WEHT To The Science Reporting In The New York Times?

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* The role of Jon Mooallem at the New York Times science section is like that of the propagandists at Pravda and Red Army News who were allowed to travel abroad and/or read foreign press and report on it to the masses. Since these were the reporters most likely to realize that the propaganda the publications were espousing was entirely bogus, only the most obviously and fanatically devout communists would be selected for this role. After Nicholas Wade (the former NYTimes science editor now retired) let the cat out of the bag that Human Biodiversity is real and obvious, the powers at NYT became militant about suppressing any more public airing of the evidence. So they have chosen a reporter who is a fanatically committed leftist, someone who loves the Narrative more than he loves life itself. He would rather die than admit that the evidence supports race realism. He is the perfect choice to provide an “objective” filter for NY Times readers regarding the growing scientific evidence on human evolution, human genetic differences, and related topics.

* The Polish national communist press employed a really cool guy as a foreign correspondent in the 1970s-80s. What was his name? Witold Something?

He’d go to third world countries that the Soviets were promoting and report back that they sucked, but in such a polished style that nobody could quite convict him of heresy.

About Luke Ford

I've written five books (see Amazon.com). My work has been covered in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and on 60 Minutes. I teach Alexander Technique in Beverly Hills (Alexander90210.com).
This entry was posted in Journalism. Bookmark the permalink.