November 3, 2015 Israel Restores Nationalism Luke Ford No sacred cows.

Israel Restores Nationalism

Posted on November 3, 2015 by Luke Ford

As I have mentioned before (at least eight years before), Israel will lead the way in restoring Nationalism, which is a world order where boundaries are defined by the simultaneous shared ethnicity, culture, and values of a population.

Now to the dismay of liberals everywhere, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has formalized that statement. In a brilliant act of statecraft that flew over the heads of mainstream media, Netanyahu both re-legalized the defense of an indigenous ethnic majority by a state, and announced his plans for Palestine:

Mr. Netanyahu said in a speech to the Zionist Congress on Tuesday night that “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews.” The prime minister said that the mufti, Haj Amin al-Husseini, had protested to Hitler that “they’ll all come here,” referring to Palestine.

“So what should I do with them?” Mr. Netanyahu quoted Hitler as asking Mr. Husseini. “He said, ‘Burn them.'”

While Holocaust historians and revisionists — neither of whom have a good record of getting the truth right the first time — will debate this into the ground, Netanyahu’s statement was subtle and profound. He looked carefully at the camera as he spoke the words clearly and strongly, aware that he was making history — even if the rest of the media and pundits have not caught on. Here are the implications of what he said:

(1) If you merely want to expel a foreign population, that is not really a bad thing, if you are doing it to defend your own people.
(2) Nationalism is necessary. It was necessary for Germany, and now it is necessary for Israel. It is the only way to preserve a native population.
(3) Palestine has been the darling of Europe both in the 1930s and in the present day, and both times have led to disastrous results.

The American media missed all of these implications in their desire to fight the last World War over again, mainly because it allows them to dog whistle the civil rights conformity signal to their audience, which unites them in a buzzing hive-mind.

Germany, in accordance with the ways of democracy, which is essentially a popularity contest, tried to take the lead in the narrative by immediately embarking on a guilt-drenched retrospective. Europeans have long known that there is no such thing as bad publicity and so a public self-flagellation gains power more than a denial. In democracy, it’s important to stay in the spotlight by any means necessary…

Netanyahu realizes that Europe today, Israel today, Germany in the 1930s, and Israel in Biblical times share a problem: being small, higher-IQ and thus wealthier societies beset by vast hordes of angry, low-IQ, and impoverished third world people. The Palestinians, who are essentially the Mexican indios of the Middle East, consistently outbreed Jews and are using the womb as a strategy for conquest of Israel through the power of democracy. No sane politician — no leader — would allow that to happen to his people.

Israel needs the right to do what it was formed to do, which was to protect the Jewish people against not just Nazi-inspired murders — most of which happened in advance of the actual Nazis arriving — but the numerous pogroms that saw the Jewish people ejected from every country in Europe and the Middle East as well as some in Asia. This requires Nationalism, which is the exact same political system which was demonized in the wake of WWII.

Comments:

* Israel offers up a really good blueprint for us to follow in the West. No, it’s not entirely the same. Jews are different people than us. Still, they have created a sort of “Archeo-Futurist” template that we should study. Whatever you want to say about him, Bibi is a strong leader and certainly not a “cuck”!

* Israeli-style nationalism (indigenist ethnarchism) is a rough blueprint that is incredibly viable for many European and Asian countries, and many of the values present (revival of ancient culture, fierce anti-colonialism) would be highly beneficial to white countries in their current states.

* Whatever you want to say about him, Idi Amin is a strong leader and certainly not a “cuck”!

Whatever you want to say about him, Robert Mugabe is a strong leader and certainly not a “cuck”!

Whatever you want to say about him, Nelson Mandela is a strong leader and certainly not a “cuck”!

* Pray tell, what “hordes of angry, low-IQ, and impoverished third world people” were ‘besetting’ Germany in the 1930’s? Ashkenazi Jews? Um, news flash – the Ashkenazim outperform Germans on IQ tests (read books like “The Bell Curve” by Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray plus “IQ and Global Inequality” by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen for proof).

You cannot compare what’s happening to Europe today (Germany included) with what happened to Germany in the 1930’s, though I know you’ll never stop trying. National Socialism was NOT nationalism! Rather, it was super-nationalism that masked itself as nationalism to woo over the German electorate. I seriously doubt the war-weary Germans of 1933 would have voted for the Nazis had they known about Hitler’s territorial ambitions in Eastern Europe. Hitler knew this as well, which is why he was quick to impose totalitarian rule shortly after he came to power.

I was involved in the White Nationalist movement years ago, until I got a belly full of it and left. I’ve yet to meet a WN (of Northern European extraction) who at heart isn’t a Nazi or Nazi sympathizer. Most of them also seem to think Adolf Hitler was the Second Coming. These idiots would then wonder why almost no one wanted to have anything to do with them.

Adolf Hitler, in addition to being a genocidal and democidal sociopath, single-handedly wrecked both European ethno-nationalist movements and the Eugenics movement. For that he can burn in Hell, and so can anyone who kisses his coat tails. You WN’s will just never get it. You’ll never go anywhere until you get over this love affair you have with a failed tyrant.

* The majority in the WN movement are aware that Hitler was not a White nationalist. he was a German nationalist and that he waged aggressive territorial German ethno-chauvanism which lead to the deaths of millions of White people. He didn’t know when to stop.
On the other hand one doesn’t have to be a full blow Hitlerist to be demonised as a “racist, fascist, bigoted, White supremacist, hate mongering Nazi.” You just have to be a White identitarian who believes we have the right to our own homelands and to live amongst our own kind and are under no moral obligation to hand over our lands, heritage and identities to competing alien peoples and cultures. So our enemies, the anti-Whites have evolved a kind of heads they win, tails we lose, Catch22, closed loop argument. The dice are loaded, the game is rigged and the fight is fixed.

* The crisis of 30s Germany had more to do with economic collapse and socialist agitation than it did with foreign invasion. Frankly, I’m not sure the German people ever really accepted Nazism. Hitler got into power more by parliamentary maneuvering than by popular acclaim. He stayed in power by offering a semblance of order and revenge for the defeat of WWI, which was what Germans really wanted. Everything else was peripheral.

* An interesting article, but one that avoids the inconvenient facts of leftist and jewish strategic goals. Both are presently winning the war to destroy the White race and European culture, even if they sit back and do nothing more the biological momentum is such that we will be overwhelmed within 20 years. The only way for us to survive is to somehow, probably an impossibility, achieve political power and start the process of massive repatriation and resettlement. No half measures will be tolerated, the bleeding hearts and the churches can squark all they like.
If Netanyahu wants to tell the world about his nationalist program, fine, we wish him well, but can anyone honestly believe the beltway elites are going to follow his lead! The elites circles in politics, business, and academia wouldn’t piss on ordinary White people if we were on fire. The noble burden has fallen on our shoulders, let’s clean up this mess our way, ourselves alone.

* Hungary is leading the restoration of nationalism within European Christian civilization, as Kevin MacDonald correctly predicted, while Israel, through its AIPAC henchmen in the USA such as Paul Singer, Sheldon Adelson, Haim Shaban etc. and their puppets, caused the refugee crisis by destroying Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Syria and Yemen (and Iran and Russia next?), which in turn provided a pretext for an invasion of welfare-seeking economic migrants – and all these gung-ho, Israel supporting war mongers in the Jewish diaspora are also the biggest supporters of open borders for White countries.

Netanyahu’s remark may help slow down the current surge of migrant invasion, by making the Germans feel a little less guilty and a little more wary of Muslim immigrants. Very well, this particular remark was good for Whites, but is there any evidence that Netanyahu sees us as anything other than cattle to be bilked of our blood and treasure for the good of the Jews, to be preserved only to the extent necessary to serve Jewish interests? If not, why has he never called off the dogs and told his powerful admirers in the diaspora to stop supporting open borders and stop supporting wars which, while providing slight benefits to Israel, cause immense damage to Middle Eastern Christians and to European peoples?

I say we should take Brett Steven’s advice and expel, if not from our nations then at least from our pro-White publications and organizations, those Jews whose only contribution seems to be incessant attempts to distract attention from, and make excuses for, the anti-White malice of diaspora Jewish elites.

If they were truly on our side they would use their Jewish privilege to undertake direct actions which, while necessary, would be counter-productive if undertaken by White men. Every people needs to take out its own trash. Von Stauffenberg understood this.

Posted in Israel, Nationalism | Comments Off

It’s Never OK To Marry A Wanker

Posted on November 3, 2015 by Luke Ford

Posted in Marriage | Comments Off

Drugs, Realism & The Jews

Posted on November 3, 2015 by Luke Ford

The more powerful the individual, group or state, the more care outsiders will take with you. For instance, criticism of Jews will often end your career in America (just ask Rick Sanchez, Gregg Easterbrook) because of Jewish power.

As blacks rose in power in America during the 1960s, they increasingly replaced Jews from leadership positions in civil rights. As blacks gained, Jews lost.

As the Jewish population of America declined from 3% to 1.7%, the Jewish vote mattered less.

The higher the percentage of Jews in Israel, and the more Jewishly committed these Jews, the more powerful and secure Israel is.

Those who argue that America should assist China’s economic growth are advocating that America assist China with its billion plus people to become much more powerful than America.

I have an instinctive bias in favor of meritocracy and the free market but I want to be open about the consequences of this. Over the past couple of years, I’ve come to see at times higher values than capitalism, such as nationalism.

In a free market in baseball, the New York Yankees, the Los Angeles Dodgers and other big market teams would dominate, so Major League Baseball instituted revenue sharing to even the playing field.

This year, I watched all episodes of the Colombian miniseries on drug kingpin Pablo Escobar. I was fascinated by his story. I’ve always hated drugs but watching this series helped me to see things from the Colombian perspective. If they could make lots of money manufacturing and selling drugs to North America, why not? Why should they be expected to care about the welfare of North Americans? Do Americans care about the welfare of Colombians?

In the series, I watched many honorable people in Colombia who opposed the drug trade get slaughtered, and I started to think if there sacrifice was worth it. Why would an ordinary Colombian who was not a saint turn down an opportunity to create a better life for himself and his family? It suddenly made sense to me why Colombia, Mexico and company became narco states and it ceased making sense to me why so much domestic effort was put in these countries to reducing the narcotics trade.

I don’t expect people to be saints. I expect people to act in their self interest. So what was the self-interest of those who’ve fought the narcos in Colombia, Mexico etc?

Over the past couple of months, I’ve listened to many lectures on offensive realism by John J. Mearsheimer. He makes the obvious point that the richer a state gets, the more power it has to threaten other states. So I start thinking about the drug gangs. If they were not fought, they would increasingly take over their countries. With wealth comes power. So perhaps Colombians and Mexicans have had a strong incentive to fight the narco trade.

Then I started thinking about Jews. Ashkenazi Jews have an average IQ of around 108-120 while whites have an average IQ of about 100, East Asians of 105, American hispanics of 90 and African-Americans of 85. In a free market, Jews are going to dominate. Superior verbal IQ, in particular, will help Jews to dominate the media.

I don’t expect people to be saints. I expect individuals and groups to act in their self-interest. So as Jews rise in power, they are going to support policies that are good for Jews. This may not always be in interests of the natives and hence there’s going to be a reaction, which is generally called “anti-Semitism.”

With wealth and power, comes increased sexual access. I don’t expect Jews, or any group, to be saints, so some Jews will inevitably use their wealth and power to have sexual access to non-Jews. Most groups don’t like it when outsiders have sex with their women. So there’s going to be more conflict.

If drug traffickers are given a free hand to peddle their product, they are going to make tons of money, accumulate power and lots of sex.

If smart people are given a free market, they’re going to make lots of money, accumulate power, and have lots of sex.

Is the free market, then, always in the best interests of a nation? Or should it erect discrimination in favor of its majority?

The diaspora Chinese are known as the Jews of Asia because they are inevitably smarter and harder working than the natives and accumulate greater wealth and education.

My Ashkenazi friends from Australia generally regard Australians as dumb, racist, bigoted, mouth-breathing drunks who are lousy in business. My gentile Australian friends who know Jews in real life tend to regard them as elitists who lack mateship. About the only Australians who are anti-Semitic are those Aussie who encounter Jews in real life (particularly Sydney and Melbourne).

Australians have traditionally had one culture, and so the majority feels easy kinship while those who stick out, such as Orthodox Jews and Seventh-Day Adventists, are often hated. In multi-cultural America, by contrast, minority groups have an easier time and the majority is often uncomfortable.

In a free market, a minority who does not strongly identify with the majority population, is going to be more likely to peddle destructive things such as drugs, gangster rap, pornography, and the like. Crime rarely happens according to a race’s exact demographic percentage of the general population. Certain groups tend to dominate certain crimes. In the West today, however, it is usually considered impolite to point that out. Whose interests does that serve?

If Jews occupy themselves with Torah, Torah observance and a way of doing business that does not compete with non-Jews, perhaps they will be less likely to be hated by non-Jews.

Jews tend to be smart, educated, cohesive and hard-working. I’ve rarely thought of that as posing a threat to non-Jews. It seemed like a gift diaspora Jews were bringing their gentile countries. Jews were serving as a light unto the nations. Now I’m struggling with difficult questions. I’m starting to think that the rise of the Jews creates a reaction that is often fatal for Jews.

Brett Stevens writes:

Diversity does not work simply because it destroys culture by destroying standards. When you have two or more groups, standards differ, and thus an “official” Government standard must be created that includes both, which prevents each group from establishing its own cultural mores and values. This creates a Balkanization effect where each group withdraws, which prompts liberal democratic Government to try to force them to merge, resulting in genocide by the outbreeding of both.
But diversity doubly fails when it attempts third-world integration into the first world. It takes a population which is genetically predisposed to certain behaviors, and introduces a new population which is genetically hardwired for the exact opposite. This forces the first-world natives to become caretakers for the newcomers, exhausting themselves and turning their society into a battleground for the symbolic victory of diversity.
Netanyahu has had extensive experience with the Palestinians, who as a mixed-race population (Caucasian, Asian, and some North African) of third-world status have its typical traits: low IQ (in the low 90s), a lack of long-term planning ability, r-strategic reproduction, unruly social behavior requiring rule by warlords, and a tendency to blame first-world populations for their endemic poverty, disorder, crime, corruption, poor hygiene, and impulsiveness. With Palestinians within its borders, Israel can never properly exist, and it cannot protect the Jewish people who share a culture, languages, heritage/ethnicity, and religion.

Posted in Australia, China, Drugs, Jews, Nationalism | Comments Off

SPLC: Willis Carto, Longtime Anti-Semite and Holocaust Denier, Dies Aged 89

Posted on November 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

From a Jewish perspective, Willis Cato was a horrible man. I don’t know much about him, but he strikes me as a white nationalist, and hence a hero for his people.

From a Jewish and Western perspective, Osama Bin Laden was evil, but I can understand why many Muslims regard him as heroic.

Different groups have different interests and are engaged in a struggle to the death for scarce resources. What is good for whites is often bad for Jews, and what is good for Jews is often bad for whites. What is good for Jews and Christians is often horrible for Muslims and vice versa.

From SPLC: Willis Carto, founder of several radical right publications and organizations and a major American promoter of Holocaust denial, has passed away according to white nationalist reports.

According to reports from white nationalists, Willis Carto, a man active on the radical right for more than 60 years, has died, aged 89. Carto was one of the most active and influential white nationalists of the past century and leaves behind a legacy of vile racial hatred, especially towards Jews. He heavily influenced a number of racists who were active in the latter part of the twentieth century, such as Klansman turned-politician David Duke and William Pierce, founder of the National Alliance, at one-time the most dangerous and best organized neo-Nazi organization in America.

Carto devoted most of his early activism on the radical right to promoting the work of his predecessor, Francis Parker Yockey, a white nationalist ideologue who in his 600-page book Imperium pitched an upbeat message to beleaguered fascists, urging them to engage in a “world-historical struggle” and arguing that the fall of the Third Reich was merely a temporary setback that paved the way for a future triumph.

Carto founded the first major American Holocaust-denial outfit, the Institute for Historical Review (IHR), a group still active today despite the fact that Carto lost control of the group some two decades ago. In fact, Carto was one of the first American writers to deny the Holocaust in print, writing “‘Gas-chambers’ that did not exist were photographed, and a ‘gasmobile’ was invented to titillate the mechanically-minded.” Before founding IHR, Carto created the Liberty Lobby in the 1950s, an outfit that billed itself as a conservative, anti-Communist group. Liberty Lobby eventually became known for its advocacy of both white supremacy and anti-Semitism.

In the 1960s, Carto supported Alabama Governor George Wallace during his 1968 presidential bid. Carto co-authored a pamphlet headlined “Stand Up For America: The Story of George C. Wallace,” lauding the candidate as the only one capable of beating back “Blacky” and the Communist-dominated federal government. Carto’s Liberty Lobby mailed 175,000 copies to its subscribers and printed an additional 150,000 copies that were provided to the Wallace campaign for distribution.

In 1978, Carto started his most well known enterprise, IHR (under a parent organization called the Legion for the Survival of Freedom). IHR presented itself as a legitimate historical research group, devoted to “revisionism” — a term hijacked from a school of credible historians who offered new interpretations for the origins of World War I. In fact, the new organization was made up of white supremacists and Nazi sympathizers, and it would draw expertise from the like-minded from around the world. Its mission was to erase the Holocaust by any means at its disposal — including distortion, misquotation and outright falsification.

In 1984, Carto helped to found the far right Populist Party, which soon became a haven for white supremacists and other racial extremists. David Duke, the former Ku Klux Klan leader, captured the party’s presidential nomination in 1988, winning 0.05% of the national vote; in 1992, Bo Gritz, the former Green Beret and militia enthusiast, headed the party’s ticket, grabbing 0.1%, twice the amount that Duke had received.

Carto’s uncanny ability to find himself embroiled in legal battles also made him an extremely divisive figure on the radical right. He eventually lost control of both Liberty Lobby and IHR following a series of lawsuits brought against him by others in leadership roles in both organizations who accursed Carto of fraud and financial mismanagement.

In the early 2000s, Carto formed the anti-Semitic newspaper American Free Press (AFP) out of the ashes of Liberty Lobby’s Spotlight publication, as well as The Barnes Review (TBR), which has developed into America’s leading Holocaust-denial publication. Due to old age, Carto’s role with both publications diminished in recent years. In 2013, however, he attended and addressed an AFP event in Austin, Texas, featuring a number of other Holocaust deniers and anti-Semites such as Austin-based Texe Marrs.

AFP has suffered the loss of a number of its writers in the past few years. In 2013, Jim Tucker, known for his prolific writings on the Bilderberg Group, an annual gathering of world elites, died at age 78. In 2014, former Congressman Jim Traficant, a racist conspiracy theorist and AFP contributor, died in a farming accident. Earlier this year, another AFP stalwart, Michael Collins Piper also passed away.

Posted in Nationalism | Comments Off

What Is Nationalism?

Posted on November 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

John J. Mearsheimer says: “What is Zionism? It is Jewish nationalism. It is Jews in Europe moving to Palestine and getting a state of their own. Palestinians are interested in getting a state of their own.”

“In a world where nationalism is the most powerful ideology, the state is not going away… What you see today is a planet populated by states… The evolution of the political order since 1500 has been about the rise of the state.”

“What about states coming together? It’s not going to happen. Nationalism is a particularistic ideology. It privileges one’s own group. There’s little interest in a marriage with the other. In most cases, there’s an interest in divorce. Look at the former Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Soviet Union. We are going to live in an anarchic world dominated by states.”

Why would the US facilitate the rise of China?

“I have a number of liberal friends who want to get China hooked on global capitalism and help China get richer and richer… From a realist perspective, this horrifies me… Why would I help facilitate the creation of a very powerful state, a state capable of becoming much more powerful than the United States when I can’t be sure what its intentions will be? There’s no way anyone can assure me that China will have benevolent intentions.”

“If we had to rerun history, it was 1919, what do you do with Germany? Most of my liberal friends would say we should not impose a Carthaginian peace. We should treat the Germans more nicely. My view is that you should break Germany up into eight pieces because you can’t be sure what its intentions will be. My liberal friends say that if you treat Germany nicely, Hitler wouldn’t come to power. Well, you didn’t need Hitler to start WWI. That I would allow Germany after WWI to become powerful again, it’s not the way I operate. I think it is important to make sure that you are more powerful than all of your neighbors because you can’t be sure of their intentions.”

“Though realists accept that war is politics by other means, realists are very reluctant to use military force. They are much more reluctant than liberals and neo-conservatives. Virtually all realists in the US opposed the Iraq War [of 2003]. Almost every important realist in the US opposed the Vietnam War before it happened (Kenneth Waltz, Hans Morgenthau, Walter Lipman, George Kennan, etc).”

“If realists ran foreign policy, we would have a more peaceful world.”

Posted in China, Germany, Nationalism | Comments Off

Paul Singer – A Mini George Soros In The Making

Posted on November 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* We have an up-and-coming Mini Soros getting involved in the Republican primary. Sources have stated that internationalist Paul Singer is the new billionaire benefactor for Marco Rubio. Breitbart.com has mentioned that Singer is an open borders activist, but I remember reading about Mr. Singer on The Occidental Observer a few months back. This man is much, much worse than simply an open borders activist. He is a Corporate Raider of nations. He destroyed Argentina’s economy and a number of African countries as well. He is the lowest of the low and people need to know it.

* Orban received a scholarship from Soros in his youth.

Soros is bad for every nation on earth. He does not discriminate against Europeans. Most ordinary Jews hate the guy. He helped the Third Reich, causes an economic crisis in Thailand and makes enemies everywhere he goes. Others mentioned above his well known anti-Israel activities.

He is an equal opportunity misery bearer.

* If Soros is hostile to Israel and to traditional/theological/religious Judaism and to the Likud-allied government, he and his family are certainly self-conscious of their Jewish identity and of the role of this people in the world qua a distinct people.

* The Open Society Foundations funds anti-Israel activism, pro-Palestinian causes, and participates (as much as possible) in the BDS boycott movement against Israel.

OSF is a primary funder of Human Rights Watch, whose Jewish president is monomaniacally obsessed with Israeli human rights violations.

I hate to break it to you guys, but this idea you all have that “the Jews” are all working together to destroy the rest of the world while preserving Israel is basically nonsense. The Left, Jewish and non-Jewish, doesn’t like Israel or any moderately well-off nation-state.

Posted in Immigration, Israel | Comments Off

This Vulture-Fund Billionaire Is the GOP’s Go-To Guy on Wall Street

Posted on November 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

From Mother Jones: When Republicans make their pilgrimages to Wall Street for money to help take back the Senate next year, there may be no hotter ticket than a party at Paul Singer’s. The 69-year-old hedge fund billionaire’s co-op apartment at the Beresford, a hulking Italian Renaissance building on Central Park West whose celebrity residents have included Jerry Seinfeld, Glenn Close, and Helen Gurley Brown, can draw scads of high-finance players. The haul for a dinner event has been known to run to $1.4 million, and Singer himself has no trouble writing a $1 million check to a super-PAC. He’s been described as a “fundraising terrorist” for his persistence in twisting arms, a skill that has helped drive a major strategic shift among Big Finance donors, who favored Obama in 2008 but now overwhelmingly back the GOP.

Singer has a professorial mien and close-cropped beard that give him a passing resemblance to Fed chairman Ben Bernanke. A hardline free-marketeer with political roots in the Barry Goldwater era, he despises the Obama administration’s push to tighten financial regulations. At a 2010 dinner for the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank whose board he chairs, he blasted “indiscriminate attacks by political leaders against anything that moves in the world of finance.” Singer’s $21 billion Elliott Management is one of many firms that face tougher oversight due to the 2010 Dodd-Frank law, the sweeping financial-services overhaul that he’d like to see repealed. Elliott has been called a “vulture fund” because a chunk of its profits comes from buying distressed companies’ or countries’ debt at a steep discount and then playing hardball—including, in one case, detaining the flagship of Argentina’s navy—to extract payment.

The trifecta of big checks, high-powered connections, and influence in GOP policy circles has made Singer a kind of triple threat. “Singer is the big power broker in the Republican financial world,” says one operative who knows him. “He’s involved with almost everything.” Fortune described him as “a passionate defender of the 1%.” In practical terms, notes one conservative donor, “if you write checks as big as Singer’s, you can be close to anyone.”

Posted in Republicans | Comments Off

MARCO RUBIO’S NEW BILLIONAIRE BACKER TOP FUNDER FOR OPEN BORDERS

Posted on November 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

From Breitbart: Hedge-fund billionaire Paul Singer’s decision to throw his financial weight behind the donor-class 2016 favorite, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)77%, has sparked fresh questions about Rubio’s coziness with the financial interests funding his career.

Singer was a major financial force behind the Rubio-Obama amnesty and immigration expansion push in 2013.

As Politico reported at the time, Singer “quietly go[t] involved in the fight for immigration reform, making a six-figure donation… to the National Immigration Forum”— a George Soros-backed organization that lobbied for Rubio’s legislation to issue 33 million green cards to foreign nationals in the span of a single decade. The announcement of Singer’s endorsement highlights an intra-party tension that has emerged with new strength since Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI)58%’s inauguration as Speaker of the House.

There is a growing chasm between the more than 9 in 10 GOP voters, who want to see future immigration rates cut, versus GOP donors that are desperately seeking to install leaders in the White House and Congress who will further expand the nation’s already record breaking immigration rates that are transforming the country’s economy and electorate.

Upon the announcement of the Singer’s decision, GOP frontrunner Donald Trump tweeted:

“I see Marco Rubio just landed another billionaire to give big money to his Superpac, which are total scams. Marco must address him as ‘SIR’!”

Even though Rubio’s donors stand to make an enormous profit from a surge of low-wage migrant labor, Rubio has repeatedly denied that his wealthy backers have influenced his agenda. “People buy into my agenda. I don’t buy into theirs,” Rubio has said.

However, a review of several of Rubio’s top donors reveals that many of them have benefited from the Floridian’s rise to power.

Perhaps one of the most widely-criticized areas of Rubio’s campaign pledge to create “A New American Economy” on migrant labor is his support for tripling the controversial H-1B visa program.

Throughout his brief time in Washington—noted primarily for pushing the La Raza and Obama-backed amnesty bill through the Senate—Rubio has co-authored two pieces of legislaton that would massively expand the wage-depressing H-1B visa program used to replace American workers in white-collar jobs. His most recent bill—known as I-Squared—would triple the number of H-1B visas imported into the United States despite the fact that the U.S. Census Bureau reports 3 in 4 Americans trained in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) are not employed in those fields. The Walt Disney Company used H-1Bs to lay off hundreds of American workers and forced them to train their low-wage foreign H-1B replacements. Disney’s CEO has endorsed Rubio’s I-Squared bill.

Trump, who has called on Disney to hire back all of Rubio’s laid-off constituents, thundered:

“Lobbyists write the rules to benefit the rich and powerful. They buy off Senators like Marco Rubio to help them get rich at the expense of working Americans by using H-1B visas–so called “high tech” visas–to replace American workers in all sorts of solid middle class jobs… Senator Rubio works for the lobbyists, not for Americans. That is why he is receiving more money from Silicon Valley than any other candidate in this race. He is their puppet.”

According to open-secrets, Goldman Sachs has been one of Rubio’s biggest financial boosters. Since 2011, Goldman Sachs was the top donor to Rubio’s campaign committee, contributing $53,200. Interestingly, Goldman Sachs is also among the top 50 corporate users of the H-1B visa, which labor experts call an “indentured servitude” program. According to USCIS data analyzed by Computerworld’s Patrick Thibodeau, Goldman Sachs is the ranked number 33 among the biggest users of the program.

Behind Goldman Sachs, Microsoft is the second largest contributor to Rubio’s campaign committee since 2011, donating $33,100. Similarly, Microsoft is the 12th biggest user of the H-1B program, having brought in 1,048 foreign workers on H-1Bs in 2013. Last year, Microsoft announced its plans to lay off 18,000 workers at the same time the company was lobbying to increase the H-1B program, prompting strong condemnation from U.S. Senator Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL)79%, a top opponent of Rubio’s H-1B expansion plan.

Morgan Stanley has also been one of Rubio’s top financial contributors— having donated $47,564 to Rubio throughout his career. Morgan Stanley is the ranked 66th among the biggest H-1B users.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off

Paul Singer & Anti-Semitism

Posted on November 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

Billionaire Paul Singer, who supports Marco Rubio, stands for gay rights, open borders for goyim and secure borders for Israel. He is the anti-thesis of a Torah Jew. He stands in open rebellion with the traditional Jewish way of life.

When Jews such as Paul Singer leave the Torah Corral, they sometimes make the world better and sometimes worse.

If Jews such as Paul Singer act in ways that hurt non-Jews, anti-Jewish feelings can only result.

Jews are sometimes weak and sometimes strong, depending on where they are in the world. In some spheres of the world, such as media and finance, Jews are strong and thus have the power to hurt non-Jews who will react with anti-Jewish feelings and behavior.

The world is composed of groups with clashing interests struggling to survive. It is in every group’s interest to become as strong as possible, but in this wrestle for supremacy, there is inevitably conflict.

When Jews invent financial instruments that help the world, the world and Jews benefit. When risky financial instruments pushed forward by Jews backfire, then Jews and non-Jews get hurt and an anti-Jewish whirlwind gathers force.

Jews tend to have higher IQs than non-Jews, more of a work ethic, they are more rooted in reality and this world as opposed to the next world, they have a more flexible code refined over millennia living among people who are frequently hostile, and this give Jews great advantages, but with great power, comes great responsibility.

Every people, every nation, tries to become as powerful as possible but every people are uniquely adapted to thrive in various locales. Africans are best suited for thriving in Africa, Tibetans in Tibet, the Japanese in Japan, etc. Different groups competing in the same place is brand new in history and conflict and tragedy inevitably results. Diversity plus proximity sometimes equals prosperity and sometimes equals tragedy.

Groups tend to fear each other. Jews, for instance, fear criminal violence by non-Jews. Non-Jews fear Jewish influence in politics, law, academia, media and finance. Non-blacks tend to fear criminal behavior by blacks. Blacks tend to fear that other groups are smarter than them and will take advantage of that fact.

No human being and no group only has benign intentions. Every person and every group is a mixture of benign and malign intentions. What makes a group scary is when it has power and it has an incentive to hurt you. Jews, remembering the Holocaust and centuries of bad will with their East European gentile neighbors, instinctively fear and loathe white power. Gentiles often have instinctive fear of Jewish power based on gentile history.

It is a weird type of Christian who has no burn against Jews and Muslims. It is a weird type of Jew who does not have some fear of Christianity and Islam. It is a weird Muslim who has no negative feelings towards Jews and Christians. These three monotheistic religions compete for world dominance. The more Muslims enter the West, the less power and security Jews and Christians have. The more Israel thrives, the weaker and more vulnerable its neighbors feel.

We can all say nice words to each other, we can often finds ways to cooperate, but in the final analysis, groups are in a fierce competition with each other for scarce resources and conflict is inevitable.

You can do a great deal as an individual or as a group and totally annihilate the other party, but it may well end up doing you more harm than good. We can never predict with 100% accuracy how other people will react.

When China was weak in the 19th Century, the Sassoon family was able to harness the power of the British empire to protect its opium trafficking, which devastated the Chinese and other Asians. On the other hand, the Sassoon family (along with their British protectors) got rich from selling death to the Chinese.

It’s impossible for Jews (or any people) to completely know what is going on with outsiders and to accurately predict their behavior. What we can know is that when we are useful to other groups, they have a stronger incentive to keep us around than when we are damaging to other groups.

I’m freely adapting the realist school of foreign policy to inter-group conflict.

The traditional Jewish way of looking at Jewish suffering is to try to see where we fell short in our observance of God’s commandments. Where did we sin?

I learned in Twelve Step work that when it comes time to make amends, you don’t ask, where did I do wrong? You ask, where did I harm somebody? You may feel you were wrong and selfish and lustful, but where exactly did you hurt someone?

So too I think it is useful for any group living as a tiny minority to ask where are we harming the majority. Every living organism has an instinctual response against anything that threatens it (“Who’s f***ing up my s***?”). The tiny group needs to be particularly sensitive to things it might be doing that tick off the majority.

We can never predict how the majority will act towards us. We can never predict the shifting alliances of our competitors. All we can do is to make ourselves as strong as possible and as useful as possible to those whose support we need. Jews have always done best in individualist Protestant countries such as the USA, England, Canada, and Australia. So it is in the Jews’ interest that these nations thrive. If we break down their individualist identity through pushing immigration and multi-culturalism, we are putting ourselves in danger.

Down deep under layers of repression, everybody has a part of themselves that regards the different as sub-human.

Posted in Anti-Semitism | Comments Off

Obama Administration Supports Muslims Filing Suit For Discrimination

Posted on November 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

The Obama administration, like all the major American Jewish organizations, are on the side of the fringe against the core.

REPORT: After months of refusing to step in among several religious liberty lawsuits filed by Christians involving same-sex weddings, the Obama administration has jumped in feet first to aid Muslim truck drivers who don’t want to deliver liquor products for their employers.

In the case of a pair of Muslim truck drivers who were fired for refusing to deliver the loads required by their employers, the Obama administration’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) intervened and won a wrongful termination lawsuit on their behalf.

An Illinois jury awarded $240,000 in damages and back pay to two former truck drivers who were fired in 2009 after refusing to make beer deliveries. The Muslims cited their religion as a reason for refusing to do their jobs.

The Obama administration, though, reversed its recent practice of ignoring religious liberty lawsuits by adding its voice in support of the Muslims in this case. Along with informing the courts that the administration sided with the Muslims, the EEOC sent a congratulatory message after they won their suit.

“We are proud to support the rights of workers to equal treatment in the workplace without having to sacrifice their religious beliefs or practices,” the statement read. “It’s fundamental to the American principles of religious freedom and tolerance.”

Posted in America, Islam | Comments Off