Luke Ford | No sacred cows.

Hillary: Trump Would Ban 1.5 Billion Muslims from Entering the U.S.

Posted on August 26, 2016 by Luke Ford

Hillary takes skepticism about Muslim immigration very personally. To Hillary, American immigration policy is, first and foremost, all about her Huma.

COMMENTS:

* They make a lovely couple. Both are officially “married” to pervert/sex offenders, but they found true love in each other’s arms. A heartwarming tale of an elderly matriarch and her comely Arab mistress.

* If Crooked Hildabeast becomes president, Huma Abedin will be America’s first Muslim first lady. You just know Hilda is tapping that.

Hildabeast is J. Edgar Hoover and Huma Abedin is Clyde Anderson Tolson.

* Matching shirts for couple, clearly the one on the right is butch.

* Is that Chelsea in the background between the two of them? Can’t help but wonder how she feels about having two pervert parents.

* 1.5 billion Muslims includes a lot of Somalians.

Here’s a lady who “back-talked” a couple of heckling Somalians who were randomly passing by her house when she was in her front yard. It got really shitty, really fast. In too many places where Obama’s Somali’s are planted, episodes like this transpire.
This isn’t the America I want to know:

* Has anyone with the Trump campaign attempted to reach out to immigrant groups like Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh & Christian South Asians, Burmese, Thais and Middle Easterners who all have very negative memories of Islam from their homelands.

Living on the far Southside of Indianapolis where we have many recent Christian Burmese, (mostly Chin), Sikhs and Naga people (Christian Indians from Nagaland) immigrants I can tell you Hillary’s project to flood Indianapolis in particular with “Syrian” and Somali “refugees” is unpopular in the extreme not just with us Hoosiers but with our new neighbors as well.

* Huma is a security threat, probably passing on tidbits to her family members who in turn pass it on. Along with her private server Clinton has been a security disaster. According to Wikipedia Bill Clinton performed the wedding ceremony for her marriage to Anthony Weiner. Both women are married to sexual degenerates, a very weird situation but perhaps that fits the picture of women with lesbian tendencies who find men to marry but therefore have to make compromises in their special arrangements.

* Mainstream politicians in Australia are calling for a muslim ban. A breakfast TV host, who was a model, also called for it. Watch her clumsily defend the position.

None of this would have happened if trump hadn’t called for it. And as you said a few days ago, trump just stumbled upon it. The part ‘luck’ plays in history is the timing of events. Trump jump-started events which were bound to happen.

* Huma Weiner so obviously banked on Carlos Danger easily climbing the political ranks and affording her a lifetime of taxpayer-funded luxury, just like ol’ Hillary and Bill. You would have to be either braindead or a true sociopath to be okay with Bill Clinton officiating at your wedding, and yet it seems that the toxic brew of personality disorders and greed afflicted not only the Clintons but both Huma and Carlos as well. These qualities most likely cemented their early spiritual and psychological bond with the Clintons…and what a lifelong bond it is…

Alas! (((Carlos))) was but a mere rat-faced intellectual mediocrity and narcissistic, lackluster pol, preferring to indulge his sex addiction come what may. He and wife were not afforded the total North Korea-style propaganda whitewashing of his crimes (again, a la Bill and Hillary) in the mainstream press, and the harsh truths of the Internet laid bare the depravities of the Weiners for all to see. And what a depraved world it was…

Their gravy train was derailed! So now he’s taking care of the kid while Huma fulfills the feminist working-woman fantasy of carrying Hillary’s bags, scheduling granny naptime, disposing of various criminal evidence – and all the while printing out Sid Blumenthal’s emails.

What a heartbreaking story of Carlos and Huma Weiner – grifters that were never quite able to grift like their mentors….

Weiner political dynasty, R.I.P.!

* Isn’t Huma Abedin the real Manchurian candidate? How can someone be so close to (someone who is likely to become) the most powerful person in the world and at the very least have questionable connections to Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood? I just don’t understand it.

Then again I still don’t understand how someone named “Barack Hussein Obama” could be elected president of the United States just seven years after a massive Islamist terrorist attack on the U.S. That’s like someone named “Hiroshi Sato” defeating Truman in 1948.

* Can someone ask Mrs. Clinton (or her surrogates): What are we getting from Muslim immigration that offsets the increased risk of terrorism? Are we importing a bunch of Muslim Einsteins and Edisons along with the Omar Mateens and Syed Farooks (or their parents, in any case)? Why can’t we do a simple cost-benefit analysis? Can’t someone at least raise the question?

* I’ve come to appreciate the importance that the Empire of Inclusion and Diversity places on Hillary’s election. For a moment, think of the pokemon points that she can win for the Empire:

1. Hillary is a (suspected) woman.
2. Hillary is a (suspected) lesbian.
3. Hillary is at least a 2nd-wave feminist who was impregnated by someone to “have one for the experience”.
4. Hillary will try to fake a southern accent when talking to southern “rednecks”.
5. Hillary will try to speak ebonics when talking to Afro-Americans. She is also willing to share the “in your face” aspects of female African culture.
6. Hillary is equally at ease with the Wolves on Wall Street.
7. Like Obama, there is a special place in her heart for 1.5 billion potential Muslim immigrants (does her special relationship with Huma have anything to do with this?).
8. She is married to a beta male who manifests a degree of masochism on account of his troubled relationship with an over-dominant mother. Bill also has a felt need to overcome feelings in inadequacy due to that relationship by raping and sexually abusing women … everyone but Hillary who perhaps represents the “mother figure” in his life. In short, Bill and Hillary have sadomasochism covered.
9. She gets pokemon points for running for President at her age (the retired community needs representation).
10. She gets pokemon points for being physically handicapped (the physically handicapped community needs representation).
11. She gets pokemon points for being mentally handicapped (think of the community support she can get on this one).
12. Finally, Hillary gets pokemon point for being emotional handicapped. Hillary has manifested the behaviors of a sociopath since her college days (but for some reason the DSM-5 prefers to call this the Borderline Personality Disorder).

There you have it. Hillary is the perfect candidate for the Empire of Inclusion and Diversity. She can cover the gamut of perhaps almost every abnormal condition, social deviancy, and physical handicap that exists in the contemporary world. She is indeed the perfect candidate to represent the troubled people in our troubled world, although I am less enthusiastic about her ability to do anything about the troubles.

* She’s alright, marriageable if she had a great personality.

“You’re comely enough, Huma.”

* I’ve wondered if Hillary thought Bill’s demise would help her win the election, how long would it take her to exchange those horrid blue outfits for some widow’s weeds. And how far Huma would go to help her.

* Can you blame Weiner for seeking alternative outlets for his sex drive while being but a beard to the ugly lesbian concubine of Hillary? Carlos Danger I feel your pain!

* Bacha Bazi is the name of the venerable tradition where Muslim men force a pre-pubescent boy into sexual slavery. The boy learns to dance and sing like a quasi-woman for the entertainment of men, and services them to varying degrees. It is practiced widely among Pashtuns and other groups.

* I’m not a believer in the whole Hillary-Huma romance thing. I doubt Hillary would have married Bill if she’d been lesbian. I suspect that for Hillary, lackeys are more important than lovers, especially this late in her life. I leaned a lot when I heard the story about how Hillary would snap the word ‘gum’ at Huma, and instantly, Huma would have the gum out, all ready for Hillary to chew. That sort of sycophancy is freakish. It did explain why Huma has stuck it out with Anthony Weiner. She’s a trad Muslim masochistic female. It’s recently emerged that Huma has authored articles in defense of traditional Muslims families and lifestyles. However, this makes it more likely that she’s not liberated at all, but a sympathizer with the Islamic radicals in her family.

Posted in Hillary Clinton, Islam | Comments Off

Where Are the Black Rudy Giulianies?

Posted on August 26, 2016 by Luke Ford

Robert Weissberg writes:

Reaction to the recent Milwaukee riot has followed a predictable script and for liberals this requires insisting that that blacks themselves are largely blameless for the “uprising.” But, even if liberals admit that some Milwaukee residents were guilty, they will nevertheless claim that these miscreants, typically unemployed school dropouts, are only a minuscule element in an otherwise law-abiding, peaceful population. In other words, we should not smear an entire community by the actions of a tiny untypical handful.

This “only a few bad apples” view is factually incorrect—the pathologies are far more extensive than a few attention-getting rioters. To be sure, thousands of Milwaukee inner-city residents did not take to the streets and a few residents did denounce the mayhem. Nevertheless, the penchant for disorderly behavior, and this includes criminality, is more deeply ingrained in these black neighborhoods than the liberal-dominated mainstream media admits.

This unflattering assessment rests on a dog that does not bark: if the overwhelming majority of ordinary ghetto residents—as liberals usually claim– are so opposed to the thuggery punctuated by occasional rioting, where are the ambitious local politicians anxious to capitalize on this supposed thirsting for law and order? After all, it is rare office-seeker who will shun any type of pandering almost guaranteeing electoral victory.

Indeed, if, as many liberals allege, the trouble-makers are exclusively poorly educated youngsters who almost never vote, why would black office-seekers pay them any attention? Why should elected black officials traffic in responsibility escaping justification—white racism, oppression, rotten schools, years of financial neglect, bigoted cops—when, supposedly, thousands of law-abiding residents dread neighborhood predators? How many votes can Black Lives Matter deliver? If economic self-interest motivated voters, the Hobbesian inner-city should be the ideal place for a black Rudi Giuliani. It would not take much for this black Rudy to woo ghetto residents with the benefits of tough policing: more tax-paying businesses, more convenient shopping, more jobs, safer public parks and, most of all, enhanced personal freedom. Why don’t all those African American preachers who organize anti-violence rallies run for office? If the bad guys are just a small minority, surely these Reverends would win in a landslide.

Why the absence of black law and order Giulianis? Let me hypothesize two probably over-lapping possibilities, both of which, if true, bode poorly for future efforts at reducing criminality and rioting. First, and most obviously, is the ghetto culture that permeates black neighborhoods in cities like Milwaukee. This culture rejects anything “white” and nothing is more quintessentially “white” than law and order. In fact, the very phrase “law and order” and “crime” have now widely viewed by self-designated community spokesmen as the code word for racism.

This aversion even applies to the small stuff like eliminating graffiti or cracking down on public drinking. In an electoral contest between a fire-breathing black nationalist (a good “race man” to use an older terminology) who denounces white privilege as the root of black misery and a mild- mannered rival who modestly calls for making parks drug-free, the firebrand will almost always win. Hard to even imagine a black Rudy Giuliani campaigning in the Hood. Recall the long successful career of Washington DC’s Marion Berry, a dissolute crackhead whose popularity among blacks totally baffled law-and-order whites.

A second explanation is more rational: even many upright inner-city blacks personally have more to lose than to gain by electing a black Giuliani. Though it is impossible to admit in public, many inner-city blacks at least occasionally engage in petty drug dealing, prostitution, public intoxication, shoplifting, misusing EBT cards, fencing stolen goods (including guns), small-time gambling, and similar unsavory behaviors. Strict law and order will thus invariably restore mass incarceration which in practice means imprisoning family members (especially teenage children), boyfriends/girlfriends and neighbors, a situation that many whites find unimaginable given their minimal contact with criminals. Put another way, a “broken windows” campaign is perhaps the most disparate policy imaginable and a costly one, too, given fines and lawyer fees. In a sense, the damage done by the corner drug dealers or burning down the local CVS pharmacy (as occurred in the Baltimore riot) is a tolerable alternative to locking up these miscreants, all of whom are blood relatives of other community residents. Again, this trade-off is unthinkable to middle class whites watching the mayhem on TV.

Taken together, this bodes poorly for government-based efforts to ameliorate black slums of Milwaukee, East St. Louis, Detroit and Camden, NJ and elsewhere. It is delusional to believe that millions of black inner-city residents are silently waiting to be rescued by a black Giuliani who refuses to be intimidates by Black Lives Matter and street gangs. After all, these cities have been festering for decades, more than sufficient time for a black law and order Messiah to arrive. Read on.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off

Are Black Neighborhoods ‘Segregated’?

Posted on August 25, 2016 by Luke Ford

Steve Sailer writes: We’re always being told that white flight occurred because whites succumb to irrational Stereotypes about blacks being crime prone, so, logically, these black families are saving a bundle by living by in safe yet low rent neighborhoods. You could, for example, save your money on housing and send your kids to private school.

I guess, however, because the NYT describes black neighborhoods as “segregated” it mean it’s a bad thing. “Segregated” is the mirror image of “diverse,” which is a good thing. NFL starting cornerbacks are “diverse,” while East St. Louis is “segregated.”…

For example, there’s no quality housing in the Austin neighborhood on the West Side of Chicago. It’s been falling apart ever since blacks started moving in 49 years ago.

Sure, the original housing stock in Austin wasn’t all that different from across the Austin Avenue in Oak Park, but that’s not what we mean by “quality.” What we mean by “quality” is that the people living in the housing have enough wealth and determination to be able to get away from poor people. The working definition of a poor person in modern America is somebody who can’t afford to get away from other poor people.

In Oak Park, they stayed away from poor people, so that’s “quality.” In Austin they didn’t so that’s “not quality.”

…In other words, blacks tend to be bad for property values, just like all those horrible racists told my in-laws in the Austin neighborhood in 1967. They didn’t believe them, but when they finally moved out in 1970 after three felonies against their family, losing half their net worth, they admitted that maybe the bigots had had a point…

White Flight is the main form of ethnic cleansing in which we all agree to blame the victims…

Milwaukee itself, which is nearly two-thirds nonwhite, has never elected a black mayor.

Whereas cities that elected a long stream of black mayors, like Detroit and New Orleans, have worked out well for blacks.

“At school, the Sabir children have heard a teacher play down slavery, and classmates stereotype black neighborhoods as bad and drug infested. On their block, where the sidewalks are cracked and some empty lots have been turned into gardens, they occasionally see drugs and fights.”

In other words, the stereotypes are truthful, which just makes them more hateful hate-filled.

Truth Is Hate.

Thus, as our Presidential frontrunner explains in her ongoing Conversation, it is the duty of all good Americans to hate the truth.

COMMENTS:

* One hears a lot about how residents in Ferguson righteously rioted in response to systemic injustices like racking up lots of civil fines (could have a point) to the black majority failing to elected very many blacks to the school board and town council (so what). Same thing with Milwaukee , Baltimore and elsewhere.

Unmentioned is that the behavior of these young revolutionaries destroyed what little appeal their neighborhoods had to start with and millions of dollars of whatever homeowner equity existed. Therefore there are thousands of people who cannot sell their properties at a price that makes sense so the option is to stay and try and ride it out or leave and rent elsewhere and rent out their homes to people willing to live in a high crime/high social dysfunction neighborhood.

This process has played out much more slowly in urban areas across the country – the societal tolerance of cultural dysfunction in black neighborhoods that is unlike any other segment of society means that high concentrations of working to lower class blacks means property values will drop off a cliff as surely as the sun sets in the west. The left has for decades demanded non-judgment of dysfunctional behavior from its most treasured part of its base, and we can see the results. Now they are trying to peddle the narrative that it’s a collection of racist policies that haven’t existed for half a century or more that has made black neighborhoods hellholes, but even the most ardent black political voices (TNC, Spike Lee) don’t want to live in “real” black neighborhoods either if they can help it.

* Money does not mean successful real estate investments. Black athletes and the homes they build are a case in point. Michael Jordan’s 56,000 sq.ft estate in Chicago featured wrought iron gates with his uniform number embedded in them, an indoor basketball court, a beauty salon and 19 bathrooms but had to be auctioned off.

Michael Vick spent $5 million on his Atlanta mansion and it sold for $500,000 at his bankruptcy auction.

In St. Petersburg, a retired NFL players home had to torn down as its vintage early 1990′s accoutrements made it unsaleable at any price.

The homes of black superstars may have been impressive to hoodrats but what a hoodrat finds impressive and in good taste and what other luxury housing buyers do may not be the same. You can’t buy class.

* The problem with Michael Jordan’s mansion is that he made it so much about Michael Jordan that, when he decided to sell it, he was shocked to discover that there wasn’t another Michael Jordan to buy it at the price that Michael Jordan wanted to sell it for.

* My most liberal friends have never lived in a black neighborhood in their lives and witnessed what goes on day to day, and they would never consider it. They are very proud of their “solidarity” or “allyship” with oppressed minorities, though.

I did have one liberal couple I am friends with get randomly assaulted by some justice-involved youth downtown once – they couldn’t seem to understand why these young black males decided to beat up a hip white couple and not even try to take their money or iPhones. “Why” indeed.

* The Talented Tenth want to live lives separate from Negro trash, in elite Talented Tenth neighborhoods, with elite Talented Tenth clubs and schools and service organizations. They don’t want to be dragged back down into the steaming hot mess of Negro dysfunction. But they also don’t want to live surrounded by white middle class and upper middle class folks.

Milwaukee has no Talented Tenth neighborhoods, clubs, or organizations. It has been unable to create, whole cloth, Talented Tenth neighborhoods that are both segregated from Negro trash AND from white folks as well..

Young Talented Tenths move to Atlanta, Chicago and LA instead. There is no solutions to the Milwaukee Problem. White folks can’t solve it and black folks with talent and ability don’t want to.

* The reality is that there has never been a better time in America for blacks to be successful. If you have a reasonable level of reliability and presentability and decent language skills, all you need is a Bachelor’s degree from a mid-tier school in something marketable — finance, marketing, accounting, “management” — and you will have all the major U.S. corporations fighting one another to give you a job. Similarly, you can get a gig at a city/state/federal bureaucracy with no problem. If you prefer to get a degree in say history or literature, you will find the most lilly white suburban school districts desperate to hire you as a teacher. Publishing companies, magazines, etc. will also push you to the front of the list, to say nothing of media companies like Vox.

Simply put, it’s dead simple to get a well paying, middle class job as a black person in America in this year, thanks to massive reverse-discrimination, codified into law and company hiring policies everywhere. Yet it still doesn’t happen at scale. Journalists of America, I invite you to explore why this is the case.

* I personally witnessed Negro influxes destroy two beautiful residential areas in New Jersey; East Orange in the mid 1970s and Trenton’s many White ethnic neighborhoods a decade later. It starts with a few “middle-class” Negro households; they are seldom families in the traditional sense. These harbingers usually bring with them obnoxious habits, e.g., destruction of foliage, failure to maintain property, noise and loitering until nearly dawn, etc., and an ever-changing retinue of thuggish relatives and acquaintances.

As a result life becomes intolerable for their White neighbors. Then the less savory Negro element starts replacing the first White refugees. The escalating levels of theft, vandalism, and violence soon cause local businesses to shut down and eventually drive out any remaining Whites families and individuals who can afford to leave. Even those who can’t eventually are in such fear for their lives that they leave regardless of the cost.

In East Orange I saw the process from beginning to end. In my particular neighborhood it played out over the course of a year. In Trenton the process was just as inevitable but took several years. Those who haven’t observed or experienced the process cannot imagine the horror its brutal inevitability instills in those who have.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off

Hillary’s Alt-Right Speech

Posted on August 25, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* NBC’s First Read

What does the “Alt Right” mean?

At 3:00 pm ET, Hillary Clinton will deliver remarks from Reno, NV tying Donald Trump to the conservative ‘Alt Right” movement. But what does the Alt Right mean? We surveyed some Republicans and journalists and organizations who’ve observed the movement:
…….

•The Washington Post’s Dave Weigel, who has written about the movement: “Conservatives opposed to the philosophy of ‘invade the world, invite the world.’”

* The anti-Alt-Right stuff by Hillary is not aimed at Jewish donors; Big Money including Jewish donors are hard for her already, figuring she’s the favorite. Don’t want to be left out in the cold not donating to the Clinton Foundation Stash for Cash Dash do we?

Its aimed at White women, White professional women in particular. Hillary! neither wants nor needs White men supporters. Like all “Mean Girls” her politics is aimed at excluding people and demonizing large segments of the population, not an inclusive spoils politics for everyone. She’s not a Happy Warrior; rather the nasty Witch of the East.

Her speech no doubt is aimed at painting Trump Male Supporters as icky, awful, “racist” beta males who no woman worth anything sexually or socially would have anything to do with. Its more “social status” messaging and is likely to be powerful. Heartiste detects some PUA guy helping her campaign and this seems part of it.

Face it, Hillary! being the personification of angry, man-hating Lesbianism is not going to get much in the way of White Male votes. But she is quite likely to get over 70% of the White female vote among the Professional classes the way things are going.

Trump better respond with “Hillary will provoke a War with Russia that gets young women drafted and killed” ad.

* The left has a hard time grasping the idea that there exists a bunch of internet Trolls without wealthy donors funding and organizing them. It would be hard to find someone big (rich) enough to point fingers at when taking on the aspect of the Alt-Right that drives the big shoe activists and media the most nuts. Can anyone actually see Hillary holding up some picture of a cartoon frog avatar with a bad pun for a name and calling them a public enemy? I think she will call Breitbart a hate site, give some choice quotes from there ‘bout the blacks, and focus on Trumps campaign manager running it while mean commentary happened. She could end it with a tearful recounting of the Ghostbusters black lady star being bullied and hacked though. Probably call for Trump to disavow his stained shirts on Twitter. I doubt we will see specific HBD nerds, pickup artists, discussion board dads and Trolls denounced beyond that Breitbart guy, so everyone needs to curb their enthusiasm that this is going to launch their hate career into the mainstream.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off

NYT: Anne Frank Today Is a Syrian Girl

Posted on August 25, 2016 by Luke Ford

Is Anne Frank a Palestinian girl? A Ukrainian girl? An Iranian girl? An Iraqi girl?

So Anne Frank stands in for whatever cause you want to embrace. Got it.

Nicholas Kristof writes:

AMSTERDAM — On April 30, 1941, a Jewish man here in Amsterdam wrote a desperate letter to an American friend, pleading for help emigrating to the United States.
“U.S.A. is the only country we could go to,” he wrote. “It is for the sake of the children mainly.”
A volunteer found that plea for help in 2005 when she was sorting old World War II refugee files in New York City. It looked like countless other files, until she saw the children’s names.
“Oh my God,” she said, “this is the Anne Frank file.” Along with the letter were many others by Otto Frank, frantically seeking help to flee Nazi persecution and obtain a visa to America, Britain or Cuba — but getting nowhere because of global indifference to Jewish refugees.
We all know that the Frank children were murdered by the Nazis, but what is less known is the way Anne’s fate was sealed by a callous fear of refugees, among the world’s most desperate people.
Sound familiar?
President Obama vowed to admit 10,000 Syrian refugees — a tiny number, just one-fifth of 1 percent of the total — and Hillary Clinton suggested taking more. Donald Trump has repeatedly excoriated them for a willingness to welcome Syrians and has called for barring Muslims. Fears of terrorism have left Muslim refugees toxic in the West, and almost no one wants them any more than anyone wanted a German-Dutch teenager named Anne.
“No one takes their family into hiding in the heart of an occupied city unless they are out of options,” notes Mattie J. Bekink, a consultant at the Anne Frank House in Amsterdam. “No one takes their child on a flimsy boat to cross the Mediterranean unless they are desperate.”
The son of a World War II refugee myself, I’ve been researching the anti-refugee hysteria of the 1930s and ’40s. As Bekink suggests, the parallels to today are striking.
For the Frank family, a new life in America seemed feasible. Anne had studied English shorthand, and her father spoke English, had lived on West 71st Street in Manhattan, and had been a longtime friend of Nathan Straus Jr., an official in the Franklin Roosevelt administration.

So perhaps Syrian refugees should go to Israel?

Nicholas Kristof doesn’t bother arguing that taking in Syrian refugees would be good for America. He doesn’t argue that they should go to the Jewish state. He just wants gentile states to swallow this poison.

Posted in Holocaust, Immigration | Comments Off

The Complicated Appeal of the Harambe Meme

Posted on August 25, 2016 by Luke Ford

The New York Times says: “The meme has also been used to spread harmful messages…”

Ohmigod, not harmful messages? That’s horrible. So sad. The MSM would never spread harmful messages, right?

Posted in America | Comments Off

Chateau: “Although my pictures suggest otherwise I’m not entirely superficial”: The female rationalization hamster on speed.

Posted on August 24, 2016 by Luke Ford

Source.

Every Mexican maid knows she's a half-White baby away from the middle class. https://t.co/5YWrvvCcWG
— John Rivers (@JohnRiversToo) August 25, 2016

Posted in Sex | Comments Off

War Dogs

Posted on August 24, 2016 by Luke Ford

Steve Sailer writes:

War Dogs’ closest comparison is to Martin Scorsese’s The Wolf of Wall Street. But Scorsese didn’t have the courage to make the ethnic angle explicit. In his memoir, embezzler Jordan Belfort had explained the animus that motivated him:

I came to realize that the WASPs were yesterday’s news, a seriously endangered species no different than the dodo bird or spotted owl. And while it was true that they still had their little golf clubs and hunting lodges as last bastions against the invading shtetl hordes, they were nothing more than twentieth-century Little Big Horns on the verge of being overrun by savage Jews like myself…

Still, you can’t blame Scorsese. First, he is in the business of making big-budget movies with the vaguely Slavic Leonardo DiCaprio as his star. While a tremendous leading man, DiCaprio, unlike Scorsese’s former main man Robert De Niro, can’t play Jewish.

Second, although Scorsese is a living legend, he’s Italian, not Jewish. So does he really need the risk? How’s Mel Gibson’s career doing?

The Wolf’s lack of courage left an opening for Hill to move up to the alpha role in War Dogs, in which Phillips is explicit about where its antiheroes are coming from: Miami Beach. (The film even changes Diveroli’s financial backer from the Mormon he was in real life to Kevin Pollak in a yarmulke.) Unlike in The Social Network, where Aaron Sorkin rationalized Mark Zuckerberg’s chicanery by painting an implausible portrait of a 21st-century Harvard where Jews are on the outside looking in, War Dogs doesn’t offer any excuses. Jonah Hill’s Efraim Diveroli isn’t a victim of stereotypes; he is a stereotype.

Critics, however, have mostly been baffled by War Dogs, wondering why isn’t this movie an exposé of Dick Cheney? And since it’s not, what in the world is this movie about anyway?

Well, War Dogs is, as Jonah Hill said, about “hustler Jews from Miami.” That’s a topic that Phillips and Hill obviously find amusing. Jewish entertainers satirizing Jewish machers has been a staple at least since The Producers.

But to most journalists these days, the concept of making fun of Jewish business ethics is not even a thought that can be put into words, rather like how in 1984 the Declaration of Independence can only be described as “crimethink.”

A lot of people give the movies a hard time for their political biases (for example, the surplus of black computer geniuses). And yet films like War Dogs often are more frank in showing human realities than the critics who claim to summarize their lessons for us.

Posted in Business, Ethics, Hollywood, Jews | Comments Off

Hillary Will Denounce “Alt-right” on Thursday

Posted on August 23, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Don’t assume Hillary’s people haven’t focus-grouped extensively this new ploy of hers to pick out some Emmanuel Goldsteins for voters to hate. Hillary’s people usually know what they’re doing.

* Clearly, the most unifying, utopian position is to embrace endless immigration by Third Worlders, especially Muslims.

But I wonder if her denunciation of the alt-right might backfire. A whole lot of people might hear about it, investigate, and discover a lot of what used to be called “common sense.”

* I think I started reading “Alternative Right” in 2010 a few months after Richard Spencer founded it, and coined the term. I have to say I never thought I’d see the day the Democratic candidate for President would devote a speech to denouncing his works. An incredible, wonderful achievement.

* I’m genuinely puzzled by this. Normal voters don’t spend their free time talking about politics on the internet, so they’ve never even heard of the “alt right.”

Republicans don’t go around attacking Democrats by quoting obscure left-wing blogs.

* This makes me wonder how many high level decisions are being made by Hillary Clinton. This only makes sense if you’re knowledge of the alt-right comes from a few sections of text taken out of context and forwarded to you by the young folks on her campaign? Does anyone in her organization really ‘get’ the alt-right? Who the intellectual fonders are, what the basic concepts are?

If I was running for Democratic ticket and I actually ‘got’ the alt-right, I would avoid mentioning it like the plague. I’d talk vaguely about extremists and let my auxiliaries do the dirty work, I wouldn’t mention them in a speech.

Maybe there’s a deeper understanding of politics going on here or this is part of some eleventh dimensional game of chess, but this sounds like an old woman who’s mentally stuck in the 90s taking bad advice from other old people.

But hell, what else can she campaign on? Other than co-opting Trump’s campaign to the max.

* And now we know why the media have been spilling a lot of ink about the alt-right in the last few days. They’re telling Hillary who to attack.

* The ‘alt right’ would not exist without Steve Sailer. It’s nice, even for this alienated liberal, to see him slowly gain mainstream recognition as one of the most influential political thinkers in America.

* So that was the genesis of Dave Weigel’s pieces in the WaPo. He had a head’s-up that this was coming, and was preparing the ground for the Clinton campaign.

* It’s not that puzzling. The alt-right has been promoting the delegitimization of elections and the political process in anticipation of a possible Trump loss in November. In the event of a Trump loss, that will eventually entail extra-electoral and extra-political activities. Hillary is laying the groundwork for the narrative that will be deployed if and when the government feels necessary to crack down as the alt-right’s extra-electoral/political activity intensifies.

* It will be interesting to see the reaction to this speech, and how the “alt-right” gets covered by the media in general. Bringing the alt-right to greater public attention could very well backfire on the Left. Hey, one can hope!

I’m still waiting for the Left to wake up to the fact that, as guys like Rod Dreher keep trying to explain to them, the “post-religious right” is going to be a very, very different animal than what they’re used to. Most of the liberals I speak with are still under the impression that the “alt-right” is somehow part of the Koch brothers/Christian fundamentalist Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy, and they’re pretty sure they can just run the same old playbook against them.

Eventually they’ll catch on, but right now it’s fun to watch them stumble around. Like neocons who are still fighting the Cold War, liberals are lunging at shadows, trying to battle the empty space where their enemy used to be — while stirring up a lot of resentment with the way they keep accidentally blowing up noncombatant bystanders.

* I will bet any amount of money that, if she does open up this can of worms, Hillary will tie Donald Trump to the “rape culture” she will accuse PUAs of having.

Remember that many men come to the Alt-Right via the red pill and pick-up blogs. It’s a good intro: men wonder why all the advice they’ve ever gotten about women hasn’t worked, start a google search, and begin to question their feminist-indoctrinated beliefs. Soon they start admitting the sexes are very different, and then they get results with women, and then they are ready to question their other deeply-held beliefs, such as those about race, culture, and the like.

Since the Left has already painted PUAs as sexist-mysognyists unpersons who are either (1) rapists or (2) losers living in their mothers basements, it wouldn’t be much of a stretch for Leftists to make Trump responsible for rapes by these loser-rapists (of which there is no evidence).

Roosh got swarmed in February by no less than the Washington Post, and although he’s not folded and still going strong, damage was done.

Of course she’ll bring up the race realists. And probably her crew are working overtime to grab some links and screenshots to more inflammatory posts, posters, and such.

But don’t count out the fact that feminism is a big driver of Hillary’s campaign, so race AND sexual BadThought in the Alt Right will be attacked.

* Crooked Hildabeast most likely does not even know who Steve Sailer is. Even Alt-Right guys like Gavin McInnes and Anthony Cumia are more famous than Steve, because Gavin and Anthony are extroverts who make media appearances on Fox News and have their own podcast shows. Steve is an introvert hermit who likes to stay as low key as possible.

* We’re days away from one of America’s presidential frontrunners all but name-dropping /pol/.

As the young Canadian negro Drake would say, “what a time to be alive.”

* Crooked Hildabeast won’t call out The Unz, but she will call out Breitbart because they get way more traffic than The Unz.

Breitbart is the WWE of the Alt-Right, while The Unz is the TNA of the Alt-Right.

Breitbart is the big leagues when it comes to Alt-Right websites.

* Bear in mind that the event that triggered “Trump’s embracing the alt-right” was his recent hiring of Breitbart’s Bannon. Breitbart is likely the evil face of alt-rightism to the Buzzfeed journalist class.

Why did Weigel go with Sailer/Brimelow/Jared? Dug deeper into the old-school?

* Contra Skeegs, this could actually be a pretty deft political move. It’s a much bigger and more complex version of the reporter who asked Trump to denounce David Duke. Hillary’s speech is going to paint the alt right as a rebirth of that old racism everybody knows exists on the right. Trump will be tied to and put in a position of repudiating or embracing. His track record shows he will probably not respond well, or, if he does, the media will just spin whatever he says out of control… the whole WaPo article is part of a big set-up to entrap Trump and re-inforce the idea that he’s a racist at just the moment that he’s planning to move left on immigration. If does it, he’ll be left with no supporters on the right or in the center…

* I hope during Ms Clinton’s lecture she mentions Francis Galton, iSteve, Hbd*chick, La Griffe du Lion, Ron Unz, Greg Cochran, Kevin MacDonald, Philipe Rushton, Arthur Jensen, Hernstein and Murray, Linda Gottfredson, IQ, neoteny, regression to the mean, the cenral limit theorem, the r-K continuum, TFR, differential fertility, smart fraction theory, dysgenesis, the g factor, the Flynn effect, Beysian statistics, psychometry, hyperethnocentricism and group evolutionary theory, Pearbothham’s curve etc.

I also hope she does not have another uncontrollable coughing fit, seizures, Tourettes-spectrum spaz out, vertigo/double vision, memory lapse/brain freeze, uncontrolled cackling episode, Parkinsonian tremor, catheter leak under her pantsuit or heavens forbid, start raising her voice sounding like Mrs. Bates berating Norman while refering to Trum… er.. her husband. I hope none of this happens during this very stressful– 30 minute scene plus money shot — week for her prior to next weekend’s three-day recuperation period.

* She won’t, but in preparation for this speech, any bloggers who might plausibly come up in people’s Google searches for the alt right ought to be putting up posts right now on the themes (1) what the alt-right is (2) who’s in it, and (3) how it’s different from ye ol’ slavery and apartheid.

In addition, readers and commenters ought to be ready to take to the comment threads on media outlets and leftist blogs.

Calling all alt-right bloggers… Calling all alt-right bloggers…

* Breitbart isn’t even really an alt-right site per se, but is really more representative of the populist wing of mainstream conservatism. Alt-right ideas might have filtered down into it, and Milo might have drawn attention to the alt-right, but it’s not really too different from mainstream conservatism except in tone and focus. Of course Hillary will denounce Breitbart as a white nationalist outlet, because she doesn’t know or care about the nuances and divisions within the right, and it’s just easier to smear your opponents anyways.

* It’s interesting what they’ve done over there. They basically tossed out the anti-Israel stuff and avoided any of the weird monarchy stuff and watered down /pol/ about 50%. Seems to be working for them.

* Does Hillary even look at the internet? Seriously, does she actually have any idea what’s going on? I note that many older people use the internet, but simply replicate their original MSM consumption online. They’re just reading the same lugenpresse they always did, merely in a different format. Plus they absolutely refuse to read online comments on MSM articles. Believe me I’ve tried to get older relatives to take notice of things like that and they just won’t acknowledge it means anything. (Not everyone over 65 is like this of course)

Hillary is supposed to be a connected, switched on person and I’m sure she has no end of people advising. But for herself, is the internet actually a thing at all, I suspect not.

* The usual strategy the Left and media follow is to lump together both the reasonable people and the less reasonable people, and taint the former by association with the latter. So you’ll see Steve (who’s an HBD guy but a conventional citizenist) lumped together with Jared Taylor, a white nationalist, or the KKK. And Trump lumped together with both. That’s why Weigel profiled both Sailer and Taylor.

This lets them avoid making any actual argument. The equation is Trump = Sailer = Moldbug = Taylor = KKK. Notice that they don’t have to bother addressing any of the perfectly reasonable and in fact majority views of Trump about immigration here, because Trump’s the KKK, and therefore his views on immigration are those of the KKK.

* They’re going for the kill shot. I think it was Plouffe that tweeted that Trump doesn’t only have to be defeated but soundly so his type never rises again. The Right will be allowed to exist but only on the Left’s terms.

Hillary isn’t even campaigning and she’s winning running away. Several polls came out today and none of them could be described as good for Trump. VA is out of reach. FL poll came out with Clinton up double digits. Another has him up one in Missouri and tied in SC although that one was a Dem sponsored poll.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off

Do You Speak Australian?

Posted on August 23, 2016 by Luke Ford

New York Times: HONG KONG — In October 2014, Australia’s prime minister produced blank stares around the globe when he vowed to “shirt-front” President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia over the downing of a Malaysia Airlines plane in Ukraine, in which 28 Australian citizens had been killed.

Back home, many Australians knew exactly what Tony Abbott, who was then prime minister, was talking about: “Shirt-front” describes charging an opponent in Australian football. But those who didn’t understand Mr. Abbott had few authoritative sources to consult.

Until now.

“Shirt-front” is among the more than 6,000 new entries in an updated version of the Australian National Dictionary, released Tuesday at a ceremony at the country’s Parliament in Canberra, the capital. It was the first update since the dictionary’s inaugural edition was printed in 1988.

The new edition, which lists 16,000 idioms, was compiled by the Australian National Dictionary Center at the Australian National University. New entries include popular terms like bogan (“an uncultured and unsophisticated person”) and budgie smugglers (“a pair of closefitting male swimming briefs made of stretch fabric”).

Posted in Australia | Comments Off