The 2025 book, Industrial Policy for the United States: Winning the Competition for Good Jobs and High-Value Industries, adds a material, economic “base” to the cultural “superstructure” described in Jacob Savage’s The Connection: The “Lost Generation” are the victims of this decoupled fallacy. They were trained to be the “mind” of an economy that has lost its “body.” The book suggests that without a healthy industrial base, the “knowledge” sector becomes a precarious, low-productivity service sector—exactly the “disadvantageous” trap Savage’s subjects find themselves in. 3. The “Buffer” Was Actually Economic Dominance In the previous turn, we established that the “Buffered Self” relies on insulation from outside forces. The Book’s Insight: The book details how the US post-WWII economy was a historical anomaly of total dominance, allowing for a “Golden Age” where high wages and stability were the norm. This abundance created the illusion that individual merit was all that mattered. The Connection: The “Buffer” that protected the Boomers and Gen X wasn’t just psychological; it was economic monopoly. When the US refused to use industrial policy to defend its industries against mercantilist rivals (China, Japan), that economic buffer dissolved. The “Lost Generation” is porous because the national economy itself became porous—open to predation by foreign industrial policies that gutted the domestic middle class. 4. From “Masters of the Universe” to “Service Workers” Savage’s essay laments the loss of agency among white male elites who thought they would be “masters of meaning.” The Book’s Insight: The book distinguishes between “Advantageous” industries (high barrier to entry, pricing power, oligopoly) and “Disadvantageous” ones (perfect competition, low margins, commoditized labor). The Connection: The “Lost Generation” thought they were entering Advantageous careers (Masters of the Universe). Instead, due to the hollowing out of the economy, they found themselves in Disadvantageous labor markets (commoditized freelancers, easily replaced, competing on price/politics). The book provides the economic theory for why their labor value collapsed: they are trapped in sectors with “diminishing returns” rather than “increasing returns”. The book argues that you cannot have a buffered identity in a porous economy. You cannot maintain a confident, meritocratic professional class in a country that has surrendered the structural economic leverage (manufacturing, supply chains) that creates broad-based wealth. The “Lost Generation” is lost because the industrial foundation required to “find” them was sold off.
LATEST POSTS:
- The Comparator Test: Does Penn Apply the Same Standard?
- PragerU Salaries & Bonuses
- The David Pinsof Story
- Added Context to the Dennis Prager-Cedars Sinai Lawsuit
- The Criticism Was Right and It Did Nothing: Andrew Gelman, Seth Roberts, and the Limits of Being Correct
- What Andrew Gelman Doesn’t Write About
- Andrew Gelman: ‘Computer scientists today are like economists in the early 2000s and Freudian psychiatrists in the 1950s’
- Virtue Signaling and the Amy Wax case
- Revisiting Virtually You: The Dangerous Powers of the E-Personality
- The Great Delusion
- Why Do I Instinctively Dislike Erik Erikson?
- WSJ: The Uninvited Guest Who Crashed Our Family Vacation: My Mom’s AI Chatbot
- WEHT to Marc Weisblott?
- WEHT to Moxie aka Madison Slade?
- WEHT to Nicholas Polson’s Archive?
- Cohen Passes His Own Audit (V2)
- Andrew Gelman & the E-Personality
- ‘(1) “Do you think the culture of research has genuinely changed since the replication crisis became widely discussed, or has it mostly generated new compliance rituals around pre-registration and open data while leaving the underlying incentive structure intact?, (2) Regarding Columbia University, “is there a statistical or social scientific way of understanding how institutions lose the ability to accurately perceive their own situation?”’
- What a Public Audit Does (V4)
- Post: ‘Nathan Cofnas the Schlimazel’
BEST POSTS:
- * The Enlightenment Wasn’t Enlightened (6-23-26)
* Mr. Burge Draws The Line (6-23-26)
* 'Improving on Democracy' (6-17-26)
* People Leak To People Who Are Fun (6-11-26)
* Why Does Australia Produce So Many Great Journalists? (6-11-26)
* Steve Wynn and the Press: Power, Litigation, and the Contest Over Las Vegas (6-3-26)
* Sheldon Adelson and the Journalists (6-3-26)
* The Vigilant Animal: Thinkers Who Reject the Myth of Human Gullibility (6-2-26)
* The Cost of Refusing the Misunderstanding Myth (6-2-26)
* Show Me How It Travels (6-2-26)
* The Norm Explainers (6-2-26)
* Centering Marginalized Voices (6-1-26)
* What would it look like if the Washington Post put its reader first? (6-1-26)
* What would it look like if the Financial Times put its reader first? (6-1-26)
* What It Would Mean for the Los Angeles Times to Put the Reader First? (6-1-26)
* What It Would Mean for The New York Times to Put the Reader First? (6-1-26)
* Why Wembanyama Lives on the Perimeter (5-31-26)
* The Emotional Palettes Of San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco & Sacramento (5-27-26)
* The Administrative Capital: Sacramento Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* San Diego - The Quiet Republic (5-27-26)
* The Quiet Bar: San Diego Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* SF v LA Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* Why Talent Travels Poorly Between San Francisco and Los Angeles (5-27-26)
* San Francisco and Los Angeles as Rival Models of Urban Access (5-27-26)
* Social Cliques in New York, 2026 (5-25-26)
* Social Cliques in San Francisco, 2026 (5-25-26)
* The Rival Courts of Washington (5-25-26)
* The City of Private Rooms (5-25-26)
