* Yet it’s considered racist to use the same amount of due diligence and surveillance to vet potential immigrants. Tashfeen Malik was admitted even though she posted in support of jihad Islam on social media. DHS officials testified they were explicitly prohibited from examining the social media profiles of immigration applicants.
* I read a tweet the other day from one of those bad, alt-right Twitter accounts that made a good point: “if you don’t want a Reich, don’t create a Weimar”. I’m not a Daily Stormer type but the guy has a point. If you don’t want a thuggish buffoon in power, stop creating all the conditions that make it seem like the least worst option. If you don’t want a blond, country club Mussolini running America then stop taunting Whitey and working for full spectrum chaos.
* I do remember reading a lot of these groups the SPLC talks about are basically two guys with a website and fax machine and half the Klan is FBI informants by now.
* Apple / Google / Microsoft all get bad publicity for being extended arms of the surveillance state. The FBI gets bad publicity for both being totally ineffective at stopping terror plots as well as paying actual terrorists. The FBI then picks a “fight” with Apple where Apple can stand up for customer privacy. Now people care about terror blame Apple and customers who don’t want Apple to act as an arm of the state think Apple is on their side. Everyone wins.
* It would be interesting to talk to the various Muslims recruited by FBI/CIA as agents and find out whether they are really patriots, they have a real dedication to diversity ideology, or they think the US would be a great place for Muslims to take over as long as their more radical brethren don’t ruin for them.
* There are two alternatives on immigration. You can have a strict policy with intense scrutiny of prospective immigrants and a free country. Or you can have a lax immigration policy and a country burdened with ever-increasing surveillance and oppressive laws. Intensive vetting of would-be immigrants is easy and is only a short-lived inconvenience for them. The horrors of the balkanised multiracial state are forever.
* Regulatory capture takes on various new forms, without regard to quaint or prosaic concepts like morality or ethics. Why start now?
* A cynic, OK me, would say that most of the surveillance is not aimed at stopping Muslim jihad but reaction to the jihad by natives, who are non-Muslims. That is the whole point. Note Facebook cooperated greatly in removing any anti-rapefugee sentiment to the delight of Merkel. And as Derb has noted in VDARE, Britain has jailed thousands who object to Islamification and Muslims settled in every remote corner. Including Scottish islands.
Its insane of course, and a religious delusion of upper class Whites who believe moral hectoring by upper class Whites will magically transform goat herding jihadis into magical scientists. Or something. Its really all about them, with Muslims as props.
But clearly, a massive police state they believe is needed to head off the anti-Muslim revolt.
