J. Philippe Rushton: A Life History Perspective by Edward Dutton

Here are some excerpts:

* From the eighteenth century to the middle of the twentieth century almost all biologists and anthropologists accepted that the human species could be divided into biologically distinct races. Since around 1900, anthropology in Western Europe and the USA has gradually moved from being a branch of biology concerned with the physical and social evolution of humans, to a highly ideologically driven discipline strongly influenced influenced by dogmas such as cultural determinism (that ‘culture’ explains all population differences in behavior), cultural relativism (that all cultures are equally valuable and have their own truths), and postmodernism (that ‘truth’ is subjective and merely the ideology of the powerful and we must deconstruct their ‘truth’ and promote the marginalized) (see Dutton, 2012).

* Rushton and Templer (2012) found that among human sub-species and animal sub-species darker pigmentation was associated with higher levels of aggression and higher levels of sexual activity. Moreover, even within human races (such as when comparing siblings) darker siblings tended to be more aggressive and sexually active as well as less intelligent than lighter siblings.

* Analyzing a large data set of life-history variables on 234 mammalian species, Rushton (2004) found further evidence for his K factor. He discovered that brain size correlates 0.70 with longevity (0.59, after controlling for body weight and body length). His analysis revealed a single r–K life-history factor with loadings such as: brain weight (0.85), longevity (0.91), gestation time (0.86), birth weight (0.62), litter size (-0.54), age at first mating (0.73), duration of lactation (0.67), body weight (0.61), and body length (0.63).

* Rushton (2004) observes that in 1930, people in the lowest social class in the UK had a 23% higher chance of dying at every age than people in the highest social class, with ‘social class’ a proxy for socioeconomic status. By 1970, this excess risk had grown to 61%. In 1980 it had jumped to 150%.

* A General Factor of Personality (GFP) has now been extracted from over 24 different personality inventories (Rushton & Irwing, 2011) and is predicted to exist in others (Woodley & Bell, 2011). Dutch psychologist Dimitri Van der Linden and his colleagues (2010) have found that the GFP is robust to meta-analysis and Rushton and English psychologist Paul Irwing (2011) have found that it has a heritability of about 0.5. The GFP can be defined as a mix of socially desirable traits. It is composed of high scores on the Big 5 personality characteristics Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion and Openness and low scores on Neuroticism. This is the K personality… that GFP did indeed correlate positively with national average IQ.

* There is evidence that large-breasted women are relatively low in Conscientiousness, that is, they are relative r-strategists (see Dutton, 2018; Steiner, 1980). In a K-context, males would be more likely to pass on their genes by investing in good mothers. Accordingly, they would need to trade physical characteristics for psychological ones, meaning it would make more sense to actually be attracted to smaller breasts.

* …Simonton (2009) has observed that the closer to mathematics a scientific discipline moves, the lower is the level of mental instability among the most influential and creative practitioners of that discipline.

* The ‘male brain’ is focused on systemizing: analyzing the variables in a system, working out its rules, and creating systems to make sense of novel situations. This, it appears, would make males inclined towards or adept at the hypothetico-deductive method, generally considered the essence of the scientific method. The ‘female brain’ is less focused on this and instead is more focused on ‘empathizing’: identifying another person’s emotions and thoughts and working out the best way to respond to them.

* Despite higher levels of average intelligence and K than Caucasians, Northeast Asian levels of cultural achievement are clearly lower. They have never innovated an Industrial Revolution, despite having higher average intelligence than the Europeans, who did. Japanese economist Kenya Kura and colleagues (2015) have argued that a probable explanation is Northeast Asians’ extremely high levels of social anxiety. This allows them to develop a highly cooperative group, crucial in the harsh ecology to which they are evolved. But it also renders them very low in inquisitiveness, openness to new ideas, curiosity . . . indeed any behavioural tendency that might ‘rock the boat.’

* Rushton’s model doesn’t work in terms of Neuroticism either. This is ‘mental instability’ so we would expect Northeast Asians to be lowest in it. In fact, they are highest in it and black people are lowest in it (e.g. Eap et al., 2008). The reason for this appears to be the importance of social anxiety – a trait which comes under the umbrella of Neuroticism – in high K societies. In such societies, in their harsh ecology, you are more likely to survive if you can form a highly cooperative group and you will die quickly if you are cast out of this group. So it pays to be socially anxious, seemingly to the extent that this overwhelms other aspects of anxiety, leading to a higher score overall.

* American medic Beth Auslander and her team (2009) conducted a study of 202 American girls aged between 14 and 21 (26% white, 43% black and 31% Hispanic) and found that black girls were significantly less likely than white or Hispanic girls to have ever had oral sex and, if they had had it, they were significantly older when they had it for the first time than whites or Hispanics were. There were no racial differences in terms of the prevalence of anal sex. American medic Gypsyamber D’Souza et al. (2014) have also found that whites are more likely than Mexicans to have ever had oral sex while blacks are the least likely. These studies also replicated an earlier study (Smith et al., 1985) which had found that while white adolescents progressed through a predictable pattern of kissing, above the waist touching and then below the waist touching before engaging in coitus, black adolescents engaged in very little behaviour of this kind and quickly advanced to sex. Follow-up studies found that anal and oral sex were less frequent among blacks than among whites and that oral sex was first initiated at a much later age than among whites, despite vaginal sex having occurred at a much earlier age (Ompad et al., 2006 or Evans et al., 1998). Interestingly, a study of black-white sex behaviour differences which controlled for SES found little difference in oral sex prevalence between blacks and whites (Samuels, 1997). In that SES can be seen as an expression of Differential K, this is as we would expect; it shows that oral sex is associated with a K-strategy.

* Younger siblings tend to display more fast Life History and Narcissistic traits than older siblings. The youngest sibling, of three, has been found to be most likely to be a writer (especially of autobiography), in addition to having the highest self-esteem and the greatest desire to be unique (Szobiova, 2008). …those who write autobiographies tend to be Narcissistic, believing that their lives are so interesting that people will want to read about them (Mendelsohn, 25th January 2010).

Posted in Ed Dutton, HBD, Phil Rushton | Comments Off on J. Philippe Rushton: A Life History Perspective by Edward Dutton

#158 1-22-19 “Conservatives” Hate White People Too, Covington Proves

00:00 Why was the Never Trump crowd so quick to condemn these kids?
20:00 Healthy & unhealthy internet use
30:00 Tiring and energizing live streams
1:19:00 How a 57-hour Donkey Kong game struck a blow against online toxicity
1:23:00 Classical music vs popular music
1:33:00 Death on demand: has euthanasia gone too far?
1:38:00 President Trump’s ‘Xanatos Gambit’ Government Shutdown
1:45:00 Tucker Carlson’s war against Woke Capital and the future of the Right
1:56:00 OCASIO-CORTEZ ON MILLENNIALS: ‘WE’RE LIKE THE WORLD IS GOING TO END IN 12 YEARS IF WE DON’T ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE’
1:59:00 SUPREME COURT ALLOWS TRUMP TO TEMPORARILY ENFORCE TRANS SOLDIERS BAN
2:02:00 Oscar nominees
2:20:00 Welcome to another controversy algorithmically designed to tear America apart

Panel: Monsier: Blog: http://inelegantviceroy.water.blog
Otto Pohl: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGDA_3w0-mqywO9MS-eq1Gg
Brundlefly: https://twitter.com/Brundlefly14?lang=en

HE LIED: Native American Activist Nathan Phillips Never Served in Vietnam — But Raised Money By Saying He Did

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jan/20/shoshana-zuboff-age-of-surveillance-capitalism-google-facebook

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/jan/18/death-on-demand-has-euthanasia-gone-too-far-netherlands-assisted-dying?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

https://www.infowars.com/snl-writer-offers-oral-sex-for-anyone-who-punches-maga-kid/

https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/22/supreme-court-trump-trans-ban/

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/01/21/limbaugh-nro-pushed-covington-hoax-to-win-approval-of-the-mainstream-media/

https://news.grabien.com/story-ocasio-cortez-millennials-were-world-going-end-12-years-if-w

https://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/2019/01/21/tucker-carlsons-war-against-woke-capital-and-the-future-of-the-right/

President Trump’s ‘Xanatos Gambit’ Government Shutdown

Posted in America | Comments Off on #158 1-22-19 “Conservatives” Hate White People Too, Covington Proves

The Covington Catholic Fiasco

00:00 The nine characteristics of NPD
02:00 KMG arrives to discuss the Covington story
04:00 The Black Israelites
30:00 Who is Ed Buck? The erratic life of the Democratic donor in whose home two dead men have been found
38:00 7 Reasons Why LGBTQ+ People Don’t Want to Go to Your LGBTQ+ Inclusive Church
42:00 MLK was an orgiast and a plagiarist
55:00 RooshV: I Was Fooled By The Promise Of The Internet
1:01:00 Jim Kunstler’s estrangement from the Left
1:05:00 Kyle’s value-added proposition to the ruling class
1:11:00 China confirms the birth of gene-edited babies
1:14:00 Mystery diary of Rajneesh secrets discovered in locked file cabinet from commune

https://reason.com/blog/2019/01/20/covington-catholic-nathan-phillips-video

https://bookishbearblog.com/2018/06/11/7-reasons-why-lgbtq-people-dont-want-to-go-to-your-lgbtq-inclusive-church/

Native Protester Admits They Knew Black Nationalists Were Yelling Racist, Homophobic Slurs at Children When They Confronted Covington Students in ‘Solidarity’ With Them

https://reason.com/blog/2019/01/20/covington-catholic-nathan-phillips-video

Journalists and Celebs Rush to Delete Tweets Slamming MAGA-Hat Kids

Journalists and Celebs Rush to Delete Tweets Slamming MAGA-Hat Kids

https://www.thewrap.com/national-review-pulls-article-saying-covington-students-might-as-well-have-just-spit-on-the-cross/

http://www.unz.com/isteve/kamala-harris-is-running-for-president-to-apply-those-long-hard-lessons-about-the-true-nature-of-politics-she-learned-while-working-under-willie-brown/

https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-ed-buck-west-hollywood-20190110-story.html

Blueprint: How DNA Makes Us Who We Are

https://reason.com/archives/2019/01/19/what-the-new-hbo-brexit-film-gets-wrong

http://www.unz.com/isteve/which-kind-of-white-boys-does-the-nyt-hate-most-protestants-or-catholics/

https://www.rooshv.com/i-was-fooled-by-the-promise-of-the-internet

Coming Attractions

https://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2018/04/mystery_diary_discovered_in_lo.html

Posted in America | Comments Off on The Covington Catholic Fiasco

The Total Freedom Of Science Fiction

Bernie says: You and KMG have been talking about pedophilia in science fiction. What I would point out is that science fiction is kind of like the internet, it’s a free for all. You will find eugenic advocacy in science fiction, racism, homosexuality, absolute monarchies, critiques of democracy, religious fundamentalism, genocide, time travel, incest, coup d’etat, murder, race mixing, aliens, total war, degeneracy, speculations on life extention (including buying a body from brain dead persons), space travel , the most immoral capitalist societies where everything can be bought and sold, slavery, socialism, dictatorships and etc.

If I recall correctly you said if one wants to live in a white community, just pick a white church and then you have a white only community.

The same goes for eugenics. If you read a pro-eugenic science fiction book nobody will call you a racist, or a Nazi or whatever. All you need to say it’s just a book I lent from a friend, nothing to it, or something akin to that.

The point is that you basically have total freedom of speech in science fiction, so people are complaining about not being able say this or that. One solution is to write a short science fiction story or a science fiction novel about what you want to say, and give yourself plausible deniability.

Posted in Literature | Comments Off on The Total Freedom Of Science Fiction

How to Judge People by What They Look Like

Edward emails: “I’ve done a book called “How to Judge People By What They Look Like’ which brings together the mass of evidence for the accuracy of physiognomy which mostly passed under the radar for fear of offending PC. My book ‘At Our Wits’ End: Why We’re Becoming Less Intelligent and What It Means for the Future’ is the first to present to a popular audience proof that our intelligence is in decline due to dysgenics, feminism, immigration and welfare and our civilization will, therefore, collapse as every other has in its cycle. My book, due out later this year, ‘Race Differences in Ethnocentrism’ looks at why whites are so low in ethnocentrism – key factors are low poverty, low religiousness, dysgenics breeding, large gene pool, immigration, low cousin marriage, high iq, our evolved personality. My book, also due out this year, ‘Churchill’s Headmaster: The Sadist Who Nearly Saved the British Empire’ argues that World War II was totally unnecessary and was entirely Churchill’s fault. His much maligned headmaster was actually an excellent teacher and had the young psychopath Churchill not been withdrawn from his prep school then the Head would likely have broken him down fully into being a gentleman, making him less Narcissistic, meaning no World War II, as Churchill only had to press for the War for financial reasons, underpinned by his psychopathic markers, especially financial profligacy. In other words, a traditional headmaster – who I show has been wrongly maligned by Churchill and assorted Leftists – recruited an intellectually brilliant young white male to preserve the Empire but tragically failed in his mission because Churchill was withdrawn from his school too early and sent to a less traditional school.”

From Edward Dutton’s Patreon page:

I like researching controversial topics. If someone forcefully insists that a certain area is out of bounds and you’re ‘immoral’ for even contemplating it, then that is where new discoveries are going to lie. I originally read Theology at Durham University, graduating in in 2002, did a PhD in Religious Studies at Aberdeen University, finishing in 2005, and was made Adjunct Professor of the Anthropology of Religion and Finnish Culture at Oulu University in Finland – where I’m based – in 2011. However, I finally plucked up the courage to move into evolutionary psychology, human biological differences and intelligence in 2012 and have never looked back! I have made many discoveries, including:

– Proving that modern-day atheism is caused by mutant genes, the prevalence of which has been increasing in the population since the Industrial Revolution relaxed Natural Selection.

– Proving that sexual selection extends to nationality, with women being sexually attracted to males from higher status nations – hence you see Finnish women marrying British men but Finnish men wedding Estonian women.

– Proving that Western Europe became deeply religious by the Reformation because it had been executing all its criminals since the early Middle Ages.

– Proving that the nature of Islamic societies – and the religion itself – retards IQ in Muslim countries.

– Proving that we are becoming less intelligent due to dysgenic fertility. (All my research is at edwarddutton.wordpress.com).

Here are some excerpts from Edward Dutton’s book How to Judge People by What They Look Like:

* So the General Factor of Personality can be conceptualized as the degree to which a personality is pro-social– in other words, the degree to which someone has the kind of personality type and behaviours that underpin many socially desirable traits, the degree to which someone approximates to the type of person that makes for friendliness, helpfulness, being a ‘good neighbour’. The GFP describes a basic personality dimension, high levels of which may have evolved as an adaptation in complex and stable societies so that people would ‘get along well together’. So a person with high GFP would be sociable, extraverted, concerned with the feelings of others, and self-disciplined in pursuit of socially-approved goals. He’d also have stable emotions, and be open to new ideas (see Rushton & Irwing, 2008)…

* ‘Race’ is employed to refer to what in the animal world would be a subspecies: a breeding population separated from another of the same species long enough to be noticeably evolved to a different environment but not long enough to be unable to have fertile offspring with the other group. In other words, a race is a breeding population that differs genetically from other such populations as a result of geographical isolation, cultural separation, and endogamy, and which shows patterns of genotypic frequency for a number of inter-correlated characteristics compared with other breeding populations. The most obvious manifestations of this are observable differences in physical appearance… It has been clearly demonstrated that humans fall into clear genetic clusters which parallel the ‘races’ of traditional anthropology (see Jensen, 1998). So, it is quite clear that ‘race’ is a biological reality and not some kind of ‘social construct.’

* …there are more genetic differences within breeds of dog than between breeds of dog, but nobody would dismiss as insignificant the differences between a Great Dane and Chihuahua.

* …as intelligence is associated with emotional intelligence, cooperativeness, low self-esteem, a trusting nature, future-orientation, law-abidingness, intellectual curiosity, creativity, leadership ability, having a sense of humour, having a good memory, and even talking speed…

* …females are higher in Extraversion, Neuroticism, Conscientiousness, and Agreeableness. They are higher in the aesthetic aspect of Openness-Intellect but they are lower in ‘Intellect’…

* * As adults (though not as children) females seem to score very slightly lower on IQ tests than men, they have worse spatial and mathematical intelligence but better verbal intelligence, and they have a narrower intelligence range (see Irwing, 2013). This means there are more very stupid males, but also more super-intelligent males, which is likely why most scientific geniuses have been male (see Dutton & Charlton, 2015).

Equally, age is a good marker of intelligence and personality. People reach their intelligence peak in early middle age (see Kirasic, 1989). Throughout life they also become more Conscientious, less Neurotic, and more Agreeable (apart from a dip during their teens) (Soto et al., 2011). Clearly, age can be reasonably well inferred from appearance…

* endomorphs were the most extraverted, ectomorphs were the most conscientious and neurotic, and mesomorphs were the least conscientious.

* if someone is obese it can be inferred that they have low intelligence, low Conscientiousness, and high Extraversion. If they are obviously intelligent – this can be reasonably inferred simply from vocabulary, for example – then their obesity is likely to be a function of personality. If they are not especially friendly or gregarious then poor impulse control is a pretty likely candidate. It follows that the person who is ‘slim’ or who has maintained a healthy weight is going to be relatively high in Conscientiousness, low in Extraversion and relatively high in intelligence.

From a personality web site: “Individuals high in extraversion on a career test have a tendency to seek out the company and stimulation of other people. They enjoy engaging with the external world. These individuals thrive on excitement, and are enthusiastic, action-oriented people. They like to be the center of attention in groups.

On the other side of the coin are introverts. These people have less exuberance and energy than extraverts. They are less involved in social activities, and tend to be quiet and keep to themselves. An introvert does not require the external stimulation that extraverts do.”

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on How to Judge People by What They Look Like