Category Archives: Rhetoric

Ten Convenient Beliefs In The UC Berkeley Departments of English and Rhetoric

Berkeley’s English and Rhetoric departments share faculty, seminars, and a creed. English runs hard toward postcolonial, ethnic, and identity-centered literature. Rhetoric runs toward Continental philosophy, critical theory, and the analysis of power. The two read literature and rhetoric as tools … Continue reading

Posted in English, Rhetoric, UC Berkeley | Comments Off on Ten Convenient Beliefs In The UC Berkeley Departments of English and Rhetoric

LAT: Trump’s war rhetoric is coarse. It’s also heard differently, depending on the audience

The Los Angeles Times piece reads Trump’s Iran rhetoric through a framework built on traditional presidential norms. That framework assumes wartime rhetoric must do three things: justify the war on moral grounds, show some respect for casualties and the enemy, … Continue reading

Posted in Iran, Rhetoric | Comments Off on LAT: Trump’s war rhetoric is coarse. It’s also heard differently, depending on the audience

Decoding Trump’s Rhetoric

Donald Trump’s style is not built around logical coherence or policy architecture. It is built around coalition maintenance, dominance signaling, and emotional clarity. He’s the great prole whisperer. First, it is epideictic more than deliberative. Classical rhetoric divides speech into … Continue reading

Posted in Rhetoric | Comments Off on Decoding Trump’s Rhetoric

BS Is Usually More Effective Than Lying

From the below video: If deceit is fundamental to animal communication, then there must be strong selection to spot deception. And this in turn ought to select for a degree of self-deception—rendering some facts and motives unconscious so as not … Continue reading

Posted in Rhetoric | Comments Off on BS Is Usually More Effective Than Lying

Arguments For The Sake Of Heaven

I once had a girlfriend for about a year, and during that time, I don’t remember ever needing to explain myself to her. By contrast, most of my girlfriends have been a bit bewildered by my sarcasm. They weren’t big … Continue reading

Posted in Rhetoric | Comments Off on Arguments For The Sake Of Heaven

NYT: The Debate Style That Propelled Charlie Kirk’s Movement

My dad was good at arguing. He devoted his life to arguing. He got a PhD in argument (Rhetoric). He developed a following from his ability to argue. None of this endeared my dad to me or to my brother … Continue reading

Posted in Rhetoric | Comments Off on NYT: The Debate Style That Propelled Charlie Kirk’s Movement

Why Do We Argue?

David Pinsof writes: The goal is to subtly punish people for questioning our dogmas or dissing our allies. When we argue about politics, we’re playing The Opinion Game—the secret war over social norms. And the norm we want to establish … Continue reading

Posted in Rhetoric | Comments Off on Why Do We Argue?

Five Chapters on Rhetoric: Character, Action, Things, Nothing, and Art

I love this 2015 book by Michael S. Kochin: * Daniel Webster: “True eloquence… must exist in the man, in the subject, and in the occasion.” * Webster shows how this true eloquence results not merely in words or speeches … Continue reading

Posted in Rhetoric | Comments Off on Five Chapters on Rhetoric: Character, Action, Things, Nothing, and Art

From Argument To Assertion

Michael S. Kochin writes in Argumentation 23, No. 3 (August 2009).: There are, however, two fundamental rhetorical difficulties with laying out one’s premises, reasoning, and conclusions. Since arguments are anticlimactic if they are explicit, the speaker who is excessively explicit … Continue reading

Posted in Rhetoric | Comments Off on From Argument To Assertion

Is Ad Hominen A Logical Fallacy When Applied To Internet Debates? (8-2-21)

08:00 That Noble Dream: The ‘Objectivity Question’ and the American Historical Profession, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=138784 10:00 Ad hominem, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem 15:00 John Locke, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke 32:00 Argument from authority, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority 48:00 Bernadotte Everly Schmitt, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernadotte_Everly_Schmitt

Posted in History, Rhetoric | Comments Off on Is Ad Hominen A Logical Fallacy When Applied To Internet Debates? (8-2-21)