* Whites in North America and Australia have always understood that the mass migration of Europeans into those places meant the displacement, if not destruction, of those indigenous cultures. Everybody knows that what was good for “us” was terrible for them, and there is no one better at calling white people wicked than other white people.
What I and others don’t get is why, with the tragic example of the Americas and Australia in front of you, you would want to repeat that except this time stick it to the Europeans? A lover of humanity would look at history and realize it’s time to call an end to the ethnic cleansing of homelands.
* The Europeans went to New World lands, displaced the locals and created a new civilization. If I recall the locals did in fact put up resistance, but far too late to have an effect. They allowed too many Europeans to land on their shores, and once established the Europeans proved to much for the natives.
Similar events have occurred throughout history as one group invades and displaces another. And in some cases the invader wins, and in other cases they lose. But in all cases the defender does put up resistance and doesn’t just hand over the keys to the kingdom. IIRC the muslims can usually be counted on to put up fierce resistance towards any newcomers moving into their areas. Just ask the French or English.
Why should the Europeans of today be any different? Why should they not put up any resistance to newcomers moving into their turf? Why should contemporary Europeans repeat the mistakes of the New World natives?
* I know we are supposed to be horrified at the sight of Hungarian police throwing sandwiches at the refugees instead of giving it on their hands and knees, but what about flipside of the invasion. What about the Europeans that lives have changed forever?
* I love when lefties show up in a place like this and express shock at the “veiled racism”. This is quite open and unapologetic racism. We don’t accept your premises on what racism means and what its effect is, neither do we share your selective outrage that excuses the bloodthirsty bigotry of your definition of racism’s “victims” only to explode upon encountering such horrors as whites complaining about being overrun by hostile, racist outsiders intent on destroying their communities.
You’re right about Lebanon and Turkey–but what are they doing with those refugees? They’re housing them in tent cities with the expectation they’ll go home or move on–to Europe, for example.
As for our elite breaking the Mid East through serial aggressions, whose idea was that? After being misled into W’s Iraq War, the people haven’t had much to do with our elite’s meddling. They have foisted on us a fait accompli. We should reject it. Those same Middle Eastern states that refuse to help are as or more complicit–the more complicit the more they refuse to help, as in the case of Saudi Arabia, Israel and Iran.
* 1). I don’t believe that 60% of the German population supports having Germany invaded by millions of Arabs. Show me the vote.
2). Given the situation in the EU, those millions of Arabs invading Germany will have unfettered access to every other EU member nation. So Germany is, unilaterally, admitting a small Arab nation into the EU. It doesn’t appear that folks in England or Hungary are on board with this. I doubt the Swiss want several million Arabs to come visit either. In fact, Germany seems the only EU member willing to allow this. Yet all Europe will suffer the consequences.
