How the Right is Finally Learning to Take Over Institutions

Aaron Renn writes Feb. 13:

Conservatives can’t use the long march strategy because the left isn’t dumb enough to let them penetrate institutions. Instead, conservatives need to do the equivalent of a private equity buyout and restructure institutions from the top down.

…ownership of Twitter marked the first time someone on the right actually acquired ownership of a major culture shaping institution and leveraged that ownership for political and cultural change. This arguably played an important role in Trump’s election, and Musk now plays a key role in the administration (for now at least). The Twitter ownership change is also probably one of the big factors in the recent “vibe shift” in the culture. And this was from controlling and fully leveraging just one institution.

The other interesting thing is that it is the left that chose exit from Twitter, largely leaving for the startup Bluesky app, which has become a low quality left wing echo chamber. They intentionally marginalized themselves from the discourse because by and large the mainstream, including most major journalists, stayed on X.

Musk’s Twitter takeover is the exact opposite of the typical pattern. Conservatives took over a liberal institution, and the left exited for a lower quality, culturally marginal platform.

Posted in Aaron Renn | Comments Off on How the Right is Finally Learning to Take Over Institutions

The Wounded Prophet

Aaron Renn writes:

Rod Dreher has a knack for putting his finger on the pulse of what people are going to be talking about next. He did this with his Benedict Option, and I believe has done it again with his work on re-enchantment.

But that comes with a heavy price. Rod is a deeply wounded man, one alienated from many of the institutions and people who shaped his life. He’s written about this publicly many times, including again recently:

As you longtime readers, as well as readers of Living In Wonder, know, I did not understand what St. Galgano had to do with me until 2020, when, in the depths of my depression over my failed marriage, I stumbled upon Tarkovsky’s film Nostalghia, in which I encountered myself as an alienated writer who was marooned in his head, unable to fully live in the present because he longed deeply for the past.

After JBP’s [Jordan Peterson] talk the other night, it has come back to mind. I have traveled far from the paralyzing nostalgia I had for family and marriage that had been lost to me, but I have not yet made the full transition into what my life is supposed to be, in God’s plan. I have a lot of new subscribers here, and what you new folks may not know is that my experience over the last two decades has been one of sustained radical loss.

Then, in early 2002, the Catholic sex abuse scandal broke big; by 2005, I had had my capacity to believe in Catholicism stripped from me, in an experience that was like a flaying. I also lost faith in my ability to be certain about Truth, as I had never imagined — literally, had never thought possible — that I could lose my Catholicism. But it happened. (As you know, I became Orthodox, and though I believe in Orthodox Christianity, the palms of my hands were burned so profoundly from 2002-05 that I can never grip, with my painful scars, any form of the Christian faith with the same ease and feeling that I did Catholicism.)

Around that time, I lost faith in the leadership of my country, and in the Republican Party and organized political conservatism, because of the Iraq War, which I had fully supported (this was another reason I lost faith in my own epistemological capabilities.)

Then, in 2012, when I learned the dark truth about how my Louisiana family regarded me and my wife and kids (as “city people,” not to be welcomed or trusted), and their refusal to admit that they had been wrong, the basic emotional base for my understanding of the world vanished overnight. That same awful year, because of the trauma of that catastrophe, my marriage began to collapse, a drawn-out process that immiserated me and my ex-wife for a decade.

It’s so often the case that the people who have the deepest insights into our world and our institutions are wounded men, those deeply hurt and alienated in important ways.

Ross Douthat wrote a column about such a man back in 2018.

The first time I ever heard the truth about Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, the former archbishop of Washington, D.C., finally exposed as a sexual predator years into his retirement, I thought I was listening to a paranoiac rant.

It was the early 2000s, I was attending some earnest panel on religion, and I was accosted by a type who haunts such events — gaunt, intense, with a litany of esoteric grievances. He was a traditionalist Catholic, a figure from the church’s fringes, and he had a lot to say, as I tried to disentangle from him, about corruption in the Catholic clergy. The scandals in Boston had broken, so some of what he said was familiar, but he kept going, into a rant about Cardinal McCarrick: Did you know he makes seminarians sleep with him? Invites them to his beach house, gets in bed with them …

At this I gave him the brushoff that you give the monomaniacal and slipped out.

That was before I realized that if you wanted the truth about corruption in the Catholic Church, you had to listen to the extreme-seeming types, traditionalists and radicals, because they were the only ones sufficiently alienated from the institution to actually dig into its rot. (This lesson has application well beyond Catholicism.)

This link between woundedness and insight is almost a cliché in the world of art. We fully expect great artists to be tortured souls, or certainly at least strange. But it’s true of intellectuals as well.

This is actually one of the great themes of science fiction: Some truths are too terrible to know. Learning them will drive one insane.

… the deepest insights, and most contrarian yet true thinking, often comes from deeply wounded people.

Posted in Aaron Renn | Comments Off on The Wounded Prophet

The Vanishing Neighbor: The Transformation of American Community (2014)

Marc J. Dunkelman writes:

* Rather than have a local nobleman keep watch over a district, as in England, the cohort of Americans living nearby took joint responsibility for their collective well – being . Many colonists had moved away from the social architecture depicted later in Downton Abbey and toward something more like that portrayed in Little House on the Prairie. 5 And because that sort of community wouldn’t abide the heavy hand of a monarch — communities working collaboratively were less interested in taking orders from on high — the founding generation designed and embraced an alternative kind of government, reflected in the Constitution, that was more appropriate to colonial American life.
In the centuries that followed, that core community building block — what Alexis de Tocqueville and others before him defined as a “township” — remained the defining feature of American society. 6 Americans moved from farm to factory and from town to city. They withstood the Industrial Revolution. They evolved from a society dependent on slave labor to one focused on innovation. But through all of those changes, the core architecture of “townshipped” society — where communities of people with different skills and interests, disparate concerns and values, collaborated with their neighbors in the pursuit of the common good — endured.

* Adults today tend to prize different kinds of connections than their grandparents: more of our time and attention today is spent on more intimate contacts and the most casual acquaintances. We’ve abandoned the relationships in between — what I define in a later chapter as “middle – ring” ties.

* Chris Rock would joke that in every town in America there are two malls: “they’ve got the white mall, and the mall where the white people used to go.”

* Where religion once acted as a sort of social obligation passed down from generation to generation, we now view piety as a route to personal expression. We have moved from a sort of institutional religiosity to what Princeton sociologist Robert Wuthnow has termed a “spirituality of seeking.” 17 Americans today choose much more frequently to abandon their parents’ liturgy in favor of a spiritual journey that feels more individually fulfilling. 18
Moreover, while we’re less likely to attend religious services, when we do choose to frequent a house of worship, we’re much more likely to travel to attend the services we like best.

* Among those who bought and sold large quantities of jewels in the Diamond District of Manhattan, he noted that most were Orthodox Jews from certain pockets of Brooklyn. For the most part, they attended the same synagogues and sent their kids to the same schools. And because their lives were so intertwined, they’d developed a series of norms that, taken out of context, might have appeared reckless. For example, when one dealer wanted to sell a bag of gems to another, he generally offered the prospective buyer an opportunity to examine the stones in private.
To most outsiders, that tradition might appear to be an invitation to theft — the buyer, after all, would then have a chance to replace the stones in question with less valuable impostors. But the sellers were rarely snookered — and for good reason: if a buyer tried something sneaky, he faced the wrath of the neighborhood back home. It’s not just that a thief would be shunned from future business transactions in and around the Diamond District — he’d be ostracized from community community gatherings, subjected to glares at shul, and offered the cold shoulder on the street. Integrity in the Diamond District wasn’t the issue it might have been because good behavior was enforced through shame.
Coleman’s explication of social capital contended that interpersonal connections couldn’t be discounted as leisurely pleasures because, in reality, they harnessed very tangible economic value.

* Our search for affirmation — what MIT scholar Sherry Turkle has defined as a sort of communal narcissism — has compelled us to avoid relationships that expanded our intellectual horizons or drove conflict. Unless we enjoy it, we no longer have to maintain a close friendship with the woman who wants to haggle over politics. We no longer have to talk football with the guy rooting for our team’s archrival. And life today doesn’t just allow us to spend more time with the acquaintances who comprise our inner and outer rings; we can populate those categories with people who speak our language. 20 Never before have people who shared our concerns been so easily accessible, not only across the dinner table but around the globe.

* The circumstances that once compelled Americans to develop the sort of familiar but less intimate relationships that were a staple of postwar American life have faded. Social capital spent on World of Warcraft or Facebook is time not spent outside talking with neighbors, shooting the breeze at a bar, or grabbing a burger with a colleague from work. And while there’s nothing wrong with that per se, we ought not to be so naïve as to think that that those new relationships don’t come at a cost.

* we tend to e – mail with the same people we visit in real life.

* for every minute an individual spends on the Internet, the time he or she spends with friends is reduced by seven seconds, and time spent with colleagues by eleven. Perhaps more jarring, the study found that for every e – mail sent or received, an individual lost a minute of time with his or her family.

* [Claude Fischer published the 1982 book To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City.] Residents of small towns engaged more frequently in what Fischer termed “traditional” relationships — they were more apt to encompass family members, neighbors, and fellow congregants at church. In cities, by contrast, relationships were more “modern,” meaning that urbanites were more often tied to work associates, club members, and friends. There seemed to be a tacit trade – off at work: people living in downtown San Francisco named a quarter fewer relatives among their network than those in semirural areas; on the flip side, only an eighth of city dwellers lived in a social world dominated by family, compared to a full half of those living further out. 2
Fischer also discerned something else: those who lived in the bedroom communities surrounding cities — suburbanites, in essence — were the least likely to be involved in the traditional relationships of rural America. His broad conclusion: while it wasn’t fair to say that community was in decline, how people in various types of neighborhoods connected to one another varied across disparate environments. 3 Different landscapes begat different flavors of community.

* In the early postwar period, being neighborly meant reaching out to the people who lived next door — taking a homemade cake to the family moving into the house across the street, offering to watch the kids in a pinch, saying hello at an annual block party, or inviting acquaintances to join a Wednesday night bowling league.
Over the years, however, the term came to denote almost exactly the opposite. Today, being “neighborly” means leaving those around you in peace. The neighborly family across the street refrains from playing loud music or leaving its garbage on the stoop. A neighborly homeowner avoids letting her house deteriorate and become a blight on the neighborhood. “Neighborly” neighbors avoid mentioning what they’ve overheard through the thin walls separating apartments. The sense of warmth once suggested by the term — a crucial ingredient for the sorts of the middle – ring relationships so important for township community — has been replaced by a kind of detachment.

* Americans aren’t nearly as invested in the missions of the membership associations that they choose to join today as their parents and grandparents were decades ago. It isn’t just that the nature of those organizations had changed, as Theda Skocpol discovered. It’s that each individual’s emotional investment in each organization had ebbed.
In the 1950s, for example, a mother might have found satisfaction in the spirit of fellowship and charity that defined her Junior League chapter, and her husband might have taken pride in being a leader of the neighborhood watch. But as Americans increasingly have come to mark their involvement by sending checks to professional lobbying organizations like Planned Parenthood Action Fund or the AARP, their sense of personal responsibility has diminished; roles once filled by voluntary associations have become the government’s responsibility. 7 Community policing, for example, the strategy of having officers become more intimately familiar with the people along their patrols, was promoted during the 1990s largely because the civic organizations that once served the same role had withered.
A similar shift is evident in the American workplace. The patterns that were predominant in the early postwar period — the industrial jobs that peaked during the 1940s and 1950s — facilitated casual acquaintances that are rarer today. The way that businesses have become specialized — farming out discrete responsibilities rather than housing a whole contingent of different sorts of employees — has eaten away at middle – ring relationships that might have existed between different kinds of employees. The interactions that might have flourished in the parking lot between an accountant and an engineer two generations ago don’t happen because the accountants now work on one suburban campus and the engineers on another.

* Robert Putnam: “The best evidence suggests that social trust rose from the mid – 1940s to the mid – 1960s, peaking in 1964. . . . In the mid – 1960s, however, this beneficent trend was reversed, initiating a long – term decline. . . . Most, if not all, of the decline in American social trust since the 1960s is attributable to generational succession. . . . At generation’s end, a generation with a trust quotient of nearly 80 percent was being rapidly replaced by one with a trust quotient of barely half that.”

I ask Grok: “What role does diversity play in social trust?”

Grok says:

Robert Putnam’s 2007 study on U.S. communities found that higher diversity often correlates with lower social capital—people tend to “hunker down,” trust their neighbors less, and pull back from civic engagement. The idea is that humans are wired for familiarity; when you’re surrounded by people who don’t look, talk, or act like you, it can trigger an instinctive wariness. Studies in Europe, like those from the Netherlands or Denmark, back this up: trust in strangers (generalized trust) tends to dip in more diverse neighborhoods.

I ask Grok: “How racially segregated are America’s churches?”

Grok says:

America’s churches remain significantly racially segregated, a reflection of both historical patterns and ongoing social dynamics. Studies and data consistently show that most congregations are racially homogenous, with Sunday morning often described as “the most segregated hour in America”—a phrase popularized by Martin Luther King Jr. in the 1960s that still holds true today.
A 2021 study by Lifeway Research found that 67% of U.S. churches are composed of one racial or ethnic group making up 80% or more of the congregation. This means that two-thirds of churches are overwhelmingly dominated by a single race. The National Congregations Study (2018-2019) reported similar findings: about 80% of churchgoers attend a congregation where one racial group comprises at least 80% of the membership. White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian congregations tend to form distinct clusters, with little overlap.

Posted in America | Comments Off on The Vanishing Neighbor: The Transformation of American Community (2014)

Christians In A Negative America (3-6-25)

01:00 NYT: People Are Going Silent’: Fearing Retribution, Trump Critics Muzzle Themselves: People say they are intimidated by online attacks from the president, concerned about harm to their businesses or worried about the safety of their families. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/06/us/politics/trump-democracy.html
20:00 New York: America’s First Post-Secular City, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHqvb4MwJqA
22:00 NYT: He Gave a Name to What Many Christians Feel: And the feeling isn’t good. Aaron Renn has gained a following by warning that the U.S. is currently a “negative world” for Christianity. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/06/us/aaron-renn-christianity-conservative-negative-world.html
25:00 The three worlds of American Christianity, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Three_Worlds_of_Evangelicalism
30:00 Telegraph: Young, single men are leaving traditional churches. They found a more ‘masculine’ alternative, https://www.yahoo.com/news/young-men-leaving-traditional-churches-171506770.html
51:00 Laws around porn are changing, https://www.youtube.com/live/xrFLz75-dIc
53:00 How elites reconcile and move on, https://www.aaronrenn.com/p/joe-rogan-christianity
55:00 Aaron Renn: The Personal Roots of Political Disputes, https://www.aaronrenn.com/p/critical-theory
59:30 Aella vs. Arrogant Red Pill Man, https://decoding-the-gurus.captivate.fm/episode/supplementary-material-24-dialogos-with-greek-gods-the-metaphysics-of-pepe-and-red-pilled-embarrassment
1:10:00 Aaron Renn: The Vibe Shift and the Decline of Double Standards: How the rehiring of a controversial DOGE staffer reflects America’s changing approach to cancel culture, https://www.aaronrenn.com/p/spiritual-boomerism
1:14:00 Aaron Renn: Andrew Tate or Panda Express: Which Way Young Man? What a fast-food debate tells us about masculinity, social class, and Spiritual Boomerism, https://www.aaronrenn.com/p/spiritual-boomerism
1:37:00 Hunter Biden struggles to sell his paintings, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuEUki_wXVI
1:42:45 From Harding to Trump: The REAL History of American Conservatism | Matthew Continetti, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KITCo1ZKLiY
1:45:30 Mark Halperin on Trump’s First 100 Days, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOlMkcqXAIg
1:52:00 Chaos sets in as Trump II resembles Trump I
1:58:00 Paris Hilton song ADHD promotes nonsense about ADHD being a superpower
2:04:30 Why Is ADHD So Impairing?, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BG1x8exxGso
2:06:30 Michael joins
2:09:00 Andrew Tate, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Tate
2:27:50 Video: My Ex-Best Friend Ashley St. Clair PLAYED Elon Musk! I BROUGHT RECEIPTS, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1LrJjOjRTM
2:46:00 Gavin Newsome is a formidable Democratic presidential candidate
2:57:20 Orthodox Conversion to Judaism in American Responsa Literature (Part 5) || Rabbi Adam Mintz, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rneJAiiOV0
3:04:00 Orthodox Conversion to Judaism in American Responsa Literature (Part 4) || Rabbi Adam Mintz, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTyh1htZoaM

Posted in America | Comments Off on Christians In A Negative America (3-6-25)

Nuclear War: A Scenario (2024)

Annie Jacobsen writes in her recent book:

* As a general rule, missile tests as significant as an ICBM launch are announced, usually to neighbors — through diplomatic channels, back channels, some other kind of channel, but almost always through a channel.
The exception is North Korea.
Between January 2022 and May 2023, North Korea test – launched more than 100 missiles, including nuclear – capable weapons that can hit the continental United States.
None of them were announced.

* Everyone with Space Delta 4 is hyper – focused on what appears to be an attacking intercontinental ballistic missile en route to the United States of America. The dreaded ICBM is unstoppable and nuclear capable.
Once launched, an ICBM cannot be recalled.

* Once ground radar confirms that an attacking ICBM is on its way to the East Coast, an impossibly dangerous, next – step feature of U.S. nuclear warfighting strategy comes to the fore.
This feature centers around a decades – old policy called Launch on Warning.
“Once we are warned of a nuclear attack, we prepare to launch,” former secretary of defense William Perry tells us. “ This is policy. We do not wait.”
Launch on Warning policy is why — and how — America keeps a majority of its deployed nuclear arsenal on ready – for – launch status, also known as Hair – Trigger Alert.

* The U.S. system centers around forty – four interceptor missiles, each one fifty – four feet tall and designed to hit a fast – flying nuclear warhead with a 140 – pound projectile called an exoatmospheric kill vehicle. The incoming North Korean warhead will be traveling at speeds of around 14,000 miles per hour, while the interceptor’s kill vehicle will be traveling at speeds of around 20,000 miles per hour, making this action, if successful, “ akin to shooting a bullet with a bullet,” according to the Missile Defense Agency’s spokesperson.
From 2010 to 2013, not a single one of the early interceptor tests was successful.

* At any given time, these forty – four interceptor kill vehicles are on alert, siloed at two separate locations in the continental United States. Forty of these missiles are located in Alaska, at Fort Greely, and four are located in California, at Vandenberg Space Force Base near Santa Barbara.

* With forty – four missiles in its entire inventory, the U.S. interceptor program is mostly for show.

* Submarines are the most survivable leg of the nuclear triad because when electronic communication systems soon fail, submariners will still be able to receive launch orders from STRATCOM using very low frequency/low frequency (VLF/LF) radio wave technology developed, rehearsed, and mastered during the Cold War. These subsurface radio systems behave differently from others working in the atmosphere, systems that can easily be destroyed by electromagnetic pulse. The second reason is because submarines cannot easily be located by an enemy force.

* To defend against short – range ballistic missiles, the U.S. Navy has developed its Aegis program, an anti – ballistic missile system mounted on navy Aegis cruisers and destroyers at sea. Unlike the faulty interceptor program, Aegis missiles have a shoot – down record of 85 percent. But these battleships are out on patrol in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, and in the Persian Gulf — defending America’s NATO and Indo – Pacific partners from attack. They are thousands of miles away from being anywhere near shooting range of America’s West Coast.
The Pentagon also operates a land – based missile defense program called the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, system — one that fires anti – ballistic missiles from launchers mounted on flatbed trucks. But as with the Aegis missile defense systems, all of America’s THAAD systems are presently deployed overseas. Years back, after North Korea first successfully fired a KN – 23 missile, Congress discussed setting up THAAD systems along America’s West Coast, but as of 2024 has not done so yet.

* In 1983, President Reagan ordered a simulated war game, code – named Proud Prophet, to explore the outcome and effects of a nuclear war… According to Proud Prophet, regardless of how nuclear war begins, it ends with complete Armageddon – like destruction. With the U.S., Russia, and Europe totally destroyed. With the entire Northern Hemisphere uninhabitable from fallout. With the death of, at minimum, a half billion people in the war’s opening salvo alone. Followed by the starvation and death of almost everyone who initially survived.

* Fourteen years later, Vice President Al Gore asked Professor Bracken to lead a different kind of war game simulation, not a nuclear war game, but one involving a cyberattack on Wall Street. In the late nineties, VP Gore was worried the newly popular internet was making America’s banking system vulnerable to terrorist attack… Their conclusion — drawn from the war game — was basic, Bracken contends. “Move data storage away from Manhattan. The Wall Street firms accelerated the movement of data storage to New Jersey and Long Island.” Cheaper. Safer. Great. Except: “What we didn’t figure out was the actual attack,” Bracken laments. “We didn’t think of driving an airplane into [the] building” where the game was being played. That is, flying a commercial airplane into the World Trade Center. Four years later, fifteen of the people who were playing that simulated war game were killed in the 9/11 terror attack at the World Trade Center…

* A Nuclear Regulatory Commission report finds that a small – to – medium – sized fire at a facility like Diablo Canyon would displace 3 to 4 million people. “We’d [be] talking about trillion – dollar consequences,” Frank von Hippel, professor emeritus at Princeton University and cofounder of its Program on Science and Global Security, said of such a catastrophe. But a nuclear strike against Diablo Canyon Power Plant will not produce a fire that is small or even medium – sized. It will be a radioactive inferno. The beginning of the apocalypse.

* The president confirms option Charlie. A nuclear counterstrike designed as the Launch on Warning response to a North Korean nuclear strike against America. Eighty – two targets, or “aimpoints,” that include North Korea’s nuclear and WMD facilities, its leadership, and other war – sustaining facilities. This counterstrike launches fifty Minuteman III ICBMs and eight Trident SLBMs (each Trident carries four nuclear warheads in its nose cone), for a total of eighty – two nuclear warheads at eighty – two targets on the northern half of the Korean peninsula. This mother lode of force is but a fraction of what the original SIOP for nuclear war called for in its opening salvo against Moscow. Here, in this scenario, the eighty – two nuclear warheads about to be launched all but guarantee the deaths of millions of people, or maybe even tens of millions of people, on the Korean peninsula alone.

* An ICBM can be launched — meaning the time it takes from the moment a launch order is received, to the weapon’s physical launch — faster than any other weapon system in the arsenal, including those on submarines. “They weren’t called Minutemen for nothing,” wrote former ICBM launch officer Bruce Blair. “The process of arming and targeting and firing the missiles [happens] in a grand total of 60 seconds.”

* “Northern Virginia has well over 60 percent of the world’s data centers.”

* Thousands of commercial airplanes using fly – by – wire technology systems lose wing and tail controls, lose cabin pressure and landing gear, lose instrument landing systems as they head violently toward the ground. One class of passenger aircraft is mercifully spared, namely the older model 747s, used by the Defense Department for its Doomsday Planes. “747 pilots still use a foot pedal and a yoke, mechanically linked to the control surfaces,” Yago tells us. “There’s no fly – by – wire technology there.”
The critical infrastructure systems on the ground fail in succession. Without SCADA systems controlling the more than 2.6 million miles of pipeline through which America’s oil and gas products flow, millions of valves rupture and explode. Combustion sensors on coal – fired boiler systems suffer the wrong mix of air and fuel, causing them to ignite and blow. With the motorized valves on America’s water – delivery systems no longer under anyone’s control, billions of gallons of water passing through America’s aqueducts surge uncontrollably. Dams burst. Mass flooding begins sweeping infrastructure and people away.
There will be no more fresh water. No more toilets to flush. No sanitation. No streetlights, no tunnel lights, no lights at all, only candles, until there are none left to burn. No gas pumps, no fuel. No ATMs. No cash withdrawals. No access to money. No cell phones. No landlines. No calling 911. No calls at all. No emergency communication systems except some high – frequency (HF) radios. No ambulance services. No hospital equipment that works. Sewage spills out everywhere. It takes less than fifteen minutes for disease – carrying insects to swarm. To feed on piles of human waste, on garbage, on the dead.
America’s complex system of systems comes to a sudden, apocalyptic halt. In the ensuing fear and mayhem, people revert to their most basic, mammalian instincts. To using their five senses, their hands, and their feet. People everywhere sense imminent danger all around. They sense that whatever just happened is the beginning of the savagery, not the end.
People abandon their vehicles and begin to flee on foot. They exit buildings, run down stairs, and outdoors. People in subway trains and on buses, in halted elevator cars, work to pry open emergency exits and doors. They crawl, walk, and run for their lives.

* As this final blitzkrieg of SLBM warheads strikes and destroys their targets, all that remains of America’s Nuclear Command and Control are its Doomsday Planes in the air and its Trident submarines at sea.

* “The density of soot would reduce global temperatures by roughly 27 degrees Fahrenheit,” climatologist Alan Robock explains. “In America, it would be more like a drop of 40 degrees Fahrenheit, slightly less near the oceans.”
The Earth plunges into a new horror called nuclear winter.

Posted in Nuclear | Comments Off on Nuclear War: A Scenario (2024)