Jews Rule The World

Little old Jewish lady sees her husband looking at his laptop, nodding and smiling. She looks over his shoulder and sees he’s on the Stormfront website.
“Murray, why are you reading that Nazi trash?”
“Because it’s full of wonderful news.”
“Wonderful news?!”
“Sure, it says here that the Holocaust never happened, and the Jews run the world!”

COMMENTS AT STEVE SAILER:

* James Traub: “The reformed center would include the beneficiaries of globalization and the poor and non-white and marginal citizens who recognize that the celebration of national identity excludes them.”

* That’s the money quote. He bares it all, up until now the sociopaths like Traub were terrified of being exposed for what they are. He see’s the elite leading a mass of rootless, stupid 3rd worlders and impoverished natives.

In his and the globalist world, there is no place for culture, community or nationalism. Or for that matter white blue collars or middle-class people at all. They should have no vote in anything. Only the elites should.

He’s a tyrant in waiting and a traitor to all this country has stood for.

* You have to wonder how the world would look if these elite, wealthy Jews like Traub would stop trolling us in favor of policies damaging to the interests of ordinary white people.

* I saw the second part of a two part report by PBS on the Brexit. The first segment which I missed was pro Brexit and the second which I saw was Remain. Of the 5 or 6 people they interviewed who were Remain, not a single one was English. Based on last names, they interviewed a Jew, and Irishwoman, an Indian, and a couple of other people who visibly non English. The person doing the report did not connect the dots. Possibly on the first report they did by complaining about nativism or some such but they just could not understand why the Brexit crowd feels they way they did.

* Soros is entirely correct. The actions by Merkel precipitated the British vote.

It’s not like Soros is opposed to mass immigration. He sponsors multiple organizations devoted to mass immigration and settlement. But, Merkel forgot the principle of the frog in a pot of water over a fire: you heat the water slowly, so the frog never feels the change. Merkel displayed her hubris by thumbing her nose at the proletariat who actually had to live with her policies.

In point of fact, the vast population of Muslims already in England were brought over entirely by British governments. The EU had nothing to do with it. Even with Britain out of the EU, it is entirely possible that mass migration of Muslims into Britain will continue.

Soros was mad at Merkel for displaying her hand too openly. She should have drawn the mass migrations out over a few more years, and made a display of turning back a few boatloads, at least until the Brexit vote. It might even cost Merkel her future Presidency of the EU when she leaves her post as Chancellor of Germany.

* We younger American Ashkenazi Jews are failing to live up to potential in the opinions of Messrs. Unz and Reed. In the future, the most gifted will probably be Asian. Regardless, even in the here and now only elite and connected Jews have the potential for national influence. In smaller Jewish community settings, politically conservative Jews get shut down almost immediately by the far more numerous liberal Jews who aren’t remotely eager to hear what the conservatives have to say. That’s why I have nothing to do with my local Jewish community. Better to be a recluse than actively hated.

Posted in Jews, Nationalism | Comments Off on Jews Rule The World

Steve Sailer: Is #BlackLivesMatter Just a Jobs for the Gays Racket?

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* In Bonfire of the Vanities, Reverend Bacon, the Al Sharpton character, enlists the aid of Gay Rights groups to help stage protests against the NYPD and Sherman McCoy. Either this gay and black activist connection is a case of life imitating art, or this trend has been going on for a long time.

* Federal bling.

One city, one program, one payout. Over $837 million of that went to Nick Mosby’s Council district.

This is the direction that school districts and state colleges have been going for 30 years, accelerated in the past 15.

It represents a more rapid and intense federal transfer of wealth than ever. And nitwit minor celebrities like “Deray” making fat six figures “managing” “human capital.”

“Human capital”–that’s property, right? Like, you know, people as slaves?

* TPTB like to put a lot of blacks in school as it supports THE NARRATIVE. It brainwashes kids ata young age that blacks are intelligent and competent, when IRL they are the exact opposite.

One way they do this is by getting lots of black ‘doctors’ in school. Typically dumb and incompetent blacks get called ‘doctor’. It turns out blacks get bog standard BA degrees then do a PhD in education. These tend to be uber leftist, anti-White (((colleges))) where you simply write a Narrative essay. Kids don’t know that and assume ‘dr’ teaching them science actually has a science doctorate. BS.

Dance Moms is a prime example of this. Mother of the incompetent token black kid is ‘Dr Holly’. The other moms are alwats in awe of her, yet she doesn’t strike me as at all bright. Clearly just another smoke and mirrors to get impressionable White girls to worship blacks.

* BLM is just following in the path blazed by the Rainbow Coalition (although I guess that has gay overtones in its name) in shaking down various institutions and corporations in exchange for being exempt from criticism. My guess is DeRay was half hired because the morons in charge of the school system think an administrator of human capital could actually accomplish something and half because he’s not going to criticize the city from the inside.

If DeRay has the slightest bit of intellectual honesty and actually works at his job, he’ll come out of it hating the professional left and what it has wrought in once-great cities. I’m not holding my breath, though.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Is #BlackLivesMatter Just a Jobs for the Gays Racket?

Chaim Amalek: ‘ If this is the only way men can take back the world from crazy feminists, then so be it.’

Cuckservative: “This thing is on MSNBC right now. I am now formally pledging allegiance to the Islamic State.”

Politico: Misty Snow and Misty Plowright are the first transgender women to win primaries

Posted in Trans | Comments Off on Chaim Amalek: ‘ If this is the only way men can take back the world from crazy feminists, then so be it.’

‘Every empire should be trying to sow division and disruption in competing empires.’

The twitter wisdom of John Rivers:

* America’s colleges now have sharply lower standards of evidence for rape accusations. Thx to repeated rape hoaxes.

* The point of propaganda battles is to control society. All colleges are adopting lower stds of evidence for rape.

* Crazy attracts crazy. Assortative mating for major psychiatric diagnoses in two population-based samples.

* UVA’s Rape Hoax is especially depressing because we exposed the hoax as entirely a lie – a total fabrication – and the Feminists won anyway.

* A lot of Media is Donor-funded now. Doesn’t matter if it gets clicks. Point is to Manufacture Opinion, not make $.

* Transgenders aren’t real. Neither are Centaurs. Trying to accurately perceive Reality is kinda important to me.

* If they said, yeah, we know they’re just dudes in dresses, but let’s call them transgenders just to make ’em feel better – I might go along.

Posted in America | Comments Off on ‘Every empire should be trying to sow division and disruption in competing empires.’

Siskel & Ebert & the Protestants

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* What a shocker that Siskel is way more upset about it than Ebert.

* Ebert was smarter and more self-aware than Siskel.

* Siskel comes off as unhinged, irrational, and completely emotional about it. While Ebert seems to be trying to be light about it, Siskel seems dead serious.

* I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. This “Jew + Catholic gang up on the WASPs” stuff used to be so normal—friendly banter among three diverse peoples, equal in dignity and self-confidence in late 20th century America.

Heaven help anyone who tried this today…

* That was my initial thought, too … Poor Siskel is probably suffering from his brain tumor.

But then I looked it up:

“Siskel was diagnosed with a cancerous brain tumor on May 8, 1998. … Siskel died from complications of another surgery at the age of 53 on February 20, 1999.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_Siskel

But in this clip Ebert mentions the President is Irish (i.e., Reagan), so this was almost a decade before Siskel’s diagnosis or more.

* I remember the Roger Ebert separate interview. Roger said that on their show, before they went on the air, Gene would make a show of getting upset with Roger about some thing or the other. Roger had the insight to realize that this was a pretend put-on by Siskel, designed to raise his own emotional energy level for the show. Joan Rivers responded that Roger was a nice guy. I realized that Siskel was a manipulative asshole.

* Siskel’s favorite movie—I shit you not—was Saturday Night Fever. He even went so far as to buy Travolta’s disco suit from the movie. I lost all respect for the man when I heard that.

Either Siskel had a secret attraction to men or he had a weird longing to hang out at an Italian-ghetto version of 54, but either way, he let that cloud his judgment on what was a silly little movie.

It’s amazing that these two guys who essentially did product reviews got such cultural cache.

* Ebert seems to be more relaxed and chatty, but Siskel stays in character and is the better comic talent, IMHO.

It’s a type pairing as old as American TV and double act comedy. The angry, earnest, slightly dim guy and the relaxed, smart, smiling counterpart. Ed McMahon to Johnny Carson, Jerry Hubbard to Barth Gimble and the Smothers Brothers are three random examples.

* Ebert is more intelligent than Siskel but Siskel is very aware of his act and knows how to work it.

Ah, for the days when ethnic groups could just vent off steam about each other right in public. Makes for a better world.

* Ebert was the best movie reviewer of his time, possibly ever. When I was a kid I had a bible-sized compilation of Ebert movie reviews, and eventually I think I read the whole thing, many reviews more than once. The quality of Ebert’s writing was very high, but you had to read a lot of him to realize this. He does not show off with obscure words or obscure references like WF Buckley or Dennis Miller as extreme examples of these annoying techniques.

In terms of simply enjoying his prose, my favorite Ebert reviews were probably his rare “no stars” reviews, generally for movies that were both really bad and morally offensive.

Even now, when I feel like watching a movie, I just go to the online archive of Ebert reviews and read through a few 4-star reviews until I see one that seems to be worth reading.

For TV, however, Ebert is usually too quiet and low energy to sustain one’s attention, which you can see by watching clips of Ebert alone v. with Siskel. They had great chemistry and Siskel knew how to bring out the best in his partner.

* All in the Family was pretty great in its era, five years straight at #1, but it’s not watchable today. I’m not sure why.

* From the perspective of someone younger seeing shows from the 50s to early 80′s in reruns:

The best of the wacky sitcoms have aged pretty well: I Love Lucy, The Lucy Show, Mr. Ed, Bewitched, Green Acres, Dennis the Menace

The Twilight Zone and Alfred Hitchcock Presents had big budgets and very talented writers and actors and completely transcend their era.

The Dick Van Dyke show had two of the best comedians at their prime and a lot of witty writing.

The Donna Reed Show, Little House on the Prairie and My Three Sons all had traditional, positive moral messages while still being entertaining.

In general I wish Americans, especially children, would watch older shows like these more, as they invariably depicted white Americans as a fundamentally good people, just the opposite of how we are now portrayed on television.

* There was an oddball (and offensively hilarious, since it is unusual to see popular media types put on the spot and out of character) interview of Siskel and Ebert by Howard Stern that might still be found somewhere. Stern was good at antagonizing his “guests” to elicit a rabid response and with Siskel and Ebert he was true to form.

In the interview, Stern starts off with friendly enough banter but soon begins interrogating Ebert about having a black girlfriend, questioning Ebert about his “jungle fever”. Then Stern remarks that he was shocked and surprised that Ebert had a black girlfriend, not because the woman was black, but because he thought Ebert was gay.

Ebert, visibly shocked, then weakly counters that he thought Stern was gay, and the interview deteriorates from that point on into pointed attacks back and forth.

Ebert soon cleverly shifts the subject to Howard Stern’s behavior and character, stating that “this is not the real Howard Stern that we are seeing with his abusive and derogatory manner.” Stern, being the narcissistic fellow that he is, takes the bait and the discussion becomes all about Howard Stern, leaving Siskel and Ebert to quickly vacate.

You can imagine the two media pundits Siskel and Ebert openly walking into what they think will be an easy and amusing time, only to be broadsided with abuse and calumny, all in the name of ratings and dubious taste.

* No less an unz.com luminary than the Derb has gone to the mat for the brilliant greatness of SATURDAY NIGHT FEVER. It is very much in the same vein as ON THE WATERFRONT — a film about working-class white people making consequential choices about their lives. The kind of people Hollywood doesn’t make films about anymore. The kind of people who are waking up this year, in case you haven’t been reading this blog.

* Siskel graduated as a philosophy major at Yale in 67, when Yale meant something besides being PC Central. He’s no dullard. And he’s likely the equal or superior to Ebert IQ wise too.

He was also a regular at Bulls games in late 70′s until his death. He was far more eclectic in his tastes than was Ebert.

* Gene Siskel actually comes out against political correctness when it comes to profiling Arab terrorists in his review and banter with Ebert on the movie The Siege.

Posted in WASPs | Comments Off on Siskel & Ebert & the Protestants