Symptoms Of Underearning

Posted on December 25, 2016 by Luke Ford

Here is how they have manifested in my life:

1. Time Indifference – We put off what must be done and do not use our time to support our own vision and further our own goals.

L: Over the past four years, I’ve probably only averaged about 30 hours a week of work. I could have gotten off my butt and looked for more work and made more money. I could have been clearer about my vision for my life and spent more time and taken more steps towards making it real. I’ve wasted a lot of time in fantasy, in narcissistic delusion. I’ve liked to numb out to movies or TV or watching sports or chasing women.

2. Idea Deflection –We compulsively reject ideas that could expand our lives or careers, and increase our profitability.

Yes, that has been huge problem for me. I have compulsively rejected ideas that could have expanded my life and increased my profitability.

3. Compulsive Need to Prove – Although we have demonstrated competence in our jobs or business, we are driven by a need to re-prove our worth and value.

Yes, this has been a constant problem for me. I’m not at peace with myself. I have to try to prove myself to others. I’m insecure.

4. Clinging to Useless Possessions – We hold onto possessions that no longer serve our needs, such as threadbare clothing or broken appliances.

Yes, I’ve had this problem in a mild way.

5. Exertion/Exhaustion – We habitually overwork, become exhausted, then under-work or cease work completely.

I have had this problem. I over-worked at age 21 and at age 22 I collapsed into years of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. This year I over-worked and in my exhausted state I made some bad decisions that cost me thousands of dollars.

6. Giving Away Our Time – We compulsively volunteer for various causes, or give away our services without charge, when there is no clear benefit.

Yes, this has been a tendency of mine. I love causes and indulge in them at a cost to my own welfare.

7. Undervaluing and Under-pricing – We undervalue our abilities and services and fear asking for increases in compensation or for what the market will bear.

Yes, I’ve never asked for a raise in my life. I have even said, “That’s too much” when I’ve been offered a good deal for my services. In some ways, I value myself, and in other ways, I don’t. I just throw myself away.

8. Isolation – We choose to work alone when it might serve us much better to have co-workers, associates, or employees.

Yes, this has been a major problem in my life. I tend to isolate.

9. Physical Ailments – Sometimes, out of fear of being larger or exposed, we experience physical ailments.

Ouch.

10. Misplaced Guilt or Shame – We feel uneasy when asking for or being given what we need or what we are owed.

True.

11. Not Following Up – We do not follow up on opportunities, leads, or jobs that could be profitable. We begin many projects and tasks but often do not complete them.

True.

12. Stability Boredom – We create unnecessary conflict with co-workers, supervisors and clients, generating problems that result in financial distress.

True. I love stirring people up and then they don’t want me around because I’m too much aggravation.

Posted in Addiction, Personal | Comments Off on Symptoms Of Underearning

Santa Monica Synagogue Smeared with Feces in Attack on Chanukah

Posted on December 25, 2016 by Luke Ford

Breitbart: SANTA MONICA, California — A local synagogue entrance was smeared with feces and food in an apparent antisemitic attack on the first night of Chanukah on Saturday night.

Congregants arriving for prayers on Sunday morning at the Living Torah Center, a synagogue affiliated with the Orthodox Chabad movement, were shocked by the vandalism, which one of the rabbis cleaned as best he could before services.

Some feces remained lodged in the upper corner of the building’s facade, and marred a window facing Wilshire Boulevard.

Rabbi Boruch Rabinowitz told Breitbart News that the attack was not random. Assistant Rabbi Dovid Tenenbaum, who serves as a chaplain with the local police department, called in a report.

The synagogue may have attracted additional attention because of the menorah lit in the window. Jewish law dictates that the Chanukah menorah be placed in a window facing the outside world in order to publicize the holiday.

Posted in Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on Santa Monica Synagogue Smeared with Feces in Attack on Chanukah

When Jewish Pols In the Diaspora Sought To Maximize The Majority’s Rights

Posted on December 24, 2016 by Luke Ford

Ari Ben Canaan points out the 19th Century Jewish politician Lewis Charles Levin (November 10, 1808 – March 14, 1860). According to Wikipedia: “Shortly after the 1844 Philadelphia riots, Levin ran for Congress and was elected on his party’s platform: (1) to extend the period of naturalization to twenty-one years; (2) to elect only native born to all offices; (3) to reject foreign interference in all institutions, social, religious, and political.”

Benjamin Disraeli is another example of a Jewish politican in the diaspora campaigning for majority rights. Disraeli was very much a race man. “No one may be indifferent to the racial principle, the racial question. It is the key to world history. History is often confusing because it is written by people who did not understand the racial question and the aspects relevant to it… Race is everything, and every race that does not keep its blood from being mixed will perish… Language and religion do not determine a race—blood determines it.”

Posted in America, Jews | Comments Off on When Jewish Pols In the Diaspora Sought To Maximize The Majority’s Rights

Who Do You Love?

Posted on December 24, 2016 by Luke Ford

Have you ever been in a situation where you only cared about one thing? Perhaps it was finding your keys or watching the end of a game or a movie. Perhaps the only thing you cared about was your brother or your best friend or your mom or dad or child. Perhaps you only cared about paying the rent or finding success with your date or avoiding humiliation at a gathering.

Perhaps you’ve been in a situation so dire that you only cared about your breath, your safety, your family, or perhaps you only cared about your friends or members of your religion or tribe.

These feelings are all human and natural and normal and healthy.

There’s nothing shocking about Jewish nationalists who in certain circumstances only care about the welfare of Jews or of Japanese nationalists who only care about the welfare of Japanese or Australian nationalists who only care about the welfare of Australians or white nationalists who only care about the welfare of whites. These feelings are all human and natural and normal and healthy.

Life has a way of narrowing our attention to what is most pressing in the moment.

Normal people often have good will towards many people, but all people in sufficiently difficult circumstances, only care about a very limited number of things people. These feelings are all human and natural and normal.

It is normal, natural and healthy to most care about those with whom you are most closely genetically linked and to have less care for those who are more genetically distant from you. In a homogeneous society, it is easy to care about your fellow who’s like you, but in a diverse society, you tend to pull back your caring to your narrow circle.

The same people in one circumstance will have good will towards all and in another circumstance, they will only care about members of their group and have hostile feelings towards outsiders.

Caring about others depends upon circumstance. Diffuse caring is usually a product of luxury.

Right now, I think, an increasing number of people in America feel pressed to the wall and they are narrowing their concerns to members of their group and they are increasing their hostility towards out-groups. In some circumstances, this will be adaptive and in other circumstances, maladaptive.

I just watched three very different movies back to back. Deep Horizon was about the world of men in danger on an oil rig. Jackie was about the world of women and emotions. Watching it after Deep Horizon seemed a letdown. It was simply a cascade of contradictory female emotions all familiar to anyone who’s had a wife or long-term girlfriend.

Lion (2016)

Plot summary: “Five-year-old Saroo gets lost on a train which takes him thousands of Kilometers across India, away from home and family. Saroo must learn to survive alone in Kolkata, before ultimately being adopted by an Australian couple. Twenty-five years later, armed with only a handful of memories, his unwavering determination, and a revolutionary technology known as Google Earth, he sets out to find his lost family and finally return to his first home.”

People create a society and genes create people and so different sub-species create different societies.

Near the end of the movie, Saroo tells his adoptive white mother, “I’m sorry you weren’t able to have children of your own.”

And the mom replies, something like, “We could have had children of our own but we thought the world had enough people in it, we wanted to take better care of babies already here who needed it. When I was 12, I had a vision that my purpose was to adopt brown babies.”

Unlike every other people in the world, Anglos don’t have a dual morality. They don’t think there’s one standard for how you treat members of your group and a different standard for how you treat outsiders. That’s why Anglos created the high trust countries of the United States, Canada, England, and Australia.

Posted in Nationalism | Comments Off on Who Do You Love?

Donna Zuckerberg on Pickup Artists Roosh V and Ovid

Posted on December 23, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* If Zuckerberg’s brother had learned some game, this man, one of the richest men in the world, maybe wouldn’t have ended up married to a peevish, career oriented Chinese (reminiscent of Ellen Pao) who is likely to give him only one child, bossing him around relentlessly.

Beta is as Beta does.

* I read “The Game” around 2006 (I was 22) and I couldn’t put it down. I devoured it in less than 72 hours. It wasn’t exactly a manual, it was a story. I never studied or employed actual Game “techniques” — one didn’t need to. But the book was like the Rosetta Stone of women (that simile is used in the book as well).

I started getting laid about 10x more. Let me pause here to beat you all to the joke:

ten times zero still equals zero, buddy-ro

With that out of the way, I’d like to say that “Game” in our day and age was simply the masculinity of another era. It’s like how our venerable host has written that the reason Mad Men is so popular is that everyone secretly longs for the bad old days when women were women, and men were men.

* Not being fat is about as big a class marker as you’ll find in this country. To be sure, many plump women and portly men circulate in high society, but the difference between classes is still considerable.

* If one likes easy women then one goes where the easy women are. Bars are the natural habitat of the schtuppable so that is where one goes.
The problem with the “easy women” is that they want to overstay their welcome. That is the virtue of the professional. They are paid to not be there in the morning.

* I haven’t read Return of Kings or Roosh’ blog for a long time, but I do follow Chateau Heartiste/ Roissy. He can, of course, defend himself, but my read of CH is that his advice on game is to give beta males a “fighting chance” in the dating game. The traditional beta male attraction was his stability and the hazards that women faced in unprotected sex with alpha males who refused to commit (e.g., pregnancy and abandonment). Effective female contraception and economic self-sufficiency have minimized those hazards, so women feel free to have sex with alphas and ignore betas, at least until their sexual market value starts its precipitous decline in their early 30s. “Game” gives a beta male a shot at those women while they are still in their prime–the alpha has “natural game,” and little need for CH’s advice. I’ve never detected in CH a dislike for well-socialized women who decline to ride the “alpha cock carousel.”

* Because men and women are different.

To a man, an unwanted sexual advance from a woman is at worst annoying. To a woman, an unwanted advance, especially in isolated or unfamiliar surroundings, is often a terrifying experience because there’s always [to her] the implicit possibility of being beaten and/or raped if she refuses.

In simpler terms women pose no physical threat to men, while men pose a very serious physical threat to women.

One thing feminists and many male anti-feminists have in common is the tendency to selectively play dumb about the differences between the sexes.

Posted in Game | Comments Off on Donna Zuckerberg on Pickup Artists Roosh V and Ovid