Voting to Leave Europe Is the Most un-Jewish Thing You Can Do

Jews tend to prefer a strong central government because Jews have rarely been popular and have survived for millennia in the diaspora by cutting deals with elites.

Ramzpaul: “It is very anti-Semitic of you to imply that British Jews are Jews first.”

Anshel Pfeffer writes for Haaretz:

It betrays the fortunate legacy of British Jews to hope that a Brexit will deny other refugees of war and dictatorship the sanctuary our great-grandparents received.
Like the overwhelming majority of British Jews, I am the descendant of ancestors who fled countries where persecution and pogroms were the norm. Put simply, if they had failed to find a safe haven in Britain, their descendants would not be alive today.
I find it hard to contain the shame that next Thursday, in the referendum on Britain’s membership in the European Union, many Jews will vote to leave. For all the talk of sovereignty and democracy being used to justify the escape from the grasp of the venal, nonelected bureaucrats in Brussels, the real motive of those voting to leave will be a fear of immigrants.
It doesn’t matter if you’re black-hatted frum or a bacon-eater who hasn’t seen the inside of a shul for decades, and it’s got nothing to do with your politics or how supportive or critical you are of Israel. There can be no more complete betrayal of the fortunate legacy of British Jews than to leave Europe in the hope that this will deny other refugees of war and dictatorship the sanctuary our great-grandparents received. Any attempt to justify it is rank hypocrisy bordering on racism.
There is of course a legitimate concern over the fact that many of the potential immigrants today are Muslims, coming from countries where crude anti-Semitic propaganda is a major staple of the daily diet. It would be foolish to deny the need for vigilance by the security services and the media. Does that mean human beings who had the misfortune to be born in countries where despots use Israel and the Jews as scapegoats for their own crimes should be left to their fate?
Few of the millions of immigrants arriving in Britain over the last century came from model democracies. Our grandparents certainly didn’t. And yet Britain is a more tolerant and open society than ever and, thanks to this tolerance, no minority has prospered more than British Jews.
Double historical burden
And yet, according to a Jewish Chronicle poll conducted last month, over a third of the Jews in Britain are planning to turn their backs on their heritage and vote for a Brexit. Of course, about half are voting to remain (and 17 percent were still undecided), but it beggars belief that it’s not just a few misfits and oddballs – at least 34 percent have no shame.
Jews cannot afford the luxury of having short historical memories. British Jews bear a unique double historical burden. They’re members of the one European minority that suffered more than any other throughout two millennia of mass murder, systematic discrimination and forced conversion. And they’re citizens of the one country in the last century to fight the entire duration of two world wars and the Cold War to rid Europe of dictatorships – Nazism and Communism.
Many of the British complaints over the EU’s restrictions and flawed policies are fully justified, but for all its Francophone dysfunction, today’s Europe – which has enjoyed seven decades of peace and trades in one single market – is more than anything the victory of British values won through immense British sacrifice. And while many Jews justly feel that the EU’s diplomats unfairly focus on criticizing Israel (which in real terms enjoys the most EU trade and cooperation in investment and research among non-European countries), how can they ignore the work done by the Union’s institutions in both fighting anti-Semitism and safeguarding Jewish culture in Europe?
In the company of Le Pen and Putin
Look around; there are still people among us who were alive back when nearly the entire continent was a hunting ground for Jews. Seventy years later, Jews have never been such equal and even honored citizens of Europe as they are today in the EU.

Judaism provides very little guidance for how Jews should vote in gentile elections so saying a vote against the EU is “unJewish” is hyperbole. There’s also nothing in Torah mandating that Jews vote in gentile elections to provide refugees with safe harbor. Judaism is almost entirely concerned with the preservation and welfare of Jews. It has very little to say about gentiles. Remember the story about the goy’s teeth?

The Goy's Teeth (scene from A Serious Man) from Diegech on Vimeo.

I agree with the author that the primary reason some British Jews will vote to leave the EU is fear of immigrants.

“Any attempt to justify it is rank hypocrisy bordering on racism.”

There is no halacah (Jewish law) against racism. Judaism holds, after all, that the Jews are God’s Chosen People.

“Does that mean human beings who had the misfortune to be born in countries where despots use Israel and the Jews as scapegoats for their own crimes should be left to their fate?”

The Torah does not have much to say about such gentile policy questions. Torah certainly does not advocate that a Jewish state accept such people. From the Torah perspective, there is no room for non-Jewish citizenship in the Jewish state. So why should Jews in the diaspora advocate that their particular gentile host country accept Muslims who are fundamentally at odds with the West?

“Few of the millions of immigrants arriving in Britain over the last century came from model democracies. Our grandparents certainly didn’t. And yet Britain is a more tolerant and open society than ever and, thanks to this tolerance, no minority has prospered more than British Jews.”

Anglos create the best countries (examples include the United States, Canada, England, Australia, and New Zealand). When you diminish the Anglo portion of these countries, they go downhill.

“British Jews bear a unique double historical burden. They’re members of the one European minority that suffered more than any other throughout two millennia of mass murder, systematic discrimination and forced conversion. And they’re citizens of the one country in the last century to fight the entire duration of two world wars and the Cold War to rid Europe of dictatorships – Nazism and Communism.”

Jews have suffered more than any other minority?

Posted in England, EU, Europe, Jews | Comments Off on Voting to Leave Europe Is the Most un-Jewish Thing You Can Do

Brooklyn’s Private Jewish Patrols Wield Power. Some Call Them Bullies.

Chaim Amalek: “The obvious way out of this problem is staring us in the face: diversity. Let’s compel the Shomrim to admit as many black goyim as their numbers warrant. Diversity! Is there nothing it can’t do?”

New York Times: Last month, two men linked to the shomrim in Williamsburg admitted taking part in the assault of a black man in their neighborhood. And in April, as part of a federal investigation, a former member of the Borough Park shomrim was arrested on charges of trying to secure handgun permits by offering bribes to the police.

That investigation led last week to the arrest of Norman Seabrook, the powerful head of the New York City correction officers’ union, who had dealings with an Upper West Side real-estate developer with ties to the New York Police Department and to Mayor Bill de Blasio. Several police officials who have come under scrutiny in the investigation had at one time or another held high-ranking posts in the 66th Police Precinct, which covers Borough Park and has in the past come under pressure from the Orthodox community.

In 1978, a mob angry over the murder of an elderly Hasidic man stormed the station house demanding better protection. Thirty years later, a similar crowd destroyed two police cars after a Jewish caterer was arrested during a traffic stop…

…a member of a Crown Heights shomrim group called the Shmira fled to Israel to escape charges of beating a black man with a nightstick; and a decade before that, when two men from another Crown Heights shomrim were convicted of assaulting another a black man with their radios.

The tensions play out in the crowded ethnic landscape of central Brooklyn, where blacks and Hasidim have lived in proximity for decades. Critics of the shomrim say the groups have leveraged this friction: In one of their recruitment videos, ordinary scenes from Borough Park — people shopping, a young boy learning Torah — are intercut with the image of a black man walking through the neighborhood and eventually stealing a woman’s purse…

In many Hasidic neighborhoods, shomrim groups court the police, honoring them at breakfasts at kosher bakeries and attending — sometimes planning — retirement affairs for officials who are leaving the department. When Stephen McAllister took command of the 66th Precinct in 2002, a crowd of Hasidic men, many from the shomrim, stood in line for hours at the station house to welcome him.

“It was a weird, but great, experience,” said Mr. McAllister, now the police commissioner in Floral Park, N.Y. “All of them came in saying: ‘Hi, I’m so-and-so. I’m the most important guy around. Don’t pay any attention to the next guy.’”

Posted in Brooklyn, Shomrim | Comments Off on Brooklyn’s Private Jewish Patrols Wield Power. Some Call Them Bullies.

Belgium Before & After The Muslim Invasion

ClKj2WaWEAAaAUh

ClKj2WaWgAE2uIY

Heretic tweets: “Conservatives never give a single conservative reason for opposing Muslim immigration.”

John Rivers responds: “Muslims are mean to gays, a danger to drunk club girls, and will make Tranny Bathrooms harder to implement.”

Posted in Belgium, Islam | Comments Off on Belgium Before & After The Muslim Invasion

The Rise of “Kamikaze Killers”

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* I note once again that since the Age of Reagan, the US has seen a net gain of some 100 million (that we know about) in one generation, and all of it due to immigration. 229 million 1981, 324 million 2016, and close to 10% of the latter foreign born.

http://www.susps.org/overview/immigration.html

Plus we know that second-generation immigrants tend in the direction of anger, frustration, etc., when they find themselves in environments at odds with their genetic dispositions. (Which for some reason is now the main reason for bringing them in as “refugees”….)

We would surely expect to see a corresponding shift in what the nature of used to be called crimes of passion.

* Yet we still have the same number of Senators (100) and Representatives (435) we had 100 or even 150 million people ago. So your vote is definitely being watered down and your congressional districts are significantly larger, which means your congressman cares even less about you than he did fifty years ago.

The US was fully populated at 150 million. We fought WW2 with about 140 million which was enough to put 12 million into uniform and fill our factories with enough workers to crank out 300K airplanes and all the assorted kit needed to win the largest war in history.

Incidentally if we still had 140 million today, we’d be the 9th or 10th most populous nation on Earth depending upon whether the EU is counted as one entity. And looking at the other nations that would top us at that level would bring no cause for envy. Pretty much all the nations above 140 million are shit holes. In fact outside of Japan the six or so nations that would follow us are shit holes too.

Maybe our leaders should look at the population list and see how the overwhelming majority of the top twenty are all pretty much shit holes. It might, I say might, give them pause.

* Hollywood and the video game industry have acted as a feedback loop amplifying the fascination with lone mass killers amongst alienated men.

* Intimate forms of serial killing are much more difficult to sustain, now, thanks to DNA identification and other forms of modern forensics.

* What we have going on in this country is a “slow, rolling Jihadist Zombie Apocalypse.” By that I mean you can never know when that nice young Muslim boy next store is going to show up at your door screaming “Allahu Akbar” and waving a machete.

This man is a pious young Muslim who attends the Mosque frequently and is quite Religious. He may or may not be outspoken about his beliefs. Unfortunately, there are thousands of Muslims in this country that fit that description and we can’t tell which ones will go ‘Zombie” on us.

Our best bet to ID them is to cut the population of this type of person as much as possible. Start by eliminating all Muslims coming into the country except for those on Diplomatic Passports and spouses. Deport all non-citizen Muslims that we can.

Then make it tough on Muslim families and Mullahs who suspect they might go bad and give them an incentive to turn them in. Do this by deporting all Families that we can of Jihadists who act on their beliefs and closing the Mosques they worshiped at. Put the word out that this will happen.

To do the above will take a change of the POV in DC. A lot more of us will have to die before their attitude will change.

* The serial killer heyday of the 70s and 80s had some characteristics that have declined or disappeared from society. These include hitch hiking, people’s willingness to interact with strangers, street prostitution, the ability of a person working odd jobs to afford a detached house with a basement, and potential victims not leaving a constant trail of their whereabouts with text masseages, selfies, and tower pings. It’s hard to be a psycho killer these days.

* The only good thing that came out of America going from a high trust society to a low trust society is that it has made it a lot harder for serial killers to ply their trade.

* The response to the Orlando massacre sounds like it was a fiasco. One off-duty cop was there when it started and exchanged shots with the Afghan. 14 cops were there at 2:15am, 14 v. 1 (as far as we know), and the killing continued until 5am?

What percentage of the victims do you think were shot by cops?

* [Charles] Whitman [Texas bell tower shooter) tried to get help ahead of time and told medical people he wasn’t right in the head anymore.

But that kind of goes a long with the idea that kamikaze killing wasn’t much at all part of American culture up through the mid-1960s. The seminal event was a guy with a massive medical problem. But that injected the meme of the kamikaze killer into American culture.

Stuff like that had happened before in America, but it didn’t really become part of culture. I’d be interested in reading a study of news coverage of the Whitman shooting. There were big technological advancements in television news around that time, and they may have played a role, along with the rise of the Baby Boomers, in why so much of current social history seems to start right around the time of JFK’s assassination / the Beatles on Ed Sullivan.

* Technology has played a role in both the decline of serial killers and the rise of spree killers. Semiautomatics are far more widely available than they were in the past, which makes spree killing easier. Spree killers also crave attention, which they get far more of now than 50 years ago.

Serial killing is harder thanks to cell phone use, widespread use of security cameras, DNA and other forms of forensic evidence, media, better cooperation and sharing of evidence across jurisdictions, etc. Ted Bundy was probably one of the smartest serial killers ever, and yet he would’ve been caught rather quickly if he were trying to commit his murders in the same manner today.

* Sailer’s description of a ‘Christian’ ethnicity might be valid. Think of how they describe people in Iraq. They have Kurds, Sunni and Shia. Supposedly the Sunni and Shia are both ethnic Arabs, but are classed differently due to religion. Or consider Bosnia where you have Bosniaks (muslims) and Serbs. Bosniaks are probably genetically identical to Serbs, but are treated as a different ethnic group.

You could say they are really treated differently due to religion, but since religion takes on so many features of ones’ diet, holidays, culture, etc., they are effectively treated as different ethnic groups.

* I’d like to think there was some correlation between belief in the afterlife and being judged, and that that would explain why we have so many mass killers in our society today, rather than yesterday, but it just doesn’t work. In the first place I don’t think that mass killings are common in faiths such as Hinduism, Buddhism, or whatever faiths are most common in China and Japan. So there has to be some reason why it is so common that doesn’t have to do with a doctrine of salvation/damnation.

Serial killers presuppose a degree of urbanization and fragmentation. But even so, people like Hamilton Fish, Belle Gunness, the Lonely Hearts Killers, as well as the ones you mentioned were active well before the 1960′s.

I think the reason serial killers took off in the ’60′s up through the early ’90′s (e.g., Joel Rifkin, Jeffrey Dahmer) is because people, usually women but always (cf. John Wayne Gacy, Dahmer, Wayne Williams) were floating around anonymously and were easy to kill without anyone noticing.

In addition to serial killers however you have also spree killers like the Starkweather-Fugati dyad in 1957. They are not exactly the same thing.

Mass killers like Charles Whitman probably start there, but as a grace note I should say that Whitman was preceded by the shocking murder of the 8 nurses in Chicago by Richard Speck, which took place about two weeks earlier. I remember the Whitman case unfolding on the radio that day, I don’t recall there being any significant TV coverage. At any rate, the latter was I guess a spree killing, rather than a “kamikaze killing.”

As for kamikazes the Japanese in WW2 were not the only ones to do this, the Balinese did it several times against the Dutch in the early 20th Century. (and they are Hindus.) And we also know that modern suicide bombing began in Sri Lanka, the Tamil Tigers, and they, too, are Hindus, I believe.

It’s really hard to connect up all of these types of killings.

I would agree that the Orlando killings, the VA Tech killings, 9/11, Sandy Hook, Columbine, Bataclan, the Aurora theater shootings, and others, might fit this typological setting of “Kamikaze killings,” except even there there are differences; most of those were brought on by anger and a desire to take the world with them, while three of them were clearly motivated by Islamic rewards. Except: some of the Bataclan killers tried to flee, as did the Charlie Hebdo killers, so we are back at square one. Also, we have to include the Bath School Disaster in this enumeration, even though it happened 80 years ago, and was motivated by nothing more complicated than raised taxes and a lost election. And we can’t forget the various terrorist and anarchist bombings, either.

Posted in America | Comments Off on The Rise of “Kamikaze Killers”

Ilana Mercer: In Order To Survive, Perhaps Christians Should Consider Converting To Judaism?

Ilana Mercer writes: There’s none of this turn-the-other-cheek, love-your-enemy, expiate-for-enemy’s-sins stuff in The Hebrew Bible and in Judaism, generally. There’s justice. Be just to your enemies, yes! But love them, welcome them into your home, let them walk all over you, even kill you when The Prophet moves them? Never!
In order to survive, perhaps Christians should consider converting to Judaism?

Posted in Christianity | Comments Off on Ilana Mercer: In Order To Survive, Perhaps Christians Should Consider Converting To Judaism?