* If the premise is ‘America is a nation of immigrants’, then America is no longer America unless it keeps taking in more immigrants. And it means immigrants are ‘more American’ than those with deep roots here. So, native-born Americans must reverse-assimilate to the world filled with potential immigrants.
It’s like if man is defined as a consumer, he must keep buying(even stuff he doesn’t need or can’t afford) to be a man.US, as currently defined, must keep consuming immigrants.
The elites prefer immigrants cuz the immigrants have no roots, claim, and memory in America that boost goy nationalism. Instead, the immigrants are merely grateful to the sector of America
(the globo-elites) that facilitated their easy entry.
Also, the immigrants’ children, being raised on PC, are useful as agents who spread America-style ‘culture and values’ back to their home countries. A kind of neo-imperialism.
Look at Mexico. Its ‘values’ are becoming more globo-Americanized with stuff like ‘gay marriage’ in urban areas.
In a way, the ‘anti-American’ and pro-minority aspects of PC fool the children of immigrants into believing that the New American culture and ‘values’ are on their side and empowers them against ‘racist’ whites. After all, ‘leftist’ Obama is president, a development that suddenly made so many nations pro-American even though Obama is merely a servant of Jewish-homo oligarchs who seek to weaken the national sovereignty of every nation but Israel.
In truth, PC is really designed to aid globo-minoritarian-elitism in every nation but Israel.
What does American-style PC do in Russia, Iran, Mexico, Vietnam, etc?
It promotes homos allied with the globo-US empire.
* The only policies with a realistic chance of achieving goals are ones that are highly visible to the public, like banning all immigration from Country X, Y and Z.
* John Derbyshire has long advocated a coherent “population policy.” He’s right, of course. But a country as factionalized and fractured as the United States is by race, class, religion, etc., is probably incapable of agreeing on anything so reasonable. My personal prediction is either tyranny and/or de facto if not de jure partition.
* Steve is too humble to say so directly but he is ultimately the source of Trump’s ideas on immigration that have turned the presidential campaign upside down. Just as certainly as Donald Trump is articulating the ideas from Ann Coulter’s book, the ideas in her book come from Steve Sailer. Ann Coulter has always talked about how bad liberals are, etc. but in the past she said little about immigration beyond the old Republican platitudes about illegal immigrants are breaking the law and immigration is O.K. as long as the law is followed, etc. Everything about immigrants turning America into a third world hellhole, etc. are Steve’s ideas expressed in Coulter’s venomous style.
