WP: Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism.

Gil Steinlauf is the senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington, D.C. He writes:

Adapted from a Rosh Hashanah sermon delivered at Adas Israel Congregation.

This summer, I had a conversation with a young woman about her Jewish identity. She told me how she grew up in a family that was very involved in her synagogue. She went to Jewish day school. She had been to Israel multiple times. But she felt very far from her Jewishness. She simply couldn’t find the relevance of Judaism as she was making her way on her own in the world. I asked her what she did feel passionate about. She told me she has been reading and thinking a lot about racial justice. What moved her was the #BlackLivesMatter movement — how, in light of Ferguson, Charleston and seemingly endless incidents of injustice against black people in our society, she felt a need to grapple with the racism that is so pervasive in this country and how it affects her identity.

“As a white woman,” she said, “as the product of so much white privilege, it makes me all the more angry to see how other white people so blindly and carelessly feed into the racial climate of our society.” “So the fact that you are white makes this issue all the more painful, all the more personal for you?” I asked. “Yes,” she said.

I certainly identified with her angst. I find the reality of American racism unbearable: the legacy of slavery; the institutional discrimination that is so pervasive; the scourge of mass incarceration of black Americans, with its collateral damage on families; the ongoing blight of housing segregation; the role of law enforcement in furthering racist systems and hierarchies; all this, and so much more. My answer to her, and my answer for all American Jews during these Days of Awe, is that finding our true Jewish identity can begin by questioning our whiteness.

In a flawed and racist society, we Jewish Americans are prospering, reaching the top echelons of privilege and power. With racism and injustice entrenched year after year, generation after generation, we must now ask ourselves: What role do we play in that injustice now that most of us live as white people in America? We must cease to consider ourselves to be part of the social construct of whiteness, despite all the white privilege that America affords us, privilege that eluded many of our parents and grandparents. Starting in this new year of 5776, we must teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.

The great blessing and promise of America to our ancestors was that it was a land of opportunity, where we are all recognized as equal, where nothing, not even the heavens, is beyond our reach. We all know that the saga of Jews in America is a stunning success story. Our success here is built on the efforts of the first generations of American Jews who struggled mightily to assimilate — to slough off the ways of the old country, to out-American the Americans. In many ways, today it’s difficult for us to appreciate how remarkable this success is.

Well into the 20th century, we Jews were barred from the whitest country clubs. We couldn’t buy houses in the whitest neighborhoods. Even today, some of us remember being called anti-Semitic names, having pennies thrown at us or being beaten up because we are Jewish. But that young woman I spoke with this summer, and most of her young adult Jewish peers today, can hardly fathom being singled out, being treated as “other,” because of their Jewishness. And the main reason why anti-Semitism is no longer mainstream in our society is because sometime in the last half century, we convinced America that we, too, are white.

All those years of singular focus on making it in America paid off! Our achievements in business, in medicine, in the arts, in government, in all circles of American life have resulted in success and security rarely known to our wandering ancestors. The history of my own synagogue in D.C., Adas Israel Congregation, mirrors the history of Jews in our country. Over a century ago, its founders dreamed of one day building what they referred to as a “great Cathedral synagogue” standing tall and proud in our nation’s capital, as powerful as the great American monuments of this city. By this spring, the president of the United States was visiting their congregation to give a speech and visit with preschool kids.

These days, the country clubs and exclusive neighborhoods are as Jewish as they are WASPy. Indeed, we Jewish people have been building a great, shining American tower, and we have just about reached the highest heavens. But in our own century, we are waking up to the fact that our astounding success in America is a Pyrrhic victory. Our own children and grandchildren, raised as white American children of privilege, have completely forgotten who built their place in society, or why their well-meaning ancestors so passionately endeavored to build it. Many no longer value their essential Jewishness in their worldviews or life plans. For most, the success built by American Jews is indistinguishable from general American white, privileged success. That young woman was right in noticing that most white Americans — Jewish, WASP or otherwise — can’t or don’t fully notice how people of color are trapped by racist structures of power. They can’t even identify how racism infuses all aspects of our lives, our choices and our expectations of themselves and others, despite good intentions.

You might think I’m not being entirely fair. Yes, most of us and our children are a part of white America now. But we know plenty of young Jewish Americans who are very proudly Jewish. Many are devoted to Israel, devoted to good causes; they fight racism and other injustices. But if we are going to take our American-ness and our Jewishness seriously, we must own all the ways that we have benefited from and continue to benefit from the worst elements of American racist culture.

I write about racism and Jewish identity not because we are not good people. I write about this because in recognizing race as central in American Jewish identity, we cannot only more effectively use our success in this country for good purposes, but we can return truly to the essence of what being Jewish in the world really means.

Our people have been known by many names over the centuries. Once, we were called Hebrews. In Hebrew, the word is “Ivri,” which translates as “the other” or “from somewhere else.” We were also called “B’nai Yisrael,” the Children of Israel. Yisra’el literally means “struggling with God.” We are to be the ones who struggle with ultimate issues of life, of values, of justice. Through the centuries, our moments of power have been all too fleeting. Mostly, our hope has been to be tolerated. From our place at the periphery, we have responded always with the ability to critique injustice, to adopt the cause of the oppressed, to envision a better and more just world. Even in times when we participated fully in non-Jewish societies, we always knew that we stood with one foot in the mainstream, and one foot outside.

America is unique in Jewish history because the social construct of power and oppression in this society came to be based more on skin color than on religion or ethnic identity. Because of that, along with the best of American values and our own hard work, we now find ourselves as another privileged white ethnicity. Despite our only good intentions, we are — all of us — full participants and beneficiaries of the American evil known as racism.

Jews will identify as white when it is to their advantage to do so. People respond to incentives. In America today, it helps to not identify as white. The core of America (whites) is under assault from the coalition of the fringe (blacks, Muslims, latinos, homos, trannies, Jews, etc). So Jews identify as an oppressed people of color.

In the South prior to the 1960s, Jews generally identified as white to fit in better.

If immigration to America was limited to whites, Jews who wanted to immigrate would argue that they were white.

The rabbi does not mention the negative attitude of the Jewish tradition toward blacks and how blacks in Israel have similar problems to blacks in America.

From the black website The Root:

A few days into an educational trip to Israel in 1991 shortly after the mass airlift of Ethiopian Jews into the country, my jaw dropped when a Jewish official casually described the arrival of the Ethiopians as an opportunity to beef up Israel’s Olympic running team.

More than two decades later, and it appears that probably didn’t work out. Israel now seems more anxious to give its sizable black African migrant population the boot. At the moment, the focus is much less on settled-in Ethiopian Jews and more so on Sudanese, Eritrean and Ethiopian Christians fleeing war, persecution and poverty at home. And, naturally, if you’re a poor African migrant looking for work, you’re headed to Israel, a top 40 country in terms of gross domestic product and the closest, most powerful, democratic, free market economy you can find within regional distance.

But now, turn back: because if you’re a black undocumented migrant, Israel is giving you 30 days to get gone. In a bid to put a humane face on it, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government is putting money where its racially charged mouth is. An estimated 45,000 Eritrean and Sudanese refugees not only get a free, no-return ticket back home (or to some “unnamed” African nation) but  also get sent with $3,500 in their pocket.

…The situation in Israel also appears equally complicated and racially challenged. Plans to push African migrants out of the Holy Land had been stirring for some time as Israel built new fences and detention centers along its southern borders. Netanyahu’s government claims it’s all about keeping black migrants safe from deadly desert crossings. But the U.N. refugee agency pushed back on that, accusing Israel of “creat[ing] fear and chaos amongst asylum seekers” and dangerously teetering on the edge of an international refugee-treaty violation…

Recent #BlackLivesMatter-style protests organized by Ethiopians in Tel Aviv underscore an embarrassing undercurrent of discrimination in a society popularly viewed as Jewish but racially as majority white. And with that comes familiar white-people-prompted problems. Israeli Ethiopians face challenges similar to those of African Americans in the United States: from high unemployment to police brutality and rampant incarceration.

Some critics, like black British filmmaker Ishmahil Blagrove, charge that the Israeli prison system is 90 percent black. Others, like Forward’s Seth Frantzman, point out that Israeli Defense Forces military-prison populations are 40 percent Ethiopian, or “760 percent higher than their proportion in society.” Israel, always in a state of war, mandates compulsory military service from its citizens.

There’s been a troubled history of Israel’s policies toward African migrants, including the treatment of once wildly embraced Ethiopian Jews who arrived by Operation Solomon in the early ’90s fleeing anti-Jewish persecution. Worries mount for Israel as its Jewish majority sweats a fast-growing non-Jewish Arab population and the presence of nearly 100,000 non-Jewish African migrants challenging the stability of the country’s relatively tiny population of 9 million.

Posted in Blacks, Jews, Race, Whites | Comments Off on WP: Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism.

MetroWeekly: Last fall, Rabbi Gil Steinlauf of Adas Israel Synagogue sent an email to his congregation. He told them he was gay. (And it was good.)

MetroWeekly: “I’m not going to go on record as saying Moses was gay.”

Rabbi Gil Steinlauf says this with a laugh — he laughs often and warmly, it turns out — but he’s also quite serious in response to a reporter’s offhand remark that Moses could be viewed as history’s first gay activist.

“But the story of Moses is a kind of coming out story,” Steinlauf says. “He grew up as a Prince of Egypt in the house of Pharaoh, completely in the center of power. Yet, he was nursed by his Israelite mother, so he knew that he had this secret identity. He lived in inner-conflict over those two worlds, those two identities of himself, until he finally came to a head when he killed an Egyptian who was oppressing an Israelite, and ran away. He tried to hide until God called him back. And then he spoke on behalf of his people.

“So I always make the argument that Moses has a kind of queer coming-out parallel in his life story, and that’s a fundamental motivational factor for his ability to recognize the suffering of his people and to stand up to Pharaoh, because of his ability to overcome his own limitations and insecurities and his shame of who he was.”

The same could be said for Rabbi Steinlauf who, in an act of courage last October, sent an email to his congregation of more than 1,500 families at Adas Israel, the storied Conservative synagogue that presides over the Cleveland Park neighborhood of Washington, D.C., and includes Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elana Kagan among its worshipers. In the email, Steinlauf informed his congregation that he, in fact, was gay and that he and his wife of 20 years, Batya, with whom he has three teenage children, would be divorcing.

Posted in Homosexuality | Comments Off on MetroWeekly: Last fall, Rabbi Gil Steinlauf of Adas Israel Synagogue sent an email to his congregation. He told them he was gay. (And it was good.)

Brazilian Ethics

This type of behavior is why Brazil is such a basketcase.

New York Times:

Winning ugly is different from winning illegally. The first you can get away with, while the second should not be allowed at all.

England’s Football Association did the logical thing to Chelsea’s Diego Costa after his sneaky aggression against Arsenal over the weekend: It charged him with violent conduct. Costa, a Brazilian-born center forward, could face a three-game suspension if he is found guilty, and it would not be the first, or probably last, punishment of a player who revels in his from-the-streets background and whose game reflects a win-at-all-costs attitude.

…“Everyone knows Diego,” Zouma said on beIN Sports TV. “And this guy likes to cheat a lot and put the opponents out of his game, and that happened in the game. He’s a real nice guy in the life, and we are very proud to have him.”

…Apparently unseen by the referee Mike Dean, Costa first went after Arsenal defender Laurent Koscielny, pushing hands into the nose and mouth of the French defender. Then Costa, with his back to Koscielny, raked his left hand across the Arsenal player’s forehead.

In close-ups, the aggression looks even worse, with Costa appearing to gouge Koscielny’s face. After the two players squared off and Costa bumped his chest into Koscielny’s, Arsenal’s other central defender, Gabriel, became involved.

Posted in Brazil | Comments Off on Brazilian Ethics

Australia’s New Prime Minister

Mark Steyn writes:

Tony Abbott is – was – more to my taste ideologically. He’s a monarchist, a social conservative, the man who repealed Australia’s disastrous carbon tax. But he was not an effective executive or parliamentarian or shifter of public opinion – and, partly as a result, he let me down badly on one of my two core issues: freedom of speech.

Malcolm Turnbull is far less to my taste ideologically. He’s a republican, in favor of gay marriage, who’s hot for all the climate-change hooey and supported that ghastly carbon tax. He’s also a little thin-skinned – to the point where he walked out of one of my speeches. Not over anything I said, alas. He never got that far. He took umbrage at something Nick Minchin, Australian Senate leader and Finance Minister, said during his introduction of me: Nick and Malcolm were on opposite sides during the monarchy referendum, and so Turnbull flounced out in what, for a republican, was a very queeny huff.

That said, I find him one of the most serious and thoughtful politicians on the other of my core issues: demography. We sat next to each other at a conference a few years back. It was alphabetical – so S for Steyn, T for Turnbull; on my other side, I had R for Kevin Rudd, the previously ousted Prime Minister. We had little plates of snacky-type stuff and, every time I turned to talk to Turnbull, Rudd’s hand crept over and snaffled my nibbles. Anyway, Turnbull, like me, is a serious demographic junkie, and he spent much of the afternoon passing me various napkin doodles of inverted pyramids showing projected population declines for different fertility rates. Compared to most politicians around the west, he was almost uniquely well-informed on the subject.

So I wish him well, and I assume he has learned the lesson of his last, failed stint as leader, which led to Tony Abbott deposing him. Now he has deposed Abbott, a decent bloke but one who seemed never quite to grasp that a leader has to lead. In the end, the issue was his competence rather than his conservatism.

Posted in Australia | Comments Off on Australia’s New Prime Minister

How Do We Resist Illegal Immigrants

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* 1. We start by saying that we will never return someone who has fled for their life from their home country to their home country. It would be inhumane.
2. We make an agreement with a country such as North Korea or the Democratic Republic of Congo, or Sudan to take the refugees. They will be paid $1000 for every year that the refugee remains in the country.
3. Every refugee who arrives will have their application automatically accepted and be immediately shipped to the country from step 2.
4. If any refugee has troubles leaving their country of refuge, we will file protests through official channels with the country from step 2 while holding firmly to our no bribery policy.

* What I hear is Australia is becoming Asian very fast via legal immigration. Asians from India, China, Burma, Thailand, Vietnam, every place in Asia but not as many from Muslim nations such as Afghanistan. Most have to pass skills tests? English proficiency? The best thing than can be said is that Australia is allowing in educated Asians while we are the dumping ground for Mexico, Central America and the 3rd world.

I read some Australian propaganda that they must allow in so many Asians to keep ahead technologically. A very high number of Chinese go to university there (similar to the American situation) and how many will return home?

* In Australia there is a large, influential and very noisy leftist minority who are adamantly opposed to the current successful policy that has entirely stopped “irregular maritime arrivals” (to use the official phrase).

The new Prime Minister (Turnbull) tends to share the views of that minority, at least on social issues, notwithstanding he is in (and now leads) a centre-right party (called the Liberal Party, just to confuse our American friends).

Turnbull would most likely restore the status quo ante if he had enough freedom to do so, but he would risk an immediate and violent backlash from his party – and from the majority of the electorate – if he tried it. My money is on his self-interest trumping his heartfelt wish to show all his friends at Eastern Suburbs (of Sydney) dinner parties what a goodwhite he is.

* We have roughly a century of stockpiled firepower, and defense comes down to being willing to use that. A wall or fence is no good if we won’t defend it, the law meaningless if we won’t enforce it. If instead our people are really determined to give their nation away, it really doesn’t matter what the plans are for that. I suppose education about the camp of the saints, and demographics and what they really mean would prove useful, but that is too racist to work.

* The system understands only one language – violence. The rioters of Ferguson were correct and their critics are victims. If you meekly allow yourselves to be robbed, well then you’re going to be robbed. This is the iron way of the world and always has been. Modern justice and democracy are shams that conceal that reality. Any white who doesn’t regard liberals in the same way that inmates in Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia regarded their camp guards is a cuck.

* There’s nothing “subtle” about Camp of the Saints flash mobs, so the prophylactic against them cannot be subtle, so it must be absolute: Zero Tolerance. What’s needed is a fifty years long total ban on all immigration.

Bear in mind that no disincentive can work until the sacred cow of Multiculturalism-Diversity as the All-Highest Good will have been exposed, slain, butchered, and incinerated to ashes.

* Americans need to stop being so damn welcoming and friendly to migrants. Some few will genuinely appreciate it and respond in kind. Most will regard it as what it is–a kindness that so readily shades off into weakness. Just altering one’s demeanor, smiling less often and less widely, making less effort to understand mangled English, making no effort to understand any other language–these all have a cooling effect on foreigners. Even the illiterate ones have gotten the memo–Americans are suckers. No need to be rude but any glad-handing should be avoided. NAMS are especially thin-skinned. They also tend to be bullies and you can almost always bully a bully. Formal and not friendly tends to cause them to back away, if not down completely. Migrants who don’t feel welcome are far less likely to tell their families back home to “Come on in, the water’s fine!”

I base these suggestions on my years spent interacting daily with foreigners from all over the world while living in a college town.

* 1. Elect Trump. In the meantime, make it clear to the world that you support Trump. He is hard line, everyone knows it, and he can move the Overton Window.

2. As others have suggested, set a concrete limit on the total number of immigrants that will be allowed into the US per year. Make it known that “migrants” and “refugees” will count as part of that number, thus reducing visas and opportunities for everyone else’s favorite race or interest group.

3. Also as others have suggested, establish one finite budget for assistance to both migrants and Americans. Make it clear to everyone that migrants will be taking from this budget, thus reducing benefits for every other moocher here.

I can imagine points 2 and 3 as parts of a Trump position statement on his website.

4. Set up a processing area somewhere like northern Alaska. It’s cold up there, and all these scumbags who want to invade European Man’s living space come from warm latitudes (big surprise). Let the world and social media know that we have this place ready, and that everyone will be stuck there for a long time while we inefficiently clear them.

5. Make sure they know that a lot of them will be permanently located up there somewhere, where we can say they will have the opportunity to work and make their homes — in northern Alaska, or North Dakota, or the most remote areas of Wyoming (cold and windy.)

6. (Most subtle and tricky of all) subversively facilitate a healthy dislike for the migrant group and it’s ethnicities. I somehow believe smarter people than me can find ways of making this happen. Make it agitprop or psyop or something. It is perfectly okay not to like people. Let’s start now. Get your Hollywood friends to make them villians in movies and TV shows. Produce Borat 2 and make him a terrorist.

7. Publicize images of the mass of “migrants” as they truly are: aggressive mobs of men. STOP PUTTING BABY PICTURES ON EVERY STORY.

* You’d have to act through civil disobedience–violent acts can be easily targeted by the FBI (and rightly so, violence is violence), but clerks refusing to endorse in-state tuition for illegals a la Kim Davis, massive protests and boycotts against employers using illegal labor, and any other ideas I am not clever enough to come up with. Even if they don’t want to enforce immigration violations, if you deluge DHS with (true!) reports of illegal activity someone else can ask why they have all these reports of illegal activity they’re ignoring, and run an expose. Don’t talk about what you would do if you had the levers of power you don’t have (PSAs, building walls, etc.–a wall would work but it will never be built). Work with the levers of power you do. It’s what the Tea Party does.

I saw Gamergate make the feminists blink. Many Americans from both parties are on our side. Let’s see what we can do.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on How Do We Resist Illegal Immigrants

Scott Walker’s Wife Is 12 Years Older

Comment: “I learned that Scott Walker is married to an older woman. A MUCH older woman. His wife, “Tonette”, is a certifiable old hag. He married her when he was 26, she was 38. What a pitiable man he is. When you’re 26, you can bang a 38 on a lark and laugh about it with your buddies the next day, but you don’t marry it.

When I saw her picture, any shred of respect I had for the governor immediately evaporated.

He’s a first-rate loser.”

* “I hear your wife is a lovely woman.”
Did anyone else pick up on how subtly Trump called Jeb’s wife a whore? The man is slick…

Posted in Politics | Comments Off on Scott Walker’s Wife Is 12 Years Older

Girly Boys At National Review Upset With Ann Coulter

David French writes: In condemning pandering, Coulter is using language that appeals to a microscopic slice of the Twitterverse that is obsessed with the notion that the GOP is full of so-called “cuckservatives” (short for “cuckolded conservative”). Who is a cuckservative? Someone like this:

The cuckservative feels very passionate about issues like abortion, which rarely directly affects his own life. In fact, you might often hear a cuckservative talking about how abortion is “racist” since blacks and mestizos overwhelmingly get more abortions that whites.

On the other hand, the cuckservative feels uncomfortable about issues like immigration. If the cuckservative is not an outright open-borders shill, he will only give lip service about “securing the border” or “opposing illegal but favoring legal immigration” but he will never talk about immigration very much. After all, immigration has very serious implications for Western Civilization, so it doesn’t concern the cuckservative.

And:

The cuckservative is often fanatically in favor of transracial adoption. He sees it as some divine calling. In a sense, this is cuckoldry at its essence, since these whites are usually forgoing their own inclusive fitness to adopt someone from another race. As Heartiste notes, they’re race-cucking their own families.

“Race-cucking their own families.” That’s next-level strange. Then there’s this:

The cuckservative, although never Jewish, often seems vicariously to live through Israel. Since the cuckservative feels that he cannot defend his own ethnic interests, he’ll defend Israel’s. The cuckservative cares more about Israel’s borders than his own. Israel adamantly defends its own ethnic interests and perhaps deep down the cuckservative respects this on some unconscious level.

So, what does Coulter tweet all night? Snide comments about GOP obsessions with abortion, insufficient attention to immigration (especially as compared to support for Israel’s border fence — a “cuckservative” world talking point), and obsession with Israel. In short, she’s pandering — pandering to a very small, very angry crowd that’s far more white nationalist than it is recognizably conservative.

Posted in Ann Coulter | Comments Off on Girly Boys At National Review Upset With Ann Coulter

DIVERSITY + PROXIMITY = WAR

From Chateau Heartiste: The latest liberal screech-out is high dudgeon over some prankster teenage muslim mud in Texas who brought a “””clock””” to school as a science project that looked suspiciously like a suitcase bomb, and his teacher justifiably freaked out and called the cops.

Status whoring badwhite-hating disingenuous shitsack liberals, of course, are springboarding off the incident to claim, for the umpteenth time, that racist White America keeps the mudman down, neglecting to mention while in thrall to their righteous indignation that White kids have been tossed out of school and hauled before court for, to wit, bringing in a pop tart bitten into the shape of a handgun.

America, fuck yeah!

Anyhow, as details have leaked past the Hivemind information bottleneck, it’s become apparent to anyone who isn’t a robotic, race creationsist leftoid that the kid was doing the bidding of his white-hating black muslim family. The “clock” was deliberately mocked-up to resemble a suitcase bomb and frighten White authorities, who would react in the appropriate way (and according to Texas law which explicitly forbids bringing objects to school that look like jihadi weapons of area-wide destruction).

The oh-so-innocent Ahmed’s darling parents are lined up behind him in faux outrage, delivering speeches to the media that sound like they were scripted by a team of Alinskyte shock-troop Eskimos.

An emailer adds to the evidence that this bomb/clock story is a giant middle mudfinger in the face of White America,

RE: Ahmed’s completely innocent homemade clock.

When I first heard about Ahmed, the kid who made the news for his “bomb” clock project, I took his side. I played with discrete electronics as a kid. I built breadboards, I soldered, and I experimented with early robotics… In this STEM obsessed educational system, why couldn’t the school officials quickly dismiss this scare as a science project? Why did this make the news? I just didn’t get it… and then I saw a picture of the clock.

From CNN: “A teenager with dreams of becoming an engineer, he wanted to show his teacher the digital clock he’d made from a pencil case.”

Anyone with an understanding of electronics will immediately see this “homemade clock” is not the tinkering of a child or teen. It was never Ahmed’s idea to begin with. This isn’t some innocent science project. The picture of the clock exposes the lie. Ahmed did not lovingly patch together IC chips and resistors, as the media would like you to believe. What you see is the guts from a manufactured digital clock, right down to the 9 volt memory backup, and the prefab button board. Absolutely nothing was made. It’s the equivalent of taking the plastic surround off of your TV and claiming you “made” a TV.

Look at the case itself. CNN calls it a “pencil case.” Please. The whole package is vaguely sinister, and it’s intentional. Notice the nondescript packet of unidentified white powder. See that nice dent in the side? I wonder if you could stash plastic explosives behind that huge LED. Why is the lining so bumpy? Look at the shoddy taping and the twisted wire used to close the case. It’s almost as if someone designed this clock to look like a questionable object.

Again, from CNN: “”I built a clock to impress my teacher but when I showed it to her, she thought it was a threat to her,” Ahmed told reporters Wednesday.” It was really sad that she took the wrong impression of it.””

Ahmed, you didn’t build a clock. You’re a pawn to your Dad’s political and social agenda. This is all a creation of your father. I’m sure he involved you in the process, and made you feel as though you were truly making something, but you didn’t. It’s a clock without its case. Everything in the “pencil case” was made in a factory. See, a legitimate electronics project full of diodes and resistors looks innocent. It usually runs off of a battery, not an exposed AC to DC transformer… speaking of science projects, Ahmed, why again did you bring this to class? Was it part of an assignment? Oh, you just wanted to impress your teacher with a clock you rearranged inside a small briefcase? Hmm…

From dallasnews.com: ““He fixed my phone, my car, my computer,” Mohamed Elhassan Mohamed said. “He is a very smart, brilliant kid.”

If he were so smart, he’d know the difference between creating a circuit and stripping the guts from a manufactured clock. His dad helped him “make” this, and dad helped to make this “project” look as questionable as possible, within the realm of plausible deniability.

The dad is a politician. He made this happen. Whatever agenda he’s advancing, it just further demonizes western society, and reminds us all to be guilty for how racist we all are. Maybe that’s the agenda.

It’s propaganda.

Posted in Diversity | Comments Off on DIVERSITY + PROXIMITY = WAR

How Deep Is The Poz?

From Chateau Heartiste: For new readers: “poz” is shorthand for the propagation of culture degeneracy, filth, freakishness, and antipathy toward normal, psychologically healthy humans. The epithet is retrofitted from its original use in the gayfag “bug chaser” sewer, where poz is a term of endearment for HIV positive gay men.

The poz is everywhere in America, but just how deep does it go? We turn our attention to the top five films hailed as “masterpieces” at this year’s Toronto International Film Festival. Synopses of each movie follow.

The Danish Girl – Set in the 1920s, a M2F tranny freak lops off his penis to become a woman. His wife supports him and takes photos of him in erotic poses.

About Ray – Three generations of single moms, bitchy lesbians, and proud sluts create a huge cunty hug box to help guide a F2M tranny freak teen girl through her testosterone therapy and tit chopping surgery.

Freeheld – Brave lesbian cop, compassionate gay rights activist, homophobic county officials, transformations, and payment transfers.

Truth – Historical revisionism recasting Dan Rather as noble truth-teller instead of as the lying, pathologically partisan shitlib in self-denial that he is and always will be.

Spotlight – Hagiography of Boston Globe shitlib journos who reported on child abuse scandal in the Catholic Church. Not mentioned: over-representation of homosexual deviance in the ranks of the priesthood, Bryan Singer’s Hollywood boylove pool parties.

To answer this post title’s question: The poz goes very, very deep. If your girlfriend asks you to accompany her to one of these fruity, implicitly (and sometimes blatantly) anti-straight white man flics, tell her no way. If she insists, tell her you think less of her for wanting to indulge this garbage.

Posted in Homosexuality, Trans | Comments Off on How Deep Is The Poz?

After Diversity

From Chateau Heartiste: Diversity™ erodes the nation-state through invidious psy op mechanisms. You are soothed into a comfort bubble of warm altruistic feels, and then one day you wake up to find yourself robbed blind and left in the street half-naked, with no home to go to for respite from the storm.

Posted in Diversity | Comments Off on After Diversity