Report: “If we broke up the big banks tomorrow,” Mrs. Clinton asked the audience of black, white and Hispanic union members, “would that end racism? Would that end sexism? Would that end discrimination against the L.G.B.T. community?,” she said, using an abbreviation for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender. “Would that make people feel more welcoming to immigrants overnight?”
At each question, the crowd called back with a resounding no.
* In other words, such utopian goals as ending racism, ending sexism, ending LGBT discrimination, and welcoming immigrants overnight (!) are touted as very important struggles in order to distract from economic/financial issues such as the power of large investment banks, etc.
Well done, Hillary.
* Thank god in heaven the reporter noted she spoke to “black, white and Hispanic” union members. Can you imagine if the reporter had only said she spoke to “union members”? How poorly informed that would have left us.
Oddly, I never see any Trump rally described as Trump speaking to white, black and Hispanic Trump fans.
* The Founding Fathers had designed weights and balances that, if their recommendations were followed (first of all, that on immigration), would have preserved freedom in the USA.
Once you have ample immigration, you have difference between peoples. Difference causes resentment (even the difference between homosexuals, disregarded by the many, and heterosexuals); resentment is a body of “anger energy” that awaits the best demagogue or demagoguery to turn into its arm. It’s a resource, like oil. It’s there to be used by someone.
The difference is, oilfields and seams can’t be created. Social anger can. So, they have this most precious of instruments of control and power, with the fantastic attribute that it can be created, apparently with no limit.
You don’t expect them to restrain themselves from creating and fostering resentment, feelings of entitlement and victimhood, do you?
* Her comment is the cleverest thing a skillful demagogue would say to the crowd she was addressing.
If you really don’t understand what it means, you must be someone who presumes good faith in the others, even if the others are people at the top of the power ladder.
* Well Granny may not be moral, ethical, honest, capable, experienced or consistent, but she certainly seems colorful. Sure she has a black heart and a dark soul which may or may not be in her possession, but that’s a good thing to her voting base isn’t it? She’s BAD, which isn’t the same as good, but appeals to who she wants to vote for her. The Low-Info Emo ignorant, imperceptive Anti-White bigots who hate success because its just unfair to losers and lazy bums.
Some people say black isn’t a color, because optical experts who understand the physics involved in the illusion of color to your optic nerves will tell you its imperceptive aspects violate the concept of color of which there are 256 hues, but that’s just racist isn’t it? When you think about it, everything is racist based on the color of your skin or the melanin content of your epidermis. And in this topsy turvy world of newspeak, obfuscation, dogmatic pseudoscientific beliefs and cultural marxism, the Truth is lost on those who find it hurts their feelings.
So, what difference at this point does it make?
* She is doing what she does best: condescend to the minority crowd while simultaneously lining her pocketbook with payoff money from Wall Street.
* He hired himSELF to play Hamilton! He is no dummy,like his countryman, Sonia Sotomayor. Hamilton was not Puerto Rican, BTW. He was also the dreamiest of the Founders. Chicks loved him. This Manuel guy is painfully homely. And, I’d wager,quite gay. I’d also include Jessie Williams in that category. (Gay).
* I recently went to a software conference where Congressman John Lewis spoke (why?). It was EXACTLY like that. The man received a lonnnnnggg standing ovation because nobody in the 90% white (9% Asian/1% other) audience wanted to be the first one to stop clapping. It was hilarious if you knew to notice it.
* I have an allergic reaction to rapping, so the little bits of it that I’ve seen sounded awful to me. But some people seem to like rapping, so that wouldn’t be an obstacle for them. Are all the people who genuinely like rapping stupid? Perhaps. I mean, the guys who review hip hop for the Village Voice or whatever aren’t stupid, but they might be faking their enthusiasm.
* It is obviously a cheap trick to distract from the fact that she is the choice for the mega rich, there are still left wingers out there that believe that they stand for the poor. The political narrative is shifting so fast however that I don’t think this will be needed at all in the near future, being left wing will for almost everyone mean being pro billionaire and pro non white.
* I always found it disturbing when white people loved rappers but I could never quite find the word to express my displeasure. Now we have the word cucked.
* The popularity of “Hamilton” should confirm what most people already suspect, namely that the Left and the financial elite are one and the same.
Trump is a “traitor to his class” by running as populist Republican and supporting the working class.
* While still in my teens I asked one of the several wisest and the single most capital-S Stoical men I ever met how a guy can tell whether a woman is a tart.
He thought for a moment and said, “Women sometimes fake orgasms. A tart fakes so many, she eventually doesn’t know the difference.”