Is this serial killer behind some of the worst murders of our time?

News: A COLD case detective starts researching a serial killer, and begins linking him to some of the most high-profile murder cases in American history.
The killer’s moves and motives line up suspiciously well with these murders, and so the detective keeps digging, writing him a letter asking for a confession. The killer soon writes back …
This sounds like the teaser for a terrible B-movie — or a terrific one — but this is the true, twisted tale of Edward Wayne Edwards, who, according to former FBI cold case taskforce detective John Cameron, may be one of the most prolific killers of all time.
Edwards was officially convicted of five murders during his lifetime, but Cameron believes he killed hundreds of times, setting up others for the murders along the way. The pair traded letters over a nine-month period, until Edwards died in 2011, aged 77.

Cameron claims Edwards was responsible for some of the most heinous murder cases over the past half-century, including the West Memphis Three murders, the Zodiac killings, the Teresa Halbach murder — as recently featured in the Netflix documentary Making A Murderer — and even the slaying of JonBenet Ramsey.
It all sounds rather fanciful, until you look at the evidence, and realise that Cameron’s theory makes a lot of sense. He first became interested in Edwards in 2010 after reading his 1972 autobiography The Metamorphosis of a Criminal: The True Life Story of Ed Edwards — ironically about how the former criminal had reformed — and realised more than a few dates and facts lined up with unsolved murders…

Cameron explains that Edwards was a ritual killer, with his murders occurring on dates that tie to the occult, Catholic holidays, US holidays, and important dates in his life, such as his mother’s birthday and the day of her death.
Teresa Halbach — the subject of Netflix documentary Making Of A Murderer — was murdered on Halloween, a date that looms large in Edwards’ legacy. He was living an hour from the murder scene at the time, and had previously killed in Wisconsin — a fact that may have gone undiscovered if it wasn’t for his daughter making a gruesome discovery and tipping off police.
“She watched a special on a 1980 Wisconsin double-murder and remembered her dad taking her and her brothers to the scene”, Cameron recalls.
“This murder ended up being his undoing and it occurred 65km from Avery’s Auto Salvage [where Halbach’s body was found].

Ed wrote about Wisconsin in his book and that was a clue that he had killed there. He killed people whose names were contained in his book. He killed in states he named in his book. The name Teresa is a big name in his book and Wisconsin so he would have spent two years preparing to kill Teresa Halbach in Wisconsin.”
Cameron also posits the name “Avery” was another link. “Steven Avery became the fall guy because of his name”, he claims.
“Paul Avery was the San Francisco Chronicle reporter who chased the Zodiac his entire career. Ed sent him what is known as the Halloween Card, which told Avery that there was a clue to his identity.”
The card contained the numbers 6-14-33: Edwards’ date of birth.

21bd59152dda2a720d598e8cc8ef86c1

Posted in Crime, Murder | Comments Off on Is this serial killer behind some of the worst murders of our time?

What’s The Argument Against Nationalism?

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* It’s really impressive how much out-of-control outrage the elite can get gin up over an argument that is so empty.

What is actually wrong with nationalism? What is wrong with citizens of a country seeking to keep the country mostly intact with respect to its peoples and culture?

I’ve asked that question in any number of places. I’ve never received what I would call a rational response.

The elites have many smears they use for nationalism — nativist, xenophobe, racist, bigot. But, apart from these entirely emotional terms, what is the argument against nationalism?

Their “arguments” always end where they start: with scare mongering, with pretending that any nationalistic attitude is and must be a precursor to hate and fascism. But on what rational basis can they possibly leap to such extraordinary conclusions? Were the US and England fascist, hate-filled countries until we had massive immigration? In the US, were the years between the closing down of immigration in the 1920s and its opening up in the 60s an ongoing devolution into authoritarianism and hate? Weren’t they instead a time a time when The Common Man was celebrated, a time of increasing prosperity for all and enfranchisement of all groups?

Really, what’s the argument? Why are the elites always reduced to talking about “fear of the other” (is there a more childish, or superstitious expression?), and “hate”, and other boogeymen of their own manufacture when the subject of nationalism comes up?

* Funny, whenever I’ve used the word “cosmopolitan” in the sense that the globalists like to think of themselves, I’ve been accused of using an old anti-semitic slur. Apparently, according to every single Jewish person I’ve ever had encounters with, “cosmopolitan” was an old code-word for “Jew”, slightly more noxious than calling someone a dirty kike or putting parentheses around their name. Perhaps I’ve just been dealing with the wrong Jewish people.

* I’m told it is a horrible anti-semetic slur now. This, of course, by Jews who tell me that any time I oppose anything any Democrat wants to do that I’m a Nazi or worse. (How the fuck I’m supposed to be worse than a Nazi I don’t know, but they insist upon it.) I guess that by saying “cosmopolitan” I’m micro-aggressing against them, because I might slip “rootless” into the conversation somewhere. You know, like saying “niggardly” is the same thing as calling for slavery.

* I guess it depends on how you define sophisticated. Ross distinguishes between a surface cosmopolitanism and a deeper one, but one could argue Obama is more of a deeper cosmopolitan, having lived in places like Indonesia, rather than having just been a tourist.

And I’m sure Obama could speak knowledgeably about the latest cultural phenomena.

But years ago, Steve wrote about Obama’s skill at articulating the arguments of his opponents. I think that’s less true today, as the Overton window has shifted to include more antagonistic opponents. I’m sure Obama could articulate, say, Marco Rubio’s views. But not Trump’s.

A temporary moratorium on Muslim immigration isn’t something Obama would be comfortable batting around in the salons of Georgetown. It’s something he’d dismiss with a “wrong side of history” or a “It’s not who we are”.

Same with Trump’s views on trade or immigration in general. So, in that sense, Obama isn’t sophisticated. As most cosmopolitans aren’t.

Posted in Nationalism | Comments Off on What’s The Argument Against Nationalism?

Hillary & Bill Clinton See ‘Hamilton’

Report: “If we broke up the big banks tomorrow,” Mrs. Clinton asked the audience of black, white and Hispanic union members, “would that end racism? Would that end sexism? Would that end discrimination against the L.G.B.T. community?,” she said, using an abbreviation for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender. “Would that make people feel more welcoming to immigrants overnight?”

At each question, the crowd called back with a resounding no.

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* In other words, such utopian goals as ending racism, ending sexism, ending LGBT discrimination, and welcoming immigrants overnight (!) are touted as very important struggles in order to distract from economic/financial issues such as the power of large investment banks, etc.

Well done, Hillary.

* Thank god in heaven the reporter noted she spoke to “black, white and Hispanic” union members. Can you imagine if the reporter had only said she spoke to “union members”? How poorly informed that would have left us.

Oddly, I never see any Trump rally described as Trump speaking to white, black and Hispanic Trump fans.

* The Founding Fathers had designed weights and balances that, if their recommendations were followed (first of all, that on immigration), would have preserved freedom in the USA.

Once you have ample immigration, you have difference between peoples. Difference causes resentment (even the difference between homosexuals, disregarded by the many, and heterosexuals); resentment is a body of “anger energy” that awaits the best demagogue or demagoguery to turn into its arm. It’s a resource, like oil. It’s there to be used by someone.

The difference is, oilfields and seams can’t be created. Social anger can. So, they have this most precious of instruments of control and power, with the fantastic attribute that it can be created, apparently with no limit.
You don’t expect them to restrain themselves from creating and fostering resentment, feelings of entitlement and victimhood, do you?

* Her comment is the cleverest thing a skillful demagogue would say to the crowd she was addressing.

If you really don’t understand what it means, you must be someone who presumes good faith in the others, even if the others are people at the top of the power ladder.

* Well Granny may not be moral, ethical, honest, capable, experienced or consistent, but she certainly seems colorful. Sure she has a black heart and a dark soul which may or may not be in her possession, but that’s a good thing to her voting base isn’t it? She’s BAD, which isn’t the same as good, but appeals to who she wants to vote for her. The Low-Info Emo ignorant, imperceptive Anti-White bigots who hate success because its just unfair to losers and lazy bums.
Some people say black isn’t a color, because optical experts who understand the physics involved in the illusion of color to your optic nerves will tell you its imperceptive aspects violate the concept of color of which there are 256 hues, but that’s just racist isn’t it? When you think about it, everything is racist based on the color of your skin or the melanin content of your epidermis. And in this topsy turvy world of newspeak, obfuscation, dogmatic pseudoscientific beliefs and cultural marxism, the Truth is lost on those who find it hurts their feelings.
So, what difference at this point does it make?

* She is doing what she does best: condescend to the minority crowd while simultaneously lining her pocketbook with payoff money from Wall Street.

* He hired himSELF to play Hamilton! He is no dummy,like his countryman, Sonia Sotomayor. Hamilton was not Puerto Rican, BTW. He was also the dreamiest of the Founders. Chicks loved him. This Manuel guy is painfully homely. And, I’d wager,quite gay. I’d also include Jessie Williams in that category. (Gay).

* I recently went to a software conference where Congressman John Lewis spoke (why?). It was EXACTLY like that. The man received a lonnnnnggg standing ovation because nobody in the 90% white (9% Asian/1% other) audience wanted to be the first one to stop clapping. It was hilarious if you knew to notice it.

* I have an allergic reaction to rapping, so the little bits of it that I’ve seen sounded awful to me. But some people seem to like rapping, so that wouldn’t be an obstacle for them. Are all the people who genuinely like rapping stupid? Perhaps. I mean, the guys who review hip hop for the Village Voice or whatever aren’t stupid, but they might be faking their enthusiasm.

* It is obviously a cheap trick to distract from the fact that she is the choice for the mega rich, there are still left wingers out there that believe that they stand for the poor. The political narrative is shifting so fast however that I don’t think this will be needed at all in the near future, being left wing will for almost everyone mean being pro billionaire and pro non white.

* I always found it disturbing when white people loved rappers but I could never quite find the word to express my displeasure. Now we have the word cucked.

* The popularity of “Hamilton” should confirm what most people already suspect, namely that the Left and the financial elite are one and the same.

Trump is a “traitor to his class” by running as populist Republican and supporting the working class.

* While still in my teens I asked one of the several wisest and the single most capital-S Stoical men I ever met how a guy can tell whether a woman is a tart.

He thought for a moment and said, “Women sometimes fake orgasms. A tart fakes so many, she eventually doesn’t know the difference.”

Posted in Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on Hillary & Bill Clinton See ‘Hamilton’

The Cost Of Illegal Immigration On Californians

CmasXy5VUAAUghj

Posted in California, Immigration | Comments Off on The Cost Of Illegal Immigration On Californians

Median hourly earnings

Asian men $24
White men $21
Asian women $18
White women $17
Black men $15
Hispanic women $12

CmSSCKsWgAArrtI

Cma_54aVMAAwX4X

Posted in Race | Comments Off on Median hourly earnings