Tucker’s Allegations About Voter Fraud

There are a few people who I always take seriously when they pronounce on something (such as Christopher Caldwell, Andrew Gelman, Stephen Turner, Nathan Cofnas, Steve Sailer). Tucker Carlson is not one of them.

I have nothing as yet to say about this claim by Tucker because I know nothing here beyond what Tucker alleges. While so far I have not been convinced of claims of massive voter fraud claims, this might be the first one! Time will tell. I’ll change on a dime with evidence.

My dad said he never knew anyone who changed his mind as often as I did.

When the facts change, I hope I change with them. Also, the facts may stay the same but my values may change. For example, I place more importance on social cohesion/trust than I used to in my more free market days (I have shifted from libertarian tendencies in my youth to paleocon in my old age). Paul Gottfried and Kevin Michael Grace among others shifted me. I used to think that parenting mattered more than genes. I used to think that religious observance made people better and that atheists were untrustworthy. I used to be obsessed with arguing that my religion was the one true one. I used to think the 12 steps were for losers. I used to think that self-compassion was stupid. I used to think I was usually the smartest guy in the room.

Michael Beckley and Peter Zeihan changed my mind on the direction of the 21st Century. I used to be more pessimistic about America’s trajectory.

Does everything disappoint and disgust you? It might be about you. There is so much beauty and greatness around us and inside us to praise and appreciate. Good job, Fordy, and that’s more God’s success than mine.

Social media tends to fuel our loathing, but we can choose who we follow and support.

Posted in Voter Fraud | Comments Off on Tucker’s Allegations About Voter Fraud

In Defense of Gossip

Kelsey McKinney writes in the New York Times:

In my earliest memory of being an insufferable gossip, I am 5 years old. I am at the top of a very tall playground slide with a friend, both of us cross-legged, as she tells me about how a boy in our class (the dreaded Chris!) pushed a girl off the swing. This was big news because most girls in our class had a crush on Chris. He was very good at kickball.

“Who told you?” I remember asking. I wanted sourcing, to know how good the intel was. It was innate in me, even then, to be nosy as hell.

Throughout my childhood, people confided in me. They told me other people’s secrets, and sometimes their own. But by the time I hit puberty, I had learned that gossip was a sin. That’s when I started attending “Big Church” — upstairs in the large auditorium with the adults at my Double Oak, Texas, nondenominational church, instead of with other children. In Big Church the message was simple: Men were prone to lust, women to gossip.

That, I realized, was me: a woman and a gossip.

Whenever asked in Bible study to confess my sin, I would always pick gossip. “Without wood a fire goes out; without a gossip a quarrel dies down,” reads the New International Version’s translation of Proverbs 26:20. In my high school study Bible, this verse is both underlined and starred. I was trying to learn, to rid myself of this thorn in my side. Gossip, the church leaders reiterated, was something to despise.

Now when I look at this verse that brought me so much pain, I see more nuance. Fire, after all, keeps us warm and cooks our food. It is not always destructive.

It can also be seen as an essential part of who we are as a species. In his 1996 book “Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language,” the anthropologist and evolutionary psychologist Robin Dunbar identified two group practices that are uniquely human: religion and storytelling. In both of those, he added, “we have to be able to imagine that another world exists.”

In a recent email, Dr. Dunbar told me: “Positive gossip is one of the ways we bond communities. Negative gossip can be useful because it allows the community to police itself.” But he makes a distinction between negative gossip that alerts the community to an individual’s bad or dangerous behavior and destructive gossip that’s intended to hurt or undermine. “If it becomes malicious,” he said, “it can actually cause communities to break up into smaller subsets that don’t interact.” Gossip that is cruel or false is something any community leader would want to tamp down, whether it comes from women or from men.

Posted in Gossip | Comments Off on In Defense of Gossip

Acting Jewish: Negotiating Ethnicity on the American Stage and Screen (7-14-21)

00:00 Acting Jewish by Henry Bial, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140799
02:00 Henry Bial’s The Jewish Pop Culture Podcast: https://soundcloud.com/user-703243949/jewish-pop-culture-podcast-lecture-feb-23
15:00 Styxhexenhammer Show ep. 17- I Was Right Again About Breadtube Astroturfing (Superchat Q&A), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PYnrBY-z9s
16:00 Definition of Breadtube, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BreadTube
28:00 David Mamet, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Mamet
44:00 Modafinil Is The Official Drug Of The Rationalist Movement, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=137046
1:24:20 Why Be Jewish? (Jonathan Sacks), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NA2U3zF_BmY
1:45:00 Yosef Mizrachi vs Jonathan Sacks, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXBMwloIpV8
1:50:00 Sidebar with Alex Jones – Viva & Barnes LIVE!, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBdMnPq6BDQ
2:13:00 Aussie shock jocks Kyle & Jackie O, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bglffWsgL4c&t=666s
2:17:40 Tucker Carlson on illegal immigration

Posted in America, Jews | Comments Off on Acting Jewish: Negotiating Ethnicity on the American Stage and Screen (7-14-21)

The Invention of Jewish Identity: Bible, Philosophy, and the Art of Translation

Aaron W. Hughes writes in 2010:

* …I cannot agree with them that the Hebrew Bible preserves some transcendent power. I thus read Buber and Rosenzweig as I read everyone in this book: against the grain.

* The mythology engulfing the production of the Septuagint in many ways justified all subsequent translation of the Hebrew Bible with its insistence that the divine presence could encompass a derivative work, that the vernacular could invoke the same reverence for the original and sacred word, and that the new language could awaken the same piety in the believer as the old.

* When Jews in general and Jewish philosophers in particular translated the biblical narrative—whether in whole or in part—they imagined a new Bible: one that would simultaneously break with the confining shackles of existing dogma by returning to an encounter with a pristine past and that would both embrace a newly constituted set of memories in addition to all the cultural sophistications of the present.

* Reality is mediated in and through language. Attempts by philosophers to break through language’s perceived confines—perhaps encountered most vividly in Maimonides’ desire to shatter language’s inherent anthropomorphism so as to abide in silent contemplation—cannot escape language’s omnipresence. Even Maimonides, as we shall see, ultimately needs the very fabric of words both to express claims and to attempt to turn such words back on themselves. Translation derives both its necessity and its potency from the paradox that even though God’s presence cannot be confined, it is encountered in language (i.e., the biblical narrative) and through the act of reading.

* Words—agleam in the firmament—spread their traces, their residue, over the created order: revealing it, sustaining it, mimicking it, subverting it. Between texture and erasure translation seeks but never finds the silent splendor of the beyond, the unraveling of words to reveal the palimpsest of all language and the All-language. As such, no text can be completely original because intertextuality is inherent to language: the translation of the nonverbal word and world, every sign being the translation of another sign in a potentially infinite regress.

Posted in Aaron W. Hughes | Comments Off on The Invention of Jewish Identity: Bible, Philosophy, and the Art of Translation

The Politics Of Biblical Interpretation (7-13-21)

00:00 Aloe vera and ginseng
02:00 There’s No Cure for Antisemitism, But There is a Vaccine, https://jewishjournal.com/commentary/columnist/editors-note/338618/theres-no-cure-for-antisemitism-but-there-is-a-vaccine/
11:00 Religious studies as an academic discipline, https://www.religiousstudiesproject.com/podcast/religious-studies-as-a-discipline/
15:00 How Luke Ford and his Show “Changed my Life” Part 1, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lg-kwHTVP0M
54:00 Gods and Demons, Priests and Scholars: Critical Explorations in the History of Religions, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=141140
1:06:00 Mircea Eliade, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mircea_Eliade
1:10:00 Aaron W. Hughes, https://www.religiousstudiesproject.com/persons/aaron-w-hughes/
1:28:30 Islamic studies vs Jewish studies
1:31:00 The Study of Islam in an Age of Trump: Notes from the Field, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRi9KfC4rOQ
1:32:00 Daniel Pipes, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Pipes
1:34:00 Richard Spencer on Steven Pinker, Nathan Cofnas and infiltrating academia, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-w8R0VIy7wA
1:46:00 Orientalism, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orientalism
1:52:00 Jewish Philosophy and the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=141165
1:59:00 Bible codes, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_code
2:00:00 Greg Johnson, Frodi, Millennial Woes on malaise in racial nationalism
2:10:20 Institutional Religion and Supernatural Conversion, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1eLH4XOFaQ
2:37:20 Revisionist Israeli historians
2:52:00 Getting to Know the North American Association for the Study of Religion, https://www.religiousstudiesproject.com/podcast/getting-to-know-the-north-american-association-for-the-study-of-religion/
2:58:00 The Study of Judaism: Authenticity, Identity, Scholarship, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=141060

Posted in America | Comments Off on The Politics Of Biblical Interpretation (7-13-21)