Does This Make Me A Bad Jew?

A friend says: “I moved my restaurant seat from bar to table because I didn’t want to listen to an incoming shvartzeh couple chatter or have to suffer their attempts at engagement in conversation. Does that make me a bad Jew? I know it makes me a bad white person because the Jews say it does, but does it make me a bad Jew? I think not.”

Moving away from blacks (at a bar, neighborhood, city, etc) is a sin for whites but a mitzvah for Jews because Holocaust.

Chaim Amalek writes: “If you really don’t want to live or dine near them or have them in public school with your kids, move to the Upper West Side of Manhattan! It is the best place in the world to be White. Really, a White Person’s paradise, especially if you are the white mother of white kids.”

Posted in Blacks, Jews | Comments Off on Does This Make Me A Bad Jew?

NeverTrumps and the End of America as We Know It

The American Thinker:

Jared E. Peterson, American Thinker, September 6, 2016

The election of Hillary Clinton would mean final defeat for American conservativism–for at least a generation and almost certainly for much longer than that. The demographic changes certain to flow from eight more years of open borders, general amnesty, and distribution of the newly arrived statist voters to electorally vulnerable states would make the Left’s presidential victory this fall, for all practical purposes, permanent.

And that’s without considering the effect on the electorate of the increasingly intolerant and repressive educational and political environment, an environment that for eight more years would continue driving substantial segments of the populace, especially the vulnerable young, into the ever more mandatory belief systems of the Left.

But don’t worry: After Clinton’s election the elegant and witty columns of George Will, William Kristol and Jonah Goldberg, aided by the surpassing political skills of the Bush and Romney families, will save us all from both these calamities, and from all the other unnamed ones that Hillary and the Left will bring.

Uh, maybe not.

If Clinton prevails there will be no conservative (or Republican) president during the lifetime of any adult member of the feckless Republican royal families, or of Mr. Goldberg or the children of George Will or William Kristol. Their prediction that the presidency will be recovered in short order is a pipe dream. Over the medium term, twenty to twenty-five years, that recovery would approach demographic impossibility.

Despite the inarguable magnitude of the coming Clinton/Left disaster, Republican/conservative turncoats, led by these and other members of what Peggy Noonan aptly terms the “protected classes,” are working for Clinton’s election.

In unalloyed self-destructive irrationality, the support of Hillary Clinton by Never Trump commentators and Republican politicians is sui generis.

Never before in American history have intellectual and political leaders of a major party deliberately attempted to open the gates of enduring power to an enemy sworn to their eradication.

Are they moved by general snobbery, confusion caused by overwork, East Coast social pressure? I’ve stopped trying to figure it out and stopped caring.

But on a different level, on the level of their own personal careers and perceived short-term well-being, I’m absolutely certain what they think:

“We’ll do fine under Clinton and the Left. Under Obama we’ve experienced all of what Clinton will bring and we’ve flourished. Under Clinton we’ll do it again. We’ll continue speaking out, politely and carefully of course, and they won’t touch us; we won’t lose our jobs, our children won’t be expelled, there’ll be no unpleasant changes in our expensive neighborhoods or our children’s toney private schools, we’ll drink with the same refined people in our clubs and cocktail parties. Through it all, we’ll continue making an excellent living as the articulate opposition to the wretchedness the Left will be imposing on the American working and middle classes. The little people, the unprotected people, will endure the downside–low wages, high taxes, unsafe and decaying neighborhoods, destroyed public schools, and violent racial animosity. We’ll be the Left’s safe and well paid critics.”

What an appalling betrayal of the vast majority of Main Street voters who elected two Bush Presidents and made conservative intellectuals ‘cushy lives possible!

This is clear: Trump’s defeat, if it occurs, will be the work of the NeverTrumps.

The margin by which Trump now trails in national and battle ground polls is almost exactly equal to that small but significant segment of the Republican and conservative voter base–some 20 – 25%–that’s still following the NeverTrumps off the cliff. Recent polling puts Trump’s support among likely Republican voters at about 73% (Romney got 93% in 2012).

So, if Trump falls, the NeverTrumps will be grinning beside the body–like Brutus perhaps a bit nervously–bloody knives in hand. But as the Clinton debacle unfolds, and their role in bringing it about is meticulously established, dissected and seared into memory, who will be their political friends? Perhaps more pertinently, where will they hide? Questions for a different essay.

Victory by the execrable Clinton and the Left is still avoidable, but only if the usually overwhelming percentages of conservatives and Republicans unite behind their Party’s candidate. 73% will not do, even with the new voters Trump’s issue candor and personal bravery are bringing.

The Republican and conservative voter base has got to be persuaded to ignore the suicidal advice of their failed former leaders and snobbish intellectuals, and come together behind a candidate who ever more clearly is solidly with them on almost all the great issues: immigration and borders, freedom of expression and religion, the role and composition of the federal judiciary, taxation and regulation, national security, and public safety.

But if 20-25%% of the Republican core continues to follow the wrist slitting advice of the Never Trump crowd, the Left once again will be victorious –as in 1992, when Republican defections to Perot gave the presidency to Bill Clinton with a puny 43% of the vote.

America thereafter would be permanently transformed into a new nation, molded by the Left’s dystopian dreams of multiculturalism, racial and ethnic balkanization, boiling hatred of black for white, open borders, and a government suffocated economy, a new nation whose populace would be increasingly beaten down by the dictates of governmentally mandated orthodoxies.

Here–of singular importance for any future chance of conservative governance in America–is what we know is coming from Clinton and the Left:

Intensification of the Democratic Party-sponsored third world invasion of the country. In this so far highly successful project, the Left has substituted millions of statist newcomer voters for the politically uncooperative Americans who shunned them in 1968, 1972, 1980, 1984, and 1988.

But the Left’s revolutionary demographic transformation of America is not complete. A stubborn and significant core of patriots and traditionalists remains. It will be the primary task of the Clinton presidency to overwhelm this annoyingly tenacious opposition once and for all.

The following states require only a modest infusion of statist newcomers to place them out of reach for any Republican or conservative presidential candidate not pledged to open borders and a huge welfare state: Virginia, North Carolina, Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Nevada, Colorado and Arizona.

When any five of these ten are gone it’s game over.

Under Clinton, Illegals would continue moving north across America’s southern border in numbers sure to exceed those who came during Obama’s presidency (a minimum of 2.5 million according to liberal leaning Pew Research and the Center for Migration Studies).

In addition to the illegals, at least 1.5 million overwhelmingly third world legal immigrants will arrive annually (up from 1.1 million per year under Obama), nearly all impoverished and nearly all with expectations of government formed in their statist homelands.

Added to the legal and illegal immigrants will be the sure-to-be-legalized 11-20 million illegals already here (again Pew and Homeland Security admit to 11.2 million illegals already in America, but the actual figure is unknowably higher).

And if Clinton’s amnesty runs into Congressional opposition and she resorts to unconstitutional executive orders, this time there’ll be no help from the Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court will become a five vote rubber stamp for the Left immediately upon Clinton’s appointment of Justice Scalia’s replacement. That majority will be sustained or enlarged by whatever further vacancies come Clinton’s way.

So, adding it all up, the number of new future statist client voters after Clinton will be in the neighborhood of 26-38 million: 11-20 million amnestied illegals; 12 million new, almost exclusively third world, statist voting legal immigrants; and another 4-6 million newly arrived illegals.

With the full power of the federal executive branch in their hands, and no opposition from an increasingly partisan federal judiciary and Supreme Court, the re-empowered Left will move its newly chosen voters around as it chooses–to the states where their voting presence will have the greatest effect.

Have the Bush and Romney families–and their intellectual enablers–given all this even passing thought?

How many of these new voters do Messrs. Kristol, Will and Goldberg expect to persuade with their erudition?

Much more likely, what they’ve focused on is what’s always been their main concern: continued politically useless but personally remunerative occupation of the places of party power.

Over the last 25 years, neither the intellectuals nor the Party leaders of the NeverTrump crowd has prevented, or even slowed, the Left’s march through our cultural institutions. And now, to round out their litany of failure, they urge us to give the Left permanent possession of the presidency and the federal judiciary.

One last fatal give-away from the crowd that’s already failed so grandly. I submit that Ronald Reagan, America’s most successful conservative president, and William Buckley, America’s most effective conservative intellectual, would be appalled by this selfish, self-destructive claque of clueless politicians and confused scribblers who are trying to lead America into the arms of the Left.

Reagan and Buckley had the unfailingly good judgement to vigorously support the most conservative electable candidate. Especially where the US presidency was at stake. Barring calamity, the list of possible next American Presidents contains two names. There are no others. It would take Ronald Reagan or Bill Buckley all of a microsecond to give Trump their full support in this crucial election.

It should be evident by now that the determined suicides within Republican Party and conservative leadership ranks can’t be reached by reason. This is the time to simply ignore them. Doing so now will be good practice for the future.

As for the rest of us, we can only work to ensure that, in the end, the overwhelming majority of America’s conservatives and Republicans are guided by what their greatest leaders would have done in these circumstances, and not by the willfully destructive, self-interested counsel of the snobs who are trying to hand America to the Left.

Posted in America | Comments Off on NeverTrumps and the End of America as We Know It

What Does Michelle Obama Want?

Steve Sailer writes: As far as I can tell, Michelle Obama has mostly gone through life wanting Ann Romney’s life. She keeps getting annoyed by the fact that her culture wants her to take on more ambitious, more masculine roles. For example, back in school, everybody wanted her to play basketball because she’s tall and broad-shouldered and her older brother was a star. But she doesn’t like sports. She didn’t particularly like going to Whitney Young HS, Princeton, and Harvard Law. She would have liked being a bigger fish in a smaller pond.

Everybody wanted her to be a hot shot lawyer, but she didn’t like law. She kind of likes political jobs where she builds networks by handing out other people’s money, but when those kind of jobs are in short supply, she’d rather stay home with her kids.

She likes clothes, vacations, and family life. She didn’t like that her bookish husband wasn’t maximizing his earning potential, turning down a million dollar per year job offer to head the liberal Joyce Foundation in order to stay in the part-time state senate.

Posted in Barack Obama | Comments Off on What Does Michelle Obama Want?

2016 Election Is One For The Ages

Comments:

* Imagine an election in which a candidate does not ever actually appear. Only surrogates do. Like the person hardly exists at all. Maybe this would be a more honest reflection of how things work: We are not voting for a person, but for a regime, the same regime as always.

“Vote for _______”fill in the blank. There’s actually nothing in the blank, and it does not matter.

It’s like that T-shirt I love: “Go Local Sports Team and/or College!”

They’ll prop up Mrs. Clinton like a scarecrow if they have to, and the correct masses will obey Michelle and every other one of their superiors, as they always do.

Still, seeing the old crook wobble and faint made my day. Keep it coming!

* Michelle seems a ludicrous choice to anyone paying the least bit of attention, but remember the utter rapture expressed in the MSM and many other quarters over her recent DNC speech (even Hugh Hewitt, for example, gushed like crazy).

I also recall numerous FB friends describing how they were shivering, weeping, cheering, etc., while Michelle spoke. They see her as a goddess, even farther beyond criticism than BO himself.

* More band names plucked verbatim from the comments, in chronological order:

Is There Still Time for Hillary to Drop Out?

Fluff The Muff
Panic Is Weakness
9 Freaks In Black Dresses
Too Late For Tim
Son In Secret Service
Imagine Reince Priebus
Right By Fluke
Withdrawal Is Futile
Perception Of Chaos
Dorian Gray Thing
Bust Out The Zipper Mask
Globo-Crunch
Mercy For Cankles
Meds Won’t Help
Winner Before Bedtime
Disco Background
Mental Image Of Steve
Yes Yes My Models
Still Shitfaced
Whoa That Video
Jew From Vermont
Of The Fringes
Fed Spoonfeed
Whiffing On Gimmies
Still Feel The Pea
Last Of Their Luster
Caligula Kaine
Hillary’s Bedroom
Big Slice Of College
Mancrush On Mittens

Hillary Not Looking Well

Stable Clodhoppers
Green Bronchial Ejecta
Allergy Shizzle
Blame A Russian
Amber Lamps
Bulging Eye Roll
Spasmodic Twitches
More Vigorous Face
Polonium!
Suge Knight With A Vagina
Rim Shotski
Sucking For Air
Occasional Glitches
Karma Bitch
Becankled Shoe
Complete Trauma Unit
Bush Vomit
Expired Pickles
Smiting The Hindmost

Kaine, Sanders, Biden, Warren, or … Michelle?

Unnatural Stiffening
Seek Out Chewbacca
Cold Dead Fangs
Smokey Backroom
Perhaps Madeleine
Seizure Angle
Stick Lesbian
Bulging Wieners

* A little while ago Facebook Trends had the story on Hillary Clinton’s health, stating that over 1M people were talking about it. Then it just disappeared from the trending list. The top story now is about Steve Harvey meeting his look-alike on Family feud, with 62K people discussing it. They’re also telling me about how 1.2K (1,200) people are discussing Terrelle Pryor making a catch in a football game.

I’m not very facebook savvy, but that looks a bit suspicious to me.

* Just reviewed drudge’s reverse angle video of Hillary’s event.
She is stiff, uncoordinated, halting in a global, whole body fashion.
The black assistant(same guy in another video who comes to podium?) lets her start to walk on her own, not something one would do if she were fainting.
If she were fainting, she should have been supine and rushed to ER.
It appears the event was not unexpected.
This adds more credence that she has a significant movement disorder.
The process is poorly controlled as one can see.

* I think the reason Trump is ahead and pulling away is that the dems aren’t considering “rhetoric fatigue” they may be creating by constantly doubling-down on their politically correct catch-phrases by her party, and especially the news outlets who have declared they can no longer report the news in a professional manner regarding Trump. Looking at you, NYT.

Because of this, I think recruiting Michelle Obama is a YUGE mistake. She’s a monolith of shrill, superficial inane catchphrases, and her “bitch face” has not improved over the years, not to mention the national “negro-fatigue” that many who are not a negro, or negrophile, is currently suffering from to dangerous degrees.

* One suspects that her SS contingent hates her guts and might be acting a bit slow as a result. I bet there was a lot of smirking going on and maybe a few toasts later that night at the bar.

* As far as I can tell, Michelle Obama has mostly gone through life wanting Ann Romney’s life. She keeps getting annoyed by the fact that her culture wants her to take on more ambitious, more masculine roles. For example, back in school, everybody wanted her to play basketball because she’s tall and broad-shouldered and her older brother was a star. But she doesn’t like sports. She didn’t particularly like going to Whitney Young HS, Princeton, and Harvard Law. She would have liked being a bigger fish in a smaller pond.

Everybody wanted her to be a hot shot lawyer, but she didn’t like law. She kind of likes political jobs where she builds networks by handing out other people’s money, but when those kind of jobs are in short supply, she’d rather stay home with her kids.

She likes clothes, vacations, and family life. She didn’t like that her bookish husband wasn’t maximizing his earning potential, turning down a million dollar per year job offer to head the liberal Joyce Foundation in order to stay in the part-time state senate.

* I wish the NYT’s would just tell the truth for once and write that the Obamas hate the Clintons. There is no way that Michelle or Barack Obama wants Hillary to win the presidency despite their obligatory and occasional voice of support required by Democrats. If Hillary loses, drops out of the race or dies before November 8th then the Obamas will reign supreme with the insiders of the Democrat party for another 4 to 8 years. If Hillary wins, the Obamas are out of the spotlight and will make much less money.

* It does not take genius to note that the Obama Machine is in rivalry with the Clinton Machine for control of the patronage spigot. Deciding who gets favors, that affect trillions of dollars. And they keep thousands of people employed. Who have a direct stake in the money machines going.

For them its not about mass immigration, as much as keeping their court position open in the royal house of Clinton or Obama. The Republican Party has a weaker version of, the Bush dynasty, but that’s it.

Plus as a practical matter a Black candidate means big Black turnout, 98% Black vote, and about 40% of the White vote, particularly virtue signaling White women. So there’s that.

Posted in America | Comments Off on 2016 Election Is One For The Ages

ESPN Chokes On Poz

Comment: ESPN is so pozzed that it’s quickly becoming unwatchable for average cracker-men. Sometimes I’ll hit the gym at lunch time and pass by the TVs.

Today as a random sample:
ESPN: SportsCenter w/ Cari Champion (black, female)
ESPN 2: His & Hers w/ Michael Smith (black, male) and Jemele Hill (black female)

Topic of discussion:
-Kaepernick, Kaepernick and more Kaepernick
-NCAA removing various championship tournaments from North Carolina because those reactionary Neanderthals insist that only women use the women’s locker rooms.
-Adam Jones lamenting how MLB doesn’t encourage Kaepernick-like protests because “baseball is a white man’s sport”.

The “30 for 30″ documentaries started out kinda awesomely a few years ago, but now every other episode is LGBTQ or Grrrl Power themed.

As fate would have it, ESPN has lost 3.2 million subscribers over the past year.

Let it burn.

Posted in ESPN | Comments Off on ESPN Chokes On Poz