In addition Indian chicks in america also carry the same attitude that DC chicks have. I’m educated, I’m not a sexual being, my pride is in having 2 degrees, and I want a wealthy educated man to spend money on me. In addition Indian chicks in the USA can be very cocky with guys or tease them for pursuing sex. Another no no of feminimity.
From what I’ve seen (mind you this is ONLY professional y dealing with them as customers) they’re VERY high maintenance and most seem to quickly westernize and jump on the “lets be fat and wear sweatpants” bandwagon.
They’re wack and are usually ugly.
Indian girls are like American girls on steroids. No thanks.
Sometimes on a first date, after I’ve already made out with a girl, I’ll stop her mid-walk, grab her and kiss briefly. The only girl who cuntily laughed at this was Indian. “What, you wanted to just kiss me again” or something to that effect. She was pretty, and very thin, but I never contacted her again.
Another problem, at least in my area, is that good looking Indian women are rare as fuck. I mean, every now and then there will be one where you’re like, holy shit she’s banging, but they’re few and far between, and the rest are ugly.
I’d be interested to see what you guys have noticed, because as far as I’ve noticed, Indian women by and large are just not good looking.
Indian women’s personality issues are just as bad if not worse than their lacking in the good looks department.
they tend to chub up pretty easily. Additionally, they love white guys more than other races from what I’ve seen.
Meanwhile brown girls are just like Jewish and Persian girls in that they’re more status seeking and materialistic except they’re not as attractive (that’s not me being biased against other brown people, everybody here agrees that brown girls on the whole aren’t hot) which makes the attitudes they sport hard to put up with.
A lot of the hot brown girls I know who are born and raised in the West LOVE acting ghetto when in reality they’re far from it. They think they are African American. Anyway they are really Westernized and predominately hang out with other wannabe ghetto brown girls or wannabe ghetto white girls. They grow out of that after they finish university. Brown girls very much prefer dating other brown guys and at least at my age don’t seem to care whether or not they’re Indian or Sri Lankan or Pakistani. They get a fuckload of attention from pathetic hordes of ultra beta and needy brown guys and as such develop gigantic egos. They get passed around by the few player brown guys and wannabe ghetto white guys (mainly Italian and Greek in my neck of the woods) all the while pretending to be ultra innocent to all their brown male friends. If they knew how slutty some of the girls they idolate so much are they would probably kill themselves. They put them on the pedestal THAT much.
* But you’ll never lack for an Indian willing to lecture you on American racism.
* There are 4 types of Indian skin colors
Yellow , for the Mongoloid peoples of North East India
Black , for the dravidians
nearly white, for the bollywood stars, usually Khatri ( upper caste punjabi merchants ), some brahmins and kashmiri
Brown for the rest of Indians ( 65% )
and there are shades of brown
Upper castes mostly have lighter brown skin ( wheatish )
Padma Lakshmi , the model, is a Tamil brahmin, with wheatish color
* Lots of successful Dalit and Lower caste men , get themselves trophy Brahmin and Upper caste wives – like how Tiger Woods collects trophy blondes
Udit Raj is a Dalit MP , from Delhi, of the BJP
http://s1.firstpost.in/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/udit-rajFB.jpg
and here he is raving about his white upper caste wife , Seema, Khatri – Upper caste Punjabi merchant
http://www.aljazeera.com/archive/2003/10/20084913256610287.html
“I am very dark, almost black, but my wife is as fair as an English woman and I must say that although ours was a love marriage in which her intrinsic qualities mattered more than looks, I found her fair skin very attractive,” says Udit Raj.
–
http://im.rediff.com/news/2005/feb/27nlook.jpg
The dude on the left, is Ram Vilas Paswan, a central govt minister and a dalit billionaire ( got his wealth by being corrupt politician )
The fair woman feeding him is his brahmin 2nd wife – he is bigamist,
he dumped his 1st wife ( dalit ) but did not divorce her
–
http://www.thehindu.com/multimedia/dynamic/01771/28FR-SRINIDHI_CHID_1771015g.jpg
This woman is Srinidhi, she was Tamil film actress, and Tamil Brahmin
She married the son of P.Chidambaram, a powerful billionaire dravidian politician
–
This is Anusha, a Tamil Brahmin
the fat ugly dude on her right is her husband, a dravidian politician
and grandson of M.Karunanidhi, the former chief minister of Tamil Nadu
( and a corrupt billionaire , whose politics involves mainly brahmin baiting )
—
http://www.reshareit.com/wp-content/uploads/Jayalalitha-e1412767219145.jpg
http://drop.ndtv.com/albums/NEWS/jayalalithalifeinpics/f.jpg
This is picture of Jayalalitha from 1966
She is Tamil brahmin, now she is 50 years older and much fatter and uglier
she is now Chief minister of Tamil Nadu
She got her entry into politics by becoming mistress of MGR, a former dravidian
film star, who later became Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu. and she inherited the post
* One of the first things I noticed after moving to Vancouver was that all (most) of the White people I befriended man and woman alike, while your standard PC Canadian, would without prompting say:
“I f’n hate brown people.” Humorously it was often prefaced by “I’m not racist but…”
I came to the conclusion it was proximity. Kind of like how Americans catch heat both at home and abroad for “racism” against blacks.
Try livin’ next to ‘em. I certainly understood the browns’ reputation after working a hotel for 4 years in downtown Van.
* Very recently I was enlightened by an Indian coworker on the subject of backward castes. “Only in India do people strive to be backward”. He was obviously very indignant about his classmates who were several generations from “backward” status and who still benefit from their disadvantage. Just this year, there were riots near Delhi as a clan of Indians lobbied for “backward” status and set-asides. This won’t last.
* Progressive millennial Indians of the sort that browse and contribute to Buzzfeed are a vanishingly small minority in India; typically Westernized rich kids from the big cities with expensive educational credentials on their resumes and much wisdom derived from blogging. Not all that different from progressive millennials in America, the main difference being that in India, they have virtually no political power or ability to influence the grand narratives that drive electoral politics in the country. They are vastly outnumbered by the poor, and the poor are all segregated along various tribal interests, whether caste or religion or language. The only progressive party with a national scope they could join is the Congress, which is fading thanks to the incompetence of the Nehru-Gandhi family. Meanwhile, the reactionary right-wing BJP rises to power because of the Hindutva heartlands, and their stance on caste may charitably be compared to Reagan’s stance on race.
It’s a different situation in America where progressive millennials wield not-inconsiderable cultural power, even if they don’t vote enough to have much political power.
* On the contrary this, i.e. large scale affirmative action for low castes and ‘other backward castes’, has been in place for more than six decades in India, with up to 50% of jobs and college slots in some situations being set aside for that purpose.
The reactionary right in India has introduced the term “creamy layer” into political dialogue. The idea is that there be a both an income and a caste test for affirmative action quotas and reservations. The creamy layer, of course, is those who are now part of the mainstream middle and upper classes, but technically still from “backward” castes.
A US analogy would be shutting down affirmative action benefits in college admissions to African Americans from comfortably off middle-class and professional families. They would be deemed to be the creamy layer that has already risen to the top of their cohort.
Not surprisingly, the left in India is screaming murder at the idea and trying to discredit it vigorously.
Incidentally, I love how Indian legal and constitutional terminology doesn’t flinch at using the word “backward” in describing groups of people.
* There are several forms of Hinduism and only some of them can be properly termed as reactionary. The main orthodox current within Hinduism, that of Vedic ritualism, is descended from the very reactionary indo-european culture that spread through war and patriarchy.
Hinduism gradually evolved to become more liberal as the warriors settled down and became wealthy, and also accepted influences from other cultures into itself. At this point, the Hindu civilization gave rise to “protestant” religions like Buddhism. The following thousand years saw orthodox Hinduism adopt increasingly reactionary poses to distinguish itself from Buddhism, which in several ways foreshadowed today’s liberal progressivism. This is when the current form of the caste system became codified.
Meanwhile, non-orthodox Hindus reinterpreted their religion to make it more liberal and open, thereby leading many Buddhists to reconvert to Hinduism. The larger Hindu fold therefore contained about an even mix of reactionaries and progressives after the fall of Buddhism towards the end of the 1st millennium CE.
After that we had a thousand years of foreign rule, first 800 years of Muslims, then 200 years of the British. And one thing we see everywhere is that non-dominant cultures have to adopt very reactionary social mores in order to survive. Blacks and hispanics are far more right-wing in their innate social worldviews than Whites. As are Muslims who live in the west, compared to whites and to Muslims who live in Muslim countries. Same thing happened with Hindus in India.
* The entire system of arranged marriages is basically a form of eugenics, but by another name. The most important qualification parents look for in a prospective match is “what sort of family are they from?”. Meaning they want to have a marital alliance with a family of equal or higher social status. This usually requires the family be from the same caste that they are, in addition to wealth and connections. Each caste, no matter how low its standing in the hierarchy, considers itself quite unique and would be displeased with intermarriage, even if it were with a member of a higher caste.
The second question is usually related to level of education, and the third to income and earning potential. Height and skin color are also given importance – because subconsciously all Indians realize that their ruling class consists disproportionately of fairer-skinned and taller people.
Appearance and compatibility, the cornerstones of western marriages, are not considered particularly important when parents pick mates for their children in India.
I know all this first hand because my mother is trying to arrange a marriage for me. I’ve finally come round to admitting that her ideas are actually quite wise.
* Buddy of mine has this huge house next door to his place. It went in and out of foreclosure a few times after 2008. Finally, an Indian buys the place. He moves his extended family into the house. There are cars everywhere, people coming and going at all times, etc.
My buddy and the other wags in his neighborhood now refer to that house as The Call Center.
