Why Did The News Media Lose Interest So Quickly In The Death Of Bodybuilding Cosmetic Surgeon Bruce Nadler And His Wife Terri?

There was no follow-up on this story.

From ThinkSteroids.com Feb. 8, 2008:

The Los Angeles Police Department discovered former bodybuilding cosmetic surgeon Bruce Nadler, MD and his wife dead as the result of gunshot wounds on Monday, February 4, 2008. Authorities believe it is an apparent murder-suicide perpetrated by Bruce Nadler.

Bruce Nadler called himself the “world’s strongest plastic surgeon.” He was probably the best known cosmetic surgeon catering to amateur and professional bodybuilders. He had performed over 700 gynecomastia surgeries in his career; “gyno” is a side effect of anabolic steroid use when antiaromatase and/or estrogen antagonists are not use concurrently.

After retiring from the practice of medicine in August 2005, Dr. Nadler wrote the “The Nip Tuck Workout: Exercise through the Eyes of a Plastic Surgeon” and subsequently moved with his wife to Los Angeles to reinvent himself in a new career as personal trainer with the opening of Nip Tuck Fitness LA in Beverly Hills.

Retired plastic surgeon and certified personal trainer Bruce J. Nadler M.D. has brought his Plastic Synergy training system to Los Angeles. As stated in his book, “The Nip Tuck Workout – Exercise through the Eyes of a Plastic Surgeon,” Dr. Nadler has created an exercise program based on the plastic surgical principles of proportion and symmetry. It combines careful analysis with an individualized exercise prescription.

Bruce Nadler, MD retired after the New York State Board of Professional Medical Conduct charged him with 29 specifications of professional misconduct in thirteen patients according to public records. Rather than fight the charges, Nadler submitted and consent agreement and voluntarily relinquished his medical license.

The specifications of professional misconduct were primarily related to prescribing a variety of anabolic steroids, growth hormone and ancillary medications used by bodybuilders including Saizen, Serostim, Genotropin, Androgel, Depo Testosterone, Delatestryl, Deca Durabolin, testosterone cypionate, testosterone enanthate, Nolvadex, Proscar, Clomid, tamoxifen, Arimidex, Finasteride and Viagra. In each case, he was accused of the following:

  • Failure to obtain and/or note an adequate and complete medical history and/or history of current complaint from patient.
  • Failure to perform and/or note a complete and appropriate physical examination of patient.
  • Failure to obtain and/or note appropriate and medically indicated laboratory studies on patient including: prolactin, TSH, LH, hepatic and renal function, and assays for estrogen levels and HCG.
  • Failure to properly diagnose patient’s condition and/or rule out underlying disorders.
  • Inappropriately and without medical idnication and/or justification, prescribing and/or maintaining patient on various medications.
  • Failure to maintain a medical record for patient in accordance with accepted medical standards which accurately reflects his care and treatment of the patient.

Bruce Nadler’s beliefs regarding anabolic steroids and bodybuilding were controversial for physician. He explained his own steroid use and his willingness to prescribe steroids and growth hormone to his patients in an interview with Testosterone Nation:

I’m my own test laboratory in that respect because, in the last two years, I’ve been taking 6 to 8 IUs a week of growth hormone, and I alternate between 200 mg a week of deca and 200 mg of testosterone cypionate the next week. Instead of going super physiological, I believe in just going to maximum natural levels to that of a man in his twenties. In this way, there are no side effects.

Nadler was also critical of the steroid hysteria in the U.S. and the political posturing surrounding anabolic steroids:

I’ve always felt that politicians always have to make the majority of the electorate think that they’re doing something? So they inconvenience a small, unimportant group, like bodybuilders. They have no idea what they’re talking about. Somebody hands them a speech, and they go! They took something that could have been done safely and sent it to the black market and all of the inherent dangers that go along with dealing with that element. Will they ever be legal again? I hope so.

Feb. 2, 2008

The LAT reports: "Park La Brea: A white man and a white woman, approximately in their 60s, were found dead inside their home at 200 S. Detroit St. in the Park La Brea area at about 11:23 a.m. Saturday, Feb. 2. Officers with LAPD’s Wilshire Division responded to reports of gunshots. Upon arrival, officers discovered the man and woman
dead from gunshot wounds, said Officer Mike Lopez of LAPD’s media relations office. The woman was found inside the bathroom and the man inside the bedroom, he said. Paramedics declared both victims dead at the scene. Detectives have not determine the cause of the shooting, Lopez said."

I hear that it was a murder-suicide. There was a note… Apparently the man was an avid gun collector and also suffered from depression. His wife’s maiden name is Tomashevsky. I was told the note said that he was seeing a therapist and the therapist wanted to commit him. I believe he used to be a plastic surgeon. The couple’s son lives on the same street.

In its latest issue, the Jewish Journal calls Detroit the holiest street in Los Angeles. The column is titled "Rebbe Road."

Joe emails:

– The patient was depressed. – He is a gun collector. – There was reason for hospitalization (the note states that.) And… The patient was free to go home? and then kills his wife and himself? There are clear guidelines in cases like this – It is called Tarasoff: In memory of a woman by that name who was murdered by her husband. The therapist knew it may happen and did nothing to prevent it. The law states that any time a therapist knows of a case that:

1. The patient is might be dangerous to himself or others

2. The therapist has learned of a plan and a means (gun, knife). The therapist must break confidentiality and immediately inform police and follow up with a written report. The patient is admitted to the hospital for observation, even against their will. This is called 5150 (Britney Spears was hospitalized both times on it.)

From CBS, Feb. 4, 2008:

LOS ANGELES (CBS) — On Monday, authorities identified a husband and wife who died in an apparent murder-suicide in the Park La Brea area of Los Angeles.

Bruce and Terri Nadler, both 61, died on Saturday of gunshot wounds that
authorities believe were inflicted by Bruce, said Craig Harvey of the
coroner’s office.

Officers were sent to the 200 block of South Detroit Street on a "shots
fired" call about 11:25 a.m. Saturday, and found the bodies
in their home, the Los Angeles Police Department reported.

Homicide investigators believe they’ve also found the weapon used in the
killings, but have not established a motive.

A source says: "Their family is Orthodox. Their kid is (I think he is black hat)… I know all the cousins and the wife’s (who was killed) brother is. I don’t know exactly how religious the husband and wife were – but definitely an overall Jewish family in the community. The funeral was today."

The friends and family of Dr. Bruce Nadler say the writing was on the wall. He used to be a big doctor. He started spiraling downhill. He lost his medical license. He closed his practice. His wife Terri never indicated he was dangerous.

The Nadlers left behind a high-functioning autistic son (about 30 yo) who works at Ralphs. They need someone/some organization to help out with him. That’s the biggest concern right now of the family.

Kate Coe writes Feb. 6, 2008:

In a true-life Nip/Tuck episode, Bruce and Terri Nadler were found dead of gunshot wounds in an apparent murder/suicide, earlier this week. The bodybuilding boards are all abuzz.

Dr. Nadler had been a noted cosmetic surgeon in New York, but had lost his license awhile back. He’d written a book called The Nip/Tuck Workout, and was quite the media guy. He’d become a
trainer
, after leaving New York.

WSJ writes on Elitefitness: "He is a terrible doctor. Not board certified. Been on probation with the state of NY and lots of malpractice. I will post more on this soon. I personally would not let him operate on my dog."

According to the New York State Department of Health State Board for
Professional Misconduct
:

BRUCE NADLER, M.D., the Respondent, was authorized to practice medicine
in New York State on or about August 2, 1972, by the issuance of license
number 113153 by the New York State Education Department.

Between 1990 and 1996, Bruce Nadler, Respondent performed elective
cosmetic surgical procedures including breast reduction, breast augmentation,
augmentation mammoplasty, abdominoplasty, liposuction, calf augmentation,
on nine patients whose identities are set forth in Appendix%“. In Respondents
medical record pertaining to each of these procedures he failed to enter
Operative Reports and also failed to adequately document physical examination
and/or preoperative testing and/or laboratory reports.

Dr.
Nadler liked to bill himself as "the world’s strongest plastic surgeon
."

Devoto
posts to MuscleMayhem.com
: "This guy was THE Dr. for all bodybuilders
who in the 90’s would fly from all over to get their gyno removed by him."

Beta posts to
MuscleMayhem.com
: "whoa i remember this guy….he lost his license
for prescribing hormones….looks like his life took a big downward turn…what
a dick to take it out on someone else."

It sounds like Dr. Nadler may have been into testosterone supplements
and steroids, which may have given him ‘roid rage.

Here’s
an interview from a bodybuilder website called "Testosterone Nation"
:

The End of Genetic Limitations
An Interview With Dr. Bruce Nadler
By Garrison Kane 

Bruce Nadler is one of a kind. Dr. Nadler (or "Nads," as he
is affectionately known) is the premier bodybuilding "constructionist."
Yeah, I just made that word up, but since the good doctor doesn’t fall
into any traditional category, it seems as apt as any. You see, Nads’
background, prior to receiving his medical degree in 1971, was that of
a competitive bodybuilder and a sculptor. This makes him, unlike most
plastic surgeons, supremely suited towards understanding what the ideal
muscular body should and could look like.

I met up with Dr. Nadler at his Park Avenue office in New York City.
No one in his office bothered to give me a second look, but then again,
why should they? This is a place frequented by some of the world’s best
professional bodybuilders, a place where they travel to get those "finishing
touches" that can make the difference between winning a big show
or placing out of the money.

To some, the idea of cosmetic surgery may seem a little radical or,
at the very least, unnatural. Yet, as Bruce puts it, "There’s nothing
at all natural about bodybuilding." You gotta’ admit, lifting weights,
taking supplements and/or drugs, eating every three hours, and even
removing body hair is not exactly "nature’s plan." But the
very essence of bodybuilding is to look extraordinary. This is where
Bruce Nadler comes in. He is the next and newest step toward physical
perfection.

If you’ve ever wondered what it would be like to wake up one day and
find your genetic flaws erased, wonder no more. It’s now a reality.
And Bruce Nadler is the man who can do it.

T: What was it that made you decide to specialize in surgical body sculpting
for bodybuilders?

BN: I became interested in bodybuilding as a teenager, as many young
men do, but what I really wanted was to be a sculptor. The weightlifting
went from being an athletic endeavor to a more artistic pursuit. My
mom told me that if being an artist was to be my profession, the only
money I’d make would be after I’m dead! When I started studying medicine,
it seemed like a natural progression to combine all of the talents,
and that naturally led to plastic surgery. At the time, it was mostly
reconstructive surgery, but little by little, the cosmetic applications
started to capture the public’s imagination.

T: Do you still compete as a bodybuilder?

BN: I haven’t competed in a while because I can’t force myself to diet.
But last year, I won the overall masters in the Tri States. The fact
that I do compete helps me to have an understanding of what a bodybuilder
would want, whereas they may go to someone else and the doctor will
say, "I don’t see anything wrong." It’s a matter of knowing
the degree of perfection that a bodybuilder would be looking for.

For instance, one of the more popular procedures that I do is "ab
etching." The theory is to bring out the muscularity by removing
the fat in between the muscles, which is different from ab sculpting
where they leave blocks of fat to look like muscles. The problem with
"sculpting" is that, as soon as you twist your body, it looks
very unnatural. If you have some level of muscularity, I can "increase
your inheritance," so to speak, by enhancing your natural genetic
potential. This procedure can be used anywhere on the body. I can give
you more separation in the deltoids, cleaner lines in the biceps. Anything.
And that’s something a typical plastic surgeon may not do.

T: Speaking of going past one’s genetic potential, I understand that
you will prescribe steroid therapy to someone who is eligible for testosterone
replacement?

BN: I’m my own test laboratory in that respect because, in the last
two years, I’ve been taking 6 to 8 IUs a week of growth hormone, and
I alternate between 200 mg a week of deca and 200 mg of testosterone
cypionate the next week. Instead of going super physiological, I believe
in just going to maximum natural levels to that of a man in his twenties.
In this way, there are no side effects.

T: Would staying on exogenous GH, non-stop, lower endogenous levels
of GH?

BN: Probably, but I compare it to being a diabetic. You just accept
it as a lifestyle. The same thing applies to testosterone therapy. If
you need it, you just stay on it. I’ll be 52 years old this month, and
I noticed at about age 45 a certain decline in strength. I also started
gaining fat more easily. I hadn’t done steroids before that point, but
since I started using them in the past two years, I’ve put on about
25 pounds of mass. My body fat stays at about 9% even though I don’t
watch my diet at all, unlike in the past when, no matter how well I
ate, I would still get fat. I also heal more quickly from injuries.

T: Why do you think that there is still such a hysteria concerning
steroids in this country?

BN: I’ve always felt that politicians always have to make the majority
of the electorate think that they’re doing something?so they inconvenience
a small, unimportant group, like bodybuilders. They have no idea what
they’re talking about. Somebody hands them a speech, and they go! They
took something that could have been done safely and sent it to the black
market and all of the inherent dangers that go along with dealing with
that element. Will they ever be legal again? I hope so.

T: We’re working on it! Maybe it can slip through in the life extension
field.

BN: Well, life extension, or "youth extension," is getting
very popular, and more and more drugs are becoming readily available.

T: What do you think of the current crop of natural growth hormone
releasers?

BN: Major drug companies have a lot of money invested in the research
of these things, and it looks as if the GH secretagogues are of very
little value. Some are known to show elevation, but it’s negligible.
Even then, there is a receptor shutdown after about two months.

T: I’m surprised that they worked at all.

BN: It’s very hit and miss. The spike is also too short in duration
to make any difference. As far as the sublingual sprays, some of them
do contain real growth hormone, but it’s one four-hundredth of an IU!
I’d like to see some blood tests that show any elevation from that!

T: What is the price for a month’s supply of GH?

BN: I make arrangements with the pharmacies to sell the GH to patients
for exactly the price that I would pay for it?about ten dollars an IU.

T: That’s a pretty good price! I get the feeling that you are going
to get a lot of calls once this article is published.

BN: When the Japanese version comes out, it will be even cheaper. I
believe that within a few years, GH replacement will be as commonplace
as cough medicine. I should add that this is not recommended for young
people. If you already have a high level and take in additional GH,
it isn’t of much benefit, and that’s when you get all of the side effects,
like acromegaly. You also run the risk of diabetes and accelerated tumor
growth. Remember, you’re not going to look good just by what you inject
or swallow. You have to work out, eat right, and supplement.

Some people think that we’re fooling with nature, but I feel that growing
old is a disease process and should be fought. Nature has no need for
you after you pass the age of procreation. We are here to proliferate
the species?no other reason. So when you can no longer reproduce, you
have to be killed off to make room for the next generation. That’s why
it starts to decline so rapidly after 40. But I want to go down kicking
and screaming. It’s a philosophy.

T: What are your thoughts on steroid use by younger men?

BN: If they are cycled just to get an occasional "boost,"
it can be done safely. There are good steroids and bad steroids. I should
state that, in order for me to prescribe steroids, the patient must
prove to be hypogonadal. I don’t prescribe any oral steroids. I mostly
recommend deca.

T: And the brand available at pharmacies is Steris?

BN: Steris has closed down!

T: Oh, no!!!

BN: Yeah, now it’s only Organon…at three times the cost.

T: Have you had any surgery done on yourself?

BN: Yes, I had liposuction. I started getting jealous of my patients!
There was that last bit of fat lapping over my belt that just wouldn’t
go away, so I had it done, and it hasn’t been back. Liposuction is the
only real spot reducer. I haven’t had work done on my face, but when
the time comes, I’ll probably get a lift.

T: What is your most common surgical procedure?

BN: I think that I’ve set a record for doing more gynocomastia surgery
than anyone else. Over 700 cases! Breast implants would have to be second.

T: I knew a woman who had perfect C-cup breasts, and she had them enlarged
to the point where they looked like Tupperware bowls. Would you ever
dissuade someone from having cosmetic surgery?

BN: It’s important to have long talks with the patient and know what
they really want. I get some bizarre requests. You learn not to make
judgements. I write for a trade magazine for strippers [Extreme], and
I can tell you that some of those women know that the bigger the breasts,
the more in demand they become. They make money by looking freaky.

T: I guess that, like beauty, deformity is in the eye of the beholder.

BN: Absolutely. And as far as turning people away, yes. For example,
I won’t do lipo on fat people. I’d recommend that they first clean up
their diet and start an exercise program. Then, when I do the work,
it will look better and the fat won’t come back. It’s also better to
work on the problem before it gets too bad. I always say that the best
compliment is when someone sees a patient of mine and thinks that they
look great, but they don’t know why. The best job is one that isn’t
too obvious.

T: I understand that you have a new procedure for calf implants?

BN: Yes, I use a soft solid silastic implant (the texture of
muscle) that can be shaped any way you want. Round, diamond…it can’t
break or leak. It’s slipped into the fascial compartment over the heads
of the gastrocnemius, so it stays within the muscle confines. Most implants
being used, like the ones that Lou Ferrigno had to have removed, are
just placed under the skin. Calf size is determined genetically by the
length of the tendons. If you have short tendons, then all you have
to do is walk, and your calves will grow.

I use a similar technique with the pec implant. It’s inserted between
the pec major and the pec minor. It pushes the pec forward so that,
when you flex, what shows is your own muscle. You also don’t get that
lower pec droop found in other pec implants.

T: Could pec implants affect flexibility?

BN: They shouldn’t. If a surgeon doesn’t know what a perfect pec should
look like, the results can be a disaster. I just worked on a professional
baseball player who was born without a pectoral muscle. He is now doing
commercials without his shirt on.

T: What are the prices for the other various procedures?

BN: The total cost of most liposuction, including office visits, anesthesia,
everything, is about $5,100. Implants can cost $5,000-$7,000.

T: I guess I’m stuck with my skinny calves after all. Any new techniques
on the horizon?

BN: There are new things all of the time. Some things, like ultrasonic
liposuction, I’m not a big proponent of. Lasers should be used only
by laser specialists. Sometimes people fall so in love with technology
that they feel a need to use it in spite of its effectiveness.

I think that, in the future, there will be doctors who are "enhancement
specialists." They will deal with all aspects of youth extension,
performance enhancement, and body alteration. It will include all forms
of surgery, drugs, and hormone therapy.

T: Doc, it sounds as if you’re doing some of that fascinating work
already. You look incredible, especially for someone your age.

BN: I feel like a man twenty years younger.

T: One last hypothetical question. What do you think would happen if
you stopped taking the GH, testosterone, and deca durabolin?

BN: [Thinks for a moment] Well, I guess I’d turn into an old man!

In 1959, a story by Charles Beaumont entitled "Number 12 Looks
Just like You" (later made into an episode of "The Twilight
Zone") spoke of a futuristic society that eliminated many of the
world’s woes by putting people through a "transformation"
that would make them young and beautiful. Today, we’re getting close
to living in that brave new world.

I think it’s fair to say that most people would choose to be as attractive
as possible. Like anything else, cosmetic enhancement can be taken too
far (e.g. Michael Jackson). It’s not meant to be a cure-all. But it’s
an option; in some cases, the only option.

After talking to Dr. Nadler, I felt much more at ease about surgery
as a method of improving one’s appearance. The idea of steroid and GH
therapy also sounds enticing. I think it’s safe to assume that I may
be making another call on the doctor, soon. Very soon.

If you wish to contact "The Liposuctionator," you may do
so by either calling 1-800-445-0505 or visiting his website at www.drnadler.com.

Here
are some more articles about Nadler, including this one
:

www.taekwondotimes.com/portal/

[Cached]

Published on: 4/10/2007   Last Visited:
4/26/2007

Retired plastic surgeon and certified personal trainer Bruce
J. Nadler
M.D. has brought his Plastic
Synergy training system to Los Angeles. As stated in his
book, "The Nip Tuck Workout – Exercise through the Eyes of a Plastic
Surgeon," Dr. Nadler has created an exercise
program based on the plastic surgical principles of proportion and symmetry.
It combines careful analysis with an individualized exercise prescription.

LOS ANGELES, April 10 /PRNewswire/ –

Retiring after 28 years of practicing plastic surgery in NYC, Dr.
Nadler
, a former competitive body builder, ASCM
certified personal fitness trainer and himself a baby boomer, developed
a regimen that is safe, efficient and effective. Instead of settling for
a minimally acceptable goal of fitness, he optimizes
each person’s physical potential.

His background in plastic surgery, bodybuilding
and martial arts (black belt in Shotokan karate) has allowed him to combine
the best of many disciplines to create his system.


Dr. Nadler has re-located to Los Angeles after
successfully training several top New York City celebrities. He
is now affiliated with The Scandinavian Health Experience.

Here are archived pages of his websites DrNadler.com
and MDFitnesspts.com.
Here’s
how he describes himself
:

I am the only M.D. specializing in Aesthetic Personal Fitness
Training. No one else has my background of cosmetic plastic surgery,anti-aging
medicine and exercise experience.

* World renowned cosmetic plastic surgeon and personal trainer for almost
3 decades specializing in body sculpture and anti-aging, now retired from
surgery
* Certified personal trainer- American College of Sports Medicine, the
most difficult certification to obtain
* Black belt- Shotokan karate
* Body building and female figure judge- National Physique Committee
* Author of "The Nip Tuck Workout"
* Creator of the "Plastic Synergy" workout system

The media has recognized my knowledge and ability.

I have appeared on:

* The View
* MTV
* VH-1
* The Discovery Channel
* CBS, NBC, ABC and Fox News.

I have been featured in:

* New York Magazine
* The New York Times
* Wall Street Journal
* New York Post
* Newsday
* Vogue
* Cosmopolitan
* Maxim
* Penthouse
* Muscular Development
* Muscle and Fitness
* Ironman

[After a topless picture of himself flexing his muscles, Dr. Nadler says:]
"Not too bad for a 60 year old It’s really me! I’ll take my shirt
off on request.. I know how to maximize your potential."

Here’s a
disturbing interview with Dr. Nadler from DietDetective.com
:

Dr. Bruce Nadler was a well known Plastic Surgeon who practiced
for 28 years and specialized in surgical body sculpting. He is now a personal
fitness trainer certified by both the American College of Sports Medicine
and the International Sports Sciences Association. He a competitive body
builder, winning titles in Master’s Level competitions, as well
as a National Physique Committee bodybuilding and figure competition judge.
This extensive background in the human form gives Dr. Nadler a special
understanding and insight into what a body should look like and how to
obtain it.

Name: 
Bruce Nadler, M.D.

Birthday: 1/29/1947

Location: New York

Q: Tell us how you got to where
you are now.

A: After practicing plastic surgery for
28 years, I retired and started a person training business, Nip Tuck
Fitness NYC.

Q: Define and discuss failure.

A: Failure is the inability to see alternative
answers to your problems. 

Q: Is there anything about yourself
that you’ve changed your mind about in the last 20 years?

A: I thought I couldn’t find something
that would give me the same satisfaction as performing plastic surgery. 
Becoming a personal trainer has changed that.  I can use the experience
and knowledge I possess to maximize my new endeavor.

Q: What’s the next major item
on your "to-do" list?

A: The next major item is to start work
on my next book called “Operation Boomerang, Returning Baby Boomers
to Fitness."  It will deal with safe and effective methods
for Baby Boomers to achieve the benefits of exercise.  Being a
Baby Boomer myself, give additional insight into the project.

Q: Define individual responsibility
and how you react to adverse situations.

A: Individual responsibility is opting
out from our current society of victims.  Too many people claim
the results of their own stupidity are caused by others.  Then
they try to sue them.

Adverse situations are challenges. 
I had rheumatic fever as a child and then another heart infection during
my surgical residency.  Instead of accepting a compromised life
style, I refused to be limited just because I have two damaged heart
valves.  I learned to compensate and do any activity I want.

Q: When do you have time to think
about your mistakes, mishaps, achievements, and minor victories; in
other words, do you have any reflective time for yourself of your career?

A: These are all lessons that should teach
rather than be ignored.  I certainly have had my share of each
of the categories.  They constantly hover in the background to
provide a measure to evaluate any potentially new activity.

Q: What is your most influential
story, fiction or nonfiction, from a film, book, magazine, newspaper
or parable? Explain its impact on your life? What’s you’re favorite
saying?

A: The most influential writing in my
life is the poem “Invictus" by William Ernest Henley.

Out of the night that covers me,

Black as the Pit from pole to pole,

I thank whatever gods may be

For my unconquerable soul.

In the fell clutch of circumstance

I have not winced nor cried aloud.

Under the bludgeonings of chance

My head is bloody, but unbowed.

Beyond this place of wrath and tears

Looms but the horror of the shade,

And yet the menace of the years

Finds, and shall find me, unafraid.

It matters not how strait the gate,

How charged with punishments the
scroll,

I am the master of my fate;

I am the captain of my soul.

This poem sums up my feelings about adversity.

Q: Was there a defining moment
in your life when you made a decision that changed the course of the
rest of your life forever?

A: Marrying my wife Terri gave the perfect
complement to my personality.  I found an equal who made me
much more than I could have been alone.

Q: What’s the most bodacious chance
you’ve ever taken?

A: Life has been a series of chances. 
Every time I refused to be compromised, I took a big chance.  When
I decided, as a plastic surgeon, to concentrate on surgery for the physically
fit, I was told there was no market.  I proved that wrong. 
When I announced my retirement to pursue personal training, I was also
told I wouldn’t be happy.  Time will tell.

Q: What’s the biggest lesson you’ve
learned about yourself? What’s the biggest lesson you haven’t learned?

A: The most important quality to be successful
is to able to bounce back from adversity.  Try to have a life boat,
a “Plan B," in mind just in case.

I haven’t learned how to be in two
places at the same time.

Q: What keeps you going (your
motivation)?

A: My motivation is to push to envelop
as far as I can.  There are four main principles that motivate
a person, fear, pleasure, pain and recognition.  One must learn
to conquer or ignore fear.  One must learn to avoid endure pain. 
One must not be satisfied with pleasure alone.  Accomplish these
feats and recognition will come.

Q: On those days when you’re not
motivated to work out, but you know you have to, what’s the one thought
that gets you going?

A: I have an image to maintain. 

Q: If you had to choose a specific
song or band to get you psyched for your workout, what would it be?

A: Metallica

Q: If you could eat one forbidden
food whenever you wanted without gaining weight, what would it be?

A: That would be a toss-up between dark
chocolate and blue cheese.

Q: What dessert do you dream about?

A: A dark chocolate soufflé with
fresh whipped cream.

Q: If there were one healthy food
item (something you love) that you had to eat every day, what would
it be?

A: Low fat, low carbohydrate chocolate
brownies.

Q: What is the one food or meal
you always eat before an event? What about before training?

A: A hydrolyzed whey protein/ carbohydrate
shake.

Q: What’s the best book
about health that you’ve read?

A: My book “The Nip Tuck Workout."

Q: What are your two favorite
health magazines?

The Journal of the ACSM and the internet
magazine T-Nation.

Q: What do you consider the world’s
most perfect food? Please be specific and try not to answer with a category
but rather with a specific food item: for example, not “whole
grain" but “raisin bran cereal"?

A: Plain Yogurt

Q: Do you have any sports superstitions
or rituals?

No

Q: How do you take total control
of your mind and body to achieve the focus you need during pivotal sports
moments?

A: Zen Meditation.  I’ve spent
15 years involved in martial arts.  It’s given me the ability
to hyper-focus.

Q: What do you think is the best
training location in the world?

A: La Jolla, California

Q: What do you do to reduce stress/relax/center
your mind? Do you participate in an organized relaxation activity such
as yoga, meditation or tai chi?

A: Total concentration on the mind-body-breathing
connection during weight training serves as a moving meditation.

Q: Are there healthy restaurants
that you enjoy and would recommend?

A: Josephina’s Restaurant in Manhattan.

Posted in Los Angeles | Comments Off on Why Did The News Media Lose Interest So Quickly In The Death Of Bodybuilding Cosmetic Surgeon Bruce Nadler And His Wife Terri?

The 43

According to Wikipedia: “On September 26, 2014, 43 male students from the Ayotzinapa Rural Teachers’ College were forcibly taken and then disappeared in Iguala, Guerrero, Mexico. They were allegedly taken into custody by local police members from Cocula and Iguala, in collusion with organized crime. According to official reports, the students’ annual commandeering of several buses to travel to Mexico City to commemorate the anniversary of the 1968 Tlatelolco Massacre turned deadly. During the journey, local police attempted to intercept several of the buses, commandeered by the students, through the use of road blocks and the firing of weapons.”

So I just watched the Netflix documentary “The 43” and realized for the first time that these college students had hijacked buses to go to a political protest. I don’t remember this from the NPR coverage.

What happens when you hijack a plane? You are likely to get killed. What happens when you hijack in general? You are likely to get killed.

I watched this Netflix documentary and at no point does anyone in it suggest that hijacking is a bad idea that increases your odds of suffering a terrible fate. Nobody wonders why the boys weren’t instilled with basic moral precepts such as “Do not steal.”

I have a simple take away from this terrible story that nobody else seems to say: If you abstain from stealing, you are much less likely to get killed. If you are abstain from deliberately harming others, you are much less likely to be the victim of retaliation.

Apparently, two of the buses that the boys commandeered were carrying approximately $2 million worth of heroin. If you don’t steal buses, you are less likely to end up in the cross hairs of angry drug lords.

In 12 step programs, it is not unheard of for people to make restitution to drug dealers they have stolen from. Just because the person you have stolen from is a criminal does not mean that you are free to rip them off without negative consequences.

When you don’t steal from others, they are much less likely to hurt you.

Posted in Mexico | Comments Off on The 43

Does Kevin MacDonald Argue That Jews Are Genetically Programmed To Weaken White Societies?

Nathan Cofnas responds to me: “I wouldn’t say “genetically programmed,” since this is too strong an expression. (It’s a tendency that requires certain cultural inputs to be expressed. The group evolutionary strategy wouldn’t function properly without culturally transmitted social controls, ideologies, values, etc. I’ve used the looser phrase “genetically and culturally adapted.”) I don’t think KMac would say the group evolutionary strategy specifically targets *white* societies–just gentiles in general, although in practice that means whites because they are the main competitor of Jews (according to KMac). In the preface to CofC he describes Jewish intellectual movements as having “attempted to weaken the power of their perceived competitors–the European peoples who early in the 20th century had assumed a dominant position…” Also he says (CofC p. 8): “Viewed from this perspective, an important goal of Jewish intellectual effort may be understood as attempting to undermine cohesive gentile group strategies…” In many passages where he doesn’t specifically use a word like “undermine” or “weaken” I think the same idea is still there.”

“I think KMac has specifically rejected that expression in response to the WSJ article. KMac: “I never claim that Jews are ‘genetically programmed to undermine Christian civilization.'”

Posted in Jews, Kevin MacDonald, Nathan Cofnas | Comments Off on Does Kevin MacDonald Argue That Jews Are Genetically Programmed To Weaken White Societies?

#258 6-13-19 Is It War With Iran?

00:00 JF Gariepy, Richard Spencer discuss new Michael Malice book on the new right
04:00 KMG arrives: Is It War With Iran [incorporates Gulf Of Tonkin: How America Was Suckered Into The Vietnam War]
20:00 Youtube’s crackdown
43:00 Siege: Trump Under Fire by Michael Wolff — a savage comedy
49:00 Nicholas Sparks, Another Victim Of Gay Rage [incorporates YouTube Bans Channel With 500K Subscribers For Criticizing Its Censorship]
1:09:00 Hunter Biden Gets A New Wife (In Record Time)
1:25:00 Evil Populists Threaten The Sanctity Of The Dual-Earner Family [NR essay by Michael Strain]
1:37:00 “I Really Want to Thank the President” Kim Kardashian Thanks President Trump at the White House for His Passion for Criminal Justice Reform
1:40:00 A New Swedish Custom: Apartment Bombings
1:49:00 Billionaire Jennifer Pritzker Stops Supporting Trump After Coming Out As Trans
2:01:00 Warning: Cheap, Illegal Immigrants Can Be Highly Hazardous To Your Health
2:07:00 Warning: The Dominican Republic Can Be Highly Hazardous To Your Health
2:11:00 Theater Thursday: Bill & Ted Double Feature

#236 5-13-19 Lurching Toward War With Iran

00:00 My ex-GF Christine Palma died (1970-2019), https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=126823
05:00 Vox Day’s view of the Alt Right
25:00 KMG arrives: Lurching Toward War With Iran
45:00 Trade War: Won’t Somebody Please Think Of China?
1:00:00 #SexStrike: Chastity Craze Convulses Feminists
1:07:00 Chips Ahoy: Now With Added Poz!
1:15:00 Joe Biden: HBD Champion
1:43:00 Christianity Disappears In Britain
1:56:00 A new puppy wrecked my health, home and happiness
2:05:00 Who are the best citizens?
2:23:00 Trump administration forces China to sell the Port of Long Beach
2:36:00 Sex Trafficking Mars the Mystique of Cannes Film Festival
2:43:00 Barry: Fuches’ Last Stand
2:55:00 Chrissy Teigen shows off her pregnant body in artsy nude photo for Mother’s Day
2:59:00 Inside Huawei’s manufacturing empire
3:04:00 Tesla Story Gets Even Weirder as $TSLA Completely Changes Its Business Strategy
3:10:00 NYT: Trump’s Tariffs Are a New Tax on Americans
3:15:00 Buttigieg responds to Trump insult: ‘I had to Google that’
3:25:00 Supreme Court rules iPhone users can sue Apple over App Store prices
2:27:00 Woman who claims she was raped by Julian Assange ‘hopes justice will win’
3:30:00 News: Sri Lanka blocks social media after anti-Muslim riots
3:33:00 News: Twitter tears into Delta for its tone-deaf anti-union, pro-video game poster

Posted in Iran | Comments Off on #258 6-13-19 Is It War With Iran?

Facebook’s Process to Label You a ‘Hate Agent’ Revealed

From Breitbart:

Facebook monitors the offline behavior of its users to determine if they should be categorized as a “Hate Agent,” according to a document provided exclusively to Breitbart News by a source within the social media giant.
The document, titled “Hate Agent Policy Review” outlines a series of “signals” that Facebook uses to determine if someone ought to be categorized as a “hate agent” and banned from the platform.

Those signals include a wide range of on- and off-platform behavior. If you praise the wrong individual, interview them, or appear at events alongside them, Facebook may categorize you as a “hate agent.”

Facebook may also categorize you as a hate agent if you self-identify with or advocate for a “Designated Hateful Ideology,” if you associate with a “Designated Hate Entity” (one of the examples cited by Facebook as a “hate entity” includes Islam critic Tommy Robinson), or if you have “tattoos of hate symbols or hate slogans.” (The document cites no examples of these, but the media and “anti-racism” advocacy groups increasingly label innocuous items as “hate symbols,” including a cartoon frog and the “OK” hand sign.)

Facebook will also categorize you as a hate agent for possession of “hate paraphernalia,” although the document provides no examples of what falls into this category.

The document also says Facebook will categorize you as a hate agent for “statements made in private but later made public.” Of course, Facebook holds vast amounts of information on what you say in public and in private — and as we saw with the Daily Beast doxing story, the platform will publicize private information on their users to assist the media in hitjobs on regular American citizens.

Breitbart News has already covered some of the individuals that Facebook placed on its list of potential “hate agents.” Paul Joseph Watson eventually was categorized as “hateful” and banned from the platform, in part, according to the document, because he praised Tommy Robinson and interviewed him on his YouTube channel. Star conservative pundit Candace Owens and conservative author and terrorism expert Brigitte Gabriel were also on the list, as were British politicians Carl Benjamin and Anne Marie Waters.

The Benjamin addition reveals that Facebook may categorize you as a hate agent merely for speaking neutrally about individuals and organizations that the social network considers hateful. In the document, Facebook tags Benjamin with a “hate agent” signal for “neutral representation of John Kinsman, member of Proud Boys” on October 21 last year.

Facebook also accuses Benjamin, a classical liberal and critic of identity politics, as “representing the ideology of an ethnostate” for a post in which he calls out an actual advocate of an ethnostate.

In addition to the more unorthodox signals that Facebook uses to determine if its users are “hate agents,” there is also, predictably, “hate speech.” Facebook divides hate speech into three tiers depending on severity and considers attacks on a person’s “immigration status” to be hate speech.

Here’s how “hate speech” — both on and off Facebook — will be categorized by the platform, according to the document:

Individual has made public statements, or statements made in private and later made public, using Tier 1, 2, or 3 hate speech or slurs:

3 instances in one statement or appearance = signal
5 instances in multiple statements or appearances over one month = signal

Posted in Facebook | Comments Off on Facebook’s Process to Label You a ‘Hate Agent’ Revealed

Accepting Reality

Kyle Rowland writes: Reactionary thinkers often note the importance of differences. That is to say, they note that different races, different genders, different classes, different individuals have different traits, and to some extent must be treated differently. If someone is violently inclined, they must be treated differently from someone who is peaceful. If a community is violently inclined, they must be treated differently from a community that is distinctly well-behaved. A crime-ridden neighborhood needs different policing strategies than a calm neighborhood.

Reactionaries note that this is not only necessary, but inevitable. No matter how loudly one protests against this principle, reality inexorably forces you to act in accordance with it. White Northerners decried how Blacks in the South were treated — and when those Blacks came north en-masse, similar behavior emerged from Northern Whites. When liberal whites are faced with similar incentives and dangers from crime, their hand is forced, and they deploy de-facto segregation and mass incarceration to make their neighborhoods safe.

The attitude towards these measures can change radically and quickly through politics, but the fact of this disparate treatment and impact is hard if not impossible to eradicate. Reactionaries note that the refusal to face reality has bizarre and perverse downstream effects — liberal elites self-flagellate with ever more vigor, spiraling into despair and fury in the face of an ‘unacceptable’ reality.

But just as liberals writhe in agony before a reality they have declared unacceptable, the alt-right declares the same reality unacceptable from a different angle. They say – we cannot bear this conflict that arises from differences between races, it is unbearable, it is unsustainable, it has to collapse, it is an abomination!

So it is that erudite scholars who are investigating and quantifying racial differences have the mic seized from them by hyperventilating alt-right morons who append: “YES, ALL OF THIS IS TRUE, AND THIS IS WHY AMERICA WILL COLLAPSE, THIS IS WHY EVERYTHING IS FALLING APART! 1488! THE JOOOOOOOOS!”

The reality is that the problems that arise from racial differences are evidently bounded and bearable. They have been borne for the entire history of the United States. With the burden of racial conflict weighing it down, the US became the most powerful nation in the world by every major metric.

That means there is a limit to how heavy a burden racial conflict must be. Moreover, it points to one of the biggest sources of confusion and noise in politics – histrionic morons with no sense of perspective, acting like their pet issue is what the world revolves around, drawing the attention from rational people with realistic perspectives and solutions.

America has always been multiracial, but racial tensions hurt the country primarily through a second-order effect. When political factions declare an unsolvable problem “UNACCEPTABLE” and devote inordinate amounts of resources and attention towards it, this leads to a crescendo of conflict. When the nation was at its most peaceful and united, all of the first-order problems inherent to multiracial countries were still present, ineradicable. There were still vast asymmetries in violence and life outcomes, as there had been long before the nation was a twinkle in anyone’s eye. They did not threaten the nation, as they amounted to pinpricks on a giant.

What has threatened the nation multiple times is conflict over what these differences in outcome signify, and how they may or may not be solved. This is where brother turns against brother, where recriminations and resentment festers. HBD provides a way to defuse this powder keg — the differences are inherent and, at least for now, ineradicable. They are also evidently bearable, as they have been borne while the most powerful nation on earth blossomed from a forsaken scattering of colonies. The solution is to learn that you can choose whether to accept reality or not – not whether reality will continue to present itself to you.

Posted in HBD | Comments Off on Accepting Reality

Is Google Calling Trump’s Bluff?

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Alphabet is calling Trump’s bluff. They may have concluded, with justification, that Trump is too weak and ditzy to actually go after his enemies and press an anti-trust case. The risk here is that even if the Democratic Congress and the Republican cucks can slow or thwart anti-trust prosecutions, the financial robustness of these companies is regarded with a jaundiced eye by many investors. They are running a risk that simply initiating the actions, even if they don’t go anywhere, could trigger a bloodbath as the smart money cashes out its chips and heads for the exits. There is something of a gamble going on here that Trump won’t do anything that would trigger a 2008 style Wall Street collapse. Either way, the scorpion can’t resist stinging the frog, even knowing what will happen afterwards.

* If Google does not play its cards right they will run into issues down the road when they try to launch things like driver-less cars and AI. Without the government’s and public’s cooperation, they will never be able to operate. The Justice can also block future mergers which it probably should anyway.

The internet is a cash cow but the technological edge they have is fleeting and consumers can change literally at the click of a button. Once it all comes out that they have been spying on our peccadilloes and using the information to overturn democracy they will be the once cut out of the future.

* The (somewhat questionable) Matthew Shepard story got hundreds of times the ink as did Jesse Dirkhising’s murder. Because the latter was dog-bites-man.

Heck, Gary Trzaska’s murder in Buffalo on the same night as Shepard’s got a microscopic amount of coverage in comparison. Five black teens beat a white queer to death? That’s just another Friday night in Buffalo.

* Last week, its YouTube unit demonetized numerous conservative channels, apparently after being bullied into doing so by one journalist.

Sure, “one journalist” — the ADL and other Jewish organizations are and have been the ones pushing hardest for censorship — the one homo journalist was just a convenient pretext to deflect blame.

Assuming the action against GOOG moves forward, it will be interesting to compare the language GOOG uses to defend their censorship campaign against ‘hate’ to the language the Supreme Court used to uphold racial discrimination affirmative action in Grutter v. Bollinger.

* I think once the bodycam footage came out, the police slaughter of Daniel Shaver story did generate a fair amount of public interest. (Recall that it was the girlfriend’s video of Castile bleeding out that was the vehicle for mass hysteria in what otherwise would have been a he-said-she-said text story.)

The NYT et al. declining to cover Daniel Shaver is an active, not a reactive decision. There is a chicken and egg dynamic, or “Megaphonics” as Steve calls it. By not promoting the story (in particular by not inserting it into their Opinion piece outrage machine) the story doesn’t generate buzz. By promoting a story, the story does generate buzz. So the “newsworthiness” of these events is still fairly self-fulfilling, and it is not really accurate to say that “white men shot dead” “don’t generate enough ‘clicks’”. They could, if the Megaphone holders chose to promote it.

Anyhow, most of these papers abandoned the profit motive long ago and are now run by ideologues backed by billionaires, so they don’t really care what the public is interested in.

* If it came to be known that Police make mistakes of judgment in high intensity situations involving suspects of all colors including white men, it would be much more difficult to maintain the narrative and political mobilization useful for fringe coalition politics.

I don’t think it’s much more complicated than curating the information that forms the daily news cycle in such a way as to conform to their politics and worldview.

Posted in Google | Comments Off on Is Google Calling Trump’s Bluff?

From Blogosphere to Vlogosphere

Anatoly Karlin writes:

times the views as writing out a more labor intensive and K-selected blog post.

The Alt Right child prodigy “soph” – recently profiled by Mr. Bernstein – is currently just shy of a million subscribers on YouTube. She has had 17 million views since she started her (rather irregular) vlogging career in August 2015. That’s approximately what the Unz Review currently generates in half a year, and we have far, far more visitors now than we did even just a couple of years ago.

The typical video by the psychometrist Edward Dutton – probably the most high profile HBD vlogger – gets around 10,000-20,000 views. I am reasonably sure that this is well above what the typical article by James Thompson here gets. My most popular “HBD” article ever – The Idiocy of the Average – got something like 40,000 views IIRC. The Golden One, a Swedish alt right pagan bodybuilder whose videos I recently binge watched, has 100,000 subscribers, and most of his videos – rather low effort productions with minimal editing or graphics – get at least 20,000 views. The most high profile vloggers make enough money to make a comfortable living (Sargon of Akkad was getting $15,000 from YouTube ads before they demonetized his account)….

Where has that old blogosphere gone?

(1) Many of the small, old school bloggers just stopped blogging. It was the digital venereal disease that is social media that killed them off more than anything else from around 2010. To have a vigorous blogosphere, you need a tightly connected network of independent bloggers bouncing ideas and arguments off each other, but when 75% of them have migrated to Twitter, there’s no longer sufficient scope in the community to generate the vigorous and counter-argument on which the old blogosphere thrived.

(2) Some bloggers were snapped up by larger websites. As a rule, the ones with stable backing from moneyed patrons were the main ones that survived and thrived (e.g. this very venue).

(3) Some parts of the blogging HBDsphere have gone into or were recruited into actual science. This is perhaps the single biggest positive development.

(4) Rising SJWism has also forced many of these discussions into closed boards, mailing lists, and Slack chats (this describes NRx and the HBDsphere).

Comments at Anatoly Karlin:

* One historical analogy to consider, is that a century ago a very similar Poz also took hold in advanced society, in Weimar Germany, where the world’s first ‘trans-gender’ clinic opened there in 1919. – In 1933 that clinic was burned to the ground by the Hitler Youth. The pendulum may swing yet again.

* Trying to negotiate and plead completely failed. Power does not relent peacefully. Swedish people, en masse, created a bunch of organic socities. The first unions were created like this. The co-operate grocer stores (which were co-owned by the shoppers themselves) were created like this. ABF – arbetarnas bildningsförbund – was created like this in order to educate the workers about their rights, and also to increase literacy. This was before universal education. This went on in sphere after sphere. Collective bargaining power is a mighty thing indeed once it fully blooms.

What happened in Sweden was essentially a state within a state, that massively increased its bargaining power vis-a-vis powerful corporations and forced its hand. YouTube is acting on pressure from Jewish lobbies but also USG pressure. There is no free market. If the “free market” esisted then YouTube would not purge these people, because it is manifestly popular and it brings in money. They are purged because of ideological pressure, giving to lie to the myth of the “free market”.

A problem for many people on the Alt Right is that they are basically racist libertarians. Many people came from libertarian and/or conservative backgrounds and still carry that baggage, so they idealise markets. But markets are not your friends and left untouched, a natural tendecy to oligarchy and/or monopoly will happen. In Sweden, nationalists are already starting to work on similar projects. Dan Eriksson has plans to create a large number of houses for Swedish nationalists, where we can have conferences and/or just hang out. The first house has already been opened. People talk about taking this approach to many other areas of life and I think this is needed.

At the risk of sounding stereotypical, we really do need to Think Big™. Censorship will only increase in the future and hiding in the shadows trying to get money is not a viable solution, it’s a rationalisation for cowards. Only mass organising is a viable long-term path, and it needs to happen now. Depending on a small number of donors is a critical mistake. A decentralised system is far harder to beat, as various Swedish oligarchs discovered over a century ago.

* I download all the videos I am interested in and just convert them to audio-only formats like .m4a. I only listen to them when walking, commuting, at the gym etc. Most of the content is just debating, so actually seeing video is completely unnecessary.

Secondly, even if the amount of vloggers have increased, everyone have their personal taste. I like some podcasts a lot more even if their quality is about equal to others simply because I like their personalities more. There is a lot of repetition across the WN/AR vloggersphere, so you only need to pick out a few you like and that will cover your bases. I don’t think people watch/listen to as much as you think they do.

Lastly, a lot of podcasts are focused on particular regions. I won’t get Sweden-specific stuff from a US podcast. Just as a Russian guy wouldn’t get his Russian politics podcast from a Swedish stuff. And you always want to mix the local with the international to get a good mix. It’s not good to be too isolated, just as it is bad too be too unmoored from your roots and surrounding.

* I don’t get the popularity of videos. I can’t really watch Ed Dutton or any other youtube personality. They are just endlessly wordy. The information density is so low, I occasionally just skim through the transcript.

The question is whether viewership is really the essential thing. A quality audience also counts for something.

* I think that a big part of the solution is technological. Why has the Pirate Bay been able to stay online despite massive attempts to shut it down? Because 1) many jurisdictions are available to move the website to, 2) making a full backup of the website and moving between these jurisdictions is easy and fast

Neither (1) nor especially (2) is currently true for accounts on social networks such as Youtube, Twitter, Facebook or Patreon. If your account is censored or deleted for whatever reason (for example, the Terms of Service change), it can be extremely time-consuming to move your operations anywhere else, and the more content is in your account, the longer it takes (and you also lose all comments & subscribers).

This is like feudalism. A few landlords, many peasants. And no Yuri’s Day, either.

So anyway,
The solution for (1) already kind of exists – federated social media such as Peertube, MediaGoblin, Diaspora. PeerTube is like many different Youtubes, with “instances” that can be hosted by anyone, all of which can communicate with each other (well, unless they block other instances) and share data. Go to any PeerTube instance, and you’ll see a familiar interface. Moreover, the hosting costs are low because the videos stay up with BitTorrent.
The problem is that without (2), anyone signing up to one of these is no better off than with Youtube – in fact, things can be much more draconian, because any instance can be hosted by just a random guy with no reputation to worry about if he decides to go nuts and ban everyone.

Unfortunately, account migration is not currently possible in any of these projects.

Not in PeerTube:
https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube/issues/549

Not even in Diaspora, where it had been advertised as a huge feature since 2011, yet absolutely no progress has been made:
https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/issues/908

So watch this space. The day that easy account migration becomes possible on one of these federated social media sites is the day that control over discourse begins to decentralize once again.

https://transferring-videos.com might work as a stopgap solution to (2) for some. It’s limited to only the few big Western social media sites, but at least it means that some of your content will remain up unless there’s a coordinated attack against you across all those sites. (which is, really, the direction things are going in. Federated social media with easy account migration would be preferable, but it doesn’t exist yet)

* Some videos are high signal to noise. It’s not inherently a bad format, any more than some vapid celebrity podcast is akin to Bach just because they’re both “sound”.

The problem with YouTube is that a few years back, for reasons best known to them, they decided to prioritize “length of time viewers spend watching a video” rather than “how much viewers like a video”. The result was to make YouTube more similar to television. You’d think the boomers who run YouTube really missed the old idiot box. The new system rewards those who stretch things out as long as possible, and punishes those who like to make videos that are “short and packed”.

This algorithm change put some animators out of business (animation requires a lot of labour per unit of footage, which previously had been offset by their high popularity). One artist I was following at the time (SexualLobster – yeah, his stuff was rather degenerate, but amusing) had his YouTube income cut in half, tried to keep going with just Patreon for a while, then seemed to give up and went to work for a studio.

* Video is a valid format when there is visual content to be presented. Cinema being the classic, but by no means only, example.

Video as a substitute for text, which is what most vlogging consists of, is for illiterate plebeians. As a means of transmitting non-visual information video has inherently lower bandwidth than text which makes vlog consumption a gigantic waste of time.

That vlogging far exceeds blogging in popularity is evidence that 90% or more of the human population should be eradicated.

* I couldn’t understand why YouTube allowed thought crime content for so long. I assumed they allowed it so that ZOGist intel agencies could monitor who was drawn to the content and study the progression of radicalization. This also allowed them to steer people toward their assets such as David Duke and Dick Spencer. Now they are shutting it down. Have they gathered enough data now? Why allow it for so long? I remember being puzzled by this way back in 2012.

It is clear smart phones have killed our attention spans. It’s harder than ever to read books. Things are winding down, the frogs are gay, the libraries are filled with drag queens. Buy and hold Bitcoin brothers, that’s all we have left.

* Television intruded on the influence of newspapers and news magazines. Now YouTube is pushing blogs aside. It seems like the same pattern.

Also, there has always been elite control of most influential media. Hearst comes to mind: “Remember the Maine!”*

Furthermore, down through history, mass media have always had to be K-selected in order to reach the masses, because the portion of the audience with high comprehension and analytical aptitude has always been small. Until relatively recently, huge numbers of people couldn’t even read; they learned by word of mouth or from priests and public speakers.

So, today we see the same thing. Spoken-word mediocrity continues in the form of YouTube, and that becomes the channel of ideas for the largest number of people among those who even care about understanding the world.

#257 6-12-19 From Blogs To Vlogs To Where After YouTube, Have Dissidents Anywhere To Go?

00:00 Steve Sailer: The Great Awokening Conspiracy Theory
06:00 Kyle Rowland on HBD
11:00 KMG arrives: From Blogs To Vlogs To Where? After YouTube, Have Dissidents Anywhere To Go?
1:29:00 Women’s Soccer: Ugly American Women On The Pitch
1:50:00 Pride Month Roundup [incorporates Kirsten Gillibrand & Elizabeth Warren Go Nuts, Florist Targeted By Gays & Masterpiece Cakeshop Sued Again, 180 Companies Come Out For Abortion & “Gestational Slavery” Under Attack]
2:12:00 Immigration Roundup [incorporates George Will Chooses The Economy Over Americans, Immigration As Revenge (NYT Op-Ed), Congolese Dumped In San Antonio & Illegals Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Papers]
2:34:00 God Says Women Shouldn’t Settle
3:12:00 David Weissman: Why I left team MAGA
3:24:00 Our culture needed an adult. Gayle King rose to the challenge.
3:32:00 Senator Hawley Attacks Pelagianism
3:37:00 Crimestopping By Genetics

Posted in Blogging, Censorship, Youtube | Comments Off on From Blogosphere to Vlogosphere

Google May Have Just Increased The Chances Of Antitrust Action Against It

David Pinsen writes: Last week, I wrote that Alphabet (GOOG), (GOOGL) had an inauspicious weekend, mainly due to the news that the U.S. Department of Justice was preparing an antitrust investigation into it. You would think that Alphabet’s Google would have wanted to lay low after that, but instead its YouTube subsidiary “demonetized” a number of right-leaning channels, most prominently Steven Crowder’s, as Fox New’s Tucker Carlson discussed with journalist Glenn Greenwald in the video below (videos are normally monetized on YouTube via ads, enabling both the video’s creators and YouTube to profit).

The focus at Seeking Alpha is on investing, rather than politics, so I don’t want to dwell too much on the politics here, except to note that Glenn Greenwald is on the left politically, and dislikes Crowder, but opposes YouTube’s actions on principle. The investment-specific issue here is that Google’s actions are increasing the company’s risk by drawing further antitrust scrutiny and possibly exposing it to shareholder litigation, as I elaborate below.

YouTube’s demonetization wasn’t limited to Crowder: Smaller channels were hit too, including Luke Ford’s as Ford mentions below (coincidentally, I had mentioned Ford’s channel to Seeking Alpha’s CEO as an example of the potential of the medium, at a meeting in April).

Posted in Google | Comments Off on Google May Have Just Increased The Chances Of Antitrust Action Against It

New York Times Doesn’t Get The Joke

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Except if you read the article carefully, it is clear he was never actually a member of ‘the alt-right’. He was always a leftist who just used to watch alt-light youtube videos and who fancied Lauren Southern.

* No one has ever been a “member” of “the alt-right.”

* Imagine having the high ground in every single cultural institution and this is the best psyop you can do.

* The problem is you can’t just copy youtube. You need a payment processor, and financial institutions fold like a cheap suit when the SJWs get on them. So either you don’t allow “far right” material on your youtube clone, giving nobody a reason to use your site, or you have to use a porn payment processor, meaning the playing field is tilted toward youtube before you even get started.

* The idea of analyzing a data dump of his YouTube history is pretty interesting.

These are the four things that Roose lists as beliefs that Cain accepted after watching “far-right decentralized cult YouTube personalities”:

— Western civilization is under threat from Muslim immigrants
— Western civilization is under threat from cultural Marxists
— Innate I.Q. differences explain racial disparities
— Feminism is a dangerous ideology

Cain did not buy into the following ideas:

— Holocaust denial
— The need for a white ethnostate

His far-right binge led Cain to:

— Identify as a traditional conservative committed to old-fashioned gender norms
— Date an evangelical Christian woman
— Debate liberal friends (which implies he had and retained liberal friends)

Rejecting his far-right beliefs led Cain to:

— Buy a gun
— Start his own YouTube channel with left-wing edgy humor and memes

Props to Roose for being specific about the beliefs of his subject and not exaggerating things. The four beliefs that Cain had seem pretty reasonable to me (depending on a couple of definitions). His resulting behavior seems positive, a girlfriend, doubts about World War T, and a viewpoint-diverse social circle. The things he rejected show that he balanced the evidence and made his own decisions. Not bad for “an aimless young man interested in video games.”

On the other hand, becoming a left-wing YouTuber and buying a Glock seem like unfortunate developments. I wish him the best. I don’t think the YouTube gig is going to pay enough to support marriage to his girlfriend (if she is still around).

* Caleb Cain had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.

* All the talk about how YouTube’s algorithms “played into the hands” of far-right creators seems to boil down to “their videos were popular! Damn them!”

* Voxday has started unauthorized tv. It is not exactly like youtube, but it does have some great stuff on it. Owen Benjamin is putting his stuff there, David the Good, and medievalist professor Rachel Fulton Brown is creating a medieval history class that will be on there. It is the ground floor beginning for this option so I am looking forward to see how it grows. unauthorized.tv is the website.

* Have you guys ever wondered if one could ever become un-redpilled?

I mean, once you’ve read about and understood the proofs for race realism and IQ differences etc., is it possible to just go back to believing normie things? How does that work?

I’d think that some of these “former alt-right” guys are consciously lying (i.e. they want to get their jobs/social lives/etc. back), while the rest might never have fully understood the thing at all. I don’t know what the proportions are, but I’d guess the majority is in the consciously lying category.

* A ‘radical’ is of course a leftist, the equivalent on the right being ‘reactionary.’

So the title of the piece, ‘The Making of a Youtube Radical,’ is accurate, if unintentionally so.

There’s room to move in denazification, Caleb! Keep up the good work, comrade.

* Here, to my mind, is the money quote from this garbage NYT article:

“But critics and independent researchers say YouTube has inadvertently created a dangerous on-ramp to extremism by combining two things: a business model that rewards provocative videos with exposure and advertising dollars, and an algorithm that guides users down personalized paths meant to keep them glued to their screens.”

The problem, you see, is that YouTube is giving people what they want and allowing them to follow their own “personalized path.” We can’t have that!

As usual, the NYT is all-in for a revanchist program that puts people like them back in control of the information people are allowed to see.

* This is analogous to how academia shut down race research. You had to get funded by Pioneer and present your paper at American Reconnaissance’s conference and get published by Mankind Quarterly. No one else would touch you. You had to associate with outfits that were easy for the other side to slime, which meant that nobody ever read your research.

* Most white people want hate speech censured, particularly on venues like YouTube, which is essentially an over the air TV network like ABC or NBC with no restrictions to access. Normal, rational white people don’t want their kids exposed to hateful alt-right dogma. They don’t want their kids to go down a rabbit hole of white nationalist indoctrination and radicalization, which has the potential to ruin their lives.

I own Alphabet stock as do many other people I know. As far as I know, none of these people want to own stock in a cesspool of racism and hate speech. There have been very serious campaigns launched by stockholders and advertisers to clean up YouTube. Beyond that, private companies have always been able to police the speech promulgated on their platforms. This is not even a First Amendment issue, as it isn’t the government that is abridging speech, although the First Amendment too has its limits.

Here is the First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The alt-righters that style themselves as strict First Amendment absolutists apparently have never read it. Or having read it, don’t understand it. Because all the clauses therein, with the exception of Establishment, are designed to empower the majority with all the tools it needs to destroy a fringe movement like the alt-right.

Freedom of speech works both ways. They can shout you down.

Freedom of the press is lethal to you. There has been a constant drumbeat of anti-alt-right articles, particularly since Charlottesville. Big tech takes notice.

Freedom of assembly means when you assemble, your opponents can assemble. And they tend to greatly outnumber you.

Freedom to petition the government. Well, I don’t have to tell you that governments at all levels are being petitioned and not in your favor.

So there you have it. The First Amendment you people say you are devoted to is actually your worst enemy.

* Don’t make it too complicated.

Alt Right figures are being deplatformed, blackballed from mainstream society, and driven to the financial ruin.

They’re scared and they want to go back to their old boring middle-class lives, pre-Alt Right.

So they feed all sorts of BS to the media about how they “changed.” Hopefully, after all that, their old employer will rehire them and they can go back to how things used to be.

I’d also say that many Alt Right figures (like Lauren Southern) are grifters. With the money drying up (due to pay services boycotting them), they want to move on to their next con. Roosh, for example, has transitioned from Alt Right PUA to Christian preacher.

It’s not about what they believe. It’s about making a living.

* It’s possible for the right to be radicalized and dangerous, but not possible for the left to become radicalized and dangerous: Marcuse would’ve made a great reporter for the NYT.

Conspiracy theories:
-The Rosenbergs were innocent.
-Rosenbergs persecuted because they were Jewish (tho’ prosecutor and judge were Jewish.)
-The King Alfred Plan
-AIDS was invented or propagated by whites to kill blacks.
-A cure for AIDS was avoided to kill gays.
-There was no infiltration of the US gov. by Soviet agents in the 40’s and 50’s
-McCarthy blacklisted Hollywood communists
-Trump colluded with the Russians
-The cult of Hitler reigns supreme, as the right today is a consumed with white supremacism or Nazism or Neo Nazi. The Hitler of the 1940’s never dreamed he would capture the hearts and minds of his arch enemy – the USA – to the extent that he has in 2019, almost 75 years after his death.
-And finally, the left has no conspiracy theories. They mostly happen on the right.

* My point was that he was an aimless, broke young man. He needs to pull himself together and get a job and a relationship.

YouTube is a time sinkhole that only is a living for a small minority, and even for them you’re a sharecropper on someone else’s platform. Google changes the rules on income all the time. The Panda algorithm update and various AdSense changes have put many websites out of business, and that is even before the censorship problems. YouTube is not a career.

As for guns, I have not problem with owning a Glock or 20. But he bought one based on fear of online death threats, which indicate a certain level of paranoia. When people threaten to kill you online, your odds of being killed have increased about 0.00001 percent, the odds of being hit by a meterorite, and mentally healthy people understand that. And there was nothing in the article about his having trained with the weapon. I want lots of people to own lots of guns, but not him. He sounds like a nut.

* I’m really interested in how Cain did a 180 on the belief “that innate I.Q. differences explained racial disparities.” This is usually a one-way ratchet: One you see the light, you never go back.

In the case of William Saletan, I think he is a combination of trying ot walk-back a case of potential career suicide, socially and culturally not wanting to hang with “race realists,” and obfuscation about what he believes on the factual stuff with a touchie feelie layer.

Maybe Cain just walked back the “innate” part, feeling like Turkheimer and company that the gap is wholely or predominantly environmental. Maybe he thinks that a big part of disproportionate representation in high level jobs is a combination of a cognitive gap and discrimination, not solely the former.

Most people who do not believe “that innate I.Q. differences explained racial disparities” won’t even discuss it and don’t want to hear any facts. That state can only survive in the absence of understanding. Once you learn about it, you cannot unsee it. If Cain is engaging with people online on YouTube, I’d be interested in hearing him on this subject.

* Due to some quirk or some unique circumstances, he might have absorbed the “alt-right” point of view without really understanding what it’s based on, and then kept regurgitating it, until, due to some change in personal circumstances (like a new girlfriend) he started to absorb another point of view (again, without much thinking), and started regurgitating it.

I think this is a big part of it: most people just aren’t very deep thinkers and will eventually absorb what they just happen to stumble across. I myself am unfortunately in this category, and that’s something I’m going to try and change.

But I also think it is more subtle than outright social intimidation. There are a lot of guys on the alt-right that don’t have friends, career prospects, lovers, much of a future life in general to go back to, no matter how ardently they “redeem” themselves, and they know it. Social stigma has little meaningful impact for somebody with no social capital and little concrete prospect of gaining any. I don’t think this guy is quite that bad off, but his life doesn’t seem like a particularly happy, successful one in which he stands to lose a lot. Obviously, if we were talking about some L5 dude at Google on the down-low, it’d be another story.

(Perhaps because they largely consist of the types of people who’ve never struggled to attain social connections, the MSM is comically bad at understanding this dynamic, hence their belief that yelling “SHAME” at ever higher decibels is going to eventually do the trick.)

I believe that it is more whether he genuinely feels like he’s a good person. This can be especially important if you are a guy with not a lot going for you in life and you want to turn it all around, as I suspect this guy might be: if you think you are genuinely scum on top of that, you are going to have a really tough time focusing on improving yourself. It messes with your brain processes. There’s a lot of people out there all too willing to conflate favoring restriction immigration numbers with actually *hating* immigrants, or a willingness to be open to the idea that IQ has a biological component with *hating* different races, or a belief that women are deeply different from men with *hating* women, or whatever. I think the more perspective/intelligent people who comment here (Twinkie, PhysicistDave, LTC, among others) show that this is utter nonsense. But there’s no question that the “real” white supremacist contingent on the alt-right, among other undesirables (incels, Holocaust deniers, that kind of thing), definitely helps confirm that in the eyes of the masses, and as I alluded to, most people aren’t particularly deep thinkers, much of our ruling classes included. As an analogy, most humans aren’t wired to be Origen or Avicenna, bent to justify the faith, most are oriented to accept the faith and not question the details too much, while their day-to-day practice is rather hit or miss depending on the circumstances.

The desire to genuinely believe you are a decent person can be very powerful. More powerful than the desire to actually be one, for that matter. To wax Joachim Fest for a bit, lot of the absolute worst movements in history had, at their core, that very dangerous kind of person with a strong but directionless craving for morality.

* I can easily imagine someone believing that blacks have the same innate abilities as whites – I more or less used to believe it myself. But how can you unlearn it, after having read all the contrary evidence? That’s just incomprehensible to me.

One explanation might be that these “ex-alt-right” people never really understood the evidence, so they held those opinions without much evidence. Due to some quirk or some unique circumstances, he might have absorbed the “alt-right” point of view without really understanding what it’s based on, and then kept regurgitating it, until, due to some change in personal circumstances (like a new girlfriend) he started to absorb another point of view (again, without much thinking), and started regurgitating it.

I still don’t understand it much. If you don’t think much about these things, then wouldn’t just absorbing the socially accepted normal point of view make the most sense? How could someone become “alt-right” without thinking a lot about it? Are there pockets in our society where the “alt-right” is the default position, which unthinking people just absorb?

Posted in Youtube | Comments Off on New York Times Doesn’t Get The Joke