Hillary’s Master Plan to Lose the Election: Campaign for Gun Control as Anti-white

Posted on May 22, 2016 by Luke Ford

Steve Sailer writes: “…the Democrats’ problem with gun control is that they just can’t stop themselves from portraying the gun problem as evil white men shooting innocent black baby bodies.”

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* The obvious riposte to the Hildebeast is, if course, Switzerland.

By law, every adult Swiss male citizen is obligated to keep a pretty heavy caliber arsenal in his home, yet, (I wonder why?), Switzerland has but a minimal level of gun related homicides.

* But in Switzerland immigrants need to get a license to own a weapon, and citizens of certain countries, including Turkey, Bosnia, Serbia, Algeria and Albania, are explicitly forbidden from owning weapons. Also every gun is registered with the state and there are restrictions on citizens with criminal records or mental illness. The NRA and the liberals would scream bloody murder if we tried to institute the Swiss system of gun ownership in the US, but it is probably the most commonsensical in the world.

* If you search a popular rap lyrics website for the keyword “choppa” there are over 2700 results. A choppa of course refers to an AK-47. I haven’t read the lyrics, but I’m sure most of them are about insane rednecks gunning down black children, or perhaps about rappers valiantly defending their communities from marauding Klansmen.

* From your Baby Gap article:

“Besides, in sparsely populated Republican areas, where police response times are slow and the chances of drilling an innocent bystander are slim, guns make more sense for self-defense than in the cities and suburbs.”

Wherever you happen to be, guns make equal sense for self-defense. If you are in a legally defined “in fear for my life” hostile situation that one can’t escape from, police response times mostly don’t matter, unless one happens to be in line of sight of a nearby witnessing officer. As far as drilling a bystander, most states have laws putting the blame on the criminal whose actions precipitated the event. Cops sometimes shoot bystanders, but that’s no reason to disarm city cops. Both police and armed civilians should train as much as possible.

* The gun control issue, even more than immigration, is a heaven-sent issue for Trump to beat her on.
After all was it two or three years ago that a couple of Colorado democrats were recalled from office over the issue? I hope the Donald reserves some time at a gun range, and gets some of his lackeys to bring him some back issues of Guns and Ammo so he can just beat her over the head with this.
The “prison to pipeline” stuff won’t sell as well because it’s been 20 or 25 years since violent crime was a super serious problem in this country. I’ve talked to numerous strait-laced older people who are convinced that hundreds of thousands of people (given some they would not like) are doing long stretches for simple drug possession.

*
(1) When did urban white liberals ever really care about white racial solidarity in any way? If there were actually any public expression of white racial solidarity, these same urban white liberals would show up in force to protest; they call them “Anti-Fa.”

(2) I also find it amusing that a white liberal Manhattanite actually is mad that ramshackle white people in West Virginia won’t let the white liberals in Manhattan disarm dangerous blacks in Harlem. Are we supposed to think that Manhattanites think that West Virginians have veto power over New York City gun laws? The Federal judiciary has gotten a lot more pro-2A in the last two decades, but that has barely impacted NYC gun laws, which white liberal Manhattanites still have at their disposal.

Of course, I say that like I already don’t know the answer, like I don’t already see an analogue at work in my own back yard all the time. If I had a dollar for every time I saw, read, heard, urban officials, politicians, law enforcement, prosecutors, from St. Louis and Kansas City blame outstate voters and politicians for their supposed inability to disarm the thug blacks in their own confines and the supposed lack of laws that give them the legal latitude to do so, I could afford to live in Manhattan. However, urban politicians either directly seek votes in urban areas or work for those that do, and while black thugs hardly every vote, their grandmothers do. Meanwhile, outstate white people don’t get to vote in St. Louis and Kansas City muni elections. Plus, as we all know, there’s a War on Noticing Things. Therefore, instead of telling the truth and naming the Dindu, the Ook, the Africanus Bellcurvius, it’s very easy to blame far way mysterious people.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Hillary’s Master Plan to Lose the Election: Campaign for Gun Control as Anti-white

LAT: Why the Expo Line to Santa Monica marks a rare kind of progress in American cities

Posted on May 22, 2016 by Luke Ford

How happy will residents of Santa Monica be when their city is inundated with residents of South-Central?

These questions don’t get addressed in all the media coverage of LA’s light rail extension to the coast.

Christopher Hawthorne writes:

The 1.5-billion second leg of the Expo Line, which opened Friday from Culver City to Santa Monica, adds seven light-rail stations and more than six miles of track to the growing Los Angeles County transit network. That’s on top of the six stations and 11.5 miles that came on line when the Gold Line extension, connecting Pasadena with Azusa, opened in March.

In the immediate context of L.A.’s attempts to turn its public-transit network from national punch line to something that increasingly resembles a mature system, 13 new Metro stations in less than three months qualifies as a pretty dramatic upgrade. (New York City has added exactly one subway station over the last 25 years, the Bay Area’s BART system fewer than a dozen stations over the last four decades.) The investment county voters made in approving the Measure R sales-tax hike in 2008 is showing dividends for the first time — and suggesting some progress in chipping away at the dominance of the car.

But if you step back and take a longer historical view, one that acknowledges that Los Angeles didn’t just exist but in many ways fundamentally shaped and defined itself before the rise of the freeway system, the new rail routes begin to take on a different character. Their arrival is part of a larger restoration, an attempt to dust off and build on a long-buried transit history that makes up much of the basic DNA of L.A. urbanism. That effort, for all its incompleteness and halting progress over the last three decades, is by the standards of American urban history unprecedented in scope.

Posted in Los Angeles, Santa Monica | Comments Off on LAT: Why the Expo Line to Santa Monica marks a rare kind of progress in American cities

Does The Bible Favor Diversity?

Posted on May 22, 2016 by Luke Ford

Chaim Amalek writes:
What is the Torah’s position on diversity? It seems not to favor it, given all the prohibitions on mixing different crops in one field or cross-breeding cattle (Leviticus 19:19). And then there is this, from Joshua 10:
Southern Cities Conquered
28 That day Joshua took Makkedah. He put the city and its king to the sword and totally destroyed everyone in it. He left no survivors. And he did to the king of Makkedah as he had done to the king of Jericho.
29 Then Joshua and all Israel with him moved on from Makkedah to Libnah and attacked it.
30 The LORD also gave that city and its king into Israel’s hand. The city and everyone in it Joshua put to the sword. He left no survivors there. And he did to its king as he had done to the king of Jericho.
31 Then Joshua and all Israel with him moved on from Libnah to Lachish; he took up positions against it and attacked it.
32 The LORD gave Lachish into Israel’s hands, and Joshua took it on the second day. The city and everyone in it he put to the sword, just as he had done to Libnah.
33 Meanwhile, Horam king of Gezer had come up to help Lachish, but Joshua defeated him and his army—until no survivors were left.
34 Then Joshua and all Israel with him moved on from Lachish to Eglon; they took up positions against it and attacked it.
35 They captured it that same day and put it to the sword and totally destroyed everyone in it, just as they had done to Lachish.
36 Then Joshua and all Israel with him went up from Eglon to Hebron and attacked it.
37 They took the city and put it to the sword, together with its king, its villages and everyone in it. They left no survivors. Just as at Eglon, they totally destroyed it and everyone in it.
38 Then Joshua and all Israel with him turned around and attacked Debir.
39 They took the city, its king and its villages, and put them to the sword. Everyone in it they totally destroyed. They left no survivors. They did to Debir and its king as they had done to Libnah and its king and to Hebron.
40 So Joshua subdued the whole region, including the hill country, the Negev, the western foothills and the mountain slopes, together with all their kings. He left no survivors. He totally destroyed all who breathed, just as the LORD, the God of Israel, had commanded.
—————-So what we see here is that Joshua did not embrace diversity as a source of strength, but rather as something to be blotted out. Similarly, when one species of ant takes over territory from another species of ant, it wipes them out entirely. Is this God’s plan for humanity?

* I still can’t reconcile the basic biblical commandment not to add or subtract from the Torah with the rabbi’s prohibition on eating chicken and cheese. I get the whole fence around the torah thing, but that is most exactly literally adding to the torah what it does not have
Also, even in the wilderness, God explicitly tells the Jews to keep Passover for seven days. Not eight. Seven. Even in the wilderness. It must really anger God to see these rabbis ignoring His will and turning it into an eight day holiday.
No wonder there is so much mixed dancing in the world
The Quran has much criticism of the Jews for adding endlessly to what the Torah teaches. And I think some of that criticism is valid.

* What happens to Yidden when they go Hollywood, and support the Hollywood agenda against God? Deuteronomy 28 spells it out:
15 However, if you do not obey the LORD your God and do not carefully follow all his commands and decrees I am giving you today, all these curses will come on you and overtake you:
16 You will be cursed in the city and cursed in the country.
17 Your basket and your kneading trough will be cursed.
18 The fruit of your womb will be cursed, and the crops of your land, and the calves of your herds and the lambs of your flocks.
19 You will be cursed when you come in and cursed when you go out.
20 The LORD will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him.
21 The LORD will plague you with diseases until he has destroyed you from the land you are entering to possess.
22 The LORD will strike you with wasting disease, with fever and inflammation, with scorching heat and drought, with blight and mildew, which will plague you until you perish.
23 The sky over your head will be bronze, the ground beneath you iron.
24 The LORD will turn the rain of your country into dust and powder; it will come down from the skies until you are destroyed.
25 The LORD will cause you to be defeated before your enemies. You will come at them from one direction but flee from them in seven, and you will become a thing of horror to all the kingdoms on earth.
26 Your carcasses will be food for all the birds and the wild animals, and there will be no one to frighten them away.
27 The LORD will afflict you with the boils of Egypt and with tumors, festering sores and the itch, from which you cannot be cured.
28 The LORD will afflict you with madness, blindness and confusion of mind.
29 At midday you will grope about like a blind person in the dark. You will be unsuccessful in everything you do; day after day you will be oppressed and robbed, with no one to rescue you.
30 You will be pledged to be married to a woman, but another will take her and rape her. You will build a house, but you will not live in it. You will plant a vineyard, but you will not even begin to enjoy its fruit.
31 Your ox will be slaughtered before your eyes, but you will eat none of it. Your donkey will be forcibly taken from you and will not be returned. Your sheep will be given to your enemies, and no one will rescue them.
32 Your sons and daughters will be given to another nation, and you will wear out your eyes watching for them day after day, powerless to lift a hand.
33 A people that you do not know will eat what your land and labor produce, and you will have nothing but cruel oppression all your days.
34 The sights you see will drive you mad.
35 The LORD will afflict your knees and legs with painful boils that cannot be cured, spreading from the soles of your feet to the top of your head.
36 The LORD will drive you and the king you set over you to a nation unknown to you or your ancestors. There you will worship other gods, gods of wood and stone.
37 You will become a thing of horror, a byword and an object of ridicule among all the peoples where the LORD will drive you.
38 You will sow much seed in the field but you will harvest little, because locusts will devour it.
39 You will plant vineyards and cultivate them but you will not drink the wine or gather the grapes, because worms will eat them.
40 You will have olive trees throughout your country but you will not use the oil, because the olives will drop off.
41 You will have sons and daughters but you will not keep them, because they will go into captivity.
42 Swarms of locusts will take over all your trees and the crops of your land.
43 The foreigners who reside among you will rise above you higher and higher, but you will sink lower and lower.
44 They will lend to you, but you will not lend to them. They will be the head, but you will be the tail.
45 All these curses will come on you. They will pursue you and overtake you until you are destroyed, because you did not obey the LORD your God and observe the commands and decrees he gave you.
46 They will be a sign and a wonder to you and your descendants forever.
47 Because you did not serve the LORD your God joyfully and gladly in the time of prosperity,
48 therefore in hunger and thirst, in nakedness and dire poverty, you will serve the enemies the LORD sends against you. He will put an iron yoke on your neck until he has destroyed you.
49 The LORD will bring a nation against you from far away, from the ends of the earth, like an eagle swooping down, a nation whose language you will not understand,
50 a fierce-looking nation without respect for the old or pity for the young.
51 They will devour the young of your livestock and the crops of your land until you are destroyed. They will leave you no grain, new wine or olive oil, nor any calves of your herds or lambs of your flocks until you are ruined.
52 They will lay siege to all the cities throughout your land until the high fortified walls in which you trust fall down. They will besiege all the cities throughout the land the LORD your God is giving you.
53 Because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege, you will eat the fruit of the womb, the flesh of the sons and daughters the LORD your God has given you.
54 Even the most gentle and sensitive man among you will have no compassion on his own brother or the wife he loves or his surviving children,
55 and he will not give to one of them any of the flesh of his children that he is eating. It will be all he has left because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege of all your cities.
56 The most gentle and sensitive woman among you—so sensitive and gentle that she would not venture to touch the ground with the sole of her foot—will begrudge the husband she loves and her own son or daughter
57 the afterbirth from her womb and the children she bears. For in her dire need she intends to eat them secretly because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege of your cities.
58 If you do not carefully follow all the words of this law, which are written in this book, and do not revere this glorious and awesome name—the LORD your God—
59 the LORD will send fearful plagues on you and your descendants, harsh and prolonged disasters, and severe and lingering illnesses.
60 He will bring on you all the diseases of Egypt that you dreaded, and they will cling to you.
61 The LORD will also bring on you every kind of sickness and disaster not recorded in this Book of the Law, until you are destroyed.
62 You who were as numerous as the stars in the sky will be left but few in number, because you did not obey the LORD your God.
63 Just as it pleased the LORD to make you prosper and increase in number, so it will please him to ruin and destroy you. You will be uprooted from the land you are entering to possess.
64 Then the LORD will scatter you among all nations, from one end of the earth to the other. There you will worship other gods—gods of wood and stone, which neither you nor your ancestors have known.
65 Among those nations you will find no repose, no resting place for the sole of your foot. There the LORD will give you an anxious mind, eyes weary with longing, and a despairing heart.
66 You will live in constant suspense, filled with dread both night and day, never sure of your life.
67 In the morning you will say, “If only it were evening!” and in the evening, “If only it were morning!”—because of the terror that will fill your hearts and the sights that your eyes will see.
68 The LORD will send you back in ships to Egypt on a journey I said you should never make again. There you will offer yourselves for sale to your enemies as male and female slaves, but no one will buy you.

* Roman Catholic Goyim – BEHOLD YOUR POPE! Listen to his words! Gape with amazement at how such a man as this could be leading Christendom! Scroll down on the link for English language translation.

* Today’s Quranic verse comes from Surah 29:
29:46 And dispute ye not with the People of the Book, except with means better (than mere disputation), unless it be with those of them who inflict wrong (and injury): but say, “We believe in the revelation which has come down to us and in that which came down to you; Our Allah and your Allah is one; and it is to Him we bow (in Islam).”

* Tons of interesting stuff in Deuteronomy, much of it antithetical to free market fetishists.

* Hot chicks won in battle. What to do with them. From Deuteronomy 21. Likely this was an improvement over prevailing practices of that time:
Marrying a Captive Woman
10 When you go to war against your enemies and the LORD your God delivers them into your hands and you take captives,
11 if you notice among the captives a beautiful woman and are attracted to her, you may take her as your wife.
12 Bring her into your home and have her shave her head, trim her nails
13 and put aside the clothes she was wearing when captured. After she has lived in your house and mourned her father and mother for a full month, then you may go to her and be her husband and she shall be your wife.
14 If you are not pleased with her, let her go wherever she wishes. You must not sell her or treat her as a slave, since you have dishonored her.

* We need this rule. From Deuteronomy 19:
Witnesses
15 One witness is not enough to convict anyone accused of any crime or offense they may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.
16 If a malicious witness takes the stand to accuse someone of a crime,
17 the two people involved in the dispute must stand in the presence of the LORD before the priests and the judges who are in office at the time.
18 The judges must make a thorough investigation, and if the witness proves to be a liar, giving false testimony against a fellow Israelite,
19 then do to the false witness as that witness intended to do to the other party. You must purge the evil from among you.
———————
[Thus, if, for example, a woman is found to have falsely accused a man of rape, she should be sentenced to serve a like amount of time in a similar setting.]
20 The rest of the people will hear of this and be afraid, and never again will such an evil thing be done among you.
21 Show no pity: life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.

* Deuteronomics. Most definitely not in accord with Reaganomics.
From Deuteronomy 15:
The Year for Canceling Debts
1 At the end of every seven years you must cancel debts.
2 This is how it is to be done: Every creditor shall cancel any loan they have made to a fellow Israelite. They shall not require payment from anyone among their own people, because the LORD’s time for canceling debts has been proclaimed.
3 You may require payment from a foreigner, but you must cancel any debt your fellow Israelite owes you.

* Torah Says: Do Not Worship Ayn Rand or the Free Market!
Deuteronomy Chapter 13:
1 If a prophet [e.g., Ayn Rand], or one who foretells by dreams, appears among you and announces to you a sign or wonder,
2 and if the sign or wonder spoken of takes place, and the prophet says, “Let us follow other gods” (gods you have not known) “and let us worship them,” [e.g., free markets and open borders]
3 you must not listen to the words of that prophet or dreamer. . . .
5 That prophet or dreamer must be put to death for inciting rebellion against the LORD your God . . . . You must purge the evil from among you. [This is what Donald Trump is doing to the conservative establishment.]

* Today’s Quranic verses. From Surah 24:
26. Women impure are for men impure, and men impure for women impure and women of purity are for men of purity, and men of purity are for women of purity: these are not affected by what people say: for them there is forgiveness, and a provision honourable.
And here is a very different translation of the same verse (Sahih International version):
Evil words are for evil men, and evil men are [subjected] to evil words. And good words are for good men, and good men are [an object] of good words. Those [good people] are declared innocent of what the slanderers say. For them is forgiveness and noble provision.

* What about the children? Won’t anyone think of the children? From Deuteronomy, chapter 3:
3 So the LORD our God also gave into our hands Og king of Bashan and all his army. We struck them down, leaving no survivors.
4 At that time we took all his cities. There was not one of the sixty cities that we did not take from them—the whole region of Argob, Og’s kingdom in Bashan.
5 All these cities were fortified with high walls and with gates and bars, and there were also a great many unwalled villages.
6 We completely destroyed them, as we had done with Sihon king of Heshbon, destroying every city—men, women and children.
7 But all the livestock and the plunder from their cities we carried off for ourselves.

* What should a Torah Jew do when learning Torah makes him increasingly skeptical that it is the word of God? Should he stop, and switch to more secular pursuits? Or should he explore other religions? Asking for a friend.

Posted in Diversity | Comments Off on Does The Bible Favor Diversity?

IQ Differences By Sex

Posted on May 21, 2016 by Luke Ford

REPORT: The conventional wisdom about sex differences in IQ is that males and females have the same average IQ. The conventional wisdom also stipulates that males are more variable than females, meaning that there are more mentally deficient and gifted males than females.

Presented here is information from two good papers on sex differences in IQ that disagree yet end up having the same conclusion with regard to the high extreme of IQs. Additionally, data from Mensa Canada is given that agrees with both those papers on that point.

Before continuing, it might be prudent to tackle one of the first objections that will be raised to a finding that the sexes are not equal in terms of IQ: that IQ tests are biased. Test bias is an intricate subject, and if you are interested in the details, the book Bias in Mental Testing by Arthur R. Jensen is suggested. (He started out believing that IQ tests were biased and through careful research ended up concluding that they generally were not).

Let it suffice to point out the analogy of height differences: Men are taller on average than women. If one does not like the situation, one cannot seriously accuse the height-measuring device of being biased. Many people have been influenced by anti-IQ reporting in the media, and politically correct writings by authors such as Stephen J. Gould to think that if IQ tests show an inequality it is obvious evidence that they are biased. There are ways of measuring test bias and merely showing that there is a difference between groups is not enough.

WISC-R

The paper that supports the conventional wisdom is Jensen, A. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (1983). It finds that females have a 101.41 mean IQ with a 13.55 standard deviation versus males that have a 103.08 mean IQ with a 14.54 standard deviation. You may want to read the IQ Basics page first if you are unfamiliar with IQ and standard deviations. By just looking at those figures, it seems to corroborate the conventional wisdom that has been known for decades: the average IQs are about the same and males are a bit more variable. However, if the summary data is used to generate a graph, a different picture emerges…

COMMENTS AT STEVE SAILER:

* …while the *average* IQs of White women and White men are the same, 100, the *ranges* are not.

The IQ Bell curve “tails” are fatter for men. In other words, most women’s scores cluster near 100, forming a very narrow and tall curve; but at the highest and lowest IQ levels, there are far more men, meaning the male curve is much broader and thicker. Ergo, there are more retarded White men than White women, but there are also more *geniuses* among White men than White women.

So, at professional levels, those few White women capable of landing those sorts of positions, (even with the Affirmative Action boost), ARE outnumbered and outclassed by smarter White men. Since professional women have to compete (and do so poorly) against all these smart(er) men, of COURSE they hate them. Donald Trump is the perfect symbol for these careerist, dried up, barren harpies, of all they envy and loathe.

(And *I’m* a smart White woman who is a fan of Trump!)

* Men outnumber women at the left and right ends of the IQ bell curve. Most of the brightest minds belong to men, as do most of the dullest.

Men are more logical than women. We’re more willing (and able) to break away from the herd, think outside the box and come up with new ideas. We’re more creative. Our curiosity about the world is deeper (and purer). Our need to understand how things work and why things are is stronger.

(Most men, like most women, are mindless followers. But the folks who are not mindless followers are mostly men. )

Girls are more obedient than boys. They’re more tolerant of boredom. They accept more readily the idea that something should be done because an authority figure wants it done. Thus, they grow up to become good worker drones – loyal, hard-working cogs.

(When I was in school, I was always struck by the fact that the girls in study groups focused all of their energy on memorizing passages from the textbook. They had no interest in synthesizing new information by analyzing its connections to what they already knew, or exploring its wider implications and deeper ramifications. They seemed to think that learning was nothing more than a cognitive binge-and-purge operation: stuff an umpteen number of factoids in your head and then spit them out on command. To me, that was boring beyond belief.)

But they tend to fall apart when they have to deal with situations where split-second decisions must be made based on constantly-changing information. Most women don’t have the capacity to form what the military calls total situational awareness, where you know not only where everything around you is right now, but where it’s been and where it might be going. Thus, they make bad leaders, especially in war.

(Keep in mind that I’m talking about generalities. When I say, “Men are taller than women,” don’t come back with, “I read an article about a 6’10″ fashion model from Germany! There are lots of women who are taller than men!” That kind of argument is so … girly.)

* Yeah, I think the differences in curiosity between men and women are more important than any differences in IQ at the extreme ends of the bell curve.

Many girls are curious about the world in their early adolescence, but they lose it as they mature. I saw this happen to my friends and sister (unbiased POV because I’m a woman too). A lot of women just become extremely focused on personal relationships and their own emotional lives. The more unstable their relationship situation, the less curiosity they have.

I’m an 8th grade teacher and I notice how students act too. When we did a unit on world religions the boys were totally enthralled and really enjoyed asking me further questions about the tenets of Buddhism, Judaism, etc. Only one of the girls (the most attractive one in the class, don’t know whether it was coincidental or not) was interested in the same way. The rest of the girls just wanted their grade and to complete the worksheets and project “correctly.” Girls are generally more well-behaved than the boys but get snippy/anxious if I am unwilling to lead them to the right answer.

* Men and women do not on average score the same on various subsections of IQ tests. Ergo whether they have the same “IQ” or not is going to be a matter of weighting. If you weight mathematical, spatial and analytical highly then men are clearly smarter. (And there are several IQ tests that show a consistent male advantage. They have more subtests that men do well on.) You could arguably get the same result for women, if you heavily weight plain vanilla verbal–reading comprehension. Pick what you value.

Secondly, most of the IQ testing and quasi-IQ testing that’s done comes from school kids. For instance the big-kahuna, the SAT is done on 16 or newbie 17 year olds. At that age, the females are young *women*. They are adult women–if you ones. They are sexually mature and have stopped growing. Many stopped growing and reached their adult height *years* previously. In contrast the males are … well … boys. Yes, they can make babies, but many of them have not even stopped growing. They are in no sense physically “mature” like the girls. Most of them won’t be equivalently mature to a 16 or 17 year old girl until they are in their first year or two of college–at least 18, more like 19 or 20. Both the girls and the boys will–excepting the terrible college PC crap–be “wising up” the next few years. But only the boys will still be actually physically growing, maturing their brain and actually getting smarter.

I confess I don’t have a link, but I’ve definitely read that some studies suggest the SAT slightly overpredicts female adult IQ relative to male IQ.

Thirdly, Whiskey’s writing was sloppy, but I don’t think he was trying to imply anything the huge white-black IQ gap for men and women, but rather a skills gap. This is certainly true.

It’s just a bone obvious fact that men continue to do pretty much all the material productive labor that *needs* doing. Women do quite a bit of clerical paper pushing, and routine service work–waitress, checkout clerk, maid–but otherwise matter chiefly in traditional female “helping professions”–teaching and nursing. If all the women in the country did not show up for work tomorrow we men would have to hustle to workaround some missing women service workers (slight backup at Starbucks this morning!), dive into some clerical work, and get some guys over the schools to monitor the kiddies. But the only critical hit I can see would be in the hospitals where, jump-into-the-breach guys would not have necessary nursing skills. We couldn’t immediately handle the patient load and would lose some folks (which is tolerable with sane triage … we don’t need to patch up that gangbanger or that old geezer). In contrast if *men* did not show up for work tomorrow … the world would end. We’d be living in the dark ages–literally–almost immediately. Civilization would end.

That’s the skills gap and why there is a “pay gap” that scum like Hillary yap on and on about endlessly without describing honestly.

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on IQ Differences By Sex

Black Woman Asks In The New York Times: Is Egg Freezing Only for White Women?

Posted on May 21, 2016 by Luke Ford

“By RENIQUA ALLEN
I want to have a kid someday, but I’m afraid of the stigma of single motherhood.”

Because as we all know, blacks are terribly afraid to have children out of wedlock. After all, only 72% of black kids are born out of wedlock.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Black Woman Asks In The New York Times: Is Egg Freezing Only for White Women?