Brooklyn Man Hangs Self — 26th New York Orthodox Suicide in Year

Forward: Brooklyn’s Orthodox community is mourning the apparent suicide of 22-year-old construction worker Yakov Krausz, whose body was discovered Wednesday in an elevator motor room, the Daily News reported.
His death marks at least the 26th suicide of a young adult in New York-area Orthodox community over the past ten months, according to Zvi Gluck, founder and director of the Orthodox social service group Amudim.
Members of the Boro Park Shomrim, a private Orthodox security patrol, organized a frantic search for Krausz on Wednesday afternoon after he missed a meeting with his wife, according to reports.
The Daily News reported that Krausz suffered from depression.
“I am completely out of words right now,” wrote activist Boorey Deutsch, a relative of Krausz, in a public Facebook post.
As news of Krausz’s death spread, friends circulated a parody version LMFAO’s “Party Rock Anthem” created for Krausz’s 2013 wedding.
Amudim’s Gluck, who has been tracking suicides among men and women under the age of 35 in the Orthodox community in the New York area since last Rosh Hashanah, said that the Orthodox community needs to cultivate greater awareness of mental health issues.
“Once we can, as a community, accept that mental illness, sex abuse and addiction is as big a problem as it is, we can create programming to provide services,” Gluck said. “We have to acknowledge that this is a problem that exists.”
Krausz’s suicide comes just weeks after Rebecca Wassertrum, 28, died after jumping off of the George Washington Bridge. That followed the July 2015 suicide of ex-Orthodox coder Faigy Mayer and the November 2015 suicide of Mayer’s sister, Sarah Mayer.
Gluck said that, until recently, any death of a young person was blamed on an “aneurysm.”
“It’s the shame factor that’s killing the next generation,” Gluck said. “That’s what we’re trying to take away.”

Posted in Orthodoxy | Comments Off on Brooklyn Man Hangs Self — 26th New York Orthodox Suicide in Year

JTA: After Elie Wiesel, can anyone unite American Jews?

Another way of posing the question is — aside from victimhood and making a religion out of the Holocaust, is there any way of uniting Jews?

The answer is probably not.

A Jewish identity rooted in the Holocaust is good for fundraising at the Simon Wiesenthal Center and at the ADL and other Jewish victimhood organizations but it is lousy for Jews and for the non-Jews who are harmed by Jewish preoccupation with their own victimhood.

A group never becomes preoccupied with its own victimhood without strengthening its in-group identity and developing more negative views of outsiders. That’s fine if Jews choose to live in the Jewish state, but to have such victimhood Jews in their midst is really bad for gentile nations.

If you think Western civilization is by and large a good thing, you’ll hate Jews whose identity is primarily based on a feeling of victimhood at the hands of goyim.

Except when you are looking at things through the eyes of faith, there are no good guys and bad guys in the universe. There are only different forms of life struggling to survive and to propagate their genes.

Ben Sales writes:

Being an American Jew, more than anything else, means remembering the Holocaust.
That’s what nearly three quarters of Jewish Americans said, according to the Pew Research Center’s landmark 2013 study on American Jewry. Asked to pick attributes “essential” to being Jewish, more Jews said Holocaust remembrance than leading an ethical or moral life, caring about Israel or observing Jewish law.
If anyone personified that consensus, it was Elie Wiesel, the Holocaust survivor who through his writing and speaking turned himself into perhaps the leading moral voice of American Jewry. Some quarters of the left derided him for, in their view, being insufficiently sympathetic to the Palestinian cause. But in a fragmented community, he was the closest thing American Jews had to a unifier.
Regardless of religious observance or thoughts on Israel, nearly all Jewish Americans agreed with Wiesel’s message of remembering the genocide and preventing another one.
Following Wiesel’s death on July 2, will another consensus leader rise to take his place? Or is the American Jewish community too divided to unite under any one person’s moral voice?

Posted in Holocaust | Comments Off on JTA: After Elie Wiesel, can anyone unite American Jews?

David Suissa: ‘Israeli religious court goes off the deep end’

“Going off the deep end” is one of the things we say when people act differently from what we want. We also say they’re “sick” or “evil” or that they have “betrayed” us.

In reality, different people have different interests. “Betrayal” is simply a hyperbolic way of noting that someone has acted differently what we expected.

If an Israeli religious court rejects my Orthodox conversion, it’s not because they’ve gone off the deep end. It’s because they are acting out their own values and their own understanding of Torah.

In Jewish and Muslim history, the rigorists usually win out.

I didn’t convert to Judaism expecting the easy way. If somebody wants an easy life, they should not convert to Judaism. Stiff requirements for conversion are warranted as it seems like half the people who convert to Orthodox Judaism end up leaving it and why should Jews accept people with a 50% batting average?

All religions different from your own will likely seem crazy at best and evil at worst. Haredi Judaism is very different from live and let live Sephardic Judaism. Modern Orthodoxy and Reform Judaism are like different religions. Chabad and mainline Orthodox Judaism are like different religions. The other guy will usually look like someone going off the deep end.

In the end, “crazy” is not a useful explanation. It’s better to delve into the other side’s values and learn why they act as they do.

David Suissa writes:

Why would a rabbinic court in the world’s only Jewish state do something that would blatantly turn off most of the world’s Jews?
That’s what I asked myself today when I read that Israel’s top religious court rejected the validity of a woman’s conversion from one of the leading lights of American Orthodoxy, Rabbi Haskel Lookstein, rabbi emeritus of Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun in New York City.
This is taking chutzpah and arrogance to another level.
It’s one thing when Charedi rabbinic courts routinely offend and reject non-Orthodox streams of Judaism, which is bad enough. But to go against a hard-core, bona fide and beloved Orthodox rabbinic leader?
How could they be so tone deaf?
But wait, it gets worse. This latest decision was on appeal, which means it’s the second time the court has rejected this woman’s conversion. Apparently, they weren’t too moved by the outrage that followed the initial decision.
After that first decision, the Jewish Federations of North America released a statement saying that the “denial of the legitimacy of this convert, who has embraced the Jewish People and undertaken to live a full Jewish life, undermines that fundamental principle (of accepting the convert). Moreover, the Bet Din’s rejection of one of America’s leading Orthodox rabbis is an affront to the country’s entire Jewish community.”
Meanwhile, the Rabbinical Council of America, the largest U.S. group of Orthodox rabbis, expressed “regret [at] the angst caused to this righteous convert, as well as the vulnerability felt by many righteous converts who feel that their legitimate status as Jews remains always subject to scrutiny.”
After the latest decision, Rabbi Seth Farber, who runs the activist group ITIM, released a statement saying that “the rabbinical court has humiliated Nicole, cast a shadow over tens of thousands of conversions around the world, and has created a crisis of confidence between diaspora Jewry and Israel’s government.”

Posted in Conversion | Comments Off on David Suissa: ‘Israeli religious court goes off the deep end’

Is Steve Sailer “SWPL Stormfront”?

Comments:

* Stormfront is equal parts WN LARPing and FBI/SPLC accounts.

Posted in Steve Sailer | Comments Off on Is Steve Sailer “SWPL Stormfront”?

Jewish Journalism Professor Jay Rosen Wants The MSM To Collaborate To Destroy Donald Trump

Jay Rosen writes in the Washington Post:

I know what you’re thinking, journalists: “What do you want us to do? Stop covering a major party candidate for president? That would be irresponsible.” True. But this reaction short-circuits intelligent debate. Beneath every common practice in election coverage there are premises about how candidates will behave. I want you to ask: Do these still apply? Trump isn’t behaving like a normal candidate; he’s acting like an unbound one. In response, journalists have to become less predictable themselves. They have to come up with novel responses. They have to do things they have never done. They may even have to shock us.

They may need to collaborate across news brands in ways they have never known. They may have to call Trump out with a forcefulness unseen before. They may have to risk the breakdown of decorum in interviews and endure excruciating awkwardness. Hardest of all, they will have to explain to the public that Trump is a special case, and the normal rules do not apply.

Posted in Journalism | Comments Off on Jewish Journalism Professor Jay Rosen Wants The MSM To Collaborate To Destroy Donald Trump