Fordy University Is In Session!

00:00 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670
09:00 Open up the lower back and the mind will follow
21:00 An Interview with moral philosophers John Doris & Laura Niemi, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Wr7vLCOIsI
24:30 Yale Courses: Virtues & Habit, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8yNxXAm7F4
32:00 Reputation Management, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CJFsG9fxWo
33:00 Professor of Communications, Josh Bentley, https://schieffercollege.tcu.edu/faculty_staff/josh-bentley/
35:00 Representations of reliability: The rhetoric of political flip-flopping, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140012
48:00 TJump Vs Jennifer | Pantheism Vs Atheism, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTQbieGy_a8
1:19:40 Dave Rubin’s Highest-Level Ideas Compilation
1:22:00 WHY CARDANO WILL 10X: The “Ethereum Killer” Cryptocurrency., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltwpx0gM_MQ
1:24:00 WHAT IF BITCOINS CRASH… THE UPCOMING CRYPTO CRASH, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TA0HzpM79ZI
1:26:40 Stop Being So Nice… (as an ex-Google millionaire)
1:29:40 MILLIONAIRE DESK SETUP TOUR for Working From Home (2021)
1:31:00 My Problem With YouTubers…, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxCZhJKwqz8
1:35:00 Why I have no friends (as a millionaire), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRzFjuranQU
1:37:40 No One Wants To Work Anymore… (crypto millionaires, stock daytraders, stimulus checks, onlyfans), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=415v3DZ1w2s
1:40:20 How to stop self-sabotaging yourself. (My struggle with self-sabotagers), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7t2X-kMhPIA
1:43:00 Everybody hates Doomcock, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cfzy3vlypRA
2:08:45 How the Irish Became White by Noel Ignatiev, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDzWYbrMT5w
2:20:00 How Big Tech enables the mob
2:24:00 Scott Adams rates Nick Fuentes’s persuasion skills as high
2:29:00 Dr. Einat Wilf: Anti-Zionism is Anti-Semitism, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMw_pxJg-hY
2:33:00 Rabbi: “America’s The Place Where ALL THE ANTI-SEMITES Now Live!”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDcrfvYKjIc
2:48:20 Nick Fuentes, Alex Jones
2:49:00 MATT WALSH: YOU DON’T HAVE A PATRIOTIC DUTY TO SUPPORT ANY COUNTRY EXCEPT YOUR OWN. BEN SHAPIRO: NO
2:50:40 David Pakman: Trump Announces Return to Presidency in Deranged Video
2:56:25 Vaush: Tim Calls Out ANDY NGO, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQ79CCfAngQ
3:04:20 Sam Hyde: It’s Important To Learn How To Scam, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dgg1fpiwVcc
3:09:20 Tucker Carlson on Kamala Harris

Posted in America | Comments Off on Fordy University Is In Session!

A Uses and Gratifications Study of Contemporary Christian Radio Web Sites

Josh Bentley writes in 2012:

* Contemporary Christian Music (CCM) is a style of music that arose out of the Jesus Movement in the 1970s (Lochte, 2007; Woods, 1999). Musically, it has become very similar to mainstream adult contemporary or pop music, but it is distinguished by its religious lyrics (Creasman, 1996). CCM radio has become an important player in the mainstream radio market (Kelly, 2003). According to Donovan (2009), the number of CCM radio stations more than doubled from 1998 to 2008, making CCM radio the fourth most common radio format in the United States and the second most common music format behind Country. The ratings service Arbitron reported that the CCM format reached more than 16 million listeners a week in 2009 and tied for 12th out of 55 formats in nationwide market share (Radio Today, 2010).

* The uses and gratifications perspective studies media according to the functions they perform (Rubin, 2009). Simply put, uses and gratifications scholars are interested in how and why people use media. Early examples of this type of research include Herzog’s (1954) study of the reasons people listened to daytime radio serials, and Berelson’s (1954) investigation into what people missed about the newspaper during a newspaper strike. However, Katz (1959) is commonly regarded as the father of uses and gratifications research because of his editorial calling for social scientists to focus on what people ‘‘do with the media’’ instead of what ‘‘media do to people’’ (p. 2). According to Katz, Blumler, and Gurevitch (1974), the uses and gratifications approach assumes that audience members are active in media use and select the media they believe will gratify their needs. Because there are multiple sources of gratification, media must compete for people’s attention. Furthermore, this approach assumes that people are sufficiently self-aware to be able to explain their motivations in surveys or interviews. Since the 1960s, various typologies of uses and gratifications have emerged (Severin & Tankard, 2001). Weiss (1971) held that media functions were either ‘‘fantasy-escapist or informational-educational in significance’’ (p. 312). McQuail, Blumler, and Brown (1972/2000) offered four types of what they called ‘‘mediaperson interactions’’ (p. 447). These included diversion, personal relationships, personal identity, and surveillance. People have been found to use television for many functions, such as learning, passing time, arousal, escape, companionship, and relaxation (Rubin, 2009). Radio also offers information, companionship, mood enhancement, and relaxation (Mendelsohn, 1964). Research into the uses and gratifications of the Internet has consistently found motivating factors such as information, convenience, communication, entertainment, and interactivity (Charney, 1996; Eighmey, 1997; King, 1998; Korgaonkar & Wolin, 1999; Lin, 1999).

* Uses and gratifications studies of CCM radio listening have found that listeners use this format for entertainment, to reinforce spiritual beliefs, and to avoid secular radio (Creasman, 1996). Using factor analysis, Woods (1999) identified three underlying gratifications that influenced CCM radio listening. The first factor, paracommunity, suggested that some listeners ‘‘vicariously celebrate shared beliefs in para-community with other believers’’ (p. 238). This factor included survey items related to spiritual guidance, fellowship, and witnessing. In other words, listeners were using CCM radio for activities more often associated with church. Wood’s second factor, content reaction, indicated that listeners were seeking something that was not ‘‘secular’’ but would be ‘‘consistent with their core values as Christians’’ (p. 238). The third factor, lifestyle management, was related to how CCM radio helped listeners ‘‘manage their emotional, physical, and spiritual lives’’ (p. 239).

* In a focus group study of college students, Hooper (2004) found that CCM listeners used the music ‘‘to further develop their spirituality, to worship God, to alter their moods, and to share their Christian faith with others’’ (p. 7). She also received several responses related to the content reaction factor in the Woods (1999) study. Many of the students wanted to avoid non-Christian music, or felt that ‘‘they should not listen to secular music’’ (Hooper, 2004, p. 8).

* Several studies have explored the uses and gratifications of radio station Web sites. Murphy (1998) surveyed users of classic rock radio Web sites and, using factor analysis, found seven underlying motivations: feels good to know the radio station; aesthetics; downloading; interaction; information; relaxation; and entertainment.

Posted in Christianity, Joshua M. Bentley | Comments Off on A Uses and Gratifications Study of Contemporary Christian Radio Web Sites

Representations of reliability: The rhetoric of political flip-flopping

I just encountered a communications academic who’s consistently clear and fun to read — Joshua M. Bentley.

His latest paper: “This study used a qualitative analysis of political flip-flops (N = 141) to create a typology of rhetorical strategies for politicians who are perceived to have changed positions on political issues. The core purpose of such rhetoric is to achieve a representation of reliability. Politicians who appear to change positions must do so in a way that does not make them seem unreliable to their
key stakeholders. Strategies for achieving this goal fall into four primary categories: ignore, deny, justify, and repent. Within each category are more specific tactics, such as evading questions, claiming one was misquoted, arguing one is adapting to new circumstances, or explaining that one has acquired new information about an issue. Using Bitzer’s theory of the rhetorical situation, we argue that certain strategies are more appropriate than others in certain situations. We discuss the practical and ethical implications of these strategies.”

Posted in Joshua M. Bentley, Politics | Comments Off on Representations of reliability: The rhetoric of political flip-flopping

NYT Op/Ed: Cancel Culture Works. We Wouldn’t Have Marriage Equality Without It.

00:00 NYT Op/Ed: Cancel Culture Works. We Wouldn’t Have Marriage Equality Without It. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/05/opinion/gay-marriage-boycotts.html
36:00 Globalization : What’s Next? | Peter Zeihan Webinar June 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV3jPKHcHSE
42:00 The Science Suggests a Wuhan Lab Leak, https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-science-suggests-a-wuhan-lab-leak-11622995184?mod=opinion_lead_pos6
1:01:00 Christopher Caldwell On The Unintended Consequences Of The Civil Rights Act, https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/christopher-caldwell-on-the-unintended
1:04:30 Not the Best: What Rush Limbaugh’s Apology to Sandra Fluke Reveals about Image Restoration Strategies on Commercial Radio, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139974
1:54:00 Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=139670
1:55:00 John M. Doris on moral character, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxLNKpLcU1k
2:17:30 Exploring LA’s RICHEST Neighborhoods, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zS-lUu0SkM
2:33:00 Exposing the Left’s agenda of fear
2:45:00 American nativism
2:46:30 Folding UK into NAFTA
2:50:00 Big Tech vs free speech
2:54:00 Challenger disaster did not involve misconduct, but institutional drift
3:02:00 Tucker Carlson on Joe Biden opening the southern border

Posted in America | Comments Off on NYT Op/Ed: Cancel Culture Works. We Wouldn’t Have Marriage Equality Without It.

Not the Best: What Rush Limbaugh’s Apology to Sandra Fluke Reveals about Image Restoration Strategies on Commercial Radio

From a 2012 paper: This study analyzes the rhetorical strategies used by Rush Limbaugh to rebuild his public image after he made offensive remarks about law student Sandra Fluke in early 2012. A close reading of Limbaugh’s public statements reveals that Limbaugh employed the strategies of evading responsibility, reducing offensiveness, and mortification (i.e., apologizing). However, Limbaugh’s apology was more of a pseudo-apology than a genuine apology. This article argues that Limbaugh adopted the strategies he did because the nature of political talk radio makes it more important to maintain a good public image with the audience than with political opponents or even advertisers.

Posted in Joshua M. Bentley, Radio | Comments Off on Not the Best: What Rush Limbaugh’s Apology to Sandra Fluke Reveals about Image Restoration Strategies on Commercial Radio