Comments at Steve Sailer:
* Once I ran across an Internet short that argued that if you let in one Pakistani, you let in over 200 after family unification. There is sense to that claim.
I worked in the Middle East for a decade. It was common practice for Third Country Nationals (TCN) from especially Pakistan and Bangladesh to bring forged documents with them documenting their having Health Certificates as well as having graduated from a university. Birth certificates were also readily forged.
Hence, letting in one immigrant from Pakistan sets the conditions for “brothers”, “sisters”, “cousins”, “grandparents”, and even “spouses” to be part of family unification. You would not believe how large these “families” can be. Then, after a while, it is time for family unification for the “brothers”, “sisters”, “cousins” and the” spouses” they left behind … with their “brothers”, “sisters”, “cousins”, and “grandparents” queuing up for their turn at family unification.
It is entirely feasible that, over time, one Pakistani could import an entire village. Indeed, I live in a highly international community in a Washington DC suburb. As I watch people walking the streets in their native garb (especially the women and old folks), I believe that is already happening.
* If you talk to local law enforcement officers, they’re extremely frustrated by the ongoing lack of direction and cooperation from the federal government regarding illegal aliens in their communities. The Bush/Obama administrations had/have no interest in deporting illegals, so once they’ve gone through the local justice system, they go back to doing whatever it is they do. When illegal aliens are charged with something where they can post bail, they’ll just disappear (to some other part of the state). This is why catch and release is so prevalent. Most cops working in sanctuary cities don’t even bother arresting illegals for non-violent offenses.
In terms of real-world impact, Trump merely unshackling local law enforcement would be yuuuuge. Deputizing and cooperating with them, is truly next-level stuff.
* I usually get silence in response when I ask what the children of low skill immigrants and refugees will do for careers.
* Immigration isn’t the only demographic problem we face. Feminism and the higher ed bubble, while not an immediate threat, are still existential threats to the demographic continuity of the traditional America and of Western civilization in general.
* One issue is that the U.S. doesn’t form new metropolises any more. There are a lot of blank spots on the map where more people could theoretically live, but they won’t, they’ll live in the exurbs of existing metropolitan areas.
For example, there’s a lot of underutilized land between Santa Barbara and Hearst Castle, but nobody will be allowed to build a new metropolis there. Similarly, there is a lot of empty land in less desirable parts of the country, but nobody will want to build a city there.
* One of the funny things about Hillary’s ad blitz is that a lot of her ads work equally well as ads for Trump. For example, there’s one where she has one Republican cuck after another talking about how they could never support Trump. To a lot of Democrat and Independent voters, this gives them permission to vote for The Donald. If those SOBs hate Trump, he must be okay! There’s nothing like seeing Lindsey Graham condemn Trump to motivate you to get out and vote for the guy.
Hillary’s ads also talk about how racist Trump is. I think a lot of people are beginning to realize that, coming from Hillary, “racist” means “doesn’t hate white people.”
I had to chuckle when Obama said he would consider it a “personal insult” to his legacy if voters (specifically blacks) didn’t go for Hillary. Hey, an opportunity to personally insult the Anointed One? That’s too good to pass up.
* Story in 3 tweets:
But, but…Trump called a bomb a bomb! Prematurely
