What are the most important differences between right and left on male-female differences?

Grok says:

Biological vs. Social Basis:

Right: Emphasizes biological differences (e.g., genetics, hormones) as primary drivers of male-female traits, behaviors, and roles. Often cites evolutionary psychology, like men’s higher physical strength or women’s nurturing tendencies, to argue for innate distinctions.

Left: Stresses social and cultural factors (e.g., socialization, systemic biases) as shaping most differences. Views many traits as constructed rather than inherent, often downplaying or questioning biological determinism.

Gender Roles:

Right: Tends to support traditional gender roles, arguing they reflect natural differences and complementary functions (e.g., men as providers, women as caregivers). Sees deviations as potentially disruptive to societal stability.

Left: Advocates for fluid or egalitarian roles, arguing traditional norms stem from patriarchal structures. Promotes dismantling rigid expectations to allow individual choice, regardless of sex.

Cognitive and Behavioral Differences:

Right: Often accepts studies showing average differences (e.g., men’s edge in spatial reasoning, women’s in verbal skills) as evidence of inherent traits, justifying differentiated treatment or expectations.

Left: Skeptical of such studies, citing methodological flaws or small effect sizes. Argues environmental factors (e.g., education, stereotypes) largely explain observed differences, advocating for equal treatment.

Policy Implications:

Right: Supports policies reflecting perceived differences, like sex-specific sports or workplace roles, arguing fairness and efficiency. May oppose affirmative action or quotas as ignoring natural disparities.

Left: Pushes for policies to counteract historical inequities (e.g., gender-neutral sports categories, workplace diversity initiatives), arguing systemic barriers, not biology, create disparities.

Approach to Transgender Issues:

Right: Often views sex as binary and immutable, tying gender to biology. May resist transgender recognition in contexts like bathrooms or sports, citing fairness or safety based on physical differences.

Left: Embraces gender as a spectrum, prioritizing self-identification over biological sex. Supports inclusive policies, arguing social acceptance outweighs concerns about physical differences.

These differences stem from contrasting views on nature vs. nurture and individual vs. collective responsibility. The right leans toward accepting differences as fixed and functional, while the left sees them as malleable and often unjustly imposed. Both sides cherry-pick science to fit their narratives, though the right tends to align more with evolutionary biology and the left with sociological frameworks.

Posted in Feminism, Sex | Comments Off on What are the most important differences between right and left on male-female differences?

DEI Kills – Capt. Lobach’s Reckless Disregard For 67 Lives Is Not Complicated (5-1-25)

01:00 NYT Lies: New details revealed by The Times show that the failures on Jan. 29 before an Army helicopter crashed into a jet near Reagan National Airport were far more complex than previously known. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/27/business/dc-plane-crash-reagan-airport.html
02:00 DC Helicopter/Airliner Crash: Shocking Pilot Error Details Covered Up By Military! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7kXWj4pOOU
05:00 Reckless Disregard, https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1190&context=alr
19:30 American citizenship has its privileges notes Commentary magazine podcast, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6X9oqr-_RVw
21:45 Tennessee authorities release body camera video of traffic stop involving Kilmar Abrego-Garcia, https://www.foxnews.com/us/tennessee-bodycam-maryland-man-traffic-stop-shows-troopers-hands-tied-despite-smuggling-clues
38:00 Standards not STDs!
41:00 Jewish students on campus are unable to move freely, Muslim students complain about their feelings
43:20 Which books best capture the Trump era?
45:00 The Age of Entitlement by Christopher Caldwell, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1Acsa_hq7M
46:30 Mark Halperin: Waltz OUT as NSA… Could Witkoff Be Next Up? Plus, Gavin Newsom on Why He’s Not a “Crazy Liberal”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28TFspj_SBI
58:00 No Trade Is Free: Changing Course, Taking on China, and Helping America’s Workers, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=160637
1:14:10 Why the media covered up Joe Biden’s obvious senility, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_K90cfrrn0
1:18:00 Kip joins to talk about how there is more to life than economic efficiency
1:36:40 Neurologist comments on Biden’s health, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97ZIHY2QcDI
1:38:30 Who Determines The Winning Narrative?, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=155583
1:41:00 Liberals Were Blinded To Biden’s Senility By Their Own Speech Codes, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=155583
1:50:30 Josh Hawley on manhood, https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/josh-hawleys-manhood-teaser/id1651876897?i=1000701556004

Posted in America | Comments Off on DEI Kills – Capt. Lobach’s Reckless Disregard For 67 Lives Is Not Complicated (5-1-25)

WSJ: Many Big Law Firms Shun Conservative Clients – They denounce Trump for targeting causes he opposes, but they’re guilty of the same thing.

Law professor John Greil writes:

For years, some of America’s biggest law firms have been unwilling to represent conservative clients whose beliefs run against the elite liberal consensus. This imbalance hurts reputations—and compromises the rule of law.

Big law firms have repeatedly tossed aside superstar attorneys when they represent conservatives. Former Solicitor General Paul Clement, one of his generation’s top Supreme Court litigators, resigned from King & Spalding in 2011 after the firm refused to allow him to defend the Defense of Marriage Act. In 2022 he was forced out of Kirkland & Ellis for declining to comply with the firm’s order to abandon all clients whose cases related to the Second Amendment. (Mr. Clement represents WilmerHale in a lawsuit challenging a Trump order.) Todd Blanche, now a high-ranking Justice Department official, had to leave Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft to represent Mr. Trump in his 2024 Manhattan criminal trial.

Law professor Derek Muller has found that in the five most politically controversial Supreme Court cases between 2018 and 2022, elite firms filed 93 friend-of-the-court briefs in favor of the liberal position and only five supporting the conservative one.

The current term is no different. This month the Supreme Court heard arguments in Mahmoud v. Taylor, a case in which parents are claiming the right to opt their children out of sexually charged elementary school lessons. Nine members of the Am Law 100—a ranking of the largest 100 law firms in the country—filed briefs backing the school. None supported the parents.

Posted in Law | Comments Off on WSJ: Many Big Law Firms Shun Conservative Clients – They denounce Trump for targeting causes he opposes, but they’re guilty of the same thing.

The Discussion Has Changed From Tariffs Are Bad To Trump’s Tariffs Are Bad (4-27-25)

02:00 Trump’s Al Anon Approach To The World, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=160926
04:00 Are there too many variables with global trade for anyone to be an expert?, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=160918
17:00 Trump Rally or Bessent Put? Elon Back at Tesla, Google’s Gemini Problem, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tcd1EgQrhU
25:00 Trump’s Dealism, https://www.ft.com/content/eb780115-80ec-48c4-ab96-4936624ff167
40:30 Michael joins to talk about tariffs
1:01:00 Jordan Peterson
1:14:20 Who determines the winning narrative? https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=155583
1:16:20 Did we evolve to be gullible? Not Born Yesterday: The Science of Who We Trust and What We Believe, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=156725
1:32:00 Are there too many variables with global trade for anyone to be an expert?, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=160918
1:40:00 Politico: Voters Were Right About the Economy. The Data Was Wrong., https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/02/11/democrats-tricked-strong-economy-00203464
2:01:00 Don’t Fall Into the Issue-Legitimacy Trap, https://chroniclesmagazine.org/web/dont-fall-into-the-issue-legitimacy-trap/
2:06:00 Tariffs Are Essential to a Free People, https://chroniclesmagazine.org/web/tariffs-are-essential-to-a-free-people/
2:14:00 No University Is Above the Law, https://chroniclesmagazine.org/web/no-university-is-above-the-law/
2:20:00 End U.S. Taxpayer Support for the Higher Education Gravy Train, https://chroniclesmagazine.org/web/end-u-s-taxpayer-support-for-the-higher-education-gravy-train/
2:37:00 Christopher Caldwell on the Right in Europe, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUQZbWBGcpo
2:46:00 The pathology of getting mad at a politician for not immediately accomplishing the impossible such as deporting 20 million illegal aliens
2:52:00 African immigration into Europe fuels a right-wing populist backlash against elites
complex trauma, growing up in danger fight or flight…how old were you before you could be authentic and be loved?
3:02:00 Christopher Caldwell: The Right since Reagan, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKAsigpcwQM
3:15:00 9 Ways Shame Changes Your Relationships With Others | The Characteristics of Complex Trauma, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dW9-9uq2-9I
3:50:00 Decoding Dennis Prager, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=148127

Posted in America | Comments Off on The Discussion Has Changed From Tariffs Are Bad To Trump’s Tariffs Are Bad (4-27-25)

Trump’s Al Anon Approach To The World

The Al Anon approach to life is to recognize the limits of your power and influence and to allow people to reap the consequences of their decisions. Ukraine tried to ally with the West. As a result, Russia smashed it. Perhaps America needs to step back and let Ukraine reap the consequences.

Grok says:

The Al-Anon approach, rooted in accepting personal limits and letting others face natural consequences, can frame complex geopolitical issues like Ukraine’s situation, but it oversimplifies the dynamics. Ukraine’s alignment with the West was a sovereign choice, driven by historical, cultural, and security concerns, including Russia’s prior aggression (e.g., 2014 annexation of Crimea). Russia’s invasion in 2022 wasn’t just a consequence of Ukraine’s Western pivot but a calculated move to assert dominance, violating international norms.
Applying Al-Anon’s “step back” logic to U.S. policy ignores strategic realities. Ukraine’s fight isn’t just its own; it’s a firewall against autocratic expansion that could threaten NATO allies, global stability, and energy markets. U.S. support—$113 billion in aid by mid-2024—hasn’t just sustained Ukraine but weakened Russia’s military and economy without direct U.S. boots on the ground. Stepping back could embolden Russia, signal weakness to adversaries like China, and unravel alliances built on mutual defense.
That said, the counterargument resonates with war fatigue and fiscal concerns. Pouring billions into a distant conflict while domestic issues fester can feel reckless, and some argue Ukraine’s Western ambitions provoked Russia unnecessarily. Yet, abandoning Ukraine risks a worse outcome: a Russian victory could destabilize Europe, spike global inflation, and invite further aggression.
Al-Anon’s wisdom about control has merit—America can’t dictate Ukraine’s path or Russia’s actions. But geopolitics isn’t personal recovery; disengagement could amplify consequences far beyond Ukraine’s borders. The challenge is balancing principled support with pragmatic limits, not washing hands of the mess.

Donald Trump learned to deal with an alcoholic brother. I wonder if this has affected his worldview?

Donald Trump’s older brother, Fred Trump Jr., struggled with alcoholism and died in 1981 at age 43. Trump has often cited this experience as profoundly shaping his personal choices, notably his decision to abstain from alcohol and drugs. He’s spoken about Fred’s addiction as a cautionary tale, emphasizing the destructive power of substance abuse and the importance of discipline. This suggests a worldview that values self-control and sees personal responsibility as critical, potentially aligning with an Al-Anon-like perspective of recognizing limits in controlling others’ choices while learning from their consequences.
Fred’s struggle also reportedly strained family dynamics, with their father, Fred Sr., pushing high expectations that clashed with Fred Jr.’s more laid-back personality. Trump witnessed this tension and has described feeling pressure to succeed where his brother faltered, particularly in the family real estate business. This could have reinforced a competitive, results-driven outlook, where weakness—whether personal or strategic—is something to avoid or exploit.
Politically, Trump’s rhetoric often frames issues in terms of strength and winning, which some analysts tie to his formative experiences with his brother’s decline. His foreign policy, including skepticism of prolonged U.S. involvement in conflicts like Ukraine’s, might reflect a belief in cutting losses and avoiding entanglement in others’ self-inflicted problems—a stance that echoes Al-Anon’s “letting go” ethos. For instance, during his presidency and 2024 campaign, Trump criticized extensive aid to Ukraine, arguing it risks escalation and burdens U.S. taxpayers, suggesting a preference for nations to handle their own consequences.
However, Trump’s worldview also diverges from Al-Anon’s humility. His public persona—confident, often domineering—contrasts with the program’s emphasis on serenity and acceptance. His approach to adversaries like Russia or China leans transactional, prioritizing deals over moral stands, which might stem less from his brother’s alcoholism and more from his business background. Still, Fred’s fate likely deepened Trump’s disdain for perceived weakness and his focus on personal agency, influencing how he views both individual and national struggles.
No direct evidence ties Trump’s Ukraine stance explicitly to Fred’s addiction, but the parallels are suggestive: a belief that nations, like people, must navigate their own paths, with America stepping back from enabling or over-managing others’ crises. Yet, his broader geopolitical instincts—favoring strongman tactics and quick resolutions—suggest his brother’s influence is just one piece of a complex puzzle.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Trump’s Al Anon Approach To The World