Jeeves read on X that Bertie Wooster is a sex pest. Jeeves provides Bertie sage advice in the age of Me-Too.

Grok: Setting: Bertie Wooster’s elegant London flat, April 2025. Bertie is pacing frantically, his bow tie askew, clutching his phone as if it might explode. Jeeves, serene as ever, stands by the fireplace, having just reviewed a troubling thread on X. A tray of tea sits untouched, the air thick with impending crisis.
Bertie: Jeeves, we’re in the soup! The absolute, boiling, brimstone soup! I’ve just seen it on X—some blighter’s posted that I’m a sex pest! Me! Bertram Wilberforce Wooster, a pest of the amorous variety! It’s slander, I tell you, but it’s spreading like wildfire. What’s to be done? I’ll be blackballed from the Drones Club and hounded by Aunt Agatha!
Jeeves: Calmly adjusting a cufflink. A most distressing development, sir. I have reviewed the X thread in question, which appears to stem from a misunderstanding involving your recent interaction with Miss Poppy Pendleton. The term “sex pest” is, I suspect, an exaggeration, but in the current climate, such accusations carry weight. Might I inquire as to the specifics of your conduct at the Drones Club event?
Bertie: Specifics? Oh, it’s all a ghastly mix-up, Jeeves! You know Poppy—sparkly frocks, laughs like a hyena. After our… er… encounter the other night, I sent that polite text you drafted, all about being friends. But at the club last night, I may have been a tad too chummy—gave her a wink, called her “old sport,” maybe patted her shoulder. Purely platonic, I swear! Now X is ablaze with claims I’m some sort of lecherous octopus!
Jeeves: Nodding thoughtfully. I see, sir. In the era of the Me Too movement, even well-intentioned gestures can be misconstrued, particularly when amplified on platforms like X. The public is acutely sensitive to perceived impropriety, and a wink or touch, however innocent, may be interpreted as overfamiliarity. Allow me to offer some guidance to navigate this delicate landscape.
Bertie: Guidance? Jeeves, I need a miracle! If this gets out, I’ll be persona non grata from Mayfair to Soho. Lay it on me—what’s the drill in this Me Too age? I don’t want to be the chap who’s whispered about at cocktail parties.
Jeeves: Clearing his throat softly. Very well, sir. Firstly, I recommend issuing a prompt and sincere clarification on X, crafted to defuse the situation without admitting fault. I propose something along the lines of: “Dear friends, I am dismayed by recent misunderstandings. My conduct is always intended with respect and good humor. I apologize for any discomfort caused and pledge to be more mindful henceforth. Yours, Bertie W.” This acknowledges the concern while preserving your character.
Bertie: Post on X? Me? Jeeves, I’d sooner wrestle a crocodile! Everyone will see it—Biffy, Tuppy, even that ghastly Spode! Can’t we just ignore it and hope it blows over, like that time I accidentally set fire to Gussie’s top hat?
Jeeves: Regrettably, sir, in the digital age, silence is often construed as guilt. A measured response, coupled with discreet actions, is the wiser course. Secondly, I advise adopting a more reserved demeanor in social settings. Avoid physical gestures—winks, pats, or the like—and maintain a polite distance, particularly with those of the opposite sex. A nod and a smile suffice to convey amiability.
Bertie: Reserved? You mean I’ve got to act like a blooming statue? Dash it, Jeeves, I’m a friendly cove! If I stop winking, people will think I’ve gone dour, like Aunt Agatha on a bad day. And what about Poppy? Should I send her flowers or something to smooth things over?
Jeeves: Frowning slightly. Flowers, sir, might be misinterpreted as an attempt to curry favor. Instead, a private message—brief and contrite—would be more appropriate. For example: “Dear Miss Pendleton, I regret any unease caused by my behavior. My intentions were purely cordial, and I shall strive to be more considerate. Yours sincerely, Bertie.” I can dispatch this on your behalf to ensure propriety.
Bertie: Propriety? You’re making me sound like a vicar, Jeeves! But I suppose you’re right—this Me Too business is trickier than a round of golf with Barmy Fotheringay-Phipps. Any other pearls of wisdom to keep me from being branded a menace?
Jeeves: Indeed, sir. Thirdly, educate yourself on contemporary social norms. The Me Too movement emphasizes consent, respect, and awareness of power dynamics. Even a jest or compliment, if misjudged, can cause offense. I could procure a discreet online course on workplace and social etiquette, tailored to the modern gentleman, which you might complete in the privacy of your flat.
Bertie: A course? Good lord, Jeeves, next you’ll have me reading manifestos! But I take your point—I’ve got to watch my step. No more calling girls “old sport,” no more shoulder pats. I’ll be as bland as a boiled egg. But what if this X nonsense escalates? What if I’m canceled, like that chap who tweeted about his cat’s political views?
Jeeves: With a ghost of a smile. Cancellation, sir, is not inevitable. By acting swiftly and sincerely, we can mitigate the damage. Should the situation persist, I have contacts in public relations who can manage your online reputation discreetly. For now, refrain from engaging with the X thread directly, lest you fan the flames. I shall monitor developments and advise accordingly.
Bertie: Collapsing into the armchair, mopping his brow. You’re a lifeline, Jeeves. An absolute lifeline. I’ll do as you say—no winking, no tweeting, just pure, unadulterated virtue. Pour me a stiff brandy, will you? This sex pest business has me shakier than a leaf in a gale.
Jeeves: Very good, sir. He glides to the decanter, pouring a precise measure. If I may, sir, your willingness to adapt speaks to your fundamental decency. With vigilance and my guidance, we shall restore your standing and ensure you remain a gentleman of unimpeachable repute.
Bertie: Sipping gratefully. To repute, Jeeves, and to never trending on X again! Now, draft that message to Poppy and get cracking on that X post. I’m counting on you to pull me out of this bally inferno!
Jeeves: Bowing slightly. Consider it done, sir. He retreats to compose the messages, leaving Bertie to nurse his brandy and vow eternal caution in the treacherous waters of 2025 social mores.

Posted in Sex | Comments Off on Jeeves read on X that Bertie Wooster is a sex pest. Jeeves provides Bertie sage advice in the age of Me-Too.

Bertie Wooster tells Jeeves about his first experience of sex with a woman

Grok: Setting: Bertie Wooster’s plush London flat, April 2025. Bertie is fidgeting nervously on a leather armchair, clutching a gin and tonic like it’s a life preserver. Jeeves, ever the picture of unruffled composure, is polishing a silver cigarette case with a cloth, his expression as inscrutable as a sphinx.
Bertie: I say, Jeeves, I’ve got myself into a bit of a pickle. Well, not a pickle exactly—more of a… a dashed awkward situation. Gulps drink. You see, last night at the Drones Club, after one too many of those new-fangled espresso martinis, I… er… had my first, ahem, encounter with a woman. And I’m in a frightful muddle about it!
Jeeves: Pausing mid-polish, eyebrow barely twitching. Indeed, sir? A significant milestone, if I may say. Might I inquire as to the circumstances, so as to better advise you on the matter?
Bertie: Circumstances? Oh, it’s a dashed blur, Jeeves! There was this girl—Poppy Pendleton, frightfully modern, wears those sparkly frocks that look like they’re made of disco balls. We were chatting about, I don’t know, drone racing or some such rot, and next thing I know, we’re in a cab to her flat in Shoreditch. And then… well… blushes crimson things happened. Things I shan’t describe, lest I turn the color of a beetroot!
Jeeves: Calmly resuming polishing. I quite understand, sir. Discretion is paramount. May I infer that the experience has left you somewhat unsettled?
Bertie: Unsettled? Jeeves, I’m a positive wreck! I mean, it was all very… er… thrilling, in a way, but now I’m terrified Poppy’s going to show up at my door demanding I propose or, worse, tweet about it on X! You know how these modern girls are—always posting their breakfasts and their feelings. What if I’m trending as “Bertie the Bungler” by teatime?
Jeeves: A valid concern, sir, given the proclivities of social media. However, I suspect Miss Pendleton’s intentions may be less matrimonial or public than you fear. If I might venture, was the encounter consensual and conducted with mutual respect?
Bertie: Oh, absolutely, Jeeves! I’m no cad. Poppy was all for it—kept calling me “darling” and giggling like a schoolgirl. But that’s just it—she’s so forward! What if she expects me to be her steady beau now? I’m not cut out for romance, Jeeves. I’m a fellow who likes his eggs sunny-side up and his evenings free of emotional entanglements.
Jeeves: Placing the cigarette case on a side table. A prudent stance, sir. To navigate this delicate situation, I would suggest a tactful follow-up with Miss Pendleton to ascertain her expectations. A polite message—perhaps via text, given the contemporary context—could clarify matters without committing you to undue obligations.
Bertie: A text? Me? Jeeves, I can barely manage emojis without sending a peach when I mean a thumbs-up! And what would I say? “Jolly good show last night, but let’s not make it a habit”? She’ll have my head on a platter, or worse, screenshot it for her followers!
Jeeves: Suppressing the faintest smirk. I could draft a suitable message, sir, designed to convey gratitude and goodwill while gently establishing boundaries. For instance: “Dear Poppy, thank you for a delightful evening. I trust we shall remain the best of friends. Yours, Bertie.” This strikes a cordial note without inviting further entanglements.
Bertie: Brightening slightly. By Jove, Jeeves, you’re a genius! That sounds just the ticket—friendly, but not so friendly I’m picking out engagement rings. But what if she does want more? I mean, she was awfully keen—kept saying I had “potential,” whatever that means. Sounded like something you’d say about a racehorse.
Jeeves: Thoughtfully. The term “potential,” sir, may reflect Miss Pendleton’s enthusiasm rather than a demand for commitment. Modern sensibilities often favor casual liaisons over binding contracts. Nevertheless, should she press for a deeper connection, you might gently cite your dedication to a life of unencumbered bachelorhood.
Bertie: Unencumbered bachelorhood! That’s me to a T, Jeeves! Why, I’d rather face Aunt Agatha’s wrath than get roped into picnics and pet names. Still, I can’t stop replaying the whole thing in my head. It was… well, dashed educational, but I’m not sure I’m built for this sort of caper. Too much like trying to dance a foxtrot during an earthquake.
Jeeves: Nodding sagely. A vivid metaphor, sir. Such experiences, while initially disorienting, often contribute to one’s personal growth. Should you wish to avoid future quakes, I could advise on strategies to maintain platonic relations at the Drones Club—perhaps limiting your intake of espresso martinis.
Bertie: Laughing nervously. Limit martinis? You’re pulling my leg, Jeeves! But you’re right—I got carried away. Poppy’s a corker, but I’m not ready to be anyone’s leading man. Draft that text, will you? And maybe pour me another G&T to steady the old nerves. This modern love business is more perilous than a round with Gussie Fink-Nottle’s newt obsession!
Jeeves: Very good, sir. He glides to the bar, then pauses. If I may, sir, you have navigated this rite of passage with commendable, if inadvertent, aplomb. I shall ensure Miss Pendleton receives a message of utmost tact, preserving both your dignity and your liberty.
Bertie: Sinking back into the chair, relieved. Jeeves, you’re a marvel. A positive marvel. Here’s to liberty, gin, and never trending on X!
Jeeves: Pouring the drink with a ghost of a smile. To liberty, sir. He hands Bertie the glass and retreats to compose the text, leaving Bertie to sip and muse on the perils of modern romance.

Posted in Sex | Comments Off on Bertie Wooster tells Jeeves about his first experience of sex with a woman

Bartleby the Scrivener has thoughts on Trump vs Big Law

Grok: Setting: A dimly lit, paper-strewn office in modern-day London, 2025. Bartleby the Scrivener, inexplicably transported to the present, sits at a cluttered desk, quill in hand, surrounded by laptops and empty coffee cups. Bertie Wooster bursts in, waving his phone, with Jeeves trailing calmly behind. The topic: Trump’s war on Big Law, as seen on X.
Bertie: I say, Bartleby, old bean, you’ve got to hear this! That Trump chap’s gone and declared war on Big Law—taxes, regulations, the works! It’s all over X. Can’t get a decent lawyer for love nor money soon, mark my words. What’s your take, you being a scrivener and all?
Bartleby: Pauses, adjusting his spectacles, voice monotone. I would prefer not to opine on such matters.
Bertie: Prefer not to? Dash it, Bartleby, you can’t just sit there like a human paperweight! This is serious! If Trump mucks up Big Law, I’ll be defenseless against Aunt Agatha’s next plot to shackle me to some ghastly heiress. You’re a legal sort—give us the lowdown!
Jeeves: If I may, sir, Mr. Bartleby’s reticence is well-documented. However, the former President’s campaign against large law firms, as articulated on X, appears aimed at curbing their perceived excesses—exorbitant fees and influence. The proposed measures, though vague, have sparked debate about access to justice versus market disruption.
Bartleby: Shuffling papers, unmoved. I would prefer not to engage with such disruptions. My concern is copying, not commentary.
Bertie: Copying? Hang copying, man! The world’s gone topsy-turvy! Trump’s out there swinging at law firms like they’re piñatas, and you’re fussing over parchment? What if I need a lawyer to fend off a lawsuit? Last month, Tuppy Glossop got sued for tweeting that his neighbor’s dog looked like a poorly shaved badger. Needed Big Law to bail him out!
Bartleby: Flatly. I would prefer not to involve myself in canine-related litigation.
Jeeves: A prudent stance, sir. To clarify, Mr. Trump’s rhetoric, as observed on X, suggests a desire to favor smaller firms and reduce costs for clients. Critics, however, warn of unintended consequences—diminished expertise for complex cases, such as Mr. Glossop’s unfortunate tweet. I have identified several local solicitors unaffected by these transatlantic policies, should the need arise.
Bertie: Jolly good, Jeeves, but I’m still in a flap. Bartleby, you must have some thoughts. You’ve seen law offices, all that scribbling and sealing wax. Isn’t Big Law the backbone of getting chaps out of scrapes? What’s Trump playing at, rattling their cage?
Bartleby: Staring at a blank screen. I would prefer not to speculate on motives. Law is a machine, and I am but a cog. Whether large or small, firms grind on. I copy what is set before me.
Bertie: A cog? You’re about as lively as a damp sponge, Bartleby! This is no time for coggery. If Big Law goes under, I’ll be stuck hiring some cut-rate lawyer who’d lose a case against a parking meter. Trump’s stirring up a hornet’s nest—says it’s for the little guy, but I’m the one who’ll suffer!
Jeeves: If I may, sir, Mr. Bartleby’s perspective, while reserved, underscores a certain stoicism. The legal profession, as he implies, endures despite external pressures. I assure you, sir, that I have preemptively secured contact with a reputable barrister, should your entanglements escalate.
Bartleby: Muttering, almost to himself. I would prefer not to witness such entanglements. Yet, if I must copy, let it be briefs, not tweets.
Bertie: Briefs, not tweets? Ha! That’s the spirit, Bartleby! You’re halfway to a quip there. But seriously, this Trump business has me rattled. War on Big Law, indeed! Next he’ll be taxing my club’s brandy. Jeeves, what’s the move? Can’t we just bribe a judge or something?
Jeeves: Bribery, sir, is neither advisable nor necessary. I propose a more temperate course: monitoring developments via X and ensuring your legal needs are met through prudent channels. Mr. Bartleby, might you be persuaded to assist with drafting a memorandum, should the occasion demand?
Bartleby: Sighing, quill poised. I would prefer not to. But if it must be done, I will copy. Slowly.
Bertie: Slowly’s better than nothing, I suppose. Right, Jeeves, let’s leave Bartleby to his quill and get me a stiff drink. All this talk of Trump and lawyers has my head spinning like a top. To the Drones Club—and here’s to Big Law surviving this bally onslaught!
Jeeves: Very good, sir. He steers Bertie toward the door, casting a sympathetic glance at Bartleby, who resumes staring into the void, unmoved by the chaos of 2025.

Posted in Law | Comments Off on Bartleby the Scrivener has thoughts on Trump vs Big Law

Bertie Wooster & Jeeves Discuss Trump’s War On Big Law

Grok: Setting: Bertie Wooster’s swanky London flat, April 2025. Bertie is sprawled on a velvet sofa, scrolling X on his phone with a look of utter bewilderment. Jeeves, impeccable in a tailored suit, enters with a silver tray bearing a single espresso, his expression as serene as a Zen master.

Bertie: I say, Jeeves, have you caught wind of this absolute rummy business on X? That Trump fellow’s at it again, declaring war on Big Law! Says he’s going to kneecap those fancy law firms with taxes or regulations or some such rot. What’s a chap to do if he can’t get a decent lawyer to sort out his parking fines?
Jeeves: Indeed, sir. Former President Trump’s recent pronouncements on X suggest an intent to impose punitive measures on large law firms, ostensibly to curb their influence and fees. The precise mechanism remains unclear, but the rhetoric has caused considerable consternation in legal circles.
Bertie: Consternation? It’s a dashed catastrophe, Jeeves! Why, just last week, Biffy Biffen got himself tangled in a legal scrape over a misunderstanding with a drone delivery—thought it was his takeaway curry, you see, and shot it down with a pellet gun. Needed a top-notch lawyer to avoid a stint in the clink! If Trump’s mucking about with Big Law, where’s a fellow like Biffy to turn?
Jeeves: A regrettable incident, sir. However, I suspect the British legal system will remain insulated from Mr. Trump’s policies, given their extraterritorial nature. Should Mr. Biffen require assistance, I could recommend a discreet solicitor from a smaller firm, unencumbered by the proposed measures.
Bertie: Smaller firm? Jeeves, you’re talking like I should hire some chap working out of a garden shed! No, no, I need the heavy artillery—those chaps in pinstripes who charge by the syllable. If Trump’s going to tax them into oblivion, I’ll be left defenseless against Aunt Agatha’s next scheme to marry me off to some horsey girl with a laugh like a foghorn.
Jeeves: I assure you, sir, that even in the event of Mr. Trump’s policies taking effect, the availability of competent legal counsel in London will not be unduly compromised. Might I suggest diversifying your legal resources? A boutique firm, for instance, could handle your parking fines with aplomb.
Bertie: Boutique? Sounds like a place that sells overpriced scarves, not legal advice. And anyway, what’s Trump’s beef with Big Law? I mean, I know their bills can give a chap the vapors, but they do get results. Is he just sore because they didn’t take his case or something?
Jeeves: From my perusal of recent X posts, sir, it appears Mr. Trump’s grievances center on the perceived elitism and high costs of large law firms, which he claims disadvantage smaller businesses and individuals. His proposed measures—potentially including targeted taxes or regulatory reforms—aim to level the playing field, though critics argue they may disrupt the legal ecosystem.
Bertie: Ecosystem? Dash it, Jeeves, you make it sound like we’re talking about saving the whales! All I care about is not getting hauled into court over some trifling misunderstanding—like that time I accidentally RSVP’d to two rival debutante balls and caused a minor riot. Needed a lawyer sharper than a serpent’s tooth to smooth that one over. What’s Trump thinking, stirring up this hornets’ nest?
Jeeves: His motivations, sir, appear rooted in a populist appeal, as evidenced by the enthusiastic responses on X from certain quarters. However, the practical implications remain speculative. To safeguard your interests, I have taken the liberty of compiling a list of reputable legal advisors unaffected by transatlantic policy shifts.
Bertie: Compiled a list? Jeeves, you’re a wizard! What, have you got a secret Rolodex of barristers stashed behind the gin? I swear, you could run MI6 with that brain of yours. But hang on—what if Trump’s war on Big Law makes all the good lawyers flee to, I don’t know, Bermuda? I’ll be stuck pleading my case to a traffic warden!
Jeeves: An unlikely scenario, sir. The legal profession is notably resilient. Should you find yourself in need, I am confident we can secure representation capable of addressing even the most delicate social entanglements. In the interim, might I recommend refraining from engaging in drone-related altercations?
Bertie: Ha! Easier said than done, Jeeves. Drones are everywhere these days—buzzing about like mechanical wasps. But you’re right, I’ll steer clear of trouble. Still, this Trump business has me rattled. War on Big Law, indeed! Next he’ll be taxing my morning kippers.
Jeeves: A distressing prospect, sir. To ease your mind, shall I prepare a fortifying cocktail? A martini, perhaps, to restore equilibrium?
Bertie: Jeeves, you’re a bloomin’ saint. Make it a double, and let’s toast to the survival of decent lawyers and the downfall of daft tariffs!
Jeeves: Very good, sir. He glides toward the bar, a flicker of amusement in his eyes as Bertie resumes scrolling X with exaggerated indignation.

Posted in Law | Comments Off on Bertie Wooster & Jeeves Discuss Trump’s War On Big Law

Bertie Wooster & Jeeves Discuss Trump’s Tariffs

Grok says: Setting: Bertie Wooster’s flat, London. Bertie is lounging in an armchair, flipping through The Times with a look of mild panic. Jeeves, as ever, glides in with a tray of tea, radiating calm omniscience.
Bertie: I say, Jeeves, have you seen this bally nonsense in the paper? This Trump chap across the pond is slapping tariffs on all sorts of things—steel, cars, even whisky! It’s an outrage! How’s a fellow to get a decent dram without paying through the nose?
Jeeves: Indeed, sir. Mr. Trump’s economic policies have stirred considerable debate. The tariffs, designed to bolster American industry, may inadvertently elevate the cost of imported goods, including, as you note, certain libations.
Bertie: Libations? Dash it, Jeeves, you make it sound like I’m running a speakeasy. I’m talking about my evening scotch! Aunt Agatha’s already got me on a leash—now I’ll have to smuggle my own tipple like some sort of rum-runner. What’s the world coming to?
Jeeves: A lamentable state of affairs, sir. However, might I suggest exploring domestic alternatives? A fine British whisky, perhaps, or even a gin of local provenance?
Bertie: Gin? Jeeves, you’re pulling my leg! Gin’s for chaps who wear loud waistcoats and lose at baccarat. No, no, this tariff business is a disaster. Why, I read they’re even taxing tweed! My tailor’s going to have a fit, and I’ll be wandering Mayfair looking like a scarecrow.
Jeeves: I believe the tariff on textiles is less severe than reported, sir. Nevertheless, I could arrange for your tailor to source materials from within the Empire, thereby circumventing the additional costs.
Bertie: Circumventing, eh? You’re talking like a bloomin’ pirate now, Jeeves. Next you’ll have me sailing to Canada with a hold full of contraband Harris Tweed. Yo ho ho and a bottle of Glenfiddich!
Jeeves: Perish the thought, sir. My intention is merely to ensure your sartorial and liquid requirements are met with minimal disruption. Perhaps a discreet word with certain merchants could secure your preferred scotch at a pre-tariff rate.
Bertie: Discreet word? You mean bribe someone, don’t you? I say, Jeeves, you’re a dark horse. One minute you’re polishing my shoes, the next you’re masterminding a smuggling ring. I like it! But what’s this Trump fellow’s game, anyway? Why’s he making life so dashed expensive?
Jeeves: Mr. Trump’s stated aim, sir, is to protect American workers by incentivizing domestic production. Critics argue, however, that such measures may provoke retaliatory tariffs, thus complicating global trade. The ripple effects are felt even here, as you’ve astutely observed.
Bertie: Astutely? Oh, I’m sharp as a tack, Jeeves, don’t you worry. But this ripple business sounds like a lot of rot. If I want my whisky, I don’t care if it’s distilled in Glasgow or Timbuktu. Why can’t everyone just get along and let a chap have his drink in peace?
Jeeves: A noble sentiment, sir. Alas, international commerce is a complex tapestry, woven with competing interests. Might I propose a temporary solution? I have taken the liberty of securing a modest stockpile of your preferred single malt, acquired prior to the tariff’s implementation.
Bertie: Stockpile? Jeeves, you absolute marvel! You’ve been hoarding whisky behind my back? I’m torn between calling you a genius and worrying you’re about to open a black-market saloon. How much have you got stashed away?
Jeeves: Sufficient to tide you over until the geopolitical climate stabilizes, sir. I would not dream of allowing your evenings to be marred by a shortage of suitable refreshment.
Bertie: You’re a brick, Jeeves. An absolute brick. But mark my words, if this tariff nonsense goes on, I’ll have to start distilling my own grog in the bathtub. Picture me as Bertie the Bootlegger! Ha!
Jeeves: A vivid image, sir, though I trust it will not come to that. Shall I pour you a small measure of the aforementioned single malt to steady your nerves?
Bertie: Steady my nerves? Jeeves, you’re practically a doctor. Make it a large one, and let’s drink to the downfall of tariffs and the triumph of good taste!
Jeeves: Very good, sir. He glides off to fetch the whisky, a faint smirk betraying his amusement at Bertie’s theatrics.

Posted in Tariffs | Comments Off on Bertie Wooster & Jeeves Discuss Trump’s Tariffs