Ross Douthat Sanitizes Alt-Right Ideas For His New York Times Column

Richard Spencer tweets:

* For a long time, Douthat has been lifting, and sanitizing, #altright, HBD, and paleo ideas for his columns.

* Buckley didn’t capture the conservatives for neos. He created a terrible movement, which was taken over partially by neos.

* Certainly, an authentic (though naive) small-town libertarian-conservatism existed pre-Buckley.

* Also, neocons came from the Trotskyist-Marxist left, before entering the Right after Reagan.

* Interestingly, the neocons and “conservatives” had so many elective affinities: foreign policy, America = capitalism, etc.

* I have a hard time w/ idea that neocons “hijacked” conservatism, as it implies that the Buckley-ite movement was ever good.

Posted in Conservatives, Neoconservatives, Richard Spencer | Comments Off on Ross Douthat Sanitizes Alt-Right Ideas For His New York Times Column

Bernie Sanders Supporters On Race

CmicezTWYAAu2p6

Article.

Posted in Race | Comments Off on Bernie Sanders Supporters On Race

Forward: That Time a Jewess Joined the Daughters of the American Revolution

Would you expect non-Jews to feel comfortable at a Daughters of The Judaic Revolution meeting?

Forward:

A service organization founded in 1890 that educates about and preserves history related to those who fought in the American Revolution, the DAR was historically all-white. It had a reputation for racism based on such incidents as its exclusion of opera singer Marian Anderson from its concert hall in 1939.
Today, its website’s “Frequently Asked Questions” page has a section devoted to explaining that episode. The organization says it welcomes members of all races and backgrounds, on one condition — that they can trace their lineage to someone who fought for or aided the American side during the Revolutionary War. And while there are Jewish members, there aren’t many, and their relationship to the organization can be complicated due to history and demographics.
The DAR did not respond to a request for comment by the Forward.
Shuffield is a fourth generation Houstonian, who joined the DAR to honor her “ancestors and their contributions to establishing the United States.” She has some Jewish ancestry, but those people are not the ones who connect her to the DAR.
The group tended to side with those opposing immigration in the 20th century, said Jonathan Sarna, an expert in American Jewish history at Brandeis University.
“My sense is that the DAR was a somewhat nativist organization. They historically opposed immigration, including immigration of Jews, and were a force for preserving an old America,” he said. “That debate is still alive,” he added, even though the DAR is no longer involved. Indeed, presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump has repeatedly called for banning Muslim immigration to the United States and building a wall on the border with Mexico.
The organization’s past racial politics initially made Tamar Fox, a writer and editor, hesitant to join, but her reservations disappeared when she met with then-head of the DAR’s Manhattan chapter, Wilhelmina Kelly, who is African-American.
“She was really invested in getting people of color in the DAR, so I felt like they were doing good work, and I was not really worried that they were racist,” Fox told the Forward.

That the Daughters of the American Revolution was formerly all-white is not surprising as it was whites who created the American Revolution and the American nation. Jews played little role in the founding of the United States and its first 100 years of development.

The Forward says that Jews relationship to DAR can be “complicated.” Well, yeah, Jews relationship to any gentile country or institution is going to be complicated, about as complicated as it is for non-Jews to have a relationship with a Jewish state or institution.

“Anti-Semitism is as natural to Western civilization as anti-Christianity is to Jewish civilization, Islamic civilization and Japanese civilization.” (Maj. Kong)

Samuel Francis wrote:

It is all very well to point to black cotton-pickers and Chinese railroad workers, but the cotton fields and the railroads were there because white people wanted them and knew how to put them there. Almost all non-European contributors to American history either have been made by individuals and groups that have assimilated Euro-American ideas, values, and goals, or have been conceived, organized, and directed by white leaders…

Just as the Christians turned pagan temples into churches and pagan holidays into Christian holidays, multiculturalism is replacing an old culture with a new one. It is the expression of a deep-seated hatred of this culture in its religious, racial, and moral expressions…

The civilization that we as whites created in Europe and America could not have developed apart from the genetic endowments of the creating people, nor is there any reason to believe that the civilization can be successfully transmitted to a different people.

Posted in America, Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on Forward: That Time a Jewess Joined the Daughters of the American Revolution

Ricky Vaughn: “Black” civil rights leaders

CmiHMW7UcAANc0u

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Ricky Vaughn: “Black” civil rights leaders

Was Making The Holocaust Central To Jewish Identity A Good Thing?

Such a move would be great for one’s career, but was it good? Was it good for humanity? Was it good for the Jews? Nobody seems to ask these questions. They just take it for granted that making the Holocaust the center of Jewish identity is a good thing.

Would it be good for Ukrainians to make their genocide at the hands of Stalin central to their identity?

I don’t think making victimhood the center of one’s identity is a good thing.

Los Angeles Times:

“Eli Wiesel died as a hero in Israel, but it took him many years to become an Israeli hero,’’ said Yossi Klein Halevi, an Israeli American author and a fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute in Jerusalem.

“In the early years of the state, Holocaust survivors were resented by native-born Israelis for their supposed passivity during the war. Elie Wiesel’s mission to centralize Holocaust memory in Jewish identity didn’t find a place in the Israeli ethos,” Halevi said. “Over the years, Israelis began to understand the Holocaust in a much more nuanced way, and not just as a story of Jewish passivity, and began to see survivors generally and Wiesel in particular as heroes of the spirit.”

David Suissa writes:

Elie Wiesel — the Jew who taught us melancholy

Of all the contributions to humanity of Elie Wiesel, the global humanitarian, novelist, Nobel laureate, Zionist, professor and Holocaust memoirist who died Saturday night at 87, maybe the least-talked about is his embracing of melancholy.
It’s rare to see a picture of Wiesel laughing. There was a dark sobriety, a certain drama, that never seemed to leave his face. It wasn’t depression—which can paralyze the soul— but more of a lingering melancholy that he carried with him everywhere he went…

But what do you do with such darkness when you become a global rock star, when kings, presidents and popes cherish your presence, when you’re a celebrity in a world that worships fame?
Maybe this is why Wiesel clung so tightly to his melancholy. It was his way of telling the world, “Don’t think that all this veneration will change me. Don’t think I am forgetting for one instant who I am or why I’m here. Don’t think I don’t realize how much more needs to be done.”

Did Jews really need somebody to teach them melancholy? Do Jews need more Jews making a living from the Holocaust?

Could you imagine what it would have done to Elie Wiesel’s stature if he came out of the closet with happiness? His whole stardom was based on being sad. His stardom was obviously good for Elie Wiesel, but was it good for anyone else?

Clarisse comments: “Ted Koppel at the funeral stated that he enjoyed laughing with Elie Wiesel and that he told him jokes.
I do not think we want to remember him in terms of melancholy and I don’t think we need to focus on tendencies that you mentioned in your report. He lived a long prolific life, created a beautiful family, and educated the world about the horrors of genocide. That should be our focus.”

Did the world really need anyone educating it about the horrors of genocide?

Are people “educated” in the Holocaust any better? Any more useful to others?

The Torah is strangely silent about any Jewish imperative to educate the world about the horrors of genocide.

Surviving a genocide does not automatically make anyone more moral and more wise. Educating people about genocide does not automatically improve them.

I can’t think of anything Elie Wiesel wrote that was unique and valuable. He made a great living from the Holocaust. Good for him.

Posted in Genocide, Holocaust, Israel, Jews | Comments Off on Was Making The Holocaust Central To Jewish Identity A Good Thing?