National Identity & Social Cohesion

Here is a 2021 paper by Christian Albrekt Larsen:

* [Hans] Kohn’s distinction had its roots in Meineke’s (1970[1907]) distinction between “staatsnation” (state nation) and “kulturnation” (culture nation). Kohn’s basic argument was that in Western Europe (his examples were France, the UK, The
Netherlands and Switzerland), the borders of the state were settled prior to the rise of nationalism, which created a strong focus on the new democratic procedures that could legitimize the existing state. Nationalism therefore contained a narrative about turning oppressed inhabitants into citizens. In a less positive interpretation, Tilly calls it a “state-led nationalism” where “rulers who spoke in a nation’s name successfully demanded that citizens identify themselves with that nation and subordinate other interests to those of the state” (Tilly 1994:133). In contrast, the borders in Eastern Europe were settled after the rise of nationalism, which created a strong focus on the ethnic/cultural dimension of nationhood. Tilly calls it “state-seeking nationalism” where “representative of some population that currently did not have collective control of a state claimed an autonomous political status, or even a separate state, on the ground that the population had a distinct, coherent cultural identity” (Tilly 1994:133). Kohn used the terms “Western” and “Eastern” both to denote the
geographic locations of the various ideas of the nation (Kohn drew the line between the area west of the Rhine and the areas east of the Rhine) and to denote two different ideal types of perceptions of nationhood.

* most contemporary scholars find it useful to replace Kohn’s dichotomy with either 1) a continuum from “civic/Western/political” at the one end to “ethnic/Eastern/cultural” at the other or 2) a two-dimensional solution. Those in favor of a continuum often cite Anthony Smith for the argument in his seminal 1991 book that “… every nationalism contains civic and ethnic elements in varying degrees and different forms. Sometimes civic and territorial elements predominate; at other times it is the ethnic and vernacular components that are emphasized”…

Posted in Nationalism | Comments Off on National Identity & Social Cohesion

Should I Stay Or Should I Go Now?

I’m thinking about moving to Sydney.

If my growth in Orthodox Judaism is my number one priority, then there is no question I should stay in LA. The Los Angeles Orthodox Jewish community is about 30 times the size of the one in Sydney. If I want to go to a great shiur, I have more opportunity to do that in LA than in Sydney. But my growth in Orthodox Judaism has not been my number one priority for many years. It has been supplanted by my quest for emotional sobriety, where I find more help from the 12-step approach than from Orthodox Judaism. As a result, I no longer spend my mornings studying Talmud, I usually spend my mornings on 12-step meetings and 12-step phone calls and 12-step prayer, study and meditation. Over the past five years or so, I’ve spent about twice as much time in my 12-step work compared to my time in Orthodox Judaism.

Los Angeles has more of a 12-step culture than Sydney, but I don’t rely on meetings and 12-step culture to stay emotionally sober. I get that from 12-step work, which I can do anywhere.

An Orthodox shul I love is 100 times more important to me than a 12-step meeting I love. I would not want to do Orthodox Judaism virtually, but I am happy to attend virtual 12-step meetings.

I would not live anywhere without a strong Orthodox Jewish community, and Sydney has that. I like the shuls, I like the Jews, and I like the rabbis.

My choice about where to live might come down to how I feel in Sydney compared to how I feel in LA.

How I would talk to a friend contemplating this type of decision? My questions to him would be about income, employment, family, friends, community, relative happiness level, health.

There’s no question that walking down the street, riding public transport, going shopping, hanging out at the beach or at social amenities is a far happier experience in Sydney than in Los Angeles. There’s virtually no crime and no graffiti in eastern Sydney and little social dysfunction. There’s also no question that far more innovations occur in LA than in Sydney. There’s no question that there are far more people at the top of their profession in LA than in Sydney. There is more of a writer community in LA than in Sydney. There is more of an entertainment industry in LA than in Sydney. The future is built in places such as Los Angeles, San Francisco, and New York, not in Sydney.

I’m far more likely to run into a poet, a novelist, a movie director, or an elite professor in Los Angeles than in Sydney.

There’s far more going on in LA than in Sydney. The news in Australia is boring because not much happens here.

If my personal ambition is my number one priority, I would stay in LA.

I have an approximately equal number of friends in LA and in Sydney (because I grew up two hours drive north of Sydney and many of my childhood mates now live in Sydney).

I’d rather interact with strangers in Australia than in American big cities because we are more likely down under to have a similar understanding of right and wrong. Dealing with bureaucrats is a more pleasant experience in Australia. In Australia, you feel like the government is on your side. In America, not so much.

Over the past two days, for my first time in Australia on this trip, I’ve intensely missed my LA life.

Half my time in Australia, I’ve worn my yarmulka and half the time I’ve gone bareheaded. I feel more connected to Aussies when I’m bareheaded and more connected to Yiddishkeit when I wear my kit.

I get most of my energy from connecting with other people. Compared to America, it is easier for me to connect to others in Australia because we have more in common. On the other hand, I get tremendous energy from my bonds in Orthodox Judaism and there is more opportunity for that in LA than in Sydney.

I feel more energized in Australia than I normally do in LA (because I’m more connected to my fellow Australians than I am to my fellow Americans), but much of that could be novelty, and it might not last.

There’s far more of a sense of let’s do it for Australia down here than there is a sense of let’s do it for America in the States. Americans are more outwardly patriotic but Australians are more cohesive.

When I first moved to LA in 1994, I loved exploring the city, but that thrill has largely gone over the past 25 years. I’m excited now about exploring Sydney. I wonder how long that would last?

There’s more diversity and less cohesion and volunteering in Sydney than elsewhere in Australia.

I was just in Tannum Sands for three weeks and I loved being around family, but I missed Jews. I couldn’t live anywhere without a strong Jewish community and an Orthodox shul where I felt at home.

CNN reports Sept. 21, 2021:

(CNN) — Safety has long been a paramount concern for travelers when it comes to deciding which destination to visit.
But the world has been turned on its head in recent years due to the global pandemic and the notion of exactly what makes somewhere “safe” has changed significantly.
This may help to explain the shake up at the top of the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Safe Cities Index (SCI,) which ranks 60 international destinations on digital security, health security, infrastructure, personal security, as well as environmental security, a new category for this year.
While Asian cities like Tokyo, Singapore and Osaka have continuously occupied the top spots year after year, it’s a European destination that holds the number one position for 2021.
Copenhagen has been named the world’s safest city for the first time, scoring 82.4 points out of 100 in the annual report.
Denmark’s capital jumped from joint eighth place in 2019 to the top of the list, largely thanks to the introduction of an environmental security section, which the city scored particularly well in, along with personal security.
“One key factor that makes Copenhagen such a safe city is its low crime rate, currently at its lowest level in more than a decade,” Lars Weiss, lord mayor of Copenhagen, says in the report.
“Copenhagen is also characterized by great social cohesion and a relatively narrow wealth gap. It is a mixed city where both the cleaning assistant and the CEO meet each other at the local supermarket and have their kids in the same school.
“This is one of the very cornerstones of Danish culture, and it contributes greatly to the high levels of trust and safety that we benefit from.”
Canada’s Toronto just missed out on the top spot, taking second place with 82.2 points, while Singapore was third with 80.7 points.
Although Sydney came fourth, with 80.1 points, the Australian city topped the digital security category, while 2019 winner Tokyo was awarded 80.0 points, putting the Japanese city in fifth place.

Social cohesion interests me. I keep talking about it on my show. To cohere means to make whole. Australia, England, France, Germany, Japan are among the countries that are far more cohesive than the United States. On the other hand, Orthodox Judaism in America forms a more cohesive community than all these countries except perhaps Germany and Japan.

Christian Albrecht Larsen says: “I suggest that we define social cohesion as the belief held by citizens of a given nation-state that they share a moral community, which enables them to trust each other.”

Posted in Australia, Los Angeles | Comments Off on Should I Stay Or Should I Go Now?

G-Day Brisbane!

https://www.quora.com/Which-parts-of-Australia-are-considered-redneck-areas-that-are-similar-to-the-Deep-South-of-the-USA

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/tell-tale-signs-brisbane-is-still-a-hick-town.1086488/page-4

https://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/10194468/How-Brisbane-stopped-being-a-redneck-wonderland

https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/queensland/brisbane-is-just-a-big-country-town-after-all-20100411-s0ic.html

https://www.peopleconnexion.com/why-brisbane-is-australias-most-underrated-city-and-next-rail-hotspot/

https://sitchu.com.au/brisbane/neighbourhood-watch/best-places-to-live-in-the-world-brisbane

https://osheabuilders.com.au/9-reasons-for-brisbane/

With my sister and my Uncle Don Booth (mom’s side).

Posted in Australia | Comments Off on G-Day Brisbane!

The One Study That Changed JF Gariepy’s View On Vaccines

00:00 JF Gariepy – internet blood sports pioneer – goes full anti-vaxx based on a crap study, https://odysee.com/@JFGTonight:0/jfgt403:1
10:00 Elliott Blatt joins
13:00 New Year’s resolutions
14:00 Chatter: The Voice in Our Head, Why It Matters, and How to Harness It, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=142602
15:00 How we go off track during the day
17:00 What Are The Most Common Lies You Tell Yourself? https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=142558
34:00 When is internet drama healthy?
1:08:00 John Goldman aka Jack Murphy. https://nationalfile.com/denver-mass-shooting-suspect-paid-join-heteroflexible-porn-star-jack-murphys-alpha-male-forum-spree/
1:32:00 Richard Spencer on Jack Murphy and the Alt Lite grifters, https://odysee.com/@JFGTonight:0/jfgt409:2
2:15:00 Dan Bongino and the Big Business of Returning Trump to Power, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=142614
2:21:00 Decoding Academia #2: False Positive Psychology, https://decoding-the-gurus.captivate.fm/episode/patreon-preview-decoding-academia-2-false-positive-psychology
2:34:00 Brian Hooker and Neil Z. Miller publish another terrible “vaxxed/unvaxxed” study, https://respectfulinsolence.com/2020/05/29/hooker-and-miller-publish-terrible-vaxxed-unvaxxed-study/

Posted in JF Gariepy, Vaccination | Comments Off on The One Study That Changed JF Gariepy’s View On Vaccines

Dan Bongino and the Big Business of Returning Trump to Power

Evan Osnos writes for the New Yorker:

* The history of broadcasting is replete with figures who play a combative character on the air but shed the pose when they leave the studio. Bongino is not among them.

* In Bongino’s world, it matters little that Trump’s claims of rampant fraud were dismissed by his own top appointees at the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, as well as by federal and state judges. To the true believer, the lack of solid evidence simply confirms how well hidden the rigging was. In the study of conspiracy theories (a description Bongino rejects), this is known as “self-sealing”: the theory mends holes in its own logic. “A corrupted intelligence community, in conjunction with a corrupt media, will eat this country like a cancer from the inside out,” Bongino told his audience, as he built to a takeaway. “This is why I’m really hoping Donald Trump runs in 2024,” he said. “He’s the best candidate suited to clean house. Because if we don’t clean house the Republic is gone.”

Spend several months immersed in American talk radio and you’ll come away with the sense that the violence of January 6th was not the end of something but the beginning. A year after Trump supporters laid siege to the U.S. Capitol, some of his most influential champions are preparing the ground for his return, and they dominate a media terrain that attracts little attention from their opponents. As liberals argue over the algorithm at Facebook and ponder the disruptive influence of TikTok, radio remains a colossus; for every hour that Americans listened to podcasts in 2021, they listened to six and a half hours of AM/FM radio, according to Edison Research, a market-research and polling firm. Talk radio has often provided more reliable hints of the political future than think tanks and elected officials have. In 2007, even as the Republican leaders George W. Bush and John McCain were trying to rebrand themselves as immigration reformers, Limbaugh was advocating laws that would deny immigrants access to government services and force them to speak English.

* Trump has fostered a crop of broadcasters who owe their power to him, men like Sebastian Gorka, the former White House aide, and Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA. Brian Rosenwald, the author of the history “Talk Radio’s America,” has noted the triumph of ideology over experience. “Bongino is speaking to the people who believe Trump’s press releases, who see the world caving in and Biden as a raging socialist,” he told me. Rosenwald likens Bongino’s ascent to that of Marjorie Taylor Greene, of Georgia, who reached Congress in 2021, despite having voiced belief in a “global cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles” and other delusions associated with QAnon. “Back in the day, Marjorie Taylor Greene would have been consigned to the worst committees, buried by the leadership,” he said. “But the old rules of how you gain stature are out the door.”

* Angelo Carusone, the president of Media Matters, a nonprofit group that tracks and criticizes the conservative press, said that the field is changing for the first time since the nineteen-nineties, when Limbaugh, Fox News, and the blogger Matt Drudge established dominance. “They created the guidelines that people walked along for decades,” Carusone said. But Limbaugh is gone, and Drudge and Fox face more radical competitors. “The new information ecosystem is taking shape over the next year or two, and whatever shakes out is going to set the path for years to come.”

In the long run, Bongino’s most significant impact may not come from what he says on his broadcasts. “My goal is for my content to be the least interesting thing I did,” he told me. He has used his money and his influence to foster technology startups, such as Parler, Rumble, and AlignPay, that are friendly to right-wing views. These companies are intended to withstand traditional pressure campaigns, including advertising boycotts like the one that Media Matters prompted in 2019, based on old radio interviews in which the Fox host Tucker Carlson described women as “extremely primitive” and Iraqis as “monkeys.” Carusone said, “What scares me about Bongino is that this guy could end up owning or controlling or directly building the infrastructure that operationalizes a whole range of extremism.” He continued, “There used to be lines. You could say, ‘O.K., PayPal, don’t let the January 6th people recruit money to pay for buses.’ This new alternative infrastructure is not going to stop that.” If another uprising organizes online, he said, “there will be a whiplash effect. Everyone will say, ‘How did that happen?’ Well, it’s been happening.”

* At first, according to “Something in the Air,” Marc Fisher’s history of radio, stations emphasized variety, and avoided playing the same song twice in twenty-four hours. Then, in 1950, a young station owner in Nebraska named Todd Storz started to study listener preferences, perusing research by the University of Omaha and, as the story goes, staking out the jukebox at a local diner. He discovered that, even if people claimed to want variety, they tended to choose the same songs over and over. In 1951, Storz introduced a two-hour hit parade—a finite, repeated list of songs—and by the end of the year his station’s market share had grown tenfold. Storz’s method became known as Top Forty, though d.j.s discovered that they did not need forty songs to keep listeners engaged. “If they quietly cut their lists down to thirty or even twenty-five songs, the audience numbers responded immediately,” Fisher writes.

* Other d.j.s, including Don Imus, Howard Stern, and Glenn Beck, migrated from music broadcasts to talk radio, bringing with them a pop sensibility. At Talkers magazine, the editor, Michael Harrison, created a weekly list of hot topics—a hit parade of politics. “The similarity between Top Forty and commercial talk radio has been profound,” he told me. “Certain topics get the phones to ring. Certain topics are boring but important, so they stay away from them.” Even though Limbaugh saw himself as an agent of commerce, his political identity proved so profitable that it left a permanent imprint on the industry. The new generation of radio conservatives—Sean Hannity, Mike Pence, Mark Levin—devoted more attention to ideology than to show biz. “They still want to be entertaining, but entertainment is not as big a deal,” Harrison said. “These are people who are doing political content on broadcasting platforms, as opposed to doing broadcasting with a political aspect.”

* But his failure to make his network comply fortified his argument that conservatives needed their own platforms, to protect against liberal antagonists. “If they can’t get a bank to cancel you, they’ll go to the payment processor, Stripe,” he told me. “If they can’t get Stripe to cancel you, they’ll go to PayPal.” He added, “I said to my audience years ago, ‘We have to find every single link in that chain and create an alternate company that believes in free speech.’ ”

* He conceived of projects to create conservative alternatives to GoFundMe and Eventbrite, and promoted the video site Rumble, in which he is an investor. I asked him what boundaries Rumble imposes on users, and he said, “If you’re not violating our terms of service, and you’re abiding by the law, it’s not my business.”

Since the fall of 2020, Rumble’s traffic has grown more than twentyfold, to an average of thirty-six million users a month. Bongino, in promotional mode, told me that it was the “first viable video-platform contender to YouTube that’s exploding in traffic.” It’s “through the roof,” he said. Still, Rumble’s traffic represents less than two per cent of YouTube’s in a typical month.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Dan Bongino and the Big Business of Returning Trump to Power