Politico: Conservative news sites are lashing out at Facebook after a report on Monday alleged that contractors for the social media giant were told to minimize links to their sites in its “trending news” column.
In statements to POLITICO, several right-leaning media outlets said they have no clear evidence of the practice, but that they long believed they were being discriminated against and hope Facebook to remedy any bias.
Breitbart editor-in-chief Alex Marlow said that while Breitbart News has “remained in the top 25 Facebook publishers for six months,” the Gizmodo report confirms what “conservatives have long suspected: Facebook’s trending news artificially mutes conservatives and amplifies progressives.”
“Facebook claims its algorithm simply populates ‘topics that have recently become popular on Facebook’ in its trending news section, but now we know that’s not true,” Marlow said in an email. “In a spirit of transparency and community, we invite Mark Zuckerberg to do a Facebook Live interview with Breitbart News Tech Editor Milo Yiannopoulos to explain to the tens of millions of conservatives on Facebook why they’re being discriminated against.”
RedState managing editor Leon Wolf said they haven’t seen evidence of discrimination but would be “extremely disappointed if a supposed honest broker of online news was putting a finger on the scales to harm conservative viewpoints.”
“We are glad that increased attention is being paid to the tremendous influence that Facebook wields in the way people consume their news, and are hopeful that, at the end of the day, Facebook will honor its commitment to its users to be an honest broker of news content,” Wolf said.
Washington Examiner editorial director Hugo Gordon said the report is “obviously of considerable interest to us” and they plan to work with Facebook “to ensure Washington Examiner’s valuable content gets the attention it obviously deserves.”
Newsmax executive editor Ken Chandler said that while there isn’t hard evidence, “we don’t think we’re getting the exposure we deserve on some of our stories.”
“We don’t generally subscribe to the view that Facebook or even Google are out to get conservatives, but it seems like with Facebook there have been some issues,” he told POLITICO.
Chandler says Newsmax plans to work with Facebook to resolve the issue.
Daily Caller executive editor Vince Coglianese said in an email that “it’s extremely important for news consumers to understand” that sites like Facebook exercise “incredible control over what news actually gets delivered.”
Coglianese said they’ve been surprised in the past to find that Facebook has delivered millions of views to some of its entertainment coverage, but not nearly the same as its political coverage.
“In March, for example, Facebook delivered nearly 5 million page views to this piece alone: Pink Just Blew Kim Kardashian Away With This Sobering Message. And that’s not the first time Facebook has awarded our entertainment coverage with ridiculous traffic.Compare that to our political coverage, which fetched about 10 million page views during the same month — from all sources,” he said. “If this week’s reports are true, Facebook’s real disservice is to its users, who aren’t even being delivered the content they signed up for in the first place.”
LATEST POSTS:
- The Comparator Test: Does Penn Apply the Same Standard?
- PragerU Salaries & Bonuses
- The David Pinsof Story
- Added Context to the Dennis Prager-Cedars Sinai Lawsuit
- The Criticism Was Right and It Did Nothing: Andrew Gelman, Seth Roberts, and the Limits of Being Correct
- What Andrew Gelman Doesn’t Write About
- Andrew Gelman: ‘Computer scientists today are like economists in the early 2000s and Freudian psychiatrists in the 1950s’
- Virtue Signaling and the Amy Wax case
- Revisiting Virtually You: The Dangerous Powers of the E-Personality
- The Great Delusion
- Why Do I Instinctively Dislike Erik Erikson?
- WSJ: The Uninvited Guest Who Crashed Our Family Vacation: My Mom’s AI Chatbot
- WEHT to Marc Weisblott?
- WEHT to Moxie aka Madison Slade?
- WEHT to Nicholas Polson’s Archive?
- Cohen Passes His Own Audit (V2)
- Andrew Gelman & the E-Personality
- ‘(1) “Do you think the culture of research has genuinely changed since the replication crisis became widely discussed, or has it mostly generated new compliance rituals around pre-registration and open data while leaving the underlying incentive structure intact?, (2) Regarding Columbia University, “is there a statistical or social scientific way of understanding how institutions lose the ability to accurately perceive their own situation?”’
- What a Public Audit Does (V4)
- Post: ‘Nathan Cofnas the Schlimazel’
BEST POSTS:
- * The Enlightenment Wasn’t Enlightened (6-23-26)
* Mr. Burge Draws The Line (6-23-26)
* 'Improving on Democracy' (6-17-26)
* People Leak To People Who Are Fun (6-11-26)
* Why Does Australia Produce So Many Great Journalists? (6-11-26)
* Steve Wynn and the Press: Power, Litigation, and the Contest Over Las Vegas (6-3-26)
* Sheldon Adelson and the Journalists (6-3-26)
* The Vigilant Animal: Thinkers Who Reject the Myth of Human Gullibility (6-2-26)
* The Cost of Refusing the Misunderstanding Myth (6-2-26)
* Show Me How It Travels (6-2-26)
* The Norm Explainers (6-2-26)
* Centering Marginalized Voices (6-1-26)
* What would it look like if the Washington Post put its reader first? (6-1-26)
* What would it look like if the Financial Times put its reader first? (6-1-26)
* What It Would Mean for the Los Angeles Times to Put the Reader First? (6-1-26)
* What It Would Mean for The New York Times to Put the Reader First? (6-1-26)
* Why Wembanyama Lives on the Perimeter (5-31-26)
* The Emotional Palettes Of San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco & Sacramento (5-27-26)
* The Administrative Capital: Sacramento Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* San Diego - The Quiet Republic (5-27-26)
* The Quiet Bar: San Diego Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* SF v LA Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* Why Talent Travels Poorly Between San Francisco and Los Angeles (5-27-26)
* San Francisco and Los Angeles as Rival Models of Urban Access (5-27-26)
* Social Cliques in New York, 2026 (5-25-26)
* Social Cliques in San Francisco, 2026 (5-25-26)
* The Rival Courts of Washington (5-25-26)
* The City of Private Rooms (5-25-26)
