide distribution of personality:
The Anglo-Germanic nations, including Finland, Ireland and Austria, all cluster near the Linear-Active cultural type, while the Latin nations lean towards the Multi-Active node.
So in terms of racial phenotype, linguistic group, religious heritage, history, geography, culture, politics, economics, intelligence, trustworthiness, personality, temperament etc etc, Finland, Ireland and Austria are clearly part of the Anglo-Germanic/Northwest European world. And–just as clearly–the Latin nations are not. There is not just one meta-culture inside the Hajnal line, but two: the Anglo-Germanics in the northwest and the Latins in the southwest.
* Psychometrics is a mathematically centered field dealing with issues of measurement. [Richard] Lynn has not, to my knowledge, made contributions to that field.
Psychologists who studies group, particularly racial, differences, yes, he is the last of the three grand old men (Jensen and Rushton being the other two).
Lynn’s style is a broad stokes style (see the interview of Lynn by Nyborg). His focus is on the big picture. His books contains loads of errors, many of which has been pointed out on the internet. With errors corrected, the big picture remains the same however. For some more even-handed dealing with the errors, read the works by Jason Malloy. Malloy have done a series of high quality reviews of IQ and achievement scores by country. Malloy’s style is clearly that of a perfectionists. The problem is that Malloy is such a slow worker that his reviews cover only a small fraction of nations.
* Prof. Richard Lynn seems to have published a vast number of scholarly articles and books on IQ issues, and indeed Prof. Helmuth Nyborg described Lynn and his frequent collaborator Prof. Tatu Vanhanen as “undisputed and widely respected leaders of the field” of IQ studies. A few years ago, a scholarly journal devoted its entire issue to his lifelong achievements in that topic, and last year John Derbyshire published a long article summarizing his long career as part of a Festschrift. Among numerous other things, Lynn seems to have been the original discoverer of the very important “Flynn Effect,” which is therefore sometimes also called the Lynn-Flynn Effect.
So Lynn certainly seems one of the world’s leading scholars in IQ studies, and being ignorant of the nuances of that field, I tend to call him a “psychometrician,” but perhaps there’s a more appropriate term to use.
