* Konrad Adenauer and his family would pray every night in Bavaria for the defeat of the Third Reich as the War raged. I’d do my part here, but is there a British or American Army(C.1945) coming our way?
* Expel, deport all Mohammedans.
Why?
Where there are no Moslems, there is no jihad.
ISIS? They’re one faction in a multi-faction Islamic multi-sectarian civil war. So let the Moslems sort themselves out. No U.S. involvement is necessary, let alone is it desirable, as the lamentable regrettable consequences of U.S. meddling in Moslem lands are quite plain for all to see.
It’s. That. Simple.
We needed Moslems here in the U.S. like we needed to release biological warfare agents among ourselves. Importing Moslems into the West has had just one regrettable – and avoidable – consequence: each mosque in the West is another Moslem Sudetenland that gives foreign Moslems and the Moslems in those thousands of Islamic Sudetenlands no end of pretexts to subvert the West from within and from without.
Don’t try to contend that “most Moslems are peaceful,” because the whole point of those “peaceful” or so-called “moderate” Moslems in our midst is to gull us into accepting and submitting to their constant inveighing for imposition upon us evermore, degree by degree, of their sharia. Never forget that Islam’s central doctrine is to impose Islamic rule upon the entire earth, and that’s as true for the “peaceful” Moslems as it is for al Qaida and ISIS, and for the Moslem Brotherhood and all the rest of Islam’s multi-pronged infiltration, migration, subversion, conversion, siege, and assault tentacles.
* Because the Israelis are quite content to stay out of Moslem-on-Moslem internecine sectarian wars, quite content to let the Moslems sort themselves out.
It must also be noted that ISIS has attacked and grabbed only failed, civil war-disrupted, deeply sectarian-tribal-factionalized Moslem states, gone solely after all that low-hanging fruit, and has not dared to attack Israel.
* I would venture to guess that the Israelis are not going to be taking in Syrian refugees anytime soon, unless of course, they are Jews. Why can’t we be led by people who defend our interests like their leaders defend theirs?
* Perhaps (Israel) they’re sitting back enjoying the show. Don’t be surprised if it turns out that they’re doing good business selling weapons and other equipment to the various players including ISIS. After all they shipped weapons to Iran during the Iran-Iraq war. War is profitable. If one side is losing then help them; when the tables turn help the other side and drag things out as long as possible. ISIS can destroy a state or two. But is it capable of actually creating, building up and running a real state by itself?
* This ISIS hysteria is getting out of hand. I was listening to New Zealand talk radio the other day, and people were ringing up genuinely concerned that ISIS might launch an attack on NZ. For some reason westerners seem to be assuming this rag-tag army of 30, 000 militants now has a global monopoly on Islamic terrorism and can strike anywhere at will.
* 1. ISIS is almost completely inward-looking and has neither the desire nor ability to engage in mass terror in the West. The isolated and poorly-planned recent ISISite attacks, which have a low body count, are often frustrated ISIS supporters who their governments have blocked from traveling to Syria.
2. While the West-targeting Al Qaeda goes to pains to gain assets in the West, ISIS calls its Western assets to come to their caliphate in Syria and Iraq permanently
3. ISIS is more hostile to other Muslims than to the West. Shiites deserve immediate death for apostasy, but the model of Mohammad requires that Christian populations be merely subjugated.
