The Clintons As A Case Study

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* The Clintons are going to be a topic of study long into the future. They are an interesting tag-team. Bill is an over-sexed playboy, while she is a frigid lesbian. Bill’s scandals are always about chasing tail, while her scandals are all about chasing cash. This e-mail scandal is just good old fashioned city hall style shake downs. Instead of handing out city contracts, they were selling access to State.

The other wonderful set of contrasts is that Bill is a natural campaigner, while she is brutally bad. Even if you hated Bill, he could charm you in person. Hillary is probably the least charming public figure since Nixon.

Bill attracted top talent as his campaign staff, while Hillary attracts ham and eggers that never seem to understand what’s happening. People forget that the reason Clinton lost in 2008 is her people failed to understand the rule changes for allotting delegates. By the time they figured it out, Obama had a big lead. This time they are running a campaign that would have been great in 2008, but not in 2016.

* The internet has lessened the ability of the left to do hit-and-run smears through the MSM which had become their favorite weapon. A perfect recent example of this was yesterday where black pastor in Flint attempted to become offended by the Donald so then to moralize and lecture him with the obvious implication that is was due to racism. The MSM was in on it and sprung into action making that the lead piece of the night on MSNBC, CNN, etc. By the time I got home to my TV, I had already read several articles about it and how the ‘pastor’ had used Facebook to organize the take down and how she was buddies with Obama (pic included). On screen you have a breathless Lawrence O’Donnell shaking his head and acting all indignant and offended. I guess he does not have the internet.

* Pepe is a symbol of the coolness/hipness of the Alt-Right. The Alt-Right makes memes that are edgy and funny. Richard Spencer and Milo are both young dudes whose antics and memes come across as youthful and fresh, not old and stodgy. Roosh is young. Matt Forney is youner. Gavin McInnes is the oldest of the bunch, and he looks baby-faced.

The jokes and memes they tell are line-crossing, but in a scampish, young, did-I-do-that way, not an old man racist way. It’s Bob Hope in the 1940s versus Bob Hope in the 1980s.

As Steve said, the Alt-Right is like Punk Rock. But it’s important to note that the Alt-Right is like Punk Rock when Punk Rock was new, fresh, young, and cool–the late 70s/early 80s.

* Pepe: the Frog Who Refused to be Boiled.

* When respectable magazines and powerful politicians are putting effort into fighting disorganized young Twitter pranksters armed with nothing but cartoons and sarcasm, it brings to mind the Filibusters of early 19th century- American civilians who bought their own personal armies with private money and fomented revolutions in Spain’s Latin American Empire. Most of them were eventually crushed, but the fact that they were able to get started in the first place was an ominous sign for the once-mighty Spanish Empire. If you can provoke the establishment armed with just a cartoon frog and a dead gorilla, how can they expect to fare against competent opposition?

Posted in Alt Right, Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on The Clintons As A Case Study

Kaepernick isn’t divisive. Really?

Lowell Cohn writes: The media has been writing and saying with great certainly that Kaepernick is not creating a division on the team. How exactly does the media know? After the Monday night win, Kaepernick held forth to reporters on his social causes. No one is questioning the rightness of Kap’s feelings. But as Kap held forth one offensive lineman angrily walked by the media and said the 9ers had just played a football game. Larry Krueger reported this. The lineman meant Kap should not have been the center of attention, meaning Kap was, in a sense, dumping on the win and the team.

My guess is — a hunch based on experience — other players feel like the lineman. That Kap needs to choose a better time and place. That maybe Chip Kelly should have told Kap to cool it in the postgame locker room. Players, I believe, do not publicly criticize Kap because they want to preserve the appearance of team unity and are going along with the company line that Kap is not a distraction and has a right to free speech and free protest.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Kaepernick isn’t divisive. Really?

‘Hispanic activist @TonyYapias, who criticized Trump’s comments about Mexican rapists, has been charged with rape.’

Posted in Mexicans, Rape | Comments Off on ‘Hispanic activist @TonyYapias, who criticized Trump’s comments about Mexican rapists, has been charged with rape.’

Trump & Birtherism

Scott Adams writes:

Moments ago, Donald Trump acknowledged that Barack Obama was born in the United States. You all know that’s a big deal because Trump was the leader of the so-called “birther” movement, which critics called racist.

But watch the festival of cognitive dissonance that happens today among Trump’s critics and the media. They need to explain why the birther thing was racist. What exactly is the reasoning for that connection?

Jake Tapper says the connection between the birther movement and racism is so obvious that you would have to be “naive” to think it wasn’t about race, given that Obama is black. And also given that the “birther” idea had no credible evidence.

But how does that explain why Trump said Ted Cruz was Canadian? Is it because Trump is also racist against Canadians?

That’s the problem the media will have to wrestle with today. And Trump has turned all of them into idiots because there is no real answer to the Ted Cruz analogy. A rational person would look at this situation and say that Trump uses every available option to win, and birtherism helped him get this far because it gave him a launch pad.

Birtherism also allowed Trump to do what hypnotists call pacing and leading. First, he matched the Obama-hating Republicans by being one of them. That’s called pacing. Once they accepted him as one of them, he was in the position to lead. He just did that by saying Obama was born in this country.

The answer to why Trump pursued the birther issue is that he thought it would work for him, persuasion-wise. And it did. Unambiguously. Just the way a Master Persuader would expect.

First he paces, then he leads. Watch for that pattern in everything he does.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Trump & Birtherism

How Trump Flipped The Script

Scott Adams writes:

Do you remember way—-way—-way—back in July, when the public thought Trump was the candidate they couldn’t trust with the nuclear arsenal? That was before we realized he could moderate his personality on command, as he is doing now. We’re about to enter our fifth consecutive week of Trump doing more outreach than outrage.

It turns out that Trump’s base personality is “winning.” Everything else he does is designed to get that result. He needed to be loud and outrageous in the primaries, so he was. He needs to be presidential in this phase of the election cycle, so he is.

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton has revealed herself to be frail, medicated, and probably duplicitous about her health. We also hear reports that she’s a drinker with a bad temper. Suddenly, Clinton looks like the unstable personality in this race. Who do you want controlling the nuclear arsenal now?

You probably thought Trump was the bigot in this contest, until Clinton called half of Trump’s supporters a “basket of deplorables.” That’s the point at which observers started to see a pattern. Trump has been consistently supportive of American citizens of all types – with the exception of the press and his political opponents. The main targets of Trump’s rhetoric are the nations that compete against us. In stark contrast, Clinton turned her hate on American citizens. That’s the real kind of hate. Trump is more about keeping America safe and competing effectively in the world. That is literally the job of president.

Trump was once the candidate that the LGBTQ community found easy to hate. Then it turned out that Trump is the loudest voice for protecting America against the anti-gay ideology that Clinton would increase in this country via immigration. At the GOP convention, Republicans stood and applauded Trump’s full-throated support of the LGBTQ community. While Clinton was talking about a better society, Trump was transforming the Republican Party into one. (Yes, I know there is more to do.)

You might remember a few months ago when Clinton had lots of policy details and Trump had few. Clinton still holds the lead in the number of bullet-points-per-policy, but while she rests, Trump has been rolling out policy details on one topic after another. Perception-wise, the optics of “who has policy details” has flipped. (Reality isn’t important in this context.)

Do you remember over a year ago, when Trump first entered the race? Social media relentlessly insulted his physical appearance. They mocked his orange hair and his orange skin. They called him a clown. They called him a Cheeto. It was brutal.

But over time, Trump’s haircut improved. He softened the color to something more blonde than orange And his fake tan and TV makeup improved too. Today, if you ask a voter to name the candidate for president who “looks bad,” the answer would probably be Clinton, primarily because of her recent health issues. In our minds, Clinton went from being a stylish and energetic personality to a hospice patient dressed like a North Korean dictator at a rave.

Not long ago, you would have said Clinton was the strongest candidate for protecting citizens who need the help of social programs. Then Trump unveiled his plan for childcare and senior care. You can debate the details, and the cost, but nearly everyone recognized the idea as a critical need for working class people.

In other words, the world is turning inside-out, right in front of our eyes.

Posted in America, Donald Trump | Comments Off on How Trump Flipped The Script