The Jewish Culture of Critique

Chaim Amalek says: “We have one big thing going for us that the Jews in Weimar Germany did not. The German Jews were up against a nation that was 100% white, and with it, the possibilities of cohesive action that only racial uniformity permit. But in this country at this time the whites are what, 55% and declining? It is like gunpowder. 100% pure is a problem and difficult for Yidden to handle. But when we dilute it 40% with impurities, it is safe for us to handle and we can sell it to others.”

William Pierce critiqued Stephen Steinlight in 2001.

Pierce says that the Jewish concern with immigration is solely a concern over Jewish power.

“Jews use interfaith dialogue to vitiate Christianity and to turn Christian churches into lapdogs.”

Stephen Steinlight wrote in 2001: “For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions that support our agendas.”

“That America has largely tolerated this dual loyalty — we get a free pass, I suspect, largely over Christian guilt about the Holocaust — makes it no less a reality.”

“The special problem of large-scale Muslim immigration to the United States derives primarily from the worldwide ascent of Islamism (often referred to as “fundamentalism” and increasingly “Jihadism”), a totalitarian political ideology with strong theocratic and fascistic elements that is proving enormously compelling to millions of Muslims across the globe. It is without a doubt the most powerful ideological force in the Islamic world, including among Muslims in the United States. Islamism is profoundly hostile to pluralism, religious tolerance, democracy, secular civil society, Jews, Zionism, Israel, and to the United States, “the Great Satan.” It is a movement that festers and spreads in the impoverished conditions within corrupt regimes, often in response to the venality, inhumanity, and tyranny of local “secular” regimes. It expresses itself through violent populist agitation, intolerant religiosity, irrational atavistic values, misogyny, large-scale terrorism, resentment toward and hatred of everything perceived as “foreign,” and pie-in-the-sky theology.”

Privately [American Jewish leaders] express grave concern that unregulated immigration will prove ruinous to American Jewry, as it has for French Jewry, and will for Jews throughout Western Europe. There’s particular fear about the impact on Jewish security, as well as American support for Israel, of the rapid growth of the Muslim population. At the conclusion of meetings with national leaders, several told me, ‘You’re 1000 percent right, but I can’t go out and say it yet.’”

“I confess that I suspect that MTV, for better of for worse, will prove more powerful with young Muslim immigrants than the mullahs, and that the remarkable material and cultural attractiveness of American life will cause the new immigrants to follow (mostly) in the footsteps of their predecessors.”

William Pierce: “What is that if not gloating over his fellow Jews powers to capture and control the minds of non-Jews, even to wean young Muslims away from their religion, away from the influence and guidance of their own spiritual leaders, through the Jews control of the media… The whole aim of MTV propaganda is to multi-culturalize young Americans to cut them loose from their own racial, cultural and religious roots, and make rootless cosmopolitans of them with no sense of racial identity or loyalty.”

Franklin Ryckaert said:

What [Stephen] Steinlight says or thinks is the following:
1) We Jews in the US have become a privileged group.
2) We thought we could strengthen our position by weakening the white majority by the promotion of mass non-white immigration.
3) But it appears that those non-Whites cannot be so easily manipulated by Holocaust-guilt as the white Christians. Therefore they might become a danger to us.
4) We must therefore reduce non-white immigration.
5) We should not let white Christians take the initiative in this immigration reduction, because they could become hostile to us.
6)Non-white immigration should be reduced (by us) but not entirely stopped so that the door would always be open for persecuted Jews elsewhere in the world.

In this whole story there is only talk about “what is good for the Jews”, though it must be said Steinlight’s ideas are far less destructive than those of his other co-ethnics who still want to destroy America by mass non-white immigration.

Barbara Lerner Spectre runs a government-funded Jewish study group in Sweden. She says:

I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.

Israel, however, does just great as a highly nationalistic ethno-nation.

Charles Silberman said:

“American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief, one firmly rooted in history, that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviours, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse “gay rights” and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called “social issues.” [23]

Earl Raab, executive director emeritus of the Perlmutter Institute of Jewish Advocacy, said:

“It was only after World War II that immigration law was drastically changed to eliminate such discrimination. In one of the first pieces of evidence of its political coming-of-age, the Jewish community has a leadership role in effecting these changes.” [24]

Raab wants whites to be a minority in America:

“The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.”

Miriam Faine wrote in the magazine Australian Jewish Democrat:

“The organized Jewish community, if on nothing else, agrees on ‘Strict rules regarding intermarriage’. We need to remind ourselves that the apostles of a mono-cultural Australia still see this as a threat, as indeed do large sections of the dominant culture. Therefore we should make it our business to strike common cause with other non-Anglo ethnic groups to promote multicultural Australia. With the demise of Zionism as a doctrine of hope and national fulfilment, and with growing secularisation on the one hand and religious revisionism on the other, it is precisely such a multi-cultural society which would give space for Australian Jews to fulfil their hopes for the continuation of the community. The strengthening of multi-cultural or diverse Australia is also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian”. [27]

Michael Gawenda said:

“Let me be blunt. If you are really in favour of multiculturalism, then Australian Jewry is an outstanding example of an ethnic group that has a ‘Jewish’ agenda that somehow does not coincide with what is in the best interests of ‘all Australians’. Often, the way the media portrays the Jewish community will depend on where the journalist doing the portraying stands on multiculturalism. My belief is that while many journalists say they are in favour of a multicultural Australia, deep down, almost unconsciously, they have doubts and fears about such an Australia. This is not surprising. Multiculturalism is not just about eating sushi and watching foreign movies on SBS. It is about accepting that Australia will be transformed both racially and culturally, over the medium and the long-term. That can be frightening.”

Philip Mendes summarized the political views of Australian Jews:

“Most Jews agree with conservative views on matters of economics and taxation and the Australian-US alliance. But their main politics are not universalistic – that is, they are focused on specific Jewish concerns such as Israel and anti-Semitism – and they are generally not interested in traditional conservative concerns such as the monarchy, abortion, the traditional family and so on. Jews also tend to be surprisingly liberal on social issues. They don’t share socially conservative views on drugs, feminism, euthanasia, same-sex marriage, refugees and Aborigines. In many cases those same Jews who support Ariel Sharon and denounce Arab terrorism are passionate supporters of asylum seekers and are supportive of an apology to the Stolen Generation. This comes through particularly in letters to the Australian Jewish News.”

Betty Luks wrote: “The Jewish lobby in Australia has been at the vanguard of those seeking racial vilification legislation in Australia. This legislation was obtained, but lobbying continues to further tighten it. The present of racial vilification legislation was given to the Jewish lobby by the Keating Labor government; Keating promised this legislation in a speech given on 28 May 1994 to the 36th Biennial Conference of the Zionist Federation of Australia.
In 1966 Australia signed the United Nations Covenant to ban all forms of racial discrimination, at the same time, the White Australia Policy was being deceptively abandoned. The Whitlam government passed the Commonwealth Racial Discrimination Act in 1975. The Act was in part modelled on race hate laws in the United States, many of which have been struck down for being unconstitutional on First Amendment, freedom of speech grounds. Thus, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled that a legislature cannot criminalise “bigoted” thought with which it disagrees.
In Victoria the Jewish lobby campaigned for race hate legislation for many years, and the ALP ultimately pushed the race hate bill through parliament to gain Jewish votes for the State and Federal elections. [35] In March 1993, Isi Liebler a Jewish community leader said: “We consider [the racial vilification legislation] the most important Jewish issue of domestic concern over the next 12 months.”

Chaim Amalek: “If the AllMighty wanted white people to have their own countries, he would have given them the brains to defend them.”

About Luke Ford

I've written five books (see My work has been followed by the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and 60 Minutes. I teach Alexander Technique in Beverly Hills (
This entry was posted in Anti-Semitism, Immigration, Kevin MacDonald, Stephen Steinlight. Bookmark the permalink.