LATEST POSTS:
- The Comparator Test: Does Penn Apply the Same Standard?
- PragerU Salaries & Bonuses
- The David Pinsof Story
- Added Context to the Dennis Prager-Cedars Sinai Lawsuit
- The Criticism Was Right and It Did Nothing: Andrew Gelman, Seth Roberts, and the Limits of Being Correct
- What Andrew Gelman Doesn’t Write About
- Andrew Gelman: ‘Computer scientists today are like economists in the early 2000s and Freudian psychiatrists in the 1950s’
- Virtue Signaling and the Amy Wax case
- Revisiting Virtually You: The Dangerous Powers of the E-Personality
- The Great Delusion
- Why Do I Instinctively Dislike Erik Erikson?
- WSJ: The Uninvited Guest Who Crashed Our Family Vacation: My Mom’s AI Chatbot
- WEHT to Marc Weisblott?
- WEHT to Moxie aka Madison Slade?
- WEHT to Nicholas Polson’s Archive?
- Cohen Passes His Own Audit (V2)
- Andrew Gelman & the E-Personality
- ‘(1) “Do you think the culture of research has genuinely changed since the replication crisis became widely discussed, or has it mostly generated new compliance rituals around pre-registration and open data while leaving the underlying incentive structure intact?, (2) Regarding Columbia University, “is there a statistical or social scientific way of understanding how institutions lose the ability to accurately perceive their own situation?”’
- What a Public Audit Does (V4)
- Post: ‘Nathan Cofnas the Schlimazel’
BEST POSTS:
- * The Enlightenment Wasn’t Enlightened (6-23-26)
* Mr. Burge Draws The Line (6-23-26)
* 'Improving on Democracy' (6-17-26)
* People Leak To People Who Are Fun (6-11-26)
* Why Does Australia Produce So Many Great Journalists? (6-11-26)
* Steve Wynn and the Press: Power, Litigation, and the Contest Over Las Vegas (6-3-26)
* Sheldon Adelson and the Journalists (6-3-26)
* The Vigilant Animal: Thinkers Who Reject the Myth of Human Gullibility (6-2-26)
* The Cost of Refusing the Misunderstanding Myth (6-2-26)
* Show Me How It Travels (6-2-26)
* The Norm Explainers (6-2-26)
* Centering Marginalized Voices (6-1-26)
* What would it look like if the Washington Post put its reader first? (6-1-26)
* What would it look like if the Financial Times put its reader first? (6-1-26)
* What It Would Mean for the Los Angeles Times to Put the Reader First? (6-1-26)
* What It Would Mean for The New York Times to Put the Reader First? (6-1-26)
* Why Wembanyama Lives on the Perimeter (5-31-26)
* The Emotional Palettes Of San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco & Sacramento (5-27-26)
* The Administrative Capital: Sacramento Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* San Diego - The Quiet Republic (5-27-26)
* The Quiet Bar: San Diego Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* SF v LA Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* Why Talent Travels Poorly Between San Francisco and Los Angeles (5-27-26)
* San Francisco and Los Angeles as Rival Models of Urban Access (5-27-26)
* Social Cliques in New York, 2026 (5-25-26)
* Social Cliques in San Francisco, 2026 (5-25-26)
* The Rival Courts of Washington (5-25-26)
* The City of Private Rooms (5-25-26)

The Torah Revelation
Steve emails: Could you clarify the orthodox understanding of how, when and where was the actual full torah written by Moses as dictated by God. Was it when Moses was on Mt. Sinai in which case he came down with the tablets and the full written torah, or was it while they were wandering in the desert?
If there is a disagreement in this, how can Orthodox Jews believe in every word as holy when we don’t even know how and when and where it was transcribed?
Rabbi Rabbs responds: When Moses was on Mt. Sinai, G-d told him the entire Oral Torah and dictated to him letter for letter the entire Written Torah until that point in time. He also received the tablets.
Rashi explains that after Moses descended from the mountain, he wrote the entire Written Torah as it was dictated to him on the mountain. However, that book was obviously not complete. So, for the next 40 years in the desert, G-d continued to tell Moses what to add to the Written Torah.
I don’t believe there is any disagreement in that, and we absolutely do know how and when it was transcribed.
YAAKOV EMAILS: R’ Levi and R’ Herschel (Rabbs),
Please consider the following- written by Gil Student- which casts considerable doubt on the monolithic presentation above:
The Gemara in Gittin 60a records a dispute regarding the writing of the Torah:
R’ Yochanan said in the name of R’ Bena’ah, “The Torah was given scroll by scroll.” R’ Shimon ben Lakish (Reish Lakish) said, “The Torah was given sealed.”
So we see that Moshe wrote the entire Torah, with the possible exception of the last eight verses, after hearing from G-d exactly what to write. According to R’ Yochanan, this process took place over a long period of time and according to Reish Lakish it took place at the end of Moshe’s life. The Ramban, in his introduction to his commentary on the Torah, says that according to R’ Yochanan the process was as follows. When Moshe descended from Mt. Sinai he wrote from the beginning of the Torah until the end of the passages about the Mishkan, i.e. the books of Genesis and Exodus. He wrote the rest of the Torah at the end of the forty years, as evidenced by Deut. 31:26. According to Reish Lakish, the entire Torah was written at that late time.
In addition:
R’ Zev Wolf Einhorn points out in his Perush Maharzu that it seems like Moshe had some sort of book of Genesis well before he descended from Mt. Sinai. Similarly, we find in Yalkut Shimoni on Chukat (247) Moshe informing Aharon of his impending death by reading from the book of Genesis. According to Reish Lakish, that the Torah was written at the end of the forty years, how could Moshe have already had a book of Genesis? The Talmud Yerushalmi in Megillah 3:4 tells us that Moshe instituted that the Torah be read on Shabbat, holidays, Mondays, and Thursdays and in Talmud Bavli, Bava Kamma 82a, it seems like that was done during the stay in the desert. Yet, according to Reish Lakish, there was not yet a written Torah to be read.
The answer is simply that our forefathers Avraham, Yitzchak, and Ya’akov, and even those who preceded them like Adam and Noach, wrote down personal histories and theological works that were kept by their descendants. As prophets, their writings were sacred and treated like holy books. They were studied by their children and handed down from generation to generation. Rashi on Gittin 60a sv. katuv says that first the scroll of Creation was written, then the scroll of Noach, and then the scroll of Avraham. Unlike the Ramban who says that the entire book of Genesis was written at one time, Rashi seems to say that it was written at different times, scroll by scroll.
RABBI RABBS EMAILS: Yaakov,
Thank you for your input. I am well aware of that Gemara in Gittin, but I don’t see how what I wrote contradicts it, nor do I see how anything you posted casts doubt on whatever it is that you consider “monolithic”.
If you carefully read the question asked to me, at least the way I understood it, it was presented in binary form: “Was it when Moses was on Mt. Sinai in which case he came down with the tablets and the full written torah, or was it while they were wandering in the desert?”
On the mountain vs. in the desert.
Both opinions in Gittin would agree that it wasn’t written on Mt Sinai. Whether Moses wrote it down in piecemeal over the next 40 years or waited to write the whole thing down at the end of those 40 years is merely splitting hairs and irrelevant as far as the question asked to me is concerned.
About Luke Ford
I teach Alexander Technique in Beverly Hills (Alexander90210.com). Most of my posts since January 2025 are written with AI.