* Meanwhile, another football player shot, while hanging out with a guy named Antwan.
Moral: don’t hang out with guys named Antwan. Your chances of not being shot go up exponentially.
* Steve, one point that you miss, and it is perhaps the most important point of all is the *moral* right of the white west to remain the white west, regardless of politicians, economists, professional liars, and any other faux ‘justification’ of race replacement.
At root, this is the only point that really counts.
* In America I think conservatives have more kids than liberals. But liberals control the indoctrination of the youth through education. Thus many kids from conservative homes become liberal. If a conservative couple has three kids they are lucky if one remains conservative after 12 years of school.
Does this not exist in Israel? How do conservative Israelis go to school and not become indoctrinated? Or are their history books just not written by the Howard Zinns of this world?
* Also, is the right/left divide the same in Israel as it is everywhere else? I doubt if the Israeli left goes on about Jewish privilege or indulges in the ethnomasochism that defines the left in the US and Europe. I think there’s a consensus across the political spectrum that the country is by its founding principles a Jewish state. Can you imagine an Israeli socialist candidate squirming uncomfortably if a journalist asked him if he intends to serve Jewish interests, the way a white Western politician (Orbán excepted) would do in the equivalent situation?
* A real tour de force, Steve. Particularly the comment about conservatives being the second most liberal people on earth.
What I am amazed at is that nowadays most everyone knows, through the power of the internet, that in every white country on earth the immigration level is increasing at a worrying rate and they have a good idea that it will bring about our genocide – though not in those terms. A decade ago I thought that we would require a compelling documentary to bring about this understanding. I would not have thought likely that people similarly as literate and intelligent would be writing comment after comment in the major online newspapers displaying the understanding I had back then and found it extremely challenging to communicate.
The unfortunate thing is that rather than deal with these problems openly through rigorous debate, the left and mainstream right have attempted to use all manner of dirty tricks to prevent this debate from occurring… in all white countries. Globalization of thought, of media, of elite and their ideas have seen to this. So we have this pressure cooker situation building. Elites have doubled down on immigration for various purposes. Immigrants have been dispersed everywhere possible. And it is this as much as anything… our lying eyes conveying the reality of what is transpiring, that is bringing about a mass conversion of attitudes. Everywhere.
The analogy to a pressure cooker is the same as to a bomb. You can pour a can of gunpowder on the ground, light it, and you will get a flash but the reaction is harmless from a few feet away due to the ease in which it is dissipated. Put that same gunpowder into a thick steel sphere with an inconsequential hole to introduce the initial spark of the reaction – a vast difference. The reaction has nowhere to go at first. But it is a mistake to think that one is preventing anything in the nanoseconds that the steel sphere contains the reaction. No, all that is done by this is ensure that the reaction is continued to the furthest possible extent as it pushes against the mutual constraint of the shell, finding no outlet. When the containing shell eventually bursts as it must, an immensely powerful, outwardly focused shockwave is the only possible result, and this must destroy everything in its path for a good radius.
How to diffuse this situation? The governments of the world must act firstly to stop cramming the steel shell of Europe and Anglosphere with more powder. Then they must act to remove the existing gunpowder from what is now a bomb of their own construction. Good luck with that.
* Antagonistic nationalist governments arise as proxies or byproducts of imperial conflict. The German Empire stoked Irish nationalism in their conflict with the British Empire, the British stoked Arab nationalism against the German allied Ottomans, the Russian Empire stoked the Armenians against the Ottomans and the Serbs against the Austro-Hungarian and German empires, the Third Reich stoked Eastern European and Indian nationalism against Russia and Britain, Imperial Japan stoked SE Asian nationalists against the European empires, the US stoked SE Asian nationalism against Japan, etc.
The problem now is that there has been too much state peace. Immigration and low-intensity conflict and crime is not enough to generate antagonistic nationalist governments. For that you want major conflict and war, and at this point that’s only really possible with Russia or China.
* Conservative whites have more kids than liberal whites, so overall the white electorate is moving away from the left. However, the fertility rate for blacks and latinos is still above that of whites so on the whole the left still has a great future ahead of it provided it turns out voters. We’ll probably have much more overtly racial politics as well.
Nature selects for those that are more aggressive in maintaining their advantages, so what’s going to happen to the soft, self-loathing whites who populate the left and refuse to defend their own group’s values and culture when blacks and latinos finally seize the reins of the Democratic Party? I suspect they will go the way of Woodrow Wilson at Princeton – despite their progressive bona fides they will join the list of people to be shamed and shunned for real or perceived offenses against the oppressed.