Crooked: Outwitting the Back Pain Industry and Getting on the Road to Recovery III

Here are some excerpts from this 2016 book:

Long before scientists had access to the imaging technology that allowed them to visualize neuronal activity, physiatrist John Sarno grasped the relationship between chronic pain and emotional distress. Every time I told anyone I was writing about back pain, I learned to expect questions about whether I knew Sarno’s work. Almost everyone had run into someone who had been cured by Sarno, often after years of discomfort. I was happy to be able to inform his many admirers that, yes, I had actually spoken with the rock star of the back world. By the time we talked on the phone, Sarno was well up in years—and perhaps less guarded about expressing his feelings than he would have been in his younger days. After medical school at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, John Sarno worked for a decade as a family practitioner in a small town in upstate New York, making house calls and delivering babies on kitchen tables. He returned to Manhattan for further training
in the medical specialty of physiatry, at NYU Langone Medical Center’s Rusk Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine. At first, Sarno treated hospitalized patients who had suffered strokes and spinal cord injuries or lost limbs to amputation. They worked hard in physical therapy, and according to him most succeeded in regaining significant function. But when Sarno was reassigned in 1965 to the outpatient department at the Rusk Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, where he became director of the back pain clinic, his patients did not respond well to standard physical therapy protocols. Instead, like migrating birds, they flitted from practitioner to practitioner, fruitlessly trying to find someone who could fix them. One of John Sarno’s senior colleagues at NYU, physiatrist Hans Kraus, had treated John F. Kennedy’s intractable back pain with an intensive exercise protocol. The president had already undergone decades of treatment, including several spine surgeries. The young and reputedly vigorous president was actually so weak, Kraus found, that he couldn’t do a single sit-up. When he was directed to touch his toes, his fingers did not even reach to his knees. In October 1961, JFK started the Kraus program, a rigorous routine including aerobic, strength, and flexibility exercises performed twice a day, three days a week. Within a year, the president was able to lift his small children, pull on his own socks, and swing a golf club. Kraus diagnosed what he called a “muscle tension syndrome,” common among people who were exposed to significant stress, with no ready escape by means of physical action. “Your muscles, your mind, your heart and all your organs prepare to act, but you do nothing,” Kraus wrote in his book, Backache, Stress and Tension. “You may wish to fight, you may wish to flee, but modern civilization prevents you from carrying out your natural impulses. . . . You race your engines without going anywhere.” Chronic muscle tension, Kraus hypothesized, created a cycle that continually generated more pain. He recognized that, without sufficient exercise, oxygen-deprived muscles undergo a process called anaerobic glycolysis, through which lactic acid and other wastes accumulate in the body. Although many other specialists had failed with JFK, Kraus succeeded. John Sarno saw the wisdom in exercise, but he recognized that workouts three times a week were not in the cards for most of his patients. Nor was Sarno convinced that exercise would resolve their back problems, which he viewed as manifestations of emotional turmoil. Although Sarno was neither psychoanalytically trained, nor well acquainted with the works of Sigmund Freud, he attributed the pent-up rage to an unruly subconscious process rather than a physiological one. If he could convince a patient that his subconscious was kicking up a fuss in order to distract him from personal issues, and that this fuss was manifested in reduced blood flow to the postural muscles, the patient would relinquish the notion that something was structurally wrong and shortly return to a functional life. He called the condition “tension myositis syndrome,” or “TMS.”

Sarno found that the patients who had the most success with his approach were hardworking perfectionists, driven by self-imposed pressure that left them feeling stretched to the breaking point. Often, they’d had a chaotic childhood, when they’d struggled to gain control over unpredictable and toxic environments. Although the specifics would not come to light for a couple of decades, in time, research would show that people (especially women) who experience significant physical and psychological adversity in childhood are at greater risk for chronic pain than those whose early days were less challenging. Sarno published his first book in 1982, but it was not until Healing Back Pain: The Mind-Body Connection came out in 1991, eventually selling over a million copies, that he became a household name. In 1998, when Sarno published The Mindbody Prescription: Healing the Body, Healing the Pain, 20/20 coanchor John Stossel was in the midst of his own struggle. After Stossel sat down with Sarno for a chat, he realized that his back felt better for the first time in months. As he planned a TV special on Sarno, Stossel requested permission to call twenty of his patients, randomly chosen from the doctor’s medical charts. The patients that Stossel’s team interviewed all reported being “better,” or even “much better.” Roughly fifteen million people watched that segment, and Sarno became “America’s back doctor.” But there was a problem. Sarno was unmistakably bad for business. He did not endear himself to the medical community when he announced that physicians were “chiefly responsible for the pain epidemic that now exists in this country.” Once patients became Sarnoites, they lost their appetite for serial interventions. They canceled long-scheduled surgical procedures, usually at the eleventh hour, citing a new perception that their problems were emotional, rather than orthopedic. They stopped getting MRIs and spinal injections, and didn’t show up for physical therapy appointments.
At the peak of his popularity, John Sarno charged up to $1,500 for in-person consultations. But each week he set aside several days when he spoke, gratis, to prospective or current patients, regardless of whether they were celebrities, housewives, or truck drivers. He exorcised author and business pundit Tony Schwartz’s spinal demons in forty-eight hours. In our phone interview, Schwartz outlined why he thought Sarno’s approach was so successful: “He takes the fear out of the equation—the fear of ‘Uh-oh, something must really be wrong with me,’” he explained. “And the impact on symptoms is dramatic.” Most of Sarno’s patients never actually saw him. Renn Kaminski, a retired New Jersey police officer, struggled with back pain and sciatica for thirty years—from the time he was nineteen until he reached the age of forty-nine. “Three or four times a year,” he said, “I’d be out of commission for a week. It might be because I’d been involved in a foot chase, or because I’d twisted the wrong way when I was putting on my pants.”

In the middle of a six-month episode of recurrent sciatica, Kaminski limped down the hallway of a local elementary school, where he was teaching kids about drug safety. The school’s principal, familiar with the symptoms, handed him his own dog-eared copy of Healing Back Pain. “I took it home,” Kaminski said, “but I was in too much pain to read it, so I tossed it on the coffee table, where it gathered dust for a couple of months.” When he finally mustered the energy, Kaminski read the book straight through—several times. “Suddenly, I realized that my problem was that my mind was messing with me,” he said. Two weeks later, he was better. “I haven’t had serious pain since,” he said, “which is not to say that I haven’t felt that threatening twinge, where you go, ‘Now, I’ve done it.’ But when that happens, I just shake my hips like a hula dancer—like Stan Musial on the Cardinals used to—and then I stand up straight and walk away. I don’t obsess. I didn’t change my circumstances. I just changed the way my body reacted to the circumstances.”

Posted in Back | Comments Off on Crooked: Outwitting the Back Pain Industry and Getting on the Road to Recovery III

Crooked: Outwitting the Back Pain Industry and Getting on the Road to Recovery II

Here are some excerpts from this 2016 book:

From at least a dozen people, including actors, writers, and musicians, I’d heard that the Alexander Technique had made a big difference in their lives. Among the well-known adherents were Kenneth Branagh, William Hurt, Kevin Kline, Jeremy Irons, James Earl Jones, Kelly McGillis, Paul Newman, Lynn Redgrave, Maggie Smith, Robin Williams, Paul McCartney, Sting, Julian Bream (the classical guitarist), James Galway (the classical flutist), and Yehudi Menuhin (violinist and conductor). The attraction was long-standing: In the 1930s, such luminaries as George Bernard Shaw, Aldous Huxley, Lewis Mumford, and Leonard and Virginia Woolf had taken AT lessons…

…the BMJ published the outcomes of a large randomized controlled trial, funded by the United Kingdom’s Medical Research Council, which is in turn funded by the government. University researchers had recruited about five hundred patients from sixty-four general medicine practices. Prior to starting the trial, the patients, all of whom had experienced at least five years of back pain, made lists of tasks they could no longer perform. When the study ended, the plan was to evaluate whether anything had changed. One group of participants received “normal” care, that is, physiotherapy (as physical therapy is referred to in Britain) or an educational booklet. Another got massage therapy. The third group engaged in six lessons in the Alexander Technique, and the fourth group had twenty-four AT lessons, in combination with a walking program. Those who were massaged were the first to experience relief, but when the massages ran out, so did the benefits. The physiotherapy patients and those who had six AT sessions saw less improvement than those who took twenty-four Alexander lessons and joined the walking program. In that group, the number of “things I can no longer do” decreased by more than 40 percent.

Instead of inspiring admiration, the study upset both allopathic physicians (who practice conventional Western medicine) and holistic practitioners, who feared that the British National Health Service (NHS) would bail on standard conservative treatments for back pain, ruining their practices. Normally, after a paper appears in an eminent scientific journal, a few comments, phrased with great deference to the authors, are published or posted online. But after the paper describing the Alexander Technique study appeared in BMJ, it generated sixty-seven such comments within days, mostly from physicians. Few of them were even marginally polite. Just as UK physicians had anticipated, or feared, the NHS embraced the Alexander Technique as part of its revised guidelines, and declined to allow epidural steroid “jabs” for most common low back pain conditions. From there, it got ugly. In July 2009, Paul Watson, at the time the head of the British Pain Society, who had been involved in developing the new NHS guidelines, and thus put the kibosh on injections, was ousted from his leadership post, in what members described as an “extraordinary row.”

Posted in Alexander Technique | Comments Off on Crooked: Outwitting the Back Pain Industry and Getting on the Road to Recovery II

1971 Academic Paper: CRIMINALITY AMONG JEWS – AN OVERVIEW

Summary: THE CONCLUSION OF MOST STUDIES IS THAT JEWS HAVE A LOW CRIME RATE. IT IS LOWER THAN THAT OF NON-JEWS TAKEN AS A WHOLE, LOWER THAN THAT OF OTHER RELIGIOUS GROUPS, AND LOWER THAN A RATE BASED SIMPLY ON THE JEWISH PROPORTION OF THE POPULATION (THE EXPECTED RATE). HOWEVER, THE JEWISH CRIME RATE TENDS TO BE HIGHER THAN THAT OF NONJEWS AND OTHER RELIGIOUS GROUPS FOR WHITE-COLLAR OFFENSES, THAT IS, COMMERCIAL OR COMMERCIALLY RELATED CRIMES, SUCH AS FRAUD, FRAUDULENT BANKRUPTCY, AND EMBEZZLEMENT. THE AUTHOR SUGGESTS THAT THERE IS A NEED FOR STUDIES WHICH WOULD COMPARE THE JEWS WITH SOCIALLY SIMILAR GROUPS ON VARIABLES SUCH AS – MIDDLE-CLASS POSITION, COMMUNITY INTEGRATION, URBANITY, SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL PROCESSES AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTEGRATION INTO AMERICAN SOCIETY, ETC. UNFORTUNATELY, SUCH STUDIES ARE IMPRACTICABLE IN THE UNITED STATES BECAUSE MUCH OF THE NECESSARY DATA

Posted in Crime, Jews | Comments Off on 1971 Academic Paper: CRIMINALITY AMONG JEWS – AN OVERVIEW

WP: Where the alt-right wants to take America — with or without Trump

This is another in a string of recent book reviews by Carlos Lozada that contributes nothing to our understanding of books and the world. When I first started reading him, about a year ago, I was excited by his work. Now he just repeats cliches and engages in lame and inaccurate virtue signalling. There’s not one sentence in this new book review that makes me want to stop and think. There’s no perspective here that I haven’t already heard a hundred times.

He writes:

Trump has been described America’s first white president for his explicit race-baiting and reflexive impulse to undo the legacy of his black predecessor. He may also be America’s first troll president, one who treats governance as a culture war, the Oval Office as a subreddit, and the bully pulpit as a means to cyberbully his foes.

Trump fits with the alt-right’s abusive culture, and studies of the psychology of online trolls highlight their deception, narcissism and manipulativeness — traits not inconsistent with what psychiatrists observe in our 45th commander in chief. “Why We Need a Troll as President” was even the headline of a bizarrely foreshadowing argument by a contributor to Spencer’s alt-right website during the 2016 campaign. “Trump is worth supporting,” the writer argued, “because we need a troll. . . . We need someone who can break open public debate. . . . The fact that Trump himself is part of this same farce is utterly irrelevant.”

Yet though alt-righters become gleeful when Trump shares racially misleading crime statistics or offers a both-sides take to neo-Nazis marching and engaging in deadly violence, “saying that Trump and the Alt-Right are simpatico amounts to whitewashing the Alt-Right,” Hawley contends. The core alt-right wants more than greater immigration restrictions and temporary travel bans against a handful of Muslim-majority countries. It wants nonwhites out of the country altogether. Trump and his aides have called for measures that, however extreme, fall short. White-nationalist writer Matthew Heimbach, for example, endorsed Trump’s candidacy with the caveat that Trump “is not the savior of Whites in America.” And even former White House strategist Stephen K. Bannon — who has bragged of giving the alt-right a platform as head of Breitbart — is more a populist and economic nationalist, Hawley argues.

Over time, however, that the administration’s loyalty to the movement may prove less consequential. Trump’s jumble of beliefs — and really, does he have any guiding ideology beyond self-aggrandizement? — matters less than where a newly empowered and overtly racist political force attempts to take the country.

“What Trump has succeeded in doing, by exploiting the strands of right-wing populism in the country, has been to make the large and growing number of proto-fascist groups in America larger and more vicious,” Neiwert concludes. These groups won’t be deterred by a confused left or craven right. The conservative movement can’t purge them the way William F. Buckley cast out the Birchers, even if it wanted to do so — alt-right supporters “do not care what Ross Douthat thinks of them,” Hawley notes wryly. Nor will they be limited by the fumblings of the president they helped bring to power.

The alt-right is on the move, the distance from 4chan to Charlottesville just part of a longer march. I wonder if even Trump fully understands — or cares — what he has let slip.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on WP: Where the alt-right wants to take America — with or without Trump

ADL: Andrew Anglin: Five Things to Know

Friend: “So-called “intellectual racists,” EXACTLY! If someone doesn’t believe race is a social construct, how can they be an intellectual?”

From the ADL in 2016:

1. Andrew Anglin, 32, runs the neo-Nazi website, The Daily Stormer.
Anglin, who is based in Ohio, launched The Daily Stormer on July 4, 2013. The site is very popular among white supremacists. Anglin says that he is trying to reach “all disenfranchised and angry White males under the age of thirty.” He created the site after founding another neo-Nazi site, Total Fascism, in 2012. Prior to promoting Hitler and fascism, Anglin was a 9/11 “truther” and was influenced by conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones of InfoWars. Anglin was also active on the Internet on sites like the 4chan discussion forum, parts of which are notorious for their hateful content.
2. Anglin’s goal is to promote hatred of Jews and to denigrate minorities.
He writes that The Daily Stormer “is designed to serve as a hardcore front for the conversion of masses into a pro-White, Antisemitic ideology.” Anglin attacks Jews on a daily basis, using crude anti-Semitic language to describe various figures. He has a section on his site called “Jewish Problem,” where he accuses Jews of all sorts of societal ills. Anglin also lauds Hitler and promotes Holocaust denial. His hatred extends to other minorities as well, particularly blacks, and he frequently uses news items as a way to launch his tirades.
3. Anglin encourages his followers to troll and harass perceived enemies online.
Anglin often refers to himself as a troll on the Internet. In this light, he goads his readers and followers, whom he refers to as the “Stormer troll army,” to contact perceived enemies (mostly Jews) on Twitter to inundate them with hateful tweets. On his website, Anglin has also posted extensive instructions on how to troll people. He has carried out these tactics against Jewish journalists and Jewish public figures, including politicians.
4. Other racists have feuded with Anglin over his tactics.
So-called “intellectual racists,” who tend to reject more blatant or shocking displays of white supremacy, do not like Anglin’s openly provocative and crude language or the Nazi imagery he uses. The intellectual racists, though bigoted and anti-Semitic themselves, fear that his “outlandish anti-Semitic bilge” and Hitler worship might dissuade “mainstream” whites from entering the white supremacist movement. In addition, intellectual racists claim that Anglin is more interested in accumulating an Internet following than in spreading white supremacist ideas in the real world. Anglin, in turn, has attacked these intellectual racists for being too cerebral to appeal to the working-class whites he claims to be trying to reach.
5. Anglin is a controversial figure within the white supremacist movement.
Anglin lived for a while in Asia and the Philippines. He reportedly had relationships with Asian and Filipino women, something that is considered traitorous to the white race by white supremacists. Anglin is also controversial for his views on women. He often attacks and belittles women and expresses misogynist views. Saying that the purpose of The Daily Stormer is to educate men about the white nationalist movement, Anglin has actually banned women from producing content for his site.

Posted in ADL, Andrew Anglin | Comments Off on ADL: Andrew Anglin: Five Things to Know