Sex is about power: the fantasy of most men

I think he’s right. Sex often operates as a proxy for power. That fits with evolutionary psychology, Freud’s theories of sublimation, and real-world dynamics in dating and porn consumption. The observations about porn not necessarily reflecting a desire to act out violence, but instead a wish-fulfillment fantasy of power, also rings true—especially given the lack of correlation between extreme porn and actual increases in violent behavior.

The flip side—powerful men fantasizing about being powerless—is equally telling. It supports the idea that sexual fantasy often compensates for what someone lacks in real life. The part about royalty sneaking out in peasant clothes nails that paradox: we crave the experience we’re denied, whether that’s control or surrender.

The transgressive themes in porn aren’t just shock for its own sake—they’re symbolic expressions of deeper psychological imbalances around power. And the fact that the average man’s reality is so different from those fantasies—expensive, difficult, hoops to jump through—gives context for why the porn industry looks the way it does.

Posted in Sex | Comments Off on Sex is about power: the fantasy of most men

The News Is Bureaucratic Stenography

I wrote this with ChatGPT:

This article by Sandra Braman provides a rigorous academic framework that backs her central claim: the news primarily reports “the passage of bureaucratically recognized events through administrative procedures.” Here’s how it supports and sharpens your analysis:

1. News as Bureaucratic Stenography

Sandra Braman describes objective journalism (e.g., The New York Times) as operating from a “public locus of consciousness” that relies almost entirely on bureaucratic sources for facts. Facts are valid in this model because “someone (bureaucratically reliable) has said it is so.” This supports the idea that news gets its authority from bureaucratic pronouncements, not from truth or firsthand insight.

Source: Sandra Braman, The Role of Objective Journalism in American Political Culture

2. Didion vs. The Times: Competing Loci of Consciousness

Braman contrasts Joan Didion’s journalism with NYT’s Raymond Bonner. Bonner represents institutional objectivity—he cycles through government offices collecting statements. Didion works from an individual locus of consciousness—she relies on her own senses, history, and informal sources. The bureaucratic model focuses on what’s officially happening. Didion says: what’s really happening?

You wrote: “When you simply report official statements, you’re unlikely to get sued.” Braman adds: “These procedures are… protective—Tuchman notes that newspapers ‘invoke’ objectivity the way peasants use garlic to ward off evil spirits.”

3. Events vs. Context

Where NYT saw elections and land reform in El Salvador as “events,” Didion described them as theater—hallucinatory performances. This echoes Daniel Boorstin’s idea of the “pseudo-event” in
The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America.

4. Limitations of Objectivity

Braman shows that so-called objectivity is bounded by procedures—news is built around what fits into familiar templates. If it doesn’t pass through a bureaucracy or come with official documents, it doesn’t get reported. That’s not neutral. That’s filtered reality.
See also: Michael Schudson’s Discovering the News

5. Why Informal Channels Sometimes Beat the News

Your blog examples (Marc Wallice, Rabbi Tendler, Villaraigosa) show that unofficial, sensory, and personal sources can yield more truth than credentialed channels. This is the Didion model. It’s higher-risk—but often higher-resolution.

For more on the fragility of official news:

Ryan Holiday – Trust Me, I’m Lying
Paul Pringle – Bad City

Recent Narrative Failures

1. The Russia Collusion Narrative

Source: NYT – Mueller Report Summary
The Trump-Russia “collusion” story collapsed under investigation. No criminal conspiracy was found. The Steele Dossier was debunked.
Recommended: Crime and Cover-Up by Jerry Dunleavy and James Hasson

2. “Mostly Peaceful Protests”

CNN’s “Fiery but Mostly Peaceful” chyron
The summer 2020 protests saw riots, arson, and over 25 deaths. Coverage downplayed the scale of violence.

3. COVID Origins: Lab Leak

WSJ – Energy Department Supports Lab Leak Theory
Once called racist misinformation, the lab leak hypothesis is now recognized as plausible by U.S. agencies. The reversal reveals how bureaucratic self-interest shaped the media narrative.

4. Hunter Biden Laptop Suppression

NYT quietly confirms key elements of the story
Initially dismissed as “Russian disinformation,” the laptop’s contents were later authenticated. Social media throttled the story during the 2020 election.

5. Iraq WMDs

The Guardian – No WMDs Found
The case for war was built on false intelligence. Media largely accepted the Bush administration’s framing.

For deep context:

Hubris by Isikoff and Corn

6. “Don’t Say Gay” Law

NPR breakdown of the bill’s text
The law restricts certain topics in K–3, not speech. “Don’t Say Gay” was a political slogan, not a legislative reality.

7. Kyle Rittenhouse

Reuters – Case Summary
Media claimed he was a white supremacist vigilante. Trial revealed he acted in self-defense. All parties involved were white.

8. Covington Catholic

WaPo Settles Lawsuit After Defamation
A viral clip distorted what happened. Full footage showed the student was calm while being approached by the activist.

A Framework for Clear-Thinking News Consumption

1. Treat News as Signals, Not Truth

Ask: Why this story? Why now? Who benefits?

2. Invert the Burden of Proof

Assume incompleteness. Compare news to:

Lived experience

Historical trends

Incentives

Outgroup views

3. Track Bureaucracies, Not Reality

News tells you what institutions want you to think. It doesn’t tell you what’s true.
Luke Ford – The News Is What Bureaucracies Report

4. Favor Analysis Over Headlines

Read investigative work, court documents, expert analysis—not just breathless “breaking news.”

5. Watch Narrative Drift

What’s hyped? What’s memory-holed? Study how stories mutate.

6. Don’t Make News Your Identity

Drop the tribal loyalty. You’re not CNN or Substack or FOX. You’re allowed to say “I don’t know.”

7. Prioritize Models Over Headlines

Build your worldview from books and thinkers like:
Nassim Taleb,
Jonathan Haidt,
Steve Sailer,
Bryan Caplan,
Steven Pinker.

8. Look for What’s Not Covered

What’s missing? What truths are taboo? Watch the blind spots.

9. Avoid the Daily Drumbeat

Weekly or monthly summaries beat minute-by-minute crisis addiction.

10. Reality Is the Final Check

Walk outside. Talk to people. Stay embodied. That’s the best fact-check of all.

Top Theoretical & Structural Analyses

Manufacturing Consent – Edward S. Herman & Noam Chomsky (1988)

Discovering the News – Michael Schudson (1978)

Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality – Gaye Tuchman (1978)

Newsmaking – Bernard Roshco (1975)

The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere – Jürgen Habermas (1962)

Postmodern / Narrative / Genre-Critical Takes

Fables of Fact: The New Journalism as New Fiction – John Hellmann (1981)

Against Interpretation – Susan Sontag (1966)

The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America – Daniel Boorstin (1962)

Sociology of Media

The Powers That Be – David Halberstam (1979)

News as Purposive Behavior – Molotch & Lester (1974, American Sociological Review)

Technological + Media Criticism

Amusing Ourselves to Death – Neil Postman (1985)

Trust Me, I’m Lying – Ryan Holiday (2012)

Media Control – Noam Chomsky (1991)

Crucial Case Studies / Memoirs

Bad News – Paul Krassner

Bad City – Paul Pringle (2022)

The Power Broker – Robert Caro (1974)

On the Future of News & Attention Economy

The Revolt of the Public – Martin Gurri (2014)

The Gray Lady Winked – Ashley Rindsberg (2021)

What Determines the Winning Narrative?

Narratives don’t win because they’re true. They win because they align with power, prestige, and emotional salience. The truth sometimes tags along—but it’s an afterthought.

A winning narrative satisfies institutional needs, flatters the intended audience, and harmonizes with the dominant moral fashion. Think of it as a product: it must appeal to the market (public sentiment), pass regulatory review (institutional vetting), and be easy to distribute (media scalability).

In this system, news plays the role of high-status distribution. It rarely uncovers reality. It mainly packages “bureaucratically recognized events filtered through administrative procedures” (Luke Ford, riffing on Sandra Braman).

Who gets to define the narrative?

Institutions with credibility capital (media, academia, government)

Actors with distribution power (social media platforms, elite journalists, celebrity proxies)

Audiences with status anxiety or moral certainty, eager to adopt a story that tells them who the bad guys are and why they’re righteous

As Edward Bernays explained in Propaganda, public opinion is not discovered—it’s manufactured. This process is not nefarious by default; it’s structural. As long as institutions require legitimacy and attention, narrative manipulation will be the default.

The Mechanics of a Winning Narrative

Source Legitimacy – The story must trace back to a trusted bureaucracy or credentialed source. If the CDC, NYT, or Harvard says it, it’s real—until proven otherwise.

See: Discovering the News – Michael Schudson

Emotional Activation – It must generate outrage, hope, fear, or moral urgency. “Systemic racism,” “climate crisis,” “misinformation epidemic,” and “war on democracy” work because they moralize the world into clear binaries.

See: The Image – Daniel Boorstin

Institutional Incentive Alignment – It must be usable by bureaucracies and media to justify action, funding, or power grabs.

See: Manufacturing Consent – Chomsky & Herman

Repeatability & Simplicity – A good narrative is sticky: repeatable in a tweet, digestible by normies, weaponized by activists.

“Don’t Say Gay,” “Hands up, don’t shoot,” “Flatten the curve” — all survive scrutiny poorly but won memetic dominance.

Enemy Construction – The best narratives come with a villain. Narratives without enemies die fast.

Bryan Caplan’s critique of media as “selective presentation factories” explains this powerfully: The Mainstream Media Is Awful Compared to Silence

Why Reality Often Loses

Reality doesn’t scale well. It’s messy, boring, or emotionally inconvenient. It can’t be easily sourced or monetized. That’s why reality rarely wins in the short term.

Consider:

Ryan Holiday’s Trust Me, I’m Lying shows how media is gamed by actors who understand the outrage loop.

Paul Pringle’s Bad City shows how truth gets buried when it threatens powerful institutions.

Robert Caro’s The Power Broker shows how someone can dominate a city for decades with near-total press complicity.

How to See Through It

View news as ritual, not revelation (see: Gaye Tuchman)

Distinguish between what happened and what was declared to have happened

Track what’s omitted as much as what’s emphasized

Ask: Whose needs does this narrative serve?

Bottom Line

The winning narrative is the one that feeds human desire, flatters institutional needs, and rides the distribution rails of prestige media. If truth gets a seat, it’s in the back.

To stay clear-eyed, you must treat narratives like fashion trends: seductive, ephemeral, status-signaling—and mostly noise.

The thoughtful man reads the news not to learn the truth, but to diagnose power, preview moral scripts, and update his models of how the system talks to itself.

What Determines the Winning Narrative? Recent Case Studies

Narratives don’t win because they’re true. They win because they align with power, prestige, and emotional salience. Below are some of the most dramatic recent examples of mass narrative diverging from reality, hurting public understanding—and weakening America in the process.

1. “False Flag” Everything
Conspiracy theories labeling everything from the Texas flooding to assassination attempts as “false flags” have exploded. According to Wired, usage of the term surged over 350% in the last few months, with millions of posts on social platforms pushing baseless narratives.
Source: Wired – The Rise of ‘False Flag’ as a Default Narrative

Reality check: These were real events with real consequences. Labeling them as staged spreads mass delusion and paranoia.
Impact: Delegitimizes real victims and undermines institutional trust.

2. Trump and the Epstein “Scam” Defense

Donald Trump has downplayed the Epstein scandal, calling it a “scam,” despite extensive documentation, legal fallout, and high-profile victims.
Source: Yahoo – Trump’s Epstein Defense

Reality check: Epstein’s crimes and elite connections are well-documented. The defense relies on repetition, not evidence.
Impact: It trains supporters to dismiss credible accusations reflexively.

3. Endless Election Denialism

Despite dozens of court rulings and bipartisan certifications, false claims about the 2020 (and now 2024) elections persist—resurrected across ideological lines.
Source: Wikipedia – False or Misleading Statements by Donald Trump

Reality check: There is no evidence of systemic fraud. Institutions held.
Impact: Narratives of stolen elections damage democracy’s operating system.

4. Critical Race Theory Moral Panic

Right-wing activists continue to claim Critical Race Theory (CRT) is rampant in K-12 schools, despite the theory being a graduate-level legal concept.
Source: Wikipedia – 2020s CRT Controversies

Reality check: No evidence supports this narrative’s core claims.
Impact: Diverts attention from real educational issues and ignites tribal warfare in school boards and statehouses.

5. Immigration Hypocrisy Exposed

Colorado Rep. Gabe Evans touted his family’s lawful immigration story—only for historical records to show his grandfather crossed the border illegally.
Source: Sentinel Colorado – Immigration Story Discrepancy

Reality check: The myth used to justify hardline policy contradicts personal truth.
Impact: Demonstrates how convenient family fictions are weaponized for ideological gain.

Why These Narratives Win

They spark emotion (outrage, fear, self-righteousness).

They serve institutional interests (media clicks, political fundraising, bureaucratic survival).

They’re simple and sticky—easy to repeat, hard to disprove in soundbites.

They come with enemies, which gives people identity and direction.

Why They’re Dangerous

They erode shared reality.

They deepen polarization.

They waste national attention on invented threats.

They leave real problems—housing, AI, economic stagnation, institutional decay—untouched.

Use the News to Spot Power, Not Just “Truth”

As Luke Ford wrote, news is primarily a record of “the passage of bureaucratically recognized events through administrative procedures.” To use news without being used by it:

Ask who benefits.

Ask what’s left out.

Track emotional intensity: high emotion = low signal.

Posted in Journalism | Comments Off on The News Is Bureaucratic Stenography

Trump’s Power & the Rule of Law (full documentary) | FRONTLINE

Watching this Frontline doco is like watching a priest cry over spilled communion wine—except the wine is a Senate confirmation hearing or some obscure bureaucratic rule.

They speak of “democratic norms” the way I talk about Torah.

If you took a drink every time they say “norms,” you’d be dead before they got to Watergate.

“Our democracy almost died…” No, your brunch plans died. Democracy was never invited.

I’m Orthodox. I know what sacred looks like.

It’s divine fire, sexual boundaries, and not tweeting on Shabbos.

You wanna make Congress sacred? Start with mikveh for lobbyists.

2. Hero Systems in America

A “hero system” is Ernest Becker’s way of saying: This is how people prove their lives matter in the face of death.

We all want to be heroes in some story. The trouble in America? We’ve got at least 12 competing sagas—and no shared mythos.

Here’s a lineup of major American Hero Systems, and how they sacralize life:

A. Woke Heroism

Sacred object: Identity and inclusion

Sin: Microaggressions

Ritual: DEI training, pronoun updates, land acknowledgments

Martyrdom: Getting canceled for a cause

Joke: “I identify as exhausted.”

B. MAGA Heroism

Sacred object: The Constitution (selectively), the Flag, Trucks

Sin: Globalism, coastal elites, almond milk

Ritual: Boat parades, flag capes, fighting the deep state on Facebook

Martyrdom: Getting banned on Twitter

Joke: “They stormed the Capitol like it was Walmart on Black Friday. But with more camo.”

C. Careerist Heroism

Sacred object: The LinkedIn page

Sin: Wasting potential

Ritual: 6 a.m. Peloton, 10 p.m. Slack messages, reading Atomic Habits quarterly

Martyrdom: Dying at 39 with three promotions and no friends

Joke: “She died doing what she loved—grinding.”

D. Wellness/Spiritual Heroism

Sacred object: Organic food, mindfulness, morning routines

Sin: Gluten

Ritual: Yoga in national parks, intermittent fasting, posting your trauma story

Martyrdom: Getting heavy metals out of your liver chakra

Joke: “She didn’t need religion. She had adaptogens.”

E. Orthodox Religious Heroism (my people)

Sacred object: Torah, community, continuity

Sin: Chillul Hashem (desecrating God’s name)

Ritual: Shabbos meals, daf yomi, feeling guilty

Martyrdom: Sending your kids to $30k/year Jewish day school

Joke: “I’m not scared of death—I’m scared of Pesach prep.”

F. Techno-Utopian Heroism

Sacred object: Innovation, data, progress

Sin: Bureaucracy, inefficiency, fossil fuels

Ritual: Burning cash, hiring PMs, launching beta

Martyrdom: Dying from self-driving car on principle

Joke: “They disrupted taxis, hotels, and human connection.”

G. Social Justice Heroism

Sacred object: Liberation

Sin: Oppression (as defined by most recent discourse)

Ritual: Marches, GoFundMe links, unfriending

Martyrdom: Going viral for getting arrested at a protest

Joke: “She was intersectional until she inherited a house.”

H. National Security Heroism

Sacred object: The Republic

Sin: Leaks

Ritual: Briefings, surveillance, solemn oaths

Martyrdom: Testifying before Congress in uniform

Joke: “He took a bullet for the Constitution. Then the NSA flagged his browser history.”

3. Why the Conflicts Happen

You can’t have brunch with someone who thinks brunch is a decadent symbol of late-stage liberalism.
You can’t share a nation if your sacred cow is their barbecue.
One man’s hero is another man’s heretic.
One woman’s DEI consultant is another’s Babylonian exile.

It’s not just culture war. It’s ritual combat between rival faiths.

I’m not saying we need to agree on everything. I’m just saying that the more we have in common, the better.

You can’t make brunch holy, democracy infallible, and your trauma a sacrament. That’s not a society. That’s a cult buffet.

And I didn’t survive all of my own self-destruction to eat from that salad bar.

Sacralization—whether of Torah or “the rule of law”—tends to shut down scrutiny. The Frontline documentary reflects a liberal hero system where institutions (especially legal-bureaucratic ones) are treated as sacred and any challenge to them becomes a moral offense.

It’s particularly easy to do this when your side, the left, dominates these institutions.

Ernest Becker argued that all cultures create “hero systems”—frameworks that give individuals symbolic immortality by aligning them with a sacred cause, story, or identity. In secular societies, these systems substitute for traditional religion.

Here are the dominant hero systems in America today:

1. The Progressive Clerisy

Sacred objects: Civil rights, equality, DEI, climate justice, LGBTQ+ affirmation, “our democracy.”

Sacred texts: The 14th Amendment (reinterpreted), Supreme Court rulings, NYT op-eds, academic consensus.

Priesthood: Journalists, academics, bureaucrats, nonprofit lawyers, HR departments.

Afterlife promise: You are on the “right side of history.”

Conflicts: Views dissent as heresy. Labels populist or traditionalist resistance as hate, ignorance, or disinformation.

2. MAGA Populism

Sacred objects: The Constitution (as imagined by originalists), the flag, family, nation, border.

Sacred texts: Founding documents, the Bible (especially in evangelical contexts), Trump’s speeches.

Priesthood: Trump, Bannon, right-wing influencers, “ordinary Americans.”

Afterlife promise: Restoration of lost greatness; vindication of “real Americans.”

Conflicts: Views the liberal state as corrupt and illegitimate. Distrusts media, academia, and courts.

3. Technocratic Meritocracy

Sacred objects: Science, data, rational planning, expertise.

Sacred texts: Peer-reviewed studies, public health guidelines, Silicon Valley manifestos.

Priesthood: Tech founders, scientists, think tank wonks.

Afterlife promise: Optimization, progress, transcendence (via AI, biotech, etc.).

Conflicts: Often allied with the progressive clerisy but impatient with its moralism; despises populist irrationality.

4. Market Libertarianism

Sacred objects: Individual liberty, private property, the market.

Sacred texts: Hayek, Friedman, Ayn Rand.

Priesthood: VC bros, hedge funders, Cato/Reason types.

Afterlife promise: Personal autonomy, wealth, escaping the nanny state.

Conflicts: Hates regulation from the left and authoritarianism from the right.

5. Identity-Based Moral Orders

Each major identity group now often operates its own hero system:

Black identity politics: Civil rights martyrs, systemic racism as original sin, redemption through activism.

Queer heroism: Coming out = ritual initiation; allyship = sacrament.

Feminist mythology: Smashing the patriarchy = spiritual warfare.

Trans activism: Gender affirmation = salvation; misgendering = blasphemy.

These systems overlap with the progressive clerisy but operate with their own rituals, taboos, and saints (e.g. George Floyd, Marsha P. Johnson).

Result: Conflicting Sacred Orders

Modern America is fractured because people live inside incompatible hero systems. To one group, Trump is a tyrant desecrating sacred norms; to another, he’s a messianic figure reclaiming a desecrated nation.

Consequences:

Political conflict becomes moral war—disagreement is treated as evil, not error.

Dialogue is impossible—because questioning someone’s sacred object is blasphemy.

Institutions can’t mediate—they’re now battlegrounds for rival faiths (see: SCOTUS, the FBI, school boards).

Law becomes theology—with constitutional interpretation serving as scripture wars.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Trump’s Power & the Rule of Law (full documentary) | FRONTLINE

The Wealth Of Nations (1776)

1. “Division of Labor”
Yeah, Adam Smith says dividing labor increases productivity. Which explains why I’m broke—my labor’s been divided so many times there’s nothing left but me handing out resumes and emotional damage.

2. “Invisible Hand”
Adam Smith’s invisible hand is real. It reached into my pocket, took my dignity, and left me with a Subway punch card and a dream.

3. “Self-Interest”
Smith says self-interest drives the market. My self-interest once drove me to date an heiress for three weeks of NYC deli food. It also drove me straight into a therapist’s notes under “emotional parasite.”

4. “Capital Accumulation”
Capital accumulation? Buddy, I’ve been accumulating bounced checks and unopened credit card offers. I’m a wealth magnet—just for debt collectors.

5. “Merchants and Manufacturers”
Smith warned us about merchants colluding to keep prices high. Meanwhile I’m colluding with DoorDash drivers to sneak me expired sushi for half off.

6. “Moral Sentiments Crossover”
Smith also wrote about sympathy and morality. That’s nice. I sympathize with my landlord every month when I explain why Western Civilization needs me more than he needs a rent check.

7. “National Wealth”
Smith wanted to grow national wealth. I can’t even grow my crypto portfolio. I’m still holding the Dogecoin I bought at the top like it’s a patriotic duty.

Posted in Economics | Comments Off on The Wealth Of Nations (1776)

Industrial Policy for the United States: Winning the Competition for Good Jobs and High-Value Industries

I love this new book.

1. “Industrial Policy” is my new pickup line.
I go to synagogue and tell the ladies: “I believe in protecting American industry. Want to vertically integrate over kugel?” It’s not working yet, but I think my policy just needs more tariffs.

2. America outsourced its manufacturing… like I outsourced my dignity.
In the ’80s we lost steel jobs to Japan. In the ’90s we lost microchips to Taiwan. In the 2000s, I lost my girlfriend to a guy with a working HVAC. It’s all part of the same decline!

3. I believe in economic nationalism—because nobody’s gonna offshore me.
Except emotionally. Every girl I’ve dated has emotionally offshored me to some finance bro in Tel Aviv or a Burning Man DJ in Silver Lake.

4. Marc Fasteau says we need to pick winning industries. I say: pick me, dammit!
I’m high value. I’m a legacy industry. I’ve been operating at a loss since 1997, but that’s just because I’m undercapitalized!

5. America doesn’t have an industrial policy. You know what I have instead? Vibes.
My vibe is: “emotionally unavailable but economically protectionist.” I’m trying to protect domestic production of serotonin. It’s not going well.

6. They talk about a national industrial strategy. I can’t even get a personal strategy.
Their goal is full employment. My goal is any employment. I once put down “thought leader” on a job application and they replied, “That’s cute.”

7. Industrial decline is real. I’ve lived it.
Once I had a big vision, a great haircut, and a 2004 Volvo with 160k miles. Now I’ve got back pain and a blog no one reads. My last job was being ghosted by girls who quote Walter Russell Mead.

8. Economic security is sexy.
You want to get girls back into traditional values? Give ’em a guy with a defined-benefit pension and a mortgage he didn’t inherit from his bubbe. That’s the real hero’s journey.

9. I told my rabbi I’m committed to reindustrializing America. He said, “Can you start by reindustrializing your life?”
Apparently wearing the same pants three days in a row isn’t a form of economic protest. Who knew?

10. These guys want “high-value industries.” Bro, I want to be a high-value industry.
I’ve got comparative advantage in Talmudic guilt, anti-woke rants, and making women uncomfortable by quoting Carl Schmitt on first dates. Why won’t Helen Andrews profile me?

11. They talk about “reshoring jobs.” I’m trying to reshore dignity.
I used to think I was just down on my luck. Now I realize I’m an abandoned textile mill in the Rust Belt—gutted, haunted, and full of pigeons.

12. The book says we need to invest in public goods. I am a public good!
I’m the kind of guy who’ll watch your kids, quote Tocqueville, and defend Western Civilization before breakfast. But can I get a date? No. All the girls want crypto bros or trauma doulas.

13. America’s got brain drain. I’ve got soul drain.
All my friends went to work in AI or defense contracting. I went into reading Leo Strauss in parking lots and asking if it’s too late for a heroic aristocracy.

14. “We need industrial champions,” says the book. I yell, “I volunteer as tribute!”
I’ll be the national champion for celibate traditionalism, moral panic, and economic revanchism. I just need a woman to overlook my vibes and my Google history.

15. The authors call for a new economic order. I’ve been ordering the same economy special for 20 years: Sad Boy with Side of Righteous Fury.
Nobody wants it. Not even Uber Eats. I tried rebranding as a “sovereigntist,” but Bumble said I looked too angry in my profile pic.

16. America has no strategy, no vision, no will to win. Just like me at speed dating.
Some guy with an Etsy brand of “artisanal solvents” is getting action while I’m ranting about the Chicago School and currency manipulation. No justice.

17. We’ve got too many MBA consultants and not enough machinists.
Same in dating: too many “polyamorous UX researchers” and not enough women who get turned on by trade policy and moral clarity. I want a partner in industrial nationalism, not another yoga witch who ghosted me after reading Righteous Victims.

18. America has abandoned the working class. So have most of my exes.
I’m the guy they date before they get serious about buying property. One called me a “life detour.” I said, “No, I’m a Jeffersonian interlude!”

Posted in America | Comments Off on Industrial Policy for the United States: Winning the Competition for Good Jobs and High-Value Industries