Free speech is good when it helps Jews and bad when it hurts Jews.
Roger Cukierman is not an anomaly among Jews. Jews have not survived and prospered for thousands of years by boosting free speech.
Cukierman is probing for weakness among the American goyim. Think of him as the ADL’s tool. If the ADL and the SPLC and the SWC could, they would dramatically restrict speech in America. Most rabbis would take this approach.
On March 1st, Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff said: “It’s amazing that in the computer, there isn’t automatic censorship. Why do I have to see terrible language blogged in to some article?”
More rabbis would take this approach than not. If you are a part of a traditional Jewish community, you know that free expression is not encouraged.
The traditional Jewish way has been for rabbis to run communities. They have usually not been pleased with criticism and they’ve been quit to expel and anathematize rebels.
Chaim Amalek: “Yidden beware! This crackdown on hate speech might redound against us! Goyim will say that our torah has hate speech with respect to Hamanites and Amalekites, whom Hashem has commanded us to exterminate down to the tiniest baby sleeping in its grandmother’s arms, as we must teach to our kinder. The goyim might then use the law to force us to censor our Torah! We should no more try to control the speech of the goy than we should attempt to teach talmud to fish.”
NEW YORK – The head of France’s largest Jewish organization called on Americans to combat online hate speech, in an advertisement in The New York Times.
In the advertisement in Monday’s paper, titled “An appeal to our American Friends,” Roger Cukierman, who heads the Representative Council of French Jewish Institutions, an umbrella group, wrote that following the deaths of four of his co-religionists in a terrorist attack in Paris in January, “French Jews fear for their safety, their integrity, their dignity, and their future.”
This is widely known in the United States and many have asked how they can help, he continued, asserting that the best way to do so would be to “help us defuse the hate where it moves most freely – on the Internet.”
“On the Internet, anti-Semitic ravings, rooted in centuries old myths such as the rich Jew and the powerful Jew go unchecked,” he wrote, averring that both resentment of Jews and jihadism thrive online.
Only several clicks on Google can bring one to pages full of conspiracy theories, including ones linking Jews to the 9/11 attacks and old canards like The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which can be “liked” with impunity, he said.
Given that the hosts of much of this content are American firms that are subject to American law, France’s friends here must “convince them to set a limit to this swarm of hate.”
Cukierman added that, while freedom of speech is a core American value, it must be possible to crack down on online hate “without inhibiting” free expression.
The French communal leader called on Internet corporations to remove anti-Semitic content as soon as it is flagged and for the technology sector to “conform, in each country they are present, to the laws of democracies faced with anti-Semitism.”
Many European nations maintain much stricter controls on hate speech than the United States. In France “we have many ways to fight hatred directed at Jews” in the local press, but very little recourse against a “web woven across the Atlantic,” he added.
“Freedom of speech is not freedom to hate” or to “incite murder,” he concluded, likening the battle against anti-Semitism to efforts made to ban child pornography.
