American Orthodoxy Has No Public Intellectuals

In his fourth lecture on R. Chaim Ozer Grodzinksi for Torah in Motion, history professor Marc B. Shapiro says: Jonathan Sacks is in England. American Orthodox Judaism has no public intellectuals. After Michael Wyschogrod, Meir Soloveitchik may be the most distinguished public intellectual in Orthodoxy. Being that he is only about 35, that doesn’t say much for Orthodoxy. Even though he is brilliant, that we don’t have people older and more distinguished says something about Orthodoxy. The Reform and Conservative movement has many such people (people who try to change the culture from the standpoint of their religion), like what David Novak does.

Posted in Marc B. Shapiro, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on American Orthodoxy Has No Public Intellectuals

Why Don’t Rabbis Condemn Their Own Jewish Terrorists?

In his second lecture on R. Chaim Ozer Grodzinksi for Torah in Motion, history professor Marc B. Shapiro says: The Haredi community in Jerusalem did terrible things to Rav Kook. The Agudah leadership, including R. Chaim Ozer Grodzinksi were horrified by what happened but they did not publicly protest. You had violent haredim like you have today who did terrible things. Wild kids once burned Rav Kook in effigy. They had a so-called trial where they executed him at the end. And people like Rav Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld refused to condemn these people. Why? Because they were afraid that these wild youths would turn on them.

“You have terrorists in Beit Shemesh today and their rabbis do nothing to stop them.” (Example)

Zvi Yehuda Kook would not attend an Agudat Yisrael conference in the 1950s because he blamed for shortening his father’s life.

In his third lecture on R. Chaim Ozer Grodzinksi for Torah in Motion, history professor Marc B. Shapiro says: “The Edah HaChareidis, (lit. “Haredi Community”) has to bear responsibility for what is going on right now in Israel. Until they condemn them. These people threw rocks. It is only a matter of time until someone is killed.”

“Every time the Edah HaChareidis call a protest, they’re letting the inmates out of the asylum. Every time these people protest, you have violence.”

“These crazy rabbis in Beit Shemesh and elsewhere, you can’t talk to them. You can’t talk to them about the terrorists throwing rocks, the people beating up kids, the people burning things.”

According to Wikipedia: “The Edah HaChareidis, (lit. “Haredi Community”), also known as the Edah for short and popularly as the Badatz, is a prominent Orthodox Jewish communal organization based in Jerusalem, Israel. It represents a large section of the Ashkenazi Haredi community and provides facilities such as kashrus supervision, mikvas, an eruv and a rabbinical court. The Edah HaChareidis is viewed as a continuation of the former leaders of the Yishuv haYashan, and is well known for being strongly opposed to Zionism, which it condemns as heretical and opposed to Judaism.”

Posted in Marc B. Shapiro, Orthodoxy, Terror | Comments Off on Why Don’t Rabbis Condemn Their Own Jewish Terrorists?

The New Type Of Rabbi

In his second lecture on R. Chaim Ozer Grodzinksi for Torah in Motion, history professor Marc B. Shapiro says: Rabbi Yitzkak Rubenstein serves as the spiritual rav of Vilna. He served as spiritual rav in Chaim Ozer’s place for four years (around WWI). Many people were impressed by him.

Gershon Bacon, a professor of history at Bar Ilan, has written an article on the dispute over the rabbinate of Vilna. It brings to the fore a new definition of the rabbi that you’ve never seen before. The rabbi that you want most is no longer the greatest scholar but one who is of service to the community.

Rabbi Yitzkak Rubenstein comes on the scene when Chaim Ozer isn’t there and shows that he’s not just a Torah scholar but is one who serves the community as Chaim Ozer never did. All Chaim Ozer did was what all rabbonim did — posken shailas (answers questions about Jewish law) and give shiurim (Torah lectures). Very different from Rabbi Chaim Soloveitchik (the Brisker Rav), who thought the most important task of the rav was to help widows and orphans. Rav Chaim did not give shiurim in Brisk. He did not give Shabbos Teshuva drasha or posken shailas. He was involved in people’s personal lives. He helped them with their problems. He took care of children born out of wedlock.”

“That the community voted for Rabbi Yitzkak Rubenstein is the new model of the rabbi and the model we see today. Particularly in Modern Orthodox synagogues, how often is scholarship the deciding factor? How you preach a sermon was irrelevant in Europe. I think all of our shuls veto Torah scholars because they don’t have people skills or the like. I don’t know if being a Torah scholar is even a desire for most shuls.”

Posted in Marc B. Shapiro, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on The New Type Of Rabbi

The Exciting Life Of Rav Chaim Tchernowitz aka Rav Za’ir

Bio: “TCHERNOWITZ, CHAIM (pseudonym Rav Za’ir; 1871–1949), talmudic scholar and Hebrew author. Tchernowitz, born in Sebesh (district of Vitebsk), Russia, studied in Lithuania and obtained semikhah from Isaac Elchanan *Spektor of Kovno in 1896. Moving to Odessa the following year, he founded his own yeshivah, eventually transforming it into a rabbinical seminary (1907) which attracted many students from the Jewish intelligentsia in Russia, including Ḥayyim Naḥman Bialik and Joseph Klausner. Tchernowitz’s ambition was to combine traditional study with modern research in order to rejuvenate Jewish learning. His pseudonym Rav Ẓa’ir (young rabbi) reflects his aims. Tchernowitz received a Ph.D. from the University of Wuerzburg in 1914. Settling in the United States in 1923, he taught Talmud at the Jewish Institute of Religion in New York.”

In his second lecture on R. Chaim Ozer Grodzinksi for Torah in Motion, history professor Marc B. Shapiro says: Chaim Tchernowitz was the non-religious candidate for the post of crown rabbi of Vilna.

He gives the most famous hespedim for Yitzchak Elchanan Spektor. He functions as an Orthodox rav and Av Beis Din (head of a Jewish law court) in Odessa.

He later comes to America. He really leaves Orthodoxy. You see pictures of him not even wearing a yarmulke. He starts teaching at the Jewish Institute of Religion, started by Reform rabbi Stephen S. Wise. He has no involvement with Orthodox Jewish life.

“To have the Orthodox rav of a big city and then to give it all up and become a scholar and to leave the Orthodox world is unusual. The case that comes to mind is that of the Chief Rabbi of Rome who apostatized after the Holocaust. He was a strange character. He abandoned the community during the Holocaust.”

Posted in Marc B. Shapiro | Comments Off on The Exciting Life Of Rav Chaim Tchernowitz aka Rav Za’ir

Tim Tebow And Divine Intervention

Ross Douthat writes:

Nothing discredits religion quite like the gap that often yawns between what believers profess and how they live. With Tebow, that gap seems so narrow as to be invisible. (“There’s not an ounce of artifice or phoniness or Hollywood in this kid Tebow,” ESPN’s Rick Reilly wrote last year of the quarterback’s charitable works, “and I’ve looked everywhere for it.”) He fascinates, in part, because he behaves — at least in public, and at least for now — the way one would expect more Christians to behave if their faith were really true.

But the fascination doesn’t end there. Tebow’s religion doesn’t just promise a path to personal transformation. It claims that every human life is actually a story with an Author, and that a genuinely Christian life should make that divine Authorship manifest.

So in Tebow’s case, the link between faith and football can’t actually be broken. The more that his professional career seems like, well, a storybook — with exciting up and downs, new opportunities and unexpected twists — the more credible his faith in providence becomes.

Posted in Tim Tebow | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Tim Tebow And Divine Intervention

Was The Yeshiva The Great Equalizer?

In his second lecture on R. Chaim Ozer Grodzinksi for Torah in Motion, history professor Marc B. Shapiro says: As with most gadolim, Chaim Ozer comes from a rabbinical family.

This notion that people have that the great equalizer is the yeshiva and that Torah study could take someone from a simple poor ignorant family and make him into a great Talmud chacham (sage) and then he could marry into the highest families, it’s true in theory. Rabbi Yechiel Yaakov Weinberg did come from a simple family. He was one of the few. His father was in the army. The Jews who served for years, decades, in the army were usually the children of poor people. The rich kids were never taken.

If you came from the lower class, after your son finished cheder, he’d have to go work. The people who ended up going to yeshivas were from rabbinic families or from wealthy families. It’s a nice idea that anyone can rise to the top but it didn’t happen that much in practice.

Posted in Marc B. Shapiro, Orthodoxy, Yeshiva | Comments Off on Was The Yeshiva The Great Equalizer?

Why Aren’t Most Jews Orthodox?

Dear Orthodox intellectual:

Have you publicly addressed the primary reasons why most Jews are not Orthodox? If you haven’t, I’d love to see that. I’m curious if you think the biggest obstacle to non-Orthodox considering Orthodoxy is intellectual (most of the non-Orthodox thinkers I know regard Orthodoxy’s foundational claims as absurd, such as the unity of the Torah rather than being a post-mosaic composite work stitched together from many sources, the historicity of the Exodus, virtually everyone who’s studied the evidence has concluded that the Exodus did not occur as chronicled in the Torah, etc) or do you think the biggest obstacle is moral or do you think the biggest obstacle is inconvenience.

If the biggest obstacle is inconvenience, then Orthodoxy’s approach to the non-Orthodox makes sense, but if the primary reason is intellectual, then none of the great rabbis have addressed the problems that prevent thinking people from taking Orthodox Judaism seriously. Most of my peers can not take Orthodoxy seriously for the same reason they do not take seriously claims made for Superman, the Easter Bunny, Thor, etc.

History professor Marc B. Shapiro replies to my inquiry above: “I haven’t examined it, but I think the reasons are convenience, but also now ideological reasons. Many non-Orthodox Jews see the positions that Orthodoxy takes as immoral. E.g., when it comes to issues like gay marriage. For the non-Orthodox, this is a human rights issue, and Orthodoxy is on the wrong side of history (the women’s issue is also relevant in this regard). So the non-Orthodox are turned off by the difficulty of Orthodoxy, the expense, and what they regard as the moral failings of Orthodoxy. The intellectual issues are minor if at all.”

Posted in Marc B. Shapiro, Orthodoxy | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Why Aren’t Most Jews Orthodox?

Can You Be Modern Orthodox And Accept Da’as Torah?

According to Wikipedia: Da’as Torah (or Da’at Torah, Da’as Toyreh) (Hebrew: דעת תורה‎, literally “Knowledge of Torah”), is a concept in Haredi Judaism according to which Jews should seek the input of rabbinic scholars not just on matters of Jewish law but on all important life matters, on the grounds that knowledge of the Torah aids everything in life.

Avi Shafran, the spokesman for the American Hareidi organization Agudath Israel of America, explains the concept as follows:
Da’at Torah is not some Jewish equivalent to the Catholic doctrine of papal infallibility. Not only can rabbis make mistakes of judgment, there is an entire tractate of the Talmud, Horiut, predicated on the assumption that they can, that even the Sanhedrin is capable of erring, even in halachic matters. What Da’at Torah means, simply put, is that those most imbued with Torah-knowledge and who have internalized a large degree of the perfection of values and refinement of character that the Torah idealizes are thereby rendered particularly, indeed extraordinarily, qualified to offer an authentic Jewish perspective on matters of import to Jews – just as expert doctors are those most qualified (though still fallible, to be sure) to offer medical advice.[1]
Similarly, Rabbi Pesach Eliyahu Falk writes:
That which Poskim cannot prove from an explicit source, is decided upon by a thought-process which has been tuned and refined by tens of thousands of hours of Torah study (and with elderly Talmidei Chachamim even hundreds of thousands of hours) which enables them to perceive where the pure truth lies. This process is called Da’as Torah – an opinion born out of Torah thought. Their thought-process has not been affected by secular and non-Jewish ways of thinking … [2]
Accordingly, Haredi Judaism espouses a belief that Jews, both individually and collectively, should seek out the views of the prominent religious scholars of the generation (called Gedolim, “great ones”, or gedolei Torah or gedolei Yisrael) not just on matters of Jewish law or matters “of religion”, but in every aspect of life, from issues of health to secular politics.
Further whereas in declaring matters of Jewish law rabbinic authorities are required to render decisions based on precedents, sources, and Talmudic principles of analysis, a rabbinic authority has greater latitude when declaring Da’as Torah than when defining a halachic opinion. While a halachic opinion requires legal justification from recognized sources, simple Da’as Torah is regarded as being of a more subtle nature and requires no clear legal justification or explicit grounding in earlier sources. Indeed, different authorities may offer diametrically opposed opinions based on their own understanding (Feitman 1995).
In Hasidic circles, a rebbe is often regarded as having extraordinary spiritual powers and is sought for personal advice in all pursuits of life by his followers. The views and edicts of a rebbe are considered to be an expression of Da’as Torah.

***

In his second lecture on R. Chaim Ozer Grodzinksi for Torah in Motion, history professor Marc B. Shapiro says: It used to be that anyone who was a religious Zionist had to reject da’as Torah. The propounders of da’as Torah were the non-Zionist Agudah gadolim. Today you can be a religious Zionist and accept da’as Torah but your da’as Torah will be Rav Mordecai Eliyahu or Rav Hershel Schachter or one of the religious Zionist rabbis.

Posted in Haredi, Marc B. Shapiro, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on Can You Be Modern Orthodox And Accept Da’as Torah?

Can A Cantor Appear On Broadway?

In his first lecture on R. Chaim Ozer Grodzinksi for Torah in Motion, history professor Marc B. Shapiro says: Some people have a problem when you have chazzanim like Dudu Fisher who sings secular music. You can cite some rabbis who say that you can use tunes from secular music in the synagogue.

“The Shulchan Aruch states that when you have a chazzan who uses curse words or he sings love songs, you warn him not to do this. If he doesn’t listen, you remove him as a chazzan. If you sing non-Jewish music, you are not qualified to be a chazzan.”

“The Mishna Brura says that non-Jewish music refers to non-Jewish religious music. I don’t know if Irving Berlin’s White Christmas falls into this category.”

Posted in Marc B. Shapiro, Music, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on Can A Cantor Appear On Broadway?

What Is The Brisker Method Of Talmud Study?

According to Wikipedia: “The Brisker method, or Brisker derech, is a reductionistic approach to Talmud study innovated by Rabbi Chaim Soloveitchik of Brisk, as opposed to the traditional approach which was rather holistic. It has since become popular and spread to yeshivas around the world. The Brisker method is also known as the “conceptual” approach to Talmud study, and is often referred to simply as lomdus (lit. “analytical study”).”

In his first lecture on R. Chaim Ozer Grodzinksi for Torah in Motion, history professor Marc B. Shapiro says: Eliezer Berkovitz did not teach the Brisker method. He focused on pshat (plain meaning), on halachic rulings.

Posted in Marc B. Shapiro, Talmud | Comments Off on What Is The Brisker Method Of Talmud Study?