* Just looked in the cabinet and I’m all out of caring.
* Liberals love to Balkanize, and it’s coming right back at them.
* It is rather hard to avoid being anti-Zionist as the term Zionism is in itself ambiguous. Is it also wrong to be antimilleniallist or to deny that Mormonism is the only true Church? Is it wrong to oppose the back-to-Africa element of Rastafarianism?
Probably just better to stay away from university campuses to avoid the risk of being arrested by the campus religious police for some innocent remark like “Holy Moses” in case you offend secular Jews.
* Buying off PoC is not going to work. Look at Hollywood, currently in the midst of a purge of the White/Jewish talent in favor of … what Shonda Rhimes cousins? Tyler Perry’s nephew’s barber? Will Smith’s kids. [Shudder.]
Victimization won’t work either … PoC don’t care and already call the Holocaust “White on White crime” and suggest that because the victims were … wait for it … White, they don’t matter at all.
Most popular culture has bought into the idea that White people don’t matter — that’s baked into the cake so to speak.
Jews best bet is a universal White identity embracing them, the Irish to the West, to the Russians to the East; the Finns to the North and the Greeks to the South. With an emphasis on Sinn Fein willingness to fight and engage in both separatism and identitarianism.
Everything in this life is a struggle. If you don’t fight for it, you don’t get anything.
* 1. It seems subjective to accept barring anti-Muslim and anti-Gay agitation, but not apply the same to anti-Israeli agitation. Religion is a choice, so it would be easier for religious adherents to cease belonging to their religion or to change their name than it would be for a nation to allow itself to cease to exist.
2. It’s not very professional for universities to be aggressive political wargrounds in which the far-left majority threaten students and teachers who hold inconvenient ideas. It wouldn’t be tolerated at professional businesses, and it misleads students as to what’s acceptable in the professional world.
3. It’s worth remembering that the founding of Israel was a WW2 land swap, with 700,000 Islamic Middle Easterners losing their land, versus 850,000 Jewish Middle Easterners losing their land (in the 1948 Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries). Liberals are as against the data on Israel as they are on human biodiversity.
If liberals are fine with millions of Syrians moving elsewhere, they should also be fine with Israelis buying-out Palestinians’ stake in their small remaining plots of land. Israel could fund it with some years of their saved future military budget. That would let them make Palestinians who accept the buy-out richer than the average American. That’s a much better deal than Syrians are currently getting.
* There is no comparing an Israel in existential war – as it has been since its founding – with Western nations at peace. Western nations at such wars were ruthless. Firebomb Dressen, nuke Hiroshima. And that solved their problems. Were Israel to use those standards it would have long ago expelled the Palestinians and turned Tehran to glass. It is odd, the Muslim states and most of the third world have contempt for, and some are at war with, the Western liberal order. If not for that order, which Israel accepts, Israel might have long ago solved its problems – in the way New Zealand solved its Maori problem or Belgium dealt with the Congo.
In any event the West these days is suicidal. Israel deciding not to be suicidal I suppose is breaking with the standards of the West. As for Jews in the West, most of them are suicidal as well and so a gulf is opening between liberal Jews and Israel and anyone who reads the Jewish press sees this every day.
