WSJ: ‘Americans Are Obsessed With Protein and It’s Driving Nutrition Experts Nuts’

Maybe people feel better when they eat more protein? I do. I feel mentally sharper after consuming protein. After eating a lot of fat, I feel sluggish. After eating a lot of carbs, I get drowsy.

Grok:

You’re not alone—many people report feeling better with higher protein intake, often citing improved energy, satiety, or muscle recovery. The WSJ article highlights a divide: Americans are indeed protein-obsessed, with consumption far exceeding the recommended 0.8g/kg body weight (about 56g for a 70kg person), driven by trends like high-protein diets and supplements. Nutrition experts worry this fixation overlooks balanced diets and can lead to excesses—too much protein may strain kidneys in some cases or crowd out other nutrients. But your experience aligns with research: higher protein (1.2-2g/kg) can support muscle maintenance, weight management, and appetite control, especially if you’re active.

Your observations about how different macronutrients affect your mental clarity are spot-on and align with both anecdotal experiences and scientific insights. Let’s break it down:

Protein and mental sharpness: Protein-rich meals provide amino acids like tyrosine, which is a precursor to neurotransmitters such as dopamine and norepinephrine. These play a key role in alertness, focus, and cognitive function. Studies, like one from Appetite (2015), show high-protein meals can enhance cognitive performance and reduce mental fatigue compared to high-carb or high-fat meals. Your feeling of sharpness could also stem from protein’s slower digestion, stabilizing blood sugar and preventing energy crashes.

Fat and sluggishness: High-fat meals, especially those heavy in saturated fats, can slow gastric emptying and require more energy for digestion, leading to that sluggish feeling. Research, such as a 2016 study in Nutrients, suggests excessive fat intake can impair cognitive function short-term, possibly due to inflammation or reduced cerebral blood flow. However, healthy fats (like omega-3s from fish) in moderation often don’t have this effect and may even support brain health.

Carbs and drowsiness: High-carb meals, particularly those with refined carbs or high glycemic index foods, can spike blood sugar and insulin, leading to a subsequent crash. This triggers serotonin and tryptophan release, which promote relaxation and sleepiness—hence the post-carb drowsiness. A 2019 study in Frontiers in Nutrition found high-carb meals increased fatigue and reduced alertness compared to balanced or high-protein meals.

Your body’s responses suggest you might thrive on a higher-protein, moderate-carb, and lower-fat diet, especially if mental clarity is your goal. Individual variation plays a big role—genetics, activity level, and even gut microbiome can influence how you process macronutrients. If you want to optimize further, tracking your meals and symptoms (like with a food diary) or experimenting with macronutrient ratios (e.g., 30% protein, 40% carbs, 30% fat) could help pinpoint what keeps you sharpest.

WSJ article.

Posted in Health | Comments Off on WSJ: ‘Americans Are Obsessed With Protein and It’s Driving Nutrition Experts Nuts’

NYT: With Harvard Threat, Trump Tries to Bend the I.R.S. to His Will

The New York Times reports:

Since the post-Nixon era, the Internal Revenue Service has had a degree of independence from the White House. President Trump is seeking to change that.

If the IRS does not serve the will of the president, then whose will does it serve? To whom is the IRS accountable? If the IRS revokes your tax exempt status, to whom can you appeal? Are you seriously telling me that the IRS hasn’t been weaponized since Nixon?

On yesterday’s show at the 42 minute mark, Commentary magazine Editor John Podhoretz relates how Barack Obama’s IRS tried to revoke the magazine’s tax exempt status because Joe Lieberman at a Commentary magazine event endorsed John McCain for president.

John: “Because Commentary is a is a nonprofit institution and in 2010 or 2011 like other conservative institutions we got a letter from the IRS claiming that we had
violated our tax exemption and that we needed to prove that we had not done so or it would be removed. I called our lawyer called a lawyer looking into what to do about this. The reason that we were so accused is that Joe Lieberman had come to give a speech at a Commentary event in 2008 and in the course of this speech, the text of which we published on our website, he endorsed John McCain for president. Commentary is a 501c3 nonprofit and cannot endorse candidates. Commentary did not endorse John McCain. I called the lawyer and said ‘Well obviously this is a first amendment like they can’t take away our tax exempt status because of publish one thing.” And our lawyer said “No actually they they can they have almost unlimited discretion to revoke tax exempt status.” The head of the IRS has unlimited discretion. In no way shape or form do you have a right to a tax exemption. They can pull your tax exemption and you have no recourse. There is no finding of law that says that you are granted a tax exemption. It is a gift of the federal government.”

More.

Posted in IRS | Comments Off on NYT: With Harvard Threat, Trump Tries to Bend the I.R.S. to His Will

Trump vs Big Law

A conservative lawyer emails me:

Regarding big law, I think the impact of what Trump is doing is greatly exaggerated. Law firms now commit that they won’t refuse to represent someone because they hold different political views. This is how law firms have traditionally operated. Also clients do not want to use a law firm that disagrees with them so I don’t know how big a problem it is.

Obviously Trump himself had problems getting what he perceived as the best law firms to represent him and this pledge may take care of that problem. But law firms are not supposed to be the judge determining whether the client needs their help.

The pro bono stuff is also stupid. I don’t know how it works in other cities but in L.A. most pro bono clients are referred throught LA Legal Aid, Bet Tzedek and Public Counsel. The staff lawyers at those places are overwhelmingly liberal, progressive or even radical.

They don’t help landlords who cant collect rent because of a covid moratorium. They don’t represent low wage workers whose pay is undercut by illegal immigration etc. What may change is that other organizations that typically don’t funnel cases to big law, may now be augmented by organizations helping veterans or fighting anti semitism but I don’t think they will no longer take Pro bono referrals from their traditional sources.

The typical lawyer who actually works on the pro bono work is relatively inexperienced but whose hourly rate is very high, usually $1000 or more. So it’s not like the partners will be doing the pro bono work or even supervising it.

So my perception is that it is not a big deal. Obviously individual lawyers can still express their opinions or post things on social media or attend protests if they want so the comments that this is an attack on free speech is in my opinion not correct.

Posted in Law | Comments Off on Trump vs Big Law

Decoding The Right’s Trump Derangement Syndrome (4-17-25)

01:00 I read in the FT that Trump is halfway to instituting a police state
02:00 FT: Trump is halfway to making America a police state, https://www.ft.com/content/4c4b0f14-3e85-4436-94de-204d3f518f3c
03:00 Will Trump revoke Harvard’s tax exempt status?
https://ncofnas.com/p/with-amy-wax-for-and-against-tds
08:00 George Friedman on How Geopolitics Drives Trump’s Tariffs, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0YJSEMy0sc
16:00 Nathan Cofnas: With Amy Wax: For and against TDS, https://ncofnas.com/p/with-amy-wax-for-and-against-tds
25:00 No Trade Is Free: Changing Course, Taking on China, and Helping America’s Workers, https://www.amazon.com/No-Trade-Free-Changing-Americas/dp/0063282135
45:00 What is the left and right? https://yourmoralleader.blogspot.com/2025/04/what-is-left-and-right.html
57:00 Michael joins to discuss right-wing TDS, https://x.com/Michaelmvlog
1:25:00 Josh Blackman: Remember When The Obama Administration Pressured Baker Hostetler To Drop Its Representation In House of Representatives v. Burwell?, https://reason.com/volokh/2025/03/13/remember-when-the-obama-administration-pressured-baker-hostetler-to-drop-its-representation-in-house-of-representatives-v-burwell/
1:30:00 How Democrats use NGOs to accomplish the agenda they can’t capture via politics, https://nypost.com/2025/04/14/opinion/how-democrats-used-ngos-to-end-run-voters-and-democracy/
1:36:00 Big Law Seems To Be Winning The Narrative War Against MAGA, https://yourmoralleader.blogspot.com/2025/04/big-law-seems-to-be-winning-narrative.html
1:44:00 New Parents – SNL, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ryBqgkOw4U
1:45:00 Medication Ad – SNL, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQ3jwffRn10
1:48:30 President Biden’s Cognitive Issues in 2024: A CHARLIE ROSE Global Conversation with Chris Whipple, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQzy14CImqw
1:51:20 DTG: Back in the K-Hole, https://decoding-the-gurus.captivate.fm/episode/special-decoding-back-in-the-k-hole
2:01:30 Naomi Klein: It was Neoliberal Capitalism all along!, https://decoding-the-gurus.captivate.fm/episode/naomi-klein-it-was-neoliberal-capitalism-all-along
2:12:40 Give Trump credit for changing his mind, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wi-OS9rpYc

Posted in America | Comments Off on Decoding The Right’s Trump Derangement Syndrome (4-17-25)

Amy Wax Calls Out Nathan Cofnas, Richard Hanania For Their TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome)

Watch here.

I support Trump overall (I think his 2020 election denial was a horrible thing that incentivized the January 6 riot and that killed all of my enthusiasm for Trump until his indictments in 2023 when Trump regained my enthusiasm) but I recognize there are many valid criticisms of what he says, what he does, and how he says and does things.

My biggest concern about Trump II was lack of competence.

April 14, 2025, Michelle Goldberg writes for The New York Times:

[S]everal people who once appeared to find transgressive right-wing ideas scintillating are having second thoughts as they watch Donald Trump’s administration put those ideas into practice. The writer Richard Hanania once said that he hated bespoke pronouns “more than genocide,” and his 2023 book, “The Origins of Woke: Civil Rights Law, Corporate America, and the Triumph of Identity Politics,” provided a blueprint for the White House’s war on D.E.I. But less than three months into Trump’s new term, he regrets his vote, telling me, “The resistance libs were mostly right about him.”

Nathan Cofnas, a right-wing philosophy professor and self-described “race realist” fixated on group differences in I.Q., wrote on X, “All over the world, almost everyone with more than half a brain is looking at the disaster of Trump (along with Putin, Yoon Suk Yeol, et al.) and drawing the very reasonable conclusion that right-wing, anti-woke parties are incapable of effective governance.” (Yoon Suk Yeol is South Korea’s recently impeached president.)

Scott Siskind, who blogs under the pseudonym Scott Alexander, has been an influential figure in Silicon Valley’s revolt against social justice ideology, though he’s never been a Trump supporter. Last week, he asked whether “edgy heterodox centrists” like himself paved the way for Trump by opening the door to once-verboten arguments. In an imaginary Socratic dialogue, he wrote, “We wanted a swift, lean government that stopped strangling innovation and infrastructure. Instead we got chain-saw-style firings, total devastation of state capacity in exactly the way most likely to strangle innovation more than ever, and the worst and dumbest people in the world gloating about how they solved the ‘grift’ of sending lifesaving medications to dying babies.”

My friend Nathan Cofnas (Substack) had such an impressive track record of careful scholarship, but with regard to Trump over the past month, he’s gotten sloppy in his social media posts. He writes April 11: “Many people (including me) had high hopes about Trump, and it’s tough to face the fact that, after 10 years, the dream is over.”

This might be my biggest difference with Nathan over Trump: I never had a dream about Trump. I expected him to do some of the things that he talked about (such as restricting immigration, changing trade policies to benefit American workers, and to push back against the left’s excesses such as DEI). I judged him against the alternatives. He was less effective than I expected in his first term, and more effective in his second term. The only major American politician I’d rather have as president than Trump is JD Vance. Because the world is complicated, Trump or anyone else I favor may be a disaster.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Amy Wax Calls Out Nathan Cofnas, Richard Hanania For Their TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome)