Is Milo Hurting The Alt-Right?

Brett Stevens writes:

Yiannopoulos is a provocateur who delights in offending everyone as a means of subverting the culture of offense, or the idea that any speech which disturbs someone or anyone is bad and should be banned. He is the manifestation of the old ANUS motto “Say FVCK for FREEDOM” which was symbolic more than literal: whatever the herd fears must be spoken, loudly, to prevent the herd from demonizing it fully and banishing it from discussion.

He is granted this privilege by the fact that he is immune from attack. As a part-Jewish flamboyant gay man, he comes from two protected minority groups and can speak his mind without someone accusing him of being a privileged white male. He has minority privilege instead, which counts for a lot: Thomas Sowell wrote many things that a white man could not have written without ending his career. Yiannopoulos is bullet-proof and he uses that to divide the Left.

He does not claim to be Alt Right; he claims to be a cultural libertarian or some variation of the above, and yet he introduces gateway ideas that lead people to the Alt Right with every one of his speeches or writings. Some of these are quite advanced and combine conservative and libertarian thought. Often, he expresses a spectrum of Social Conservative through Traditionalist and Reactionary thought.

In other words, he does not attempt to speak for any group, but serves as a wedge splitting apart the Leftist lock on public discourse, and then kicks the Alt Right through that gap. He is a sapper, an advance vanguard, and on the whole, he has helped the Alt Right far more than he has hurt it.

Posted in Milo | Comments Off on Is Milo Hurting The Alt-Right?

The Los Angeles Connection To The 9/11 Attacks

Wherever you have Muslims, you have increased support for Islamic activity, which includes terrorism.

Wherever you have Jews, you have increased support for Zionism.

If there had not been a Saudi-funded mosque in Culver City and a Halal restaurant on Venice Blvd in Culver City, there might not have been a 9/11 attack.

Why are these institutions that played a role in the 9/11 attacks still allowed to operate with impunity and to facilitate more attacks on us?

Los Angeles Times:

The California connection involves Nawaf Hazmi and Khalid Mihdhar, two Al Qaeda veterans of conflicts in Bosnia and Afghanistan. They flew into Los Angeles International Airport as students in January 2000 and prayed at a Culver City mosque built by the Saudi royal family and frequented by a Saudi consular official.

They later moved to San Diego where they tried to improve their English and took flying lessons at the Sorbi Flying Club.

Their move to San Diego later drew the interest of FBI agents searching for any evidence of Saudi support for the attacks, according to the 9/11 Commission report and to recently declassified material from the congressional inquiry.

While eating at a halal restaurant on Venice Boulevard in Culver City, near the blue-tiled dome of the King Fahad Mosque, the two men’s Gulf Arabic drew the attention of a Saudi named Omar Bayoumi, who had a no-show job with a Saudi defense contractor in San Diego, investigators found.

Bayoumi offered to let the newcomers stay in his apartment in San Diego for a few days and later helped them pay the deposit for an apartment.

The FBI suspected that Bayoumi, who bureau informants considered a Saudi intelligence operative, was sent to meet the pair by a Saudi consular official named Fahad Thumairy, who also led prayers at the Saudi-funded mosque.

When retracing Bayoumi’s steps, FBI agents found that he had visited the Saudi consulate in Los Angeles and saw Thumairy on the same day he met Hazmi and Mihdhar.

Whether those meetings were coincidence or a link that proves official Saudi complicity in the plot is key to the families’ claims against the kingdom.

“No one ever said Bayoumi or Thumairy were senior government officials, but a government is responsible for lower level officials who cause death or injury to people under the cause of their employ,” said Jack Quinn, one of the lawyers for more than 2,000 family members of Sept. 11 victims.

Posted in Islam, Los Angeles | Comments Off on The Los Angeles Connection To The 9/11 Attacks

White Zionism

Maybe I should let them know that it would benefit them to know a man in the alt-right. Just in case this diversity thing does not work out
Maybe they have already figured that out.
“This Luke, he can move both ways. Like being bihuman, half Jew and half Goy”. Not sure what the word I’m looking for here. What do you call someone who is part goy and yet still a Jew?
We need new words for our modern age. Many new words.
Jipocrit: A diversity-embracing Zionist
White Zionist is my creation, and I am proud to have coined the term and set it loose into the wilds of the internet.
Please remember my contribution in case they take over and cause trouble for me.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on White Zionism

A Jewish merman for all seasons

merman

Article.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on A Jewish merman for all seasons

Alexis Arquette battled with HIV for 29 years reveals death certificate as cause of her tragic death is announced

TheSun: “He posted on Facebook: “Our brother Robert, who became our brother Alexis, who became our sister Alexis, who became our brother Alexis, passed this morning September 11, at 12:32 am. He was surrounded by all of his brothers and sisters, one of his nieces and several other loved ones.”

Posted in Trans | Comments Off on Alexis Arquette battled with HIV for 29 years reveals death certificate as cause of her tragic death is announced

Should Trump Stop Talking About Alicia Machado?

Comments:

* Hugh Hewitt ran from it like a whipped puppy. No mention of Machado’s background, just pleas for Trump to ignore her entirely (implying that his meanness to her was essentially indefensible) and to try to refocus on other issues. Hewitt was doing his show early in the morning, though, before Drudge put up its Machado link, so maybe tomorrow will be different.

* If I were in Steve Bannon’s loafers, I’d be reaching out to Bobby Abreu for an endorsement of Trump. I’d even have them do a presser where they autograph baseballs and talk over their best exercise tips. If B.A. feels like giving the inside scoop on Miss Housekeeping, so be it.

* Will Rahn is Peggy Noonan’s son who previously worked for the Daily Caller. I don’t know how he got to be a digital editor at CBS News, but I don’t think he is representative of the mainstream media.

* CNN and the NY Times ignoring any aspect of Machado that doesn’t fit Hillary’s narrative is why I have my doubts that the average woman is going to hear the aspects of the story that do not match Hillary’s narrative. Even wikipedia has been cleansed to fit it.

The right wing sites that are covering the full story are almost entirely visited by right-wing males. They will get the true story. Most women won’t.

The fact that censorship is not fully here yet means that the true story of Machado has leaked out and it doesn’t give the ‘Trump was a meanie to Machado’ narrative as much legs in the mainstream press. However, Hillary can keep running the ads and many women will not hear the full picture.

It is nice though that CBS has reported on it. Will others follow? I imagine it is no coincidence that the CBS reporter is a male. I doubt we will see any mainstream media female reporters breaking the full story.

* I remember this story from way back. At the time, I read a human interest story in some newspaper on dead tree. The story said that there was a Miss Universe that gained a lot of weight and she was told to lose the weight in 6 months (or whatever) or she will lose the contract. And she managed to do it. There was a short interview with her where she shared her diet tips (basically, eat nothing for 6 months.)

Nowhere in the story it was suggested that her employer was wrong in warning her about the weight. Those were simpler times.

Hillary’s play is that women will sympathize with Ms. Machado and punish Mr. Trump. But this works only if the victim is sympathetic. If she is not this may backfire big time. If Ms. Machado comes across as a b-ch the women will turn on her, because no one will judge a woman harsher than other women.

Posted in Alicia Machado | Comments Off on Should Trump Stop Talking About Alicia Machado?

Alicia Machado Engages In Fat Shaming

Posted in Alicia Machado | Comments Off on Alicia Machado Engages In Fat Shaming

Clinton-Machado 2016

Chateau: “In Post-America, fat-shaming is a mortal sin while cheating on your fiancé, being filmed on camera having illicit sex, driving your boyfriend’s getaway car from the scene of a murder, threatening the life of a judge, bearing the bastard spawn of a drug lord, and happily lying while under the direction of a presidential candidate and a colluding media about your “20 years of humiliation” from experiencing a gentle and encouraging chiding about your weight are trivial details that should not reflect poorly on an attention whore’s character.”

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Time for the campaign commercial:

“CLINTON: And one of the worst things he said was about a woman in a beauty contest. He loves beauty contests, supporting them and hanging around them. And he called this woman “Miss Piggy.” Then he called her “Miss Housekeeping,” because she was Latina. Donald, she has a name.

CLINTON: Her name is Alicia Machado.”

[Announcer]: Who is Alicia Machado?

1. Miss Universe who gained 50 pounds after winning title, managed to keep it because Donald Trump came up with a workable solution to the problem.

2. Alleged to have driven a getaway car from an attempted assassination at a funeral, but she couldn’t have, because she had not one, but two, alibis.

3. Threatened to kill a Mexican judge for charging her boyfriend with murder.

4. Had sex on a Spanish reality TV show, ruining her relationship with another man to whom she was engaged.

[Insert film clip of Alicia, with “oooh, tenges la pinga divina” — it will pass, because the FCC doesn’t know Spanish, either]

5. Dated and had a child with a notorious Mexican drug lord, and we have proof that the child was born in this country, and is a US citizen by birth …..

[Insert visual of Miami birth certificate]

So who is Alicia Machado?

She’s a new American Citizen! And

“CLINTON: She’s voting in November!”

Don’t let Donald Trump shame America over being overweight. Let’s find a better way.

Clinton-Machado 2016.

* Did anyone else notice that during the debate, Hillary said, “So we’re now on the precipice of having a potentially much better economy…” I heard this and confirmed it with the transcript.

“On the precipice” definition: The brink of a dangerous situation. A headlong fall or descent.

Perhaps an inadvertent truth from Hilltron?

* You know what Marvin Gaye’s father’s last words were to his son?

“Now you’re gonna listen to one of my 45′s.”

* His trans dad who killed him got off lightly. Six years suspended and five years probation.

* OT: Overton Window

First Douthat links to Steve with implicit approval…

Clinton’s Samantha Bee Problem

Then Robert Draper links to VDare!

How Donald Trump Set Off a Civil War Within the Right-Wing Media

First they ignore you, then they denounce you, then they hyperlink to you, …

* So now Trump is pissed and next time he is not going to listen to his advisers. Whether this will backfire or not I don’t know, but in the next debate I would bet you any amount that Trump is going to go after Hillary hammer and tongs and the moderators too. Trump won the primaries by being Trump, not by being “Presidential”. Anyone who wants a conventional figure is already voting for Hillary anyway. Trump has to sell himself as the change candidate.

* Steve, you noted the bitter resentments of the female writing staff on Law and Order populated the criminal casting as Rich White Men who as we know are always engaging in violence. And not the kind of “sexy domination” like the Tsarnaevs that led nurses to fist-fights over who would take care of Bob Dylan Tsarnaev.

Hillary lecturing White men plays well among White women. Its why Trump cannot win and the route of politics is a non-starter. Most educated White women are objectively anti-White, as much for personal disappointment in the men around them as anything else.

Rather, White men should take a page from Black activists. BLM and other stuff made a giant pain for Democrats until the desires of no policing at all for Black people is met. I would not advocate mass civil disobedience but rather various actions designed to inflict as much political pain while being distributed and deniable.

That means unearthing every unflattering thing about political leaders, their families, and social connections and making them public in the most humiliating time and fashion. It means disrupting events by technical and social means, it means a constant level of pressure and pain until elites figure it is easier to give White men what they want than fight.

* Hillary has not cracked 50%, neither has Trump. He has the winning hand. Trade, immigration, healthcare, breaking up the status quo are all his issues. He should be pounding that message into the ground 24/7. Every day he squanders defending himself over a personal attack or slight is wasted opportunity to put out the message that will resonate.

He has to understand that every big time politico will get bogus political attacks just like businesses get bogus lawsuits slapped against them all the time. He needs to remind himself that when a business gets hit with a ludicrous lawsuit, the CEO doesn’t drop everything, investigate the claim, accumulate evidence and then personally lead the defense team in court. No, when a business gets such a lawsuit, they turn it over to their hired gun law firm to take care of.

It’s the same for these bogus personal attacks. I still plan on voting for the guy, but this does show bad judgement.

* Your comment is eerily similar to what the similarly obtuse Alan Rapaport wrote in the NY Times today: “Fact-checkers have found no evidence that Ms. Machado, who was featured in Playboy, appeared in a sex tape. Her critics may be referring to a risqué scene that she appeared in on a reality television show.”

And indeed, this is what everyone is referring to. Nor was it merely “risque”: it was a real or faux real act of sexual intercourse on a Spanish reality TV show, replete with language from Alicia about how she loves being “f***ed like a perra“, and extolling the taste and the divinity of her partner’s penis.

In the same vein, the Times headline reads: Donald Trump Bashes Alicia Machado Again, Alleging a ‘Sex Tape’ (Without Evidence), and the article also quotes a tweet from Hillary, “What kind of man stays up all night to smear a woman with lies and conspiracy theories?”

The fundamental dishonesty of how they are handling this has got to get through to them at some point.

* I can see the argument that Trump shouldn’t be pursuing this Machado thing, but should focus instead on the issues.

But, of course, it’s been Hillary and the media who have been pushing at this as hard as they can, including even a New Yorker cover.

My instinct is that for him to push back hard is a very good thing to do, given all the variables, the fact that he still has over a month before the election, and the general facts of the case.

Machado as a spokesperson and icon for Hillary is completely indefensible. Shooting down her integrity is a slam dunk on a basket 5 ft high. It just requires of Joe Citizen a google to see how corrupt she is. And the chutzpah required of Hillary and the media to use her as an icon is just breathtaking — they really do think there’s no accountability when it comes to shaming people for allegedly politically incorrect behavior.

The Machado case shows not only Hillary’s vicious unfairness and incompetence. It shows how the media — including even the formerly august NY Times — is exactly as bad. You can’t put a pin between Hillary’s campaign and the media at this point, and this case illustrates like nothing else.

* Here is Vox’s desperate attempt at spin, under the headline “Donald Trump’s nasty, false tweetstorm against Alicia Machado proves how easy he is to bait”:

Trump’s mention of Machado’s past probably refers to the fact that she was once accused of threatening to murder a judge and driving a getaway car in an attempted murder. She was never charged with anything, but she doesn’t dispute the allegations, saying this week, “Everybody has a past. And I’m not a saint girl.”

The “sex tape” rumor, on the other hand, is completely false. Snopes looked into it and found that while Machado did once pose topless in Playboy and was portrayed having sex during a Real World-esque Spanish reality TV show, the footage from the show wasn’t explicit:

However, the so-called “sex tape” stemming from that incident, which is nothing more than some grainy, night-vision footage of a couple of covered figures writhing in a bed, hardly qualifies as explicit. And reality television being what it is, the scene the tape depicts was quite possibly staged or fabricated.

* I think Trump’s tweets were necessary and effective. Let’s remember the time line here.

Monday: Hillary, at the very end of the debate, rolls out Miss Piggy Machado, meant to be a death blow to Trump.

Tuesday: Consensus is that Trump did not lose the debate, and that polls show him edging upwards. The Hillary Camp (aka MSM) rolls out a series of pre-fab articles about Alicia Machado.

Wednesday-Thursday: The Alt Right (and the British Press) begin presenting answers to the question, “Who the heck is Alicia Machado?” The following series of revelations is almost entirely shut down by the MSM, who prefer to continue discussing Alicia as a victim.

Friday: Early AM, Trump sends out his tweets. The MSM _must_ respond to the content of Trump’s tweets, and as a result the cat is finally let out of the bag in all media, albeit barely landing on its feet as a result of the furious spinning, and here we are.

We can get back to pointing out Hilary’s incompetence tomorrow. Meanwhile, we can put Alicia in the same basket with Harambe and Pepe: the Untouchables of 2016.

* I’m no Trumpista, but it must be said: the election is rigged against Trump. The bad mic, the biased moderator, and the unflattering lighting constitute the proof. Almost makes me vote for the buffoon.

Posted in Alicia Machado | Comments Off on Clinton-Machado 2016

Hillary’s Debate Lies – With her comments about crime, policing, and race, the candidate helps push a false—and dangerous—narrative

Heather MacDonald writes:

Hillary Clinton repeated her incessant lie last night that the criminal justice system is infected with “systemic racism.” Race “determines” how people are “treated in the criminal justice system,” she said. Blacks are “more likely [than whites] to be arrested, charged, convicted and incarcerated” for “doing the same thing.” Such a dangerous falsehood, should Clinton act on it as president, would result not just in misguided policies but in the continued delegitimation of the criminal justice system. That delegitimation, with its attendant hostility and aggression toward police officers, has already produced the largest one-year surge in homicides in urban areas in nearly a half-century.

Criminologists have tried for decades to prove that the overrepresentation of blacks in prison is due to criminal-justice racism. They have always come up short. They have been forced to the same conclusion as Michael Tonry in his book, Malign Neglect: “Racial differences in patterns of offending, not racial bias by police and other officials, are the principal reason that such greater proportions of blacks than whites are arrested, prosecuted, convicted and imprisoned,” Tonry wrote. In 1997, criminologists Robert Sampson and Janet Lauritsen reviewed the massive literature on charging and sentencing. They found overwhelming evidence establishing that “large racial differences in criminal offending,” not racism, explained why more blacks were in prison proportionately than whites and for longer terms.

To say, as Clinton did last night, that blacks are more likely to be incarcerated for doing the same thing as whites ignores the relevance of a defendant’s criminal history in determining his sentence, among other crucial sentencing factors. Just last week, an analysis of Delaware’s prison population presented to the Delaware Access to Justice Commission’s Committee on Fairness in the Criminal Justice System revealed that when juvenile and adult criminal records are taken into account, along with arrest charges and age, racial disparities in sentencing decisions are negligible to nonexistent.

Clinton also complained that “too many young African-American and Latino men end . . . up in jail for non-violent offenses.” In fact, the majority of prisoners in the U.S. are serving time for violent felonies. The enforcement of low-level public order offenses in New York City during the mayoralties of Rudolph Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg actually lowered New York State’s prison population by intervening in criminal behavior early, before it ripened into a serious felony. Even as misdemeanor arrests increased in the city, felony arrests and felony incarcerations dropped. The number of jail inmates and convicts under parole and probation supervision in New York City dropped as well. Hillary Clinton may think that low-level public-order enforcement (otherwise known as “broken windows” policing) is racist, but law-abiding residents of high-crime communities beg the police to enforce public-order laws because they know that out of street disorder erupts gun violence and other forms of predation.

Clinton reiterated her call for “implicit-bias” training for officers. The premise of such training is that police officers are shooting black males out of such bias. Yet, four studies have come out this year alone that demolish this charge. They show that if there is bias among police officers in their shooting decisions, it works in favor of blacks and against whites. “Implicit-bias” training, based on a lie, is a grotesque waste of resources at a time when officers are desperate for more hands-on tactical training that will help them make those crucial shoot/don’t shoot decisions in the field, or avoid being put into such an excruciating situation in the first place.

Clinton claimed that “stop-and-frisk was found to be unconstitutional.” No federal judge would have the power to declare pedestrian stops unconstitutional, because the Supreme Court put its constitutional imprimatur on the practice in 1965. Stop-and-frisk remains a lawful and essential police tactic. Criminologist David Weisburd examined the practice in New York City and found that it reduced crime in shooting hot spots. Federal district court judge Shira Scheindlin did rule that the New York Police Department’s practice of stops was racially biased, but her ruling applied only to the New York Police Department. That ruling was wholly unjustified and would likely have been reversed on appeal, had newly elected New York City mayor Bill de Blasio not dropped the appeal. Judge Scheindlin used a population benchmark for measuring the lawfulness of police actions: if police stops didn’t match population ratios, they were unconstitutional, in Scheindlin’s view. Such a methodology ignores the massive disparities in criminal offending in New York City. Blacks commit over three-quarters of all shootings, though they are 23 percent of the city’s population. Add Hispanic shootings to black shootings and you account for 98 percent of all shootings in New York City. Whites are 34 percent of the city’s population; they commit less than 2 percent of all shootings. Such disparities in gun violence mean that virtually every time the police are called out on a gun run—meaning that someone has been shot—they are called to minority neighborhoods on behalf of minority victims, and, if any witness or victim is cooperating with the police, being given a description of a minority suspect. The reality of crime, not phantom police racism, determines the incidence of police activity, including pedestrian stops.

Clinton claimed that stop-and-frisk was “ineffective” and “did not do what it needed to do.” Felony crime dropped 85 percent from the early 1990s to the mid-2010s in New York City; more than 10,000 minority males were spared the violent death that they would have experienced had homicides remained at their early 1990s levels. Stop-and-frisk was a crucial part of that crime drop, the longest and steepest on record; it’s hard to imagine anything more effective than New York’s proactive policing revolution. Stop-and-frisk deterred criminals from carrying guns. Equally importantly, it intervened in a range of other criminal behaviors. If an officer saw someone casing a store on a boulevard plagued with burglaries, or saw someone walking quickly behind an elderly lady in a neighborhood plagued with robberies, he would stop that person and ask a few questions. That stop may not have resulted in an arrest, but it could have averted the commission of a crime. Read on.

COMMENTS AT STEVE SAILER:

* I like a lot of her City Journal stuff, and she’s shown some HBD sympathies, but she’s an admitted atheist. That’s not going to go over well.

Posted in Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on Hillary’s Debate Lies – With her comments about crime, policing, and race, the candidate helps push a false—and dangerous—narrative

Trump Believes In Eugenics

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* This brouhaha over trump being a eugenicist….

Everyone is a eugenicist. If you used sperm from a sperm bank to produce your next child, wouldn’t you rather it came from a man who were tall, smart and athletic? Let’s not speculate, the facts clearly prove this true. Everyone would agree.

Some might say that it’s better to be safe than sorry, meaning that it can’t hurt, and could potentially be beneficial , to choose good sperm. Oh, well can we please apply that principle on a national level with regard to chaining the demographics of the West?

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on Trump Believes In Eugenics