The Seven Deplorable Sins Of Secularism

From the Chateau:

Racism
Sexism
Anti-Semitism
Islamophobia
Homophobia
Xenophobia
Judgmentalism

The above is a riff on thecunt’s LGBTQ speech from Friday, in which she labeled Trump’s supporters a “basket of deplorables” (aka normal, sexually dimorphic Americans).

“You could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the ‘basket of deplorables.’ They’re racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic, you name it,” Clinton said.

Hillary recites a moral panic laundry list of -isms and -phobias & ends with “you name it”. That coda is very telling. As an id-blurt it reveals that Hillary and her ilk don’t really feel the moral urgency of their frightwords as much as they use them as weapons to intimidate their cucked-up enemies into a cowardly submission.

Thecunt, whether she understands it or not, enunciated the tenets of the Left’s new Secularism faith. The Seven Deplorable Sins are a guide to how the typical shitlib measures a person’s worth, because everyone needs a religion, even shitlibs who have discarded Christian Puritanism for “enlightened” atheism. The religious compulsion is an evolved trait in humans; all that differs across generations is how it’s expressed.

Compare and cuntrast with the Seven Deadly Sins of traditional Christianity:

Lust
Gluttony
Greed
Sloth
Wrath
Envy
Pride

The difference? The Seven Deplorable Sins of Secularism are affronts to the high priests. The Seven Deadly Sins of Christianity are affronts to God and self.

Posted in America | Comments Off on The Seven Deplorable Sins Of Secularism

What Ails Hillary?

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* As far as the nature of Clinton’s affliction, I’m torn between three choices:

1) Something cardiac related. The fainting sort of makes sense with this, and some think Hillary is wearing a defibrillator vest or has an implanted defibrillator.

2) Alcohol. One of the reports described her as ‘combative’ at the 9/11 ceremony. Maybe she showed up badly hung over. This sorta makes sense if you think the anonymous party elders floating the idea of a replacement at this stage are horrified at the idea of an alcoholic President.

3) Something neurological as an outside choice. Permanent damage from the concussion, maybe.

I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s other stuff, such as her wearing a foley catheter. Really, her wardrobe raises enormous questions. Even Madeline Albright, who is a hefty gal, dressed better. Hillary is one step short of wearing mu-mus.

* Wall Street would pour money on Miranda as a nonwhite (but don’t give up your tanning salon subscription, Lin-Manuel) who loves Wall Street.

Silicon Valley and Wall Street like Cory Booker for similar reasons.

The more I think about this, the more Miranda seems like a dream candidate for the Democrats in 12 to 24 years. Of all the entertainer celebrities, who is more likely to be a strong nuts and bolts politician than a guy who has helped out his dad in managing campaigns? And who else is as good at glamorizing political history? I brought up Affleck, since “Argo” was intended to help Jimmy Carter’s reputation. But what Miranda has done for Alexander Hamilton’s Q Score is amazing.

The guy is a writer and a performer. Everybody in New York loves this guy.

If he continues to compose blockbuster Broadway hits, I’m sure he’ll stick to entertainment. But what if his next couple of shows aren’t as well-received? He’s already set for life from royalties from Hamilton when it becomes a high school musical staple. Maybe when he’s 45 he gets interested in the family business of politics?

One issue is that it’s hard to get elected to the Senate from New York because there are so many celebrities, including out of towners like Hillary and RFK who want to be Senator from New York.

I was thinking Ben Affleck could make a decent Ronald Reagan of the left candidate some day, especially with Jennifer Garner as his potential First Lady — beautiful, likable, 3 kids, and from West Virginia, the most authentically American of all the states. But then …

Posted in Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on What Ails Hillary?

Victory against Rams doesn’t teach us much about 49ers

Why is Los Angeles Rams coach Jeff Fisher considered great? His lifetime winning percentage as a head coach in the NFL is .524. He’s a Jason Garrett.

Lowell Cohn writes:

I praise the 49ers for winning 28-0, but I refuse to take them seriously.

Few teams in the NFL exist at the 49ers level or below, a level that does not admit the light of day. The Niners lucked out in playing one of those teams. The team lower than them is the Los Angeles Rams, so bad L.A. should send them back to St. Loo…

The Rams have no quarterback. Oh, they have a guy, Case Keenum, but he is not worth discussing. The Rams also have Jared Goff from Cal, the first player taken in this year’s draft. The Rams gave up lots of draft picks for Goff, setting them back for years. But Goff did not dress for the game. Couldn’t beat out Keenum who is not worth discussing.

So, I praise the Niners for winning, even though the game was among the worst in the annals of sport, and totally unwatchable. The Rams and Niners actually prepared for this one? But I refuse to take them seriously.

Posted in Football | Comments Off on Victory against Rams doesn’t teach us much about 49ers

VOX: The NFL is 67% black. Diversity hasn’t helped white players and coaches understand racism.

Left-wing Jew David Leonard writes:

Proximity to African Americans doesn’t guarantee understanding, empathy, or even respectful deference — even in a space like the NFL, where white athletes are outnumbered by black ones.

This conversation has been a reminder that — no matter how ideal the conditions for compassion, understanding, or support — when it comes to acknowledgement of the existence of racism and assessments of appropriate responses to it, many white Americans cling to the privilege of keeping their own scoreboards.

From Breitbart:

ESPN Praises Colin Kaepernick as He Takes a Knee During National Anthem

Colin Kaepernick took a knee during the national anthem before the San Francisco 49ers home opener at Levi’s Stadium.
As violinist Lindsey Stirling played “The Star Spangled Banner,” Kaepernick and teammate Eric Reid remained on a knee. The players protested as military personnel held up a football-field-sized flag feet above the field. A banner in the seats at one end zone read: “Home of the Faithful.”

At least four other players offered other protests.

San Francisco linebacker Eli Harold and safety Antoine Bethea raised black-power fists during the song. Los Angeles Rams defensive end Robert Quinn and wide receiver Kenny Britt also held up fists.

Britt made the hands-up-don’t-shoot gesture two seasons ago along with several teammates when the Rams played in St. Louis in response to the police shooting of Ferguson, Missouri, teenager Michael Brown. Teammate Stedman Bailey, who joined that protest, lost his NFL career last season when criminals struck him twice in the head with bullets fired during a drive-by shooting in Miami Gardens, Florida. Bailey survived the shooting and serves as a student-assistant coach at West Virginia University.

ESPN noted that a fan reacted to Monday night’s demonstration by yelling, “Kaepernick, why don’t you stand up?” The network also showed teammates hugging the backup quarterback after the anthem and numerous fans receiving autographs from Kaepernick and posing for selfies with him before the game.

ESPN color commentator Steve Young praised Kaepernick as “thoughtful” after the anthem. “It’s really raised consciousness,” he claimed, “and it’s a wonderful thing.” Play-by-play man Chris Berman credited Kaepernick with opening up a national “discussion.”

At the conclusion of the previous Monday Night Football game between the Steelers and Redskins, announcers Jon Gruden and Sean McDonough praised Steelers lineman Alejandro Villanueva, who served three tours of duty in Afghanistan, by noting that he sang along with the anthem before the game.

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Also, sportswriting is one of the saddest careers for men out there that most men think would be awesome.

The guys who end up as sportswriters were the waterboys and timekeepers back in high school and college—-couldn’t make the team, but desperately worshiped the players, and thought that helping the team made them “one of the jocks.” The jocks laughed at them, but they pretended not to notice.

Later, they get a job as a sports reporter, and yippee! Get paid to watch sports and write about sports! Hooray!

Except, as time goes on, they start to notice things. Like how shitty they get paid. How the players don’t respect them. How the players aren’t cool guys, but overgrown children with natural talent. How the players cheat on their wives, throw games, and use steroids. How life on the road as a reporter is cool at first and then wears you out.

And then there’s the stories they have to write–all cliche, no substance. Write something too critical of a black player or black behavior, and you’ll be tarred as a racist and never work again. Same with a female athlete and sexist.

Try to write about a player having a bad night because his wife slept with someone else on the team, and the article won’t get through, and the player will go after you and you’ll be banned from the lockerroom—cutting your career off.

And don’t even think about investigating or writing about players throwing games or using steroids. No reporter ever gets to break that story. Nope, the league must announce it first, and then you can write about the aftermath….so long as you downplay it.

And your stories must always push the Leftist Agenda—blacks either superior or oppressed; women as good as men; all races as equal, etc.

So your stories become the same old tripe and nonsense, year after year. Nothing ever changes, you never evolve beyond a certain point.

Sportswriters end up one of two ways: True Believers and Drunk Cynics.

True Believers are like Bill Simmons, who promoted Obama, worships NBA players, and constantly covers up Black Bad Behavior; their cult-like blindness is self-induced and is foremost evidence of brainwashed Crimestop.

Drunk Cynics just hate themselves for being nothing more than copywriters for advertising for people to watch Local Sports Team, which they know is filled with horrible human beings just playing a silly kid’s game.

The sad fate of a sportswriter? Here’s one I saw: Bob Ryan. For decades, he was the basketball writer in Boston for the Celtics, and co-wrote many a players’ biography, including Larry Bird’s. He retired in the last few years and released a memoir of his years of service, and appeared at Barnes & Nobles in the Boston area to promote it.

I happened to walk in to a B&N to buy a book when I saw the promotion there. There was the legendary Bob Ryan, award-winning sports “journalist,” sitting behind a table—-with the entire seating area empty and no one in line to see him. And his promotion had started a half-hour or so before hand. All alone, old, and completely unfamous. He looked miserable as he checked his phone.

He sold his soul….for nothing.

* Proximity to White Americans hasn’t guaranteed understanding, empathy, or even respectful deference – at least not in case of David Leonard.

* No, proximity to African Americans doesn’t guarantee that bunch of extremely unlikely outcomes; what it does guarantee is awareness of their stupidity, mendacity, venality, childishness and impulsiveness, plus that tendency toward the old ultra-v and the fact that few of them are committed to team, at any deep level. This is typical: the liberal ardor for blackness is based on distance from it, idealization of it, and blindness to it. White NFL players know enough to keep their mouths shut and their thoughts private, to keep the big bucks and all the p—y coming. Liberals, including the ignorant Barrack Obama who has never lived among actual Negroes and knows nothing about them, don’t. ANYBODY who has worked in a diversity-mandated office knows that most are sub-standard, that their work product must be redone quietly by white people, and that making a fuss about it is a good, fast way to the career graveyard.

* I think the problem is that professional sports has become sorted out racially, with whites being overwhelmingly the financial support, while POC’s are, in most sports, the main athletic stock.

So when Kaepernick and other Players of Color disrespect the Anthem, etc., especially over something like #BLM, they are saying: “We are black and opposed to the status quo” which reminds the audience that they are mostly white, and basically just want to be entertained with a contest that underlines their sense of civic pride.

That’s bound to lead to some polarization. Especially when a number of the protesters are essentially morons and make comments on social media (like, “taking down the criminal justice system”) which are hyperbolic, histrionic, and patently ridiculous.

Thus politicizing sporting events is racially polarizing. Disrespecting this country and the sense of community that sporting events are supposed to represent is a huge turnoff to a lot of people in this country.

* I have a friend who works “producing content” for the website of one of the big four professional sports leagues, and he was indeed the equipment manager for the high school baseball team.

* Or you could just waste your time on Twitter or watch Netflix, which is basically what people who profess to be above watching sports do.

I agree that watching sports is a waste of time, but these holier than thou types on the right are insufferable. Who the hell are they kidding? Nobody believes for a second that they’re busy learning a new language or reading Gibbon. They’re internet addicts frittering their time on Twitter and listening to obscure podcasts.

* Quit being backseat quarterbacks and show the NFL how it should be done by turning VOX into a majority black organization staffed up with non-traditionally educated blacks pulled up from the ghetto by your crack team of talent scouts.

* Spectator sports and sports fandom are diverting our group bonding desire and team into something stillborn. I think if we eliminate that diversion, those energies are bound to find a more productive outlet, push us into finding one.

* Jim Goad a member of the Alt-Right likes to brag that he lives among way more Blacks than Barack Hussein Obama ever has. Jim Goad lives in Stone Mountain, Georgia which is a whopping 75% Black. Hussein grew up in Honolulu which is only a measly 1% Black.

Barack Hussein Obama the Mulatto limousine liberal elitist would not be caught dead moving to 75% Black Stone Mountain. Once he leaves The White House he has a home waiting for him in an affluent White DC suburb.

* Telling White Dudes they have to have “respectful deference” to Black dudes is pretty much a recipe for a fight; or at the very least incitement to pretty much every White Dude on the planet to be “racist” or maybe “rayyyyccccciiiiisssss” since that’s better than being someone’s groveling serf.

Why the hell should anyone be “respectfully deferential?” Tell that to Bill Belichick. Or John Harbaugh. Or Rex Ryan. Or Bruce Arians. Or Nick Saban. Or I imagine, Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, Philip Rivers, and Eli Manning.

Black people and their SWPL anti-White working class allies in the Sportainment Industry are pushing things too hard. “Paul Kersey” as SBDL thinks we have reached peak NFL, he may be right. At least in part, the NFL has failed to expand internationally because Europeans and Chinese and Mexicans don’t really worship Blacks that much. Rather, they have fairly negative views on Black people as a whole.

Professional sports and the NFL in particular is regimented and hierarchical. And there is a difference between racial insults hurled at someone and having to grovel and bow just because that someone is Black.

Telling White coaches and players particularly the stars who do stuff Black QBs really can’t (a quick read and hitting the open man) to grovel just gets their back up. Telling the White fans to grovel makes them tune out.

There are a gazillion sports alternatives: NASCAR, Golf, a million streams on Liveleak if you have a Roku, etc. If the NFL is just Thug Anti-White Anti-Flag Whitey baiting, making the fat old farts who own the teams and crave respectability, above “guaranteed” profits, then it will go the way of Boxing and Professional Race Walking.

* These NFL morons “exercising their rights” as per usual, have no sense of irony.

If this is such a rotten, evil, racist country, why are they allowed the “right” to spit on the flag and those who died for it? Why dies “Racist America” permit them to protest? Wouldn’t they be penalized for doing so if America was what they say it is?

They and their supporters are too stupid to grasp this truth.

* The level of “black lady doctors” marrying lower-IQ tough guys seems to be a combination of things:

(1) These affirmative action doctors are not as smart as the average doctor. (Q:”What do they call the person who finishes last in the medical school class? A: Doctor.”)

(2) Celebrity blinds a lot of people, men and women, to a mate’s potential problems. The cliche about the foolish old rich man going gaga over some pretty young blond actress who needs his money didn’t come from nowhere. Women, too, throw themselves at singers and actors because of one hit movie or one hit song.

(3) Florence Nightingale syndrome (all three of these guys got injured regularly, thanks to their professions–Jai White was a martial artist before acting)

(4) Black worship of the thug culture (all three of these guys are bruisers)

(5) Natural West-African feral nature showing through, where the women provide for the delinquent men.

(6) Finally, Strong Black Woman (SBW) syndrome, a distinctlyAmerican problem. SBW’s are constantly bitching about how there “are no good black men” around, all the while having exacting standards for the black men they want (“thug in the streets/playa in the sheets/sophisticated man of means”) that no man could ever meet.

Decent black guys complain about SBW’s all the time, and often say they gave up dating them because of this. And SBWs eventually admit that non-black men won’t have touch them with a ten-foot pole. In desperation, SBWs marry down to a thug or a no-good “playa”, figuring they can fix him or at least get something out of life. Or they find some milquetoast brother that they hound into misery because he’s not some rap-video-image of perfection (See Michelle Obama, miserable with Barry O., the freakin’ president).

* Tom Wolfe also has hilarious and spot on stuff about black and white interrelationships in basketball in I Am Charlotte Simmons.
Blacks try to intimidate whites in sports.
One has to get over this if one is white and expects to excel.
Not everyone can or wants to .
I once played this pretty good chess player black dude.
For him it was “street chess”.
He would glare at me , mumble trash talk, slam moved pieces hard on the table “in your face” style.
Just like playing basketball with them.
It was unnerving at first.
All athletes/competitors do this to a certain extent, but blacks have it down to a science.
If they detect it bothers you , it can be relentless.

* Both Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield were married to physicians, which shows the level of desperation of even highly educated black women.

Actor and martial artist Michael Jai White was also married to a physician. She asked him to marry her and she paid all the bills including his acting lessons. Years after he divorced her, he wrote an open letter to all of his exes confessing that until his current relationship, he had no idea why his exes wanted to be close to him.

* With a black majority in the NFL, did anyone really not see this coming? Blacks protesting their poor downtroddeness and a Jew giving voice to their alleged suffering? Does this not fit the Template?

And as in everything else it reforms, “the touch that turns everything to shit” will destroy the NFL. This is what I meant when I commented that blacks and Jews destroy everything they touch whether it be neighborhoods, financial markets, the Soviet Union or American social concord. Why is that?

I, personally, can’t stand incompetence. Of blacks I expect little else, they are perennial misfits. My bone to pick with Jews is not with their intelligence or any of their other alleged inadequacies, but with their nincompoopery. They ruin everything they succeed in. Some people see this as deliberate wrecking but I give them the benefit of the doubt and presume it is from some terrible blind spot in the middle of their field of vision.

They are fatally flawed in the Greek Tragedy sense. Give them the lead role and they, through arrogance and excessive self regard, blunder badly. Misfortune follows and they stumble about on stage, crying out to the audience, Gods and Chorus for pity and for guidance in perceiving where to turn, what to do next.

Because they can’t distance themselves from themselves, can’t hold a mirror up to themselves or fly above themselves and regard themselves impersonally from a great height, they can’t see that it is their very character with its strengths which is the cause of their own misfortune.

It is relevant in this context to note that the image or icon of a transcendent Bird plays little role in Jewish mythology (other than Noah’s raven). Virtually every civilization worshiped a bird of one sort or another as a symbol of transcendent foresight. For the Greeks, augury was the seer’s art of reading the future as interpreted in the flight of cranes and hawks. From it’s great heights, the bird sees the big picture whereas for man, what lies beyond the next turn in the road is hidden and so the man who is deficient in transcendental oversight must try to foretell his future by working out the chain of events implicit in the unfolding of his own character in the world. He must, “Know Thyself”.

* I used to listen to a lot of sports talk radio, ESPN radio, etc. While sports media types were previously apolitical or merely toed the PC line with qualified reservations, ESPN has gone full SJW in the past few years. The Michael Sam debacle was when it really became clear, as none of the ESPN radio/TV personalities had anything to say other than “This is really, really wonderful. I love gay homosexuals. I would be delighted to shower with gay homosexuals in my NFL locker room.” In fact, the commentary was so lock-step, I’d be surprised if sticking to pre-scripted bullet points enforcing The Narrative isn’t a condition of employment for ESPN sports “”journalists””.

Making an example out of Colin Cowherd for noticing Dominican academic achievement showed that ESPN was willing to enforce adherence The Narrative at all costs.

I don’t listen much anymore, as Dan Le Batard (Cowherd’s replacement) is the sports talk equivalent of “Ow! My Balls!” However, any time I surf through hoping for some local coverage, all talking heads are supportive of Kaepernick and “”opening up a national discussion””.

I sincerely hope the lying or cognitive dissonance gives them all ulcers. Especially Mike & Mike.

Posted in Blacks, ESPN, Football, Sports | Comments Off on VOX: The NFL is 67% black. Diversity hasn’t helped white players and coaches understand racism.

Forward: ‘Happy 100th Birthday to Roald Dahl — Beloved Author and Vile Anti-Semite’

Are there non-vile anti-Semites? Are there vile Jews with anti-Gentile sentiments? How come anti-Gentilism isn’t even a thing? If it is not a thing, how can anti-Semitism be a thing?

“Anti-Semitism is as natural to Western civilization as anti-Christianity is to Jewish civilization, Islamic civilization and Japanese civilization.” (Maj. Kong)

Jews, for understandable reasons, often hate gentiles and gentiles, for understandable reasons, often hate Jews. It would be weird if two different groups having frequent interactions and clashing interests did not develop some negative as well as positive feelings about each other. An Arab without any negative views of Jews is an unhealthy Arab. It makes sense that Muslims would have animosity for Jews due to the existence of a Jewish state in their midst. Similarly, Christians should be expected to have negative views of Jews as the very existence of Jews challenges the truth of Christianity.

Forward: Born on September 13, 2016, Roald Dahl, the beloved author of “Matilda” and “Willie Wonka and the Chocolate Factory” would have turned 100 today. It’s an anniversary we mark with admiration and a bit of uncertainty as well. For, aside from his brilliant imaginaton and wicked sense of humor, Dahl was also something of an unrepentant anti-Semite.

In 1983, he told the New Statesman, “There is a trait in the Jewish character that does provoke animosity, maybe it’s a kind of lack of generosity towards non-Jews. I mean, there’s always a reason why anti-anything crops up anywhere; even a stinker like Hitler didn’t just pick on them for no reason. I mean, if you and I were in a line moving towards what we knew were gas chambers, I’d rather have a go at taking one of the guards with me; but they [the Jews] were always submissive.”

In 1990, he told the Independent, “I am certainly anti-Israel, and I have become anti-Semitic.”

In his biography of Roald Dahl, Jeremy Treglown wrote that Dahl once complained about the number of Jews in the Curzon House Club and, when people objected to Dahl’s outburst, reportedly told them, “Go home if you don’t like it.” And, Treglown reported further that after the 1982 Israeli attack on Lebanon, Dahl wrote, “we all started hating the Jews.”

Posted in Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on Forward: ‘Happy 100th Birthday to Roald Dahl — Beloved Author and Vile Anti-Semite’

Hillary Warns The World About Pepe

Steve Sailer writes: From HillaryClinton.com, the campaign’s official website:

Donald Trump, Pepe the frog, and white supremacists: an explainer
That cartoon frog is more sinister than you might realize.

September 12, 2016 by Elizabeth Chan

Over the weekend, Donald Trump’s son and one of his closest advisers posted an odd photo on their social media accounts:

This raised some important questions.

Why is there a frog standing directly behind Trump?

That’s Pepe. He’s a symbol associated with white supremacy.

In other news:

Screenshot 2016-09-13 02.32.13

COMMENTS:

* Who’ll be the Hugo to write the social protest novel of our time, Les Deplorables?

* Questioning the health of a presidential candidate with a decade-long history of neurological events = conspiracy theory.

Seeing white supremacist shout-outs in a cartoon frog = Paul Revere’s second ride.

I’m more and more convinced that the Clinton campaign is dominated by a journalist/consultant bubble in ways that are hurting them. The normal people who don’t spend their waking hours looking for online neo-Nazi tells, who vote in places that matter, would see this and wonder what they’re talking about.

* People talk about Trump doing well with the WWC, but nobody ever mentions just how much Trump has completely united the large internet troll community. 4chaners always have loved shock-racism, but were also militantly social liberal (pro-gay, anti-religion, etc).

They saw in Trump’s tweets that possibility of a like-minded individual becoming the leader of the free world and are giddy at the prospect.

The whole process of joining the reactionary right began a bit before Trump with things like GamerGate and Milo’s full-time trolling of angry THAT’S NOT FUNNY campus leftists.

Showing their former non-partisan nature, 4channers hacked into Palin’s yahoo account and dumped large numbers of her e-mails in which she did not look particularly intelligent. (Before a completely dump could happen, someone else on 4chan changed her password and locked out everyone else.)

* Anthony Cumia is voting for Donald Trump even though he is an Atheist who is pro-Gay marriage, pro-environmentalist, and pro-abortion, but he hates political correctness and anti-White identity politics. He probably would have been a Democrat if that party was not so anti-White.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on Hillary Warns The World About Pepe

The brilliance of Hillary Clinton’s ‘deplorables’

Byron York writes:

Could there be a clunkier phrase than “basket of deplorables”? Hillary Clinton’s assertion that half — or maybe something less than half — of Donald Trump’s supporters are “racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic, you name it” struck a lot of observers as not just an odd turn of phrase but politically unwise. You attack your opponent, the idea was, but you don’t attack the voters.

But now, a few days later, the brilliance of Clinton’s remark is becoming clearer. Yes, she got a few liberal commentators to take her side and defend the substance of it. But the far bigger benefit is that in the wake of her comment, some media figures decided to devise a “deplorables” quiz for Trump supporters. Is Person X deplorable? How about Person Y? The effect was to pressure Trump supporters not only to agree with Clinton’s larger point but with her precise terminology.

That’s what Wolf Blitzer did with Trump running mate Mike Pence Monday. “There are some supporters of Donald Trump and Mike Pence who — David Duke, for example, some other white nationalists, who would fit into that category of deplorables, right?” Blitzer asked Pence.

“Well, as I told you last time I was on, I’m not really sure why the media keeps dropping David Duke’s name,” Pence said. “Donald Trump has denounced David Duke repeatedly. We don’t want his support, and we don’t want the support of people who think like him.”

“Would you call him a deplorable?” Blitzer pressed. “You would call him that?”

“No, I don’t — I’m not in the name-calling business, Wolf.”

So Pence said of Duke: “We don’t want his support, and we don’t want the support of people who think like him.” But that wasn’t enough. Would he use Clinton’s word? And when Pence didn’t — well, look at the coverage that followed:

Pence declines to call Duke ‘deplorable” — Politico.

Mike Pence refuses to call David Duke ‘deplorable’ — USA Today.

Mike Pence declines to say whether David Duke is ‘deplorable’ because he ‘is not in the name-calling business’ — Washington Post.

Mike Pence refuses to call David Duke ‘deplorable’ — Huffington Post.

Mike Pence declines to call David Duke ‘deplorable,’ disavows support’ — CNN.

Mike Pence Denounces David Duke but Won’t Call Him ‘Deplorable’ — ABC.

Mike Pence refuses to describe former KKK leader David Duke as ‘deplorable’; ‘I’m not in the name-calling business’ — New York Daily News.

Posted in David Duke | Comments Off on The brilliance of Hillary Clinton’s ‘deplorables’

What Unites The Alt Right Is Resistance To Lies

John Derbyshire writes:

Three weeks ago, I floated the word “Clintocalypse” to describe how the end of the world as we know it would follow a victory for Mrs. Clinton. Other opinionators were having the same thought.

The one who’s been getting most coverage—no, I don’t begrudge it, honestly [sound of weeping]—is the pseudonymous writer Decius and his The Flight 93 election. But another I particularly liked was NeverTrumps and the End of America as We Know It, by Jared Peterson at American Thinker:

The election of Hillary Clinton would mean final defeat for American conservativism—for at least a generation and almost certainly for much longer than that.

Peterson names names in the NeverTrump camp: George Will, William Kristol and Jonah Goldberg. These folk will do fine in the Clintocalypse, he says. They will serve as court jesters to the triumphant Cultural Marxist ruling power, chattering away impotently and raising an occasional laugh while the transformation of our republic into a northern hemisphere Brazil proceeds unhindered.

Still, neither commentator ventures very far into the speculative badlands we explore on the Alt Right: questions about why different ancestral populations display such different outcomes when considered in quantity, as communities or nations.

If, following a Clintocalypse, the machinery of state falls entirely into the hands of Cultural Marxist apparatchiks, one thing we may expect is more of a clampdown on dissent. Some suggestive recent developments:

  • The National Press Club

OK, it’s a private organization headquartered in Washington, DC for the promotion of journalism. It advertises itself as “the world’s leading professional organization for journalists.” It’s venerable, founded 1908; the same year, if I am not mistaken, as saw the establishment of America’s—in fact I think the worlds—first School of Journalism.

(Of course I scoff and sneer at this elevation of journalism into a credentialed profession like dentistry or civil engineering).

But the National Press Club puts on speaker events and debates on topics of public interest, especially when those topics cause a stir in the world of journalism. It was therefore entirely natural that they would agree to host a session on the Alt Right.

Thanks to Mrs. Clinton’s August 24th speech, the expression “Alt Right” is recognized today by several thousand times more Americans than were aware of it on August 23rd. So this was an excellent topic for airing—just the kind of thing the National Press Club exists for. Right?

This event was the brainchild of Richard Spencer, whose National Policy Institute[NPI] is a major pillar of the Alt Right edifice. Spencer is in fact sometimes described as the leader of the Alt Right, although not many acknowledge that the Alt Right needs a leader.

Scheduled speakers were Richard himself of course, Jared Taylor of American Renaissance, and our own Dear Leader here at VDARE.com , Peter Brimelow.

Suddenly, on Wednesday evening, just a few hours after the event had been announced, the National Press Club reneged on their contract and cancelled the event.

The Club cited “security concerns.” That is somewhat less than persuasive. For one thing, Richard Spencer had told them that should any extra security be required, his outfit, the NPI, would pay for it.

For another thing, the National Press Club has hosted several of NPI’s events before, going back at least five years. Last October they actually hosted NPI’s annual conference. More evidence of the intensifying clampdown on dissent.

ORDER IT NOW

For yet another thing, the Club has hosted events that raised far more security concerns than NPI. Nine years ago for example they hosted Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Li’l Squinty himself, outspoken Jew-hater and Holocaust-Denier.

The cancellation came accompanied by what sounded to me very like the squeaking of weasels. the Director of the National Press Club, Bill McCarren, [Email him] ,has over the past few weeks The First Amendment Lounge, and is a space dedicated to freedom of the press. [Laughter.]

I suppose we can take some slight comfort in the fact that Weasel McCarren is, at least, still enough of a human being to be embarrassed.

The event took place anyway, at the Willard Intercontinental Hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue—a mere stone’s throw, if you’ll pardon the expression, from the White House. The precise venue was the Peacock Room.

That prompts me to the following suggestion to Bill McCarren of the National Press Club. Perhaps, after a hundred-and-odd years, you might consider renaming some of your rooms to better reflect the journalistic milieu of the early 21st century. Follow the Willard’s example: the First Amendment Lounge could become the Weasel Room.

Another Clintocalypse clampdown victim:

  • James Watson, the world’s greatest living geneticist: Watson was co-discoverer of DNA, for which he shared the Nobel Prize.

Professor Watson is a race realist. Nine years ago he was in the news for publicly saying that sub-Saharan Africans have a low average intelligence. He had previously said out loud that Ashkenazi Jews have a high average intelligence.

Both things are a matter of common observation. Both things are supported by decades of evidence. Both things are, however, not to be spoken aloud in polite company. Watson lost his position as head of Cold Spring Harbor lab for what he said about blacks, and endured many indignities at the hands of CultMarx enforcers.

Watson was invited to speak at New York University’s Langone Medical Center, September 12th. But when the invitation was posted, activists at the NYU Student Council and something called the Student Diversity Initiative sent a honking letter to the organizers of the lecture. NYU thereupon went into full PC cringe mode and cancelled the invitation.

I read about this on a website written by University of Chicago biology Professor Jerry Coyne. Professor Coyne objects to the cancellation of Watson’s lecture, but in the most mincing, mealy-mouthed way possible, I suppose to safeguard his own social standing.

He calls Watson’s mild race realistic remarks “provocative, hurtful, and unevidenced,” end quote.

Provocative of what? Of disagreement? That’s the very stuff of academic debate. It should be provoked in a university.

Actually Coyne’s second adjective tells us what’s being provoked: hurt feelings.

Fiddlesticks to hurt feelings. The world, said Wittgenstein, is everything that is the case. Note he did not say, “everything that does not hurt your feelings.”

As for Coyne’s last adjective, “unevidenced,” it is a lie. There is a vast mass of evidence for race differences in intelligence. Such differences are also what you would expect a priori, as normal features of variation within species.

It’s true we don’t yet know the full genetic architecture of race differences in intelligence. As human-science blogger JayMan says, though: You don’t need to know the name and job title of every worker in the factory to know the factory produces widgets.

Conclusion:

Since the Alt Right came to widespread attention last month, the question has been in the air: What unites us? What do we have in common?

We’ve even been asking it among ourselves. What is it that makes a person think: “Yeah, I belong to this Alt-Right they’re talking about. Or at any rate, their way of seeing the world looks a lot like mine”?

Well, I’ve been hanging out with Alt-Right types for a while. I’ve known Jared Taylor for twenty years; Peter Brimelow for sixteen; Richard Spencer I think for eight or ten. All have been guests at my house, I am proud to say.

I’ve been to conferences, mingled with supporters, spoken myself. I know this territory really well. So what, in my opinion, makes the Alt-Right a distinct thing—not by any means a party, a faction, or a movement, but a collection of souls with something in common?

Here’s my answer:

We don’t like flagrant nonsense in the discussion of human affairs. We don’t like being lied to. We especially don’t like being lied to by credentialed academics like Jerry Coyne.

The lies are so flagrant, so outrageously obvious, you’d have to laugh at them—if not for the fact that laughing at them is close to being a criminal offense. Read on.

COMMENTS:

* Is Unz.com censored by facebook?

I tried to post this Derbyshire column on facebook by using the share button(on this page), but I got this warning:

“This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems. If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know.”

* On the other hand, [James] Woolsey isn’t Jewish, so there’s a reasonable chance he could change his mind. That is, he’s not wedded to neocon views the way Jewish neocons are. That’s a very important distinction. That’s why Cheney and Rumsfeld are supporting Trump. The mightn’t completely agree with him, but they realize he’s far better for the country than the alternative. That’s something Jewish panic merchants have an impossibly difficult time doing.

* In defense of Prof. Coyne, he has been a consistent defender of freedom of speech. Given where he started, he’s come a long way. You might say he was a “68er” in the Vietnam War days. He was a student of Richard Lewontin, one of the high priests of the Blank Slate. He now supports evolutionary psychology, and admires Steven Pinker, who attacked the Blank Slate in a book of that name. He is, however, an atheist (like me), and his readers are mainly leftists. All authors like to have readers. One can forgive Coyne for his “mealy-mouthed, mincing” defense of freedom of speech, given that it amounted to so much virtue signaling to his audience. For all that, Coyne isn’t a man whose mind is completely closed. Telling him that he can only be saved if he gives all that he owns to the poor and follows the Derb is a bit much.

* In an MA Applied Linguistics program at a well-regarded British university, I tried to base a thesis proposal on an analysis of how language is used to promote the elite’s narrative on race/HBD at the expense of scholars like Watson, and also to the detriment of democratic citizenries’ generally by denying them access to information they need to make informed decisions. This approach to linguistic analysis is called critical discourse analysis (CDA). It’s similar to what Sailer has been doing with lefty news articles over the past 20 years. My proposal was flatly rejected without my being given a chance to answer any questions first. I was told in no uncertain terms that 1) CDA could only be used from a leftwing perspective; 2) Watson was ignorant because blacks would score just as high on IQ tests as whites if they had invented them; and 3) that there is no such thing as race to begin with.

I’ve since been looking for a peer-reviewed paper “proving” the existence of race and have yet to find one. This is a bigger stumbling block to studying race than I think most Alt-Right types realise. You cannot do any race-realism social science that is based on the concept of race without a peer-reviewed paper that explicitly hypothesises and then proves its hypothesis that race exists. Once we have that research paper, there’s a lot we can start to do. For now, we have to dredge through schlock social science research that is based on and cites research “proving” that race does not exist and then skips merrily down the yellow brick road to our destruction.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on What Unites The Alt Right Is Resistance To Lies

Google Hides Popular Hillary Clinton Health Searches

Google has done everything it thought it could get away with to hide meaningful results for searches about Hillary Clinton’s health.

All of the major tech companies are all in for her and they must be held accountable. They are enemies of the historic American nation.

Breitbart reported Aug. 30:

Recent search engine results indicate Google, whose CEO is a supporter of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, is suppressing negative search results about the Democratic party’s presidential nominee.
Searches for “Hillary Clinton’s he-” across three different search engines provide quite different results. When searched on Google, the first suggested searches provided are “Hillary Clinton’s headquarters,” “Hillary Clinton’s health plan,” and “Hillary Clinton’s healthcare plan.”

Search results on Bing return the suggestions, “Hillary Clinton’s health,” “Hillary Clinton’s health issues,” and “Hillary Clinton’s health and weight,” while search results on Yahoo return the suggestions, “Hillary Clinton’s health problems,” Hillary Clinton’s health,” and “Hillary Clinton’s health issues.”

Earlier in August, New York Times tech columnist Farhad Manjoo called on Google to “fix” search results related to Clinton’s health. “Google should fix this. It shouldn’t give quarter to conspiracy theorists,” he tweeted.

This isn’t the first time that Google has been accused of favouring one presidential candidate over another. In June, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange accused Google of being “directly engaged in Hillary Clinton’s campaign.” Later that month a video was released proving that Google was altering search results in favour of the Democratic Presidential nominee.

Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman of Google parent company Alphabet, runs a pro-Clinton digital group called The Groundwork which directly focuses on Clinton’s digital media presence.

Posted in Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on Google Hides Popular Hillary Clinton Health Searches

‘Love Has No Labels’

As I watched Monday Night Football, I was continually assaulted by ads promoting the diversity message “Love has no labels.”

What the heck is going on?

I Googled the ads and found this on the ADL website:

The Ad Council’s Love Has No Labels is a public service advertising campaign that encourages people to examine and challenge their own implicit bias. The PSAs feature real people filmed at a live event in which a large x-ray screen depicts the people only as two skeletons embracing. As the skeleton images separate and walk out from behind the screen, the audience discovers who they really are. This process occurs a number of times, each highlighting different pairings of gender, race, sexual orientation, religion, ability and age to encourage viewers’ to take a closer look at their own expectations and implicit bias.

ADL has developed two resource guides to facilitate conversation and deepen young people’s thinking on these topics.

Family and Caregiver Guide

The Family and Caregiver Guide provides information about how to have these discussions at home and includes conversation starter questions, tips for how to rethink bias at home and additional resources. 

Download Family and Caregiver Guide (PDF)

Educator’s Guide

The Educator’s Guide provides information about how to bring these discussions into your classroom and includes key words, discussion questions, extension activities by grade level (grades 3-12), tips for rethinking bias in school and additional resources. You may pick and choose the questions and activities that work for your classroom and time allotted.

Download Educator’s Guide (PDF)

Posted in ADL | Comments Off on ‘Love Has No Labels’